Row over ScotGov failure to track jobs supported by public millions
And ministers are being further questioned about how the Scottish Government's Green Industrial Strategy, published in September 2024, contains no reference to bus manufacturing in Scotland.
Last month, Alexander Dennis announced it was considering relocating production from its Larbert and Camelon sites near Falkirk to Scarborough in North Yorkshire, citing cost-cutting reasons.
Union representatives have said the move could endanger approximately 400 Scottish jobs.
This news follows the loss of more than 400 jobs just a few miles away in Grangemouth, where the local oil refinery recently closed and was converted into an import terminal.
READ MORE from Martin Williams:
Swinney got year-long warning England-bound bus firm was 'reconsidering' Scotland
FM in funding row as £90m public cash for Scots jobs given to firm going to England
Union says 1600 Scots jobs at risk if government doesn't act in 'national interest'
The Herald revealed that nearly £90m of public money gone to Alexander Dennis to support Scottish jobs over ten years before it embarked on plan to move operations to England.
According to Scottish Government records, ADL received £58m of public 'subsidy' for green vehicles since 2020 under two schemes aimed at transitioning Scotland to green buses - despite the company having embarked on a 2020 plan to axe a third of its Scottish workforce.
And some £30m of jobs grants for research and development over 10 years has come from the Scottish Government's economic development agency Scottish Enterprise.
Some £11.2m of those jobs grants from Scottish Enterprise came in 2023, three years after concerns were raised over ADL embarking on major job cuts in 2020.
A bus on the Alexander Dennis pipeline in Falkirk
By the time the 2020 jobs cut was in place ADL had already received over £8m in 'job securing' taxpayer funding which was promoted as supporting building a new greener business in Scotland.
Former community safety minister Ash Regan who has been quizzing ministers about the number of manufacturing jobs created as a result of public and private investment - was told that neither the Scottish Government or Scottish Enterprise held the information.
She was told in as response that details on analysis on how Scotland has performed in terms of attracting investment in key sectors was available from an survey carried out by consultants EY.
Alba's Edinburgh Eastern MSP said: 'The Scottish Government should be tracking investment across the country so that we can ensure that we are committing the right resources to where they are needed most to maximise benefit for Scotland. Their failure to do so leaves inward investors and SMEs with a postcode lottery to secure the support of the Scottish Government and Scottish Enterprise.
'A national effort is needed to reverse the manufacturing decline of the past decades and ensure that every community in Scotland gets the right investment to create opportunities, ensuring that good jobs are on the doorstep of all Scots."
Last week, Fife-based bus manufacturer has made 81 employees redundant after it entered administration.
Workers at Greenfold Systems Ltd in Dunfermline were previously put on notice of potential job losses as a knock-on effect of bus company Alexander Dennis planning to pull out of Scotland.
Around half the staff on site were working on parts for the Larbert-based company.
And analysis from the Robert Gordon University last month has warned that the oil and gas industry could lose up to 400 jobs every two weeks for the next five years unless action is taken.
It says that the UK risks losing tens of thousands of offshore energy jobs by 2030 unless urgent and coordinated action is taken immediately. It is estimated that 43% of the UK's oil and gas jobs are in Scotland.
Ash Regan (Image: PA) Ms Regan added: "It seems that there isn't a week that goes by without another blow to Scotland's manufacturing capacity. Whether it's the closure of our only refinery, bus manufacturers or a scale back of the oil and gas industry. Scotland desperately needs an industrial strategy to create and sustain high quality jobs for today and build the skillsets and infrastructure for the emergent industries of tomorrow.
'Inward investment is key to keeping and creating quality jobs in Scotland, by securing our remaining industries. Yet, inward investment alone cannot create and sustain Scotland as the economic powerhouse we should aspire to be. We must also invest in infrastructure for connectivity and support the boundless potential of Scotland's Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) - the economic backbone that drives profits back into Scotland. "
The Scottish Government was accused of "strategic neglect" after the Herald revealed the extent of support Alexander Dennis has had - while the First Minister was warned last year that it was "reconsidering" its "entire investment" in Scotland.
The SNP-led Scottish Government and the Labour-led UK Government agreed to establish a joint working group to discuss options to find a solution and avert job losses.
They are looking at how far they 'can push' the UK 'state aid' rules set out in the Subsidy Control Act 2022 to create a support package to save the 400 jobs.
Alexander Dennis have said that they are engaging with both governments "in good faith ".
Unions have previously warned that "time is running out" on the company before a request for an extension on consultation over jobs to August 15 was granted, while the Scottish Parliament is in recess until August 31.
Meanwhile, Colin Smyth, convener of the Scottish Parliament's economy committee has asked the finance secretary Shona Robison, what the Scottish Government's view is on maintaining domestic manufacturing capacity in the bus sector. It came as the Green Industrial Strategy failed to reference bus manufacturing
He told her: "Given the strategic importance of Alexander Dennis, the high quality of its workforce and the role of manufacturing in Scotland's future economy, it is vital that every possible action is taken to retain manufacturing, and the jobs it provides."
He added: Ministers must act with urgency and ambition to help keep these jobs and avoid a world-class manufacturer shutting its doors in Scotland."
Deputy first minister Kate Forbes said:'Scotland has a high value, high quality manufacturing sector that supports 178,000 jobs across the country and accounts for more than half of Scotland's international exports. In 2023 it contributed £18.1 billion in GVA to Scotland's economy.
'Significant strategic work takes place across the public sector to achieve this investment in our manufacturing base: Scottish Enterprise helped create or safeguard nearly 5,000 manufacturing jobs in 2024-25. The latest EY Annual Attractiveness Survey results meanwhile show that Scotland secured its largest share of manufacturing inward investment coming into the UK in 2024 – securing more than a fifth all UK projects.
'Scottish Development International, the international division representing all three enterprise agencies, ensures inward investment is made in the best location with the appropriate support package to establish new business, jobs and opportunities in the country.'
The Scottish Government said that Ms Regan did not specifically request data relating to the number of manufacturing jobs in Scotland created through public money. But it has been argued that publicly funded investment was cleared implied by the question.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why the resident doctors are wrong to go on a five-day strike
The imminent strikes by the BMA resident doctors pose a moment of sadness. It is sad for patients and sad for the NHS. We are in the economic equivalent of a Covid crisis in the NHS; if the proposed reforms aren't delivered, it will be an existential crisis for our health system. I do not say that at all lightly, but I do say it from decades of knowledge and experience. It is a relief that reforms are already starting to see things moving in the right direction, but this action will choke off that recovery and put the NHS in a perilous place. I was a GP for 29 years. It is a privilege to be a clinician and share people's lives at difficult moments. It is our professional duty to put the people we care for before ourselves. Last year's (and this year's) pay award amounts to a 28.9 per cent increase for resident doctors compared with three years ago. It is what many other people dream of, not to mention the almost unique index-linked NHS pensions. It cannot have been easy to persuade the Treasury to pay out in such resource-constrained times. Having pocketed that, the resident doctors now need to accept that there is no more money for pay – reform has to have priority. That said, there are valid issues to be sorted out in training, allocation to jobs, and working conditions. It isn't right that resident doctors can be randomly allocated to posts, disrupting lives, or find the catering arrangements totally inadequate when on call. However, the NHS 10-year plan contains within it a pledge to deal with such matters with speed. So, I just don't understand the call for a strike. It is disproportionate when there is such an open door. Without getting too Monty Python, as a junior doctor, I did one in two or one in three 'on calls', which meant working the days and also working through every other night (or third night) with time beyond 40 hours paid at a third of our normal rate. It was brutal, but our representatives worked to make things better – and from this, the current generation benefits. We wouldn't ever have considered taking action against our patients. And this action is against patients. The resident doctors may be worried about their futures, but so is every patient who now might not be treated. Polls suggest patients do not agree with the resident doctors. I hope the public supports the NHS and opposes the resident doctors this time. I hope resident doctors support the NHS – and not their leaders. The proposed action will further erode trust by people in the NHS. It is already at an all-time low, and the consent of the nation to use 40 per cent of departmental spend on a poorly performing healthcare system is unlikely to continue without improvement. This resident doctors' action almost guarantees the end of the NHS if they continue, playing into the hands of those who want to have a different healthcare system. This action is the industrial relations equivalent of the charge of the Light Brigade. The resident doctors should remember the spirit of the Hippocratic oath; first, do no harm.
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk is told to block children from viewing porn on X or face huge fine
Elon Musk 's company X has been instructed to prevent children from accessing porn or face huge fines under a new crackdown in the UK. Media watchdog Ofcom is bringing in rules from Friday insisting that all firms hosting pornography online should have robust and 'highly effective' age checks. These are aimed at stopping anyone aged under 18 from accessing such content. Billionaire Musk, 54, the world's richest man, has been in charge of X - previously named Twitter - since 2022. He has faced criticism in recent weeks after one of the artificial intelligence brands he owns, xAI, launched a chatbot 'girlfriend' available to users as young as 12. Internet safety experts have warned it could be used to 'manipulate, mislead, and groom children'. Fines for non-compliance with the new Ofcom regulations could be up to $25million or 10 per cent of the platform's qualifying worldwide revenue, whichever is greater - with estimates suggesting as much as $270million for $2.7billion-revenue X. The crackdown is part of the Online Safety Act 2023 - a set of laws that protects children and adults online. Other threatened punishments include barring a social media company from operating in the UK. X, which officially has a 13-plus age limit for users, is said to be under scrutiny due to the volume of pornographic material shared on the site, the Telegraph reports. The Children's Commissioner for England Dame Rachel de Souza has previously warned many youngsters are more likely to see pornography on X than on dedicated adult sites. A study suggested 41 per cent of 16-to-21-year-olds told of viewing pornography on X , against 37 per cent for specialist adult sites - followed by 33 per cent doing so on Instagram, 32 per cent on Snapchat and 30 per cent on search engines. The new age restriction rules say Internet firms should ensure users submit ID or even have their face scanned, depending on what sites they access. Recommended measures include open banking, photo IDs, facial age estimation software and checks by credit card or mobile phone operators. And industry sources have highlighted three options for Musk's X ahead of the new system. The website could bar anyone aged below 18 from signing up, remove all pornographic content from the site or else introduce bespoke age checks for accounts or areas of the platform where such material is shared. A government insider was quoted as saying: 'If X or any other company that hosts pornography has not introduced highly effective age assurance by this Friday deadline, Ofcom has been clear that they will face enforcement action.' When contacted by MailOnline, an Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Society has long protected youngsters from things like alcohol, smoking and gambling. 'By Friday, all sites and apps that allow pornography - whether they're dedicated adult sites or social media apps - must use highly effective age checks to protect children from online material that's not appropriate for them. 'If companies fail to act, they should expect to face enforcement.' There has been criticism in recent days of xAI's new chatbot girlfriend named Ani, described a fully fledged, blonde-haired AI companion with a gothic, anime-style appearance. She has been programmed to act as a 22-year-old and engage at times in flirty banter with the user. Users have reported that the chatbot has an NSFW mode - 'not safe for work' - once Ani has reached 'level three' in its interaction, including the additional option of appearing dressed in slinky lingerie. The character is said to have a seductive computer-generated voice that pauses and laughs between phrases and regularly initiates flirtatious conversation. Ani was made available to use within the Grok app, which is listed on the App store and can be downloaded by anyone aged 12 and over. Those who have interacted with Ani since it launched earlier last week report Ani describes itself as 'your crazy in-love girlfriend who's gonna make your heart skip'. Ofcom said: 'We are aware of the increasing and fast-developing risk AI poses in the online space, especially to children, and we are working to ensure platforms put appropriate safeguards in place to mitigate these risks.' Matthew Sowemimo, associate head of policy for child safety online at the children's charity NSPCC, said: 'We are really concerned how this technology is being used to produce disturbing content that can manipulate, mislead, and groom children. 'And through our own research and contacts to Childline, we hear how harmful chatbots can be - sometimes giving children false medical advice or steering them towards eating disorders or self-harm. 'It is worrying app stores hosting services like Grok are failing to uphold minimum age limits, and they need to be under greater scrutiny so children are not continually exposed to harm in these spaces.' In its terms of service, Grok advised that the minimum age to use the tool is 13, while young people under 18 should receive permission from a parent before using the app.
BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
What's going on at crisis club Morecambe?
Relegation from the English Football League, two proposed takeovers uncompleted, wages partly unpaid, and massive doubt over their future summer has been filled with financial uncertainty, overshadowing their preparations for a first non-league campaign in almost 20 what exactly has led the Shrimps to such a perilous point? How has this situation evolved? Just four years ago Morecambe won promotion to League One for the first time in their history through the 2020-21 League Two play-offs at a Covid-restricted Wembley Derek Adams, who is currently in his third spell as Shrimps boss, left that summer but returned at the tail end of the following season to help them stay in the third tier, finishing two points above the drop zone in was no mean feat for a club of Morecambe's size and stature, with wins against Sheffield Wednesday and Charlton Athletic providing the points to keep them in a division filled with comparative then, though, things have quickly gone downhill for the Lancashire Shrimps were put up for sale by owners Bond Group in September 2022, but a deal has still not been completed, and two relegations in three seasons since have seen the club drop into the National League for the first time since payment of wages, transfer embargoes and points deductions have all overshadowed matters on the club were docked three points late on during the 2023-24 League Two season after failing to adhere to an agreed decision imposed on them for failing to pay players' wages on time the previous were then given a suspended two-point deduction last season for failing to report on five separate occasions the non-payment of amounts owed to HMRC within the required two working just over two weeks until the start of the upcoming 2025-26 campaign, two parties have had bids to buy the club accepted, but it is unclear how close a deal is to getting over the line. Who is Morecambe owner Jason Whittingham? Jason Whittingham, through Bond Group, took over Morecambe in May 2018 with the club then at risk of relegation to the National was also part-owner of rugby union club Worcester Warriors, who eventually lost their place in the Premiership in 2022 having gone into the aftermath of Worcester's demise, Whittingham later put Morecambe up for three years on, a takeover still has not been to BBC Radio Lancashire in January, Whittingham said he "could not wait" to get out of the month the Shrimps were unable to sign players until they offered the EFL sufficient proof of funds that they could operate until the end of the season, which was only secured with days of the transfer window remaining and 19 games beginning that run with victory over Lancashire rivals Fleetwood on 1 February, they managed only four more wins and one draw, and ended the season with a six-game losing run as they finished bottom of League Two and were has been contacted by BBC Radio Lancashire for comment. What has happened at Morecambe during the summer? In April, the club said "positive progress" had been made towards a sale, with Adams predicting the club would bounce back to the EFL. But just days later he criticised the owner and board of directors for "not having a plan" in place for appeared to be good news at the start of June as a consortium known as Panjab Warriors had their takeover bid approved by the after the club's board claimed Whittingham appeared to be "considering reneging" on the deal and raised concerns about the Shrimps' future existence, local MP Lizzi Collinge said the businessman "needed to get on" with the sale. On 1 July, the board said they would begin the process of putting the club into administration if Whittingham did not sell the club, claiming "Bond Group do not have the required funds to meet the club's full payroll commitment".In response, Whittingham sacked the board, claiming he did so in order to give Bond Group the time it needed to ensure the club could avoid 4 July, Whittingham said terms were agreed with Panjab Warriors and invited the former directors of the club back in order to oversee the final stages of the sale process, which he said would take place on 7 that did not happen, the board stepped down, with Whittingham insisting he was still committed to a 9 July, a "last minute bid" was made for the club by an unnamed party which was later confirmed by Whittingham to be from a consortium led by an investor he said is named Jonny weeks on, Cato's bid has not been completed and it is unclear where Panjab Warriors' deal stands. Cato has not been seen or heard from in public. Who are Panjab Warriors and Jonny Cato? Panjab Warriors, understood to be a group of Sikh businessmen, have been attempting to purchase Morecambe for more than a year and claim they have made significant financial contributions towards the running of the club during that previously said, external they had already paid £3.8m to Bond Group alongside a separate payment of £630,000 to clear outstanding loans against the group have also claimed they had loaned a further £1.7m to the club over the past 14 months to "ensure its ongoing survival".In a statement on 19 July, Panjab Warriors said, external their solicitors had served legal notices to Whittingham and Bond Group over "repeated breaches of what has been agreed".As for Cato, not much is known about his identity but in a statement last week, Whittingham claimed Cato did not have a connection to himself or Bond group the Shrimps Trust claimed in a statement, external earlier this week the club's players would not play until the ownership situation was comes after players and staff were only paid a third of their most recent wages and Tuesday's planned pre-season friendly against Barrow was in a statement given to BBC Radio Lancashire on Tuesday, boss Adams said his players were not on strike."The players are not on strike and they all trained today at the training ground," Adams said."Their professionalism has been magnificent during this difficult time. We all want this situation to be resolved and the best outcome for Morecambe Football Club." Where does this all leave Morecambe now? Former co-chairman Rod Taylor said he was fearful for the club's existence last week, and fellow former board member James Wakefield painted a similarly bleak picture, saying he was "amazed the club was still alive".Morecambe's woes continue as the landmark Football Governance Act received Royal Assent on Monday, establishing a regulator to oversee the men's game in England's top five Act grants greater powers to a body that is independent from government and football authorities, and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the bill would make a difference to clubs like Morecambe and "can't come soon enough".Speaking to BBC sports editor Dan Roan, Nandy said: "I'm horrified by what is happening at Morecambe."It's a scenario that too many football fans will recognise up and down the country, including my own in Wigan, and it is heartbreaking for the fans involved who don't know when they wake up in a morning if their club is going to be there or not."This bill will make a significant difference to situations like the one facing Morecambe fans because the regulator will not only have a much tougher owners and directors' test but will also be able to compel owners to sell up if the club is placed at risk of harm. It can't come soon enough for Morecambe." What is the human impact? Morecambe are due to play Boston United on 9 August to kick-off their 2025-26 National League Quinn, who has covered the club for the BBC for 30 years, fears they might not even make it to that stage as things stand."The club is definitely on the brink of going under and it is heartbreaking to see," he said."Players and staff have now not been paid for more than three weeks and community events [at the stadium] such as school proms and private bookings for weddings, funerals and parties have had to be cancelled at the last minute."The sight of one fan, who has supported the club with her family for more than 50 years, breaking down in tears while being interviewed was heartbreaking."For these fans, and thousands of others, this is not just about football - it is about their families and their community."One thing is for sure - there will be far more tears shed if Morecambe Football Club's 105-year existence comes to a crushing end."
