Royal Observatory Greenwich: The birthplace of modern astronomy turns 350
June 22 marks the 350th anniversary of the Royal Observatory Greenwich, the home of the historic Prime Meridian that is considered by many to be the birthplace of modern astronomy. To celebrate, we're taking a look back on how the famous site became the epicenter of astronomical research, timekeeping and navigation, while highlighting how its purpose has evolved over time.
The Royal Observatory's story began in 1675, when King Charles II of England decided that a purpose-built scientific institution was needed to solve a centuries old question - how can sailors navigate safely at sea?
In the 1600s, seafaring was the only way for nations to communicate and assert influence over one another, and so finding an answer to the question was vital for everything from trade, to diplomacy, exploration and warfare. Sailors and astronomers had long since figured out how to establish their latitude at sea, but despite centuries of seafaring, we had yet to find a system for determining longitude.
The newly minted Royal Observatory's main purpose was to find a way to accurately and consistently measure a sailor's longitude, which in turn would allow a ship's captain to navigate the vast oceans separating the continents. To that end, King Charles II appointed John Flamsteed as his 'Astronomical Observator' - later to be known as 'Astronomer Royal' - and tasked architect Christopher Wren to design the initial structure that the institution we see today grew up around.
Generations of astronomers, scientists and horologists bent their expertise to solving the riddle, but it would be many decades before the Royal Observatory's founding mission was completed. Since its inception, astronomers had busied themselves tracking the apparent movements of the stars, moon and planets relative to an imaginary line running north to south through the observatory, known as a 'meridian'.
These observations led to the creation of the first Nautical Almanac - a collection of tables that predicted the position of the moon and stars throughout the year - along with a handbook explaining how to mathematically determine longitude at sea, according to the Royal Observatory Greenwich website. By the year 1770, the English horologist John Harrison had also developed a complex timepiece that, unlike the pendulum-based clocks at the time, worked aboard a moving ship, giving sailors two ways to determine longitude!
By the 1880s two-thirds of the world's ships were navigating with maps that used the Greenwich meridian as a reference line. As such, when a conference was held in 1884 to decide the world's first global, or 'Prime Meridian', Greenwich was the obvious, if not uncontested choice.
The invention of railway travel also necessitated the establishment of a unified time zone, which was provided by the Royal Observatory and adopted by the railway companies. This new 'Greenwich Mean Time' (GMT) quickly spread and was adopted during the 1884 Meridian Conference as the new global time zone system, making the observatory the global reference center for time, navigation and astronomy.
As centuries passed, generations of Astronomers Royal came and went, each leaving their own scientific achievements and personal marks on the historic site, which grew larger as new facilities and buildings sprung up around the original Wren-designed Flamsteed House.
With the quest for longitude over, the observatory explored other avenues of astronomy, such as tracking Earth's magnetic field, viewing planetary transits and characterizing binary star systems. This was done with the aid of powerful new equipment, such as the Great Equatorial Telescope - a 28-feet-long (8.5 metres) refracting telescope that boasted a 28-inch aperture, which had to be housed in a vast circular shell known as the 'Onion Dome' when installed in 1893.
The observatory's practices and functions were also heavily influenced by cultural and technological paradigm shifts - and some personal grudges - that were taking root in the wider world beyond.
For example, the 1890s saw the Royal Observatory hire women for the first time, who worked for a pitiful wage as 'computers' to examine and refine observational data. Among their ranks was the famous science communicator and astronomer Annie Maunder, who advanced the scientific community's understanding of our parent star by observing the shifting sizes and positions of sunspots.
Sadly, social convention dictated that Maunder resign her position upon marrying her husband and colleague Edward Walter Maunder in 1895. However, the couple would go on to continue their work away from the observatory, writing books and chartering expeditions to capture images of the sun's atmosphere during solar eclipse events. The Maunders also created the famous 'butterfly diagram', which used over a decade of observational data to visualize the 'flapping' butterfly-wing-like disposition of sunspots that occurs as the sun progresses through its 11-year activity cycle.
The Royal Observatory has also faced its share of conflict, intrigue and danger since its inception. Vitriolic rivalries have blossomed between its astronomers and prominent scientific figures. John Flamsteed, the first Astronomer Royal, struck up a strong rivalry with Sir Isaac Newton, who hoped to use Flamsteed's star charts to refine his theories. Flamsteed had refused to release his star charts until he was certain the information within was correct, which led a frustrated Newton to publish an imperfect version of the work without the Astronomer Royal's permission.
The site itself has also weathered physical threats, including an attempted anarchist bomb attack in 1894. World War 2 also saw a V1 flying bomb detonate nearby, shredding entire sections of the famous 'Onion Dome'. Thankfully, the telescope itself had been deconstructed and moved away from the observatory to safeguard it from the perils of war.
In the wake of the second World War, the relentless creep of light pollution, smog from nearby London and the vibrations and magnetic interference from railway lines had rendered Greenwich an unfeasible location for delicate astronomical observation.
In 1948, the telescopes and astronomers of Greenwich - including the vast bulk of the Great Equatorial Telescope - began relocating to the village of Herstmonceux some 60 miles from where Flamsteed had set the foundation stone for the first Royal Observatory in 1675. The Great Equatorial Telescope would eventually return to the Royal Observatory Greenwich in 1971, where it remains to this day.
In the modern era, the Royal Observatory Greenwich serves as an invaluable historical site that serves as both a museum and a venue for science communication geared towards engaging and inspiring the next generation of astronomers.
Visitors are free to follow in the footsteps of the Astronomers Royal and tread the same Wren-designed rooms that were paced by the likes of Sir Isaac Newton. It represents a potent mixture of the old and the new, featuring the only planetarium show in London alongside the historic Prime Meridian and detailed replicas of the timepieces used to ensure safe navigation by sea.
"Founded in 1675, the Observatory was established to aid navigation through astronomical observations and timekeeping, beginning with John Flamsteed's meticulous project to catalogue 3,000 stars," said Royal Observatory Greenwich History of Science assistant curator Daisy Chamberlain to Space.com. "Since then, the work of the Observatory expanded to include studies of magnetic variation, meteorology, and chronometer testing for the Navy."
"Today, we share the wonders of time and space with our visitors through a number of fascinating permanent galleries, talks, tours, and heritage activities."
RELATED STORIES
— Preserving astronomy history: The fight is on to save iconic Royal Greenwich Observatory site
— Royal Observatory: Where East Meets West
— Stunning image of Andromeda galaxy takes top astronomy photography prize of 2023 (gallery)
On clear nights you can still find astronomers plying their trade at the historic site, using the Annie Maunder Astrographic Telescope — consisting of a vast Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope alongside a smaller refractor — to capture transit data, alongside stunning views of the cosmos.
"The Annie Maunder Astrographic Telescope has given us the privilege of keeping practical astronomy alive and well at the observatory, using modern technology that our predecessors in previous centuries could only dream of," explained Jake Foster, an astronomer at the Royal Observatory Greenwich to Space.com. "With astrophotography and livestreams of astronomical events, we aim to bring the sights of the Universe down to Earth for all to enjoy."
"Even under the modern-day light-polluted skies of London, there's so much to see! We hope that the Royal Observatory astronomers of days gone by would approve of our efforts."
Be sure to check out the Royal Observatory Greenwich website to stay up to date with talks, tours and events to celebrate the 350th anniversary of the historic site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ancient Rivers Under Antarctica Could Slow Down Melting
The ice caps which cover our planet's poles are key to understanding global weather patterns and changing climate. But we still don't have a complete understanding of how they work, and what goes on beneath the frozen surface. A group led by researchers at the UK's University of Durham used radar to glimpse beneath the coast of East Antarctica. In a new study, they announced their findings: Ancient riverbeds beneath Antarctica control the behavior of the ice sheet above them. Reconstructing ancient landscapes It is crucial to understand how much, and how quickly, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet is going to melt as temperatures continue to rise. It's the largest of Antarctica's three ice sheets, and it contains enough water to raise the sea level by over 50 meters. The behavior of an ice sheet depends on more than just surface conditions. The landmass hidden beneath the ice impacts how quickly it melts and where it collapses. To get an idea of what that hidden landscape looks like, researchers analyzed a series of radar scans covering 3,500km of East Antarctica. The scans found what was once a coastal plain formed by fluvial erosion. Between 80 million years ago, when Antarctica divorced Australia, and 34 million years ago when it became covered in ice, rivers flowed across East Antarctica and into the sea. Those rivers carved out a smooth, flat floodplain all along the coast. Breaking up the plain are deep narrow troughs in the rock. These plains covered about 40% of the area they scanned. This find confirms previous, fragmentary evidence for a very flat, even plain beneath the icy expanse. Hopeful findings This is good news for those of us who enjoy not being underwater. Computer programs modeling future climate behavior now have more data to work on. Before, as the study's lead author, Dr. Guy Paxton, said in a Durham press release, "The landscape hidden beneath the East Antarctic Ice Sheet is one of the most mysterious not just on Earth, but on any terrestrial planet in the solar system." Understanding the terrain beneath the ice makes it much easier to understand how and where the ice will move. 'This in turn will help make it easier to predict how the East Antarctic Ice Sheet could affect sea levels.' More than that, however, the ancient fluvial plains may be slowing down the melt. The study suggests that the flat plains may be acting as barriers to ice flow. Fast-moving glaciers pass through the deep channels, but the bulk of the ice, atop the plains, is moving much more slowly. Ultimately (as they always do), researchers stressed the need for more investigation. Further studies would involve drilling all the way through the ice and taking samples of the rock below. So look forward to that. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nearby super-Earth K2-18 b may be a water-rich ocean planet: 'This has certainly increased the chances of habitability'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The saga surrounding Neptune-size "super-Earth" exoplanet K2-18 b just got a whole lot more interesting. For a quick recap, this is the world a team of scientists recently suggested could host life — to the dismay of other scientists in the community, who felt the announcement failed to include necessary caution. While signs of life on the world have failed to conclusively present themselves to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the powerful space telescope has discovered that this planet is so rich in liquid water that it could be an ocean, or "Hycean" world. "This has certainly increased the chances of habitability on K2-18 b" Nikku Madhusudhan, the University of Cambridge scientist behind the original K2-18b discovery as well as the new study, told "This is a very important development and further increases the chance of a Hycean environment in K2-18 b. It confirms K2-18 b to be our best chance to study a potential habitable environment beyond the solar system at the present time." The story regarding the habitability of K2-18 b began back in April 2025, when Madhusudhan and fellow researchers from the University of Cambridge announced they had found what they called the "strongest evidence yet" of life beyond the solar system around this distant super-Earth (it's around nine times as massive as our planet). The evidence came from the tentative detection of molecules that, when found in the atmosphere of Earth, are typically the result of biological processes of living things. The pressure was then on to confirm these potential biosignatures: dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide. The team set about this by observing four separate instances of K2-18 b crossing, or "transiting," the face of its parent red dwarf star, located about 124 light-years away, during its roughly 33-Earth-day orbit. Because chemicals absorb and emit light at characteristic wavelengths, when light from a parent star passes through a planet's atmosphere, the molecules in that atmosphere leave their telltale fingerprints in the spectrum of starlight. "With four additional transit observations using JWST, we have measured the spectrum of K2-18 b's atmosphere with unprecedented precision," Renyu Hu, the new study's team leader and a NASA Jet Propulsion Lab scientist, told "The spectrum allowed us to conclusively detect both methane and carbon dioxide in the planet's atmosphere and to constrain their abundances. This information points to a planet with a water-rich interior." Hu explained that the team searched for signals of dimethyl sulfide and other organic sulfur molecules in the spectrum using several independent models, but did not find conclusive evidence for their presence. "This was not necessarily disappointing," Hu continued. "We're excited about establishing the planet's water-rich nature." Is K2-18 b a ocean world? Saying it's now confirmed that K2-18 b is water-rich, Hu explained that the next step is to discover if the planet possesses a global liquid water ocean. Ironically, one of the most positive signs of such an ocean is the fact that the atmosphere of this super-Earth appears to lack water vapor. "The spectrum we obtained does not show signs of water vapor. If the atmosphere truly lacks water, this suggests that water has been depleted — most likely through condensation," Hu said. "On Earth, this process is known as the 'cold trap,' and geoscientists consider it essential for retaining water over billions of years by preventing it from escaping to space. "Observing a similar process on an exoplanet would be very exciting. Rigorously confirming the absence of water can by itself be a scientifically important goal for future observations," Hu said. However, Hu cautioned that the spectrum detected by the JWST could also be explained by an alternative model in which the atmosphere actually contains abundant water vapor. Establishing whether K2-18 b and other similar temperate, sub-Neptune-sized planets possess liquid water oceans, Hu says, will also require detecting the presence of a broader set of atmospheric gases beyond methane and carbon dioxide. It would also require an absence of molecules like ammonia, carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide, which, as of yet, have indeed not been detected in the atmosphere of K2-18 b "This conclusion is based on theoretical work by my group and several others," Hu added. "With the new observations providing valuable context, we've summarized these insights into a roadmap to help guide future observations and studies." Meanwhile, the search for the biosignatures, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide, is far from done; while not hitting the significance level required for a confirmation, this research did provide a stronger signal from these molecules than were provided by previous examinations. "The evidence for dimethyl sulfide in the present work is significantly higher than what we had with our previous observations in the same near-infrared wavelength range," Madhusudhan said. "However, this evidence is still not high enough to claim a conclusive detection. "We also need to be able to distinguish dimethyl sulfide from other possible contributors, such as methyl mercaptan, which is also a biosignature on Earth." Related Stories: — The mystery of how strange cosmic objects called 'JuMBOs' went rogue — These mysterious objects born in violent clashes between young star systems aren't stars or planets — James Webb Space Telescope dives into the atmosphere of a mystery rogue planet or failed star It looks certain that K2-18 b will continue to hold the interest of astronomers for some time. "It is great that we are able to infer tentative signs of potential biosignatures with current JWST observations, but significantly more time is needed for conclusive detections. A key question is whether the atmosphere contains one or more biosignatures," Madhusudhan said. "At the same time, extensive theoretical and experimental efforts are needed to robustly identify biological and non-biological pathways for candidate biosignature molecules." One thing the team is sure of, though, is the progress made thus far in the study of K2-18 b wouldn't have been possible without the JWST. And, the $10 billion space telescope is set to play a key role in the future investigation of this super-Earth. "Our observations and analyses add to the growing list of exciting discoveries that highlight the truly transformative science enabled by JWST," Hu concluded. "While we found its Near-Infrared Spectrograph [NIRSpec] particularly well suited to address the goals of our study, other JWST instruments or observational modes could provide complementary and highly valuable information to further enhance our understanding of this planet." The team's research is available as a preprint on the paper repository arXiv. Solve the daily Crossword
Fast Company
16 hours ago
- Fast Company
Pfizer and BioNTech lose appeal in London over Moderna COVID vaccine patent
Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech on Friday lost their bid to overturn a ruling that their COVID-19 vaccine infringed one of Moderna's patents at London's Court of Appeal. Last year, the High Court ruled that one of Moderna's patents relating to the messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, which underpinned its COVID-19 vaccine, was valid and that Pfizer and BioNTech's Comirnaty vaccine had infringed it, meaning Moderna is entitled to damages in relation to sales after March 2022. The High Court also ruled that the other Moderna patent under challenge in the case was invalid. Moderna was refused permission to appeal against that decision. But Pfizer and BioNTech were granted permission to appeal in an attempt to try and invalidate Moderna's second patent and appealed earlier this month, arguing Moderna's developments of mRNA technology were obvious developments of previous work, rendering the patent invalid. Judge Richard Arnold, however, rejected Pfizer and BioNTech's appeal. Pfizer and BioNTech said in a joint statement that the decision 'does not change our unwavering stance that this patent is invalid' and the companies will seek to appeal. 'This decision has no immediate impact on Pfizer and BioNTech or Comirnaty,' the companies added. Moderna did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Friday's decision in the latest ruling in the legal dispute between the two sides over their competing vaccines, which helped save millions of lives during the pandemic. The companies have also been involved in proceedings in Germany – where a court ruled in Moderna's favour in March – the United States Patent Office, which held that two Moderna COVID-19 vaccine patents were invalid, and elsewhere.
