logo
Belgrade braces for another anti-government protest, calling for an early parliamentary election

Belgrade braces for another anti-government protest, calling for an early parliamentary election

Yahoo28-06-2025
BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) — Belgrade is bracing for yet another student-led protest on Saturday to pressure Serbia's populist President Aleksandar Vucic to call for a snap parliamentary election after nearly eight months of rallies that have rattled his firm grip on power in the Balkan country.
Tensions have soared ahead of the protest organized by Serbia's university students, a key force behind nationwide anti-corruption demonstrations that started after a renovated rail station canopy collapsed, killing 16 people on Nov. 1.
Many blamed the concrete roof crash on rampant government corruption and negligence in state infrastructure projects, leading to recurring mass protests.
Vucic and his right-wing Serbian Progressive Party have refused the demand for an early vote and accused protesters of planning to spur violence at orders from abroad, which they didn't specify.
In a show of business as usual, the Serbian president handed out presidential awards in the capital to people, including artists and journalists, he deemed worthy, as his loyalists, camping in a park in central Belgrade, announced they would hold a 'literary evening.'
'People need not worry — the state will be defended and thugs brought to justice," Vucic told reporters on Saturday.
Serbian presidential and parliamentary elections are due in 2027.
Saturday marks St. Vitus Day, a religious holiday and the date when Serbs mark a 14th-century battle against Ottoman Turks in Kosovo that was the start of hundreds of years of Turkish rule, holding symbolic importance.
Police earlier this week arrested several people accused of allegedly plotting to overthrow the government and banned entry into the country to several people from Croatia and a theatre director from Montenegro without explanation. Serbia's railway company halted train service over an alleged bomb threat in what critics said was an apparent bid to prevent people from traveling to Belgrade for the rally.
Authorities made similar moves back in March, ahead of what was the biggest ever anti-government protest in the Balkan country, which drew hundreds of thousands of people.
Vucic's loyalists then set up a camp in a park outside his office, which still stands. The otherwise peaceful gathering on March 15 came to an abrupt end when part of the crowd suddenly scattered in panic, triggering allegations that authorities used a sonic weapon against peaceful protesters, which they have denied.
Vucic, a former extreme nationalist, has become increasingly authoritarian since coming to power over a decade ago. Though he formally says he wants Serbia to join the European Union, critics say Vucic has stifled democratic freedoms as he strengthened ties with Russia and China.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in rare graft case
Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in rare graft case

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in rare graft case

Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one charge of abetting the obstruction of justice on Monday in part of a landmark case that led to the jailing of former transport minister S. Iswaran for obtaining valuable items as a public servant last year. However, both the prosecution and defence agreed to grant Ong judicial mercy given his chronic illness, and argued for him to be fined in lieu of imprisonment. He will be sentenced on Aug 15. A second charge of abetting an offence was also taken into consideration. Judicial mercy gives courts the authority to give a more lenient sentence in exceptional mitigating circumstances, such as a terminal illness or when imprisonment could pose a high risk of endangering a life. The defence submitted that Ong suffers from multiple myeloma, an incurable cancer that affects his blood plasma cells and renders him immuno-compromised. The case has been the subject of major intrigue in Singapore, a wealthy financial hub that offers ministers salaries of more than S$1 million ($775,000) to deter graft and prides itself on its reputation for clean governance. Ong had informed Iswaran that his associates had been questioned and a private flight manifest with Iswaran's name on it for a flight from Singapore to Doha had been seized by the corruption watchdog during investigations. This led Iswaran to ask Ong to issue an invoice through Singapore GP, promoter of the Singapore F1 Grand Prix, to bill him for the trip, which prosecutors say Iswaran knew would make it less likely that he would be investigated. Iswaran was sentenced to 12 months in prison in October 2024, the first time a former cabinet member had ever been jailed in Singapore, on charges of obstructing justice and receiving more than $300,000 worth of gifts. In February, Iswaran was put under house arrest for the remainder of his sentence. Ong gave Iswaran tickets to English Premier League soccer matches, the Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, London musicals and a ride on a private jet among other favours. Iswaran was an adviser to the Singapore Grand Prix's steering committee, while Ong, 79, owns the rights to the race. The billionaire stepped down as managing director of Singapore-listed Hotel Properties in April.

Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in graft case
Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in graft case

CNN

time3 hours ago

  • CNN

Tycoon who helped bring F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in graft case

AsiaFacebookTweetLink Follow Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one charge of abetting the obstruction of justice on Monday in part of a landmark case that led to the jailing of former transport minister S. Iswaran for obtaining valuable items as a public servant last year. However, both the prosecution and defence agreed to grant Ong judicial mercy given his chronic illness, and argued for him to be fined in lieu of imprisonment. He will be sentenced on Aug 15. A second charge of abetting an offence was also taken into consideration. Judicial mercy gives courts the authority to give a more lenient sentence in exceptional mitigating circumstances, such as a terminal illness or when imprisonment could pose a high risk of endangering a life. The defence submitted that Ong suffers from multiple myeloma, an incurable cancer that affects his blood plasma cells and renders him immuno-compromised. The case has been the subject of major intrigue in Singapore, a wealthy financial hub that offers ministers salaries of more than S$1 million ($775,000) to deter graft and prides itself on its reputation for clean governance. Ong had informed Iswaran that his associates had been questioned and a private flight manifest with Iswaran's name on it for a flight from Singapore to Doha had been seized by the corruption watchdog during investigations. This led Iswaran to ask Ong to issue an invoice through Singapore GP, promoter of the Singapore F1 Grand Prix, to bill him for the trip, which prosecutors say Iswaran knew would make it less likely that he would be investigated. Iswaran was sentenced to 12 months in prison in October 2024, the first time a former cabinet member had ever been jailed in Singapore, on charges of obstructing justice and receiving more than $300,000 worth of gifts. In February, Iswaran was put under house arrest for the remainder of his sentence. Ong gave Iswaran tickets to English Premier League soccer matches, the Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, London musicals and a ride on a private jet among other favours. Iswaran was an adviser to the Singapore Grand Prix's steering committee, while Ong, 79, owns the rights to the race. The billionaire stepped down as managing director of Singapore-listed Hotel Properties in April.

Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil
Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil

Politico

time4 hours ago

  • Politico

Newsom's big pivot on Big Oil

With help from Camille von Kaenel and Noah Baustin OIL ABOUT-FACE: Gov. Gavin Newsom spent the last four years provoking the Big Oil boogeyman. Now, it's haunting him. Newsom's casting of oil companies as the villain behind the state's perpetually high fuel prices seemingly signaled the industry's waning influence in Sacramento as recently as last year's special session. But then two of the state's nine refineries announced closure plans, leaving the governor and Democratic lawmakers scrambling to boost in-state oil supply and find potential buyers to keep the facilities pumping out gasoline and avert shortages that some experts estimate could drive gas prices up by as much as $1.21 per gallon by next August — just as midterm elections will be heating up. The pivot is emblematic of a national Democratic party course correction on cost-of-living issues in the wake of the presidential election — and provides a real-time demonstration of the political risks of pursuing an aggressive transition away from fossil fuels. 'The reality is, if those refineries close and we have increased gas prices, it's going to be a problem for everybody,' said Andrew Acosta, a veteran California Democratic campaign consultant. 'Not just Gavin Newsom, but every Democrat running for office.' The shift has left groups that thought they had Newsom on the anti-Big Oil train with whiplash. Newsom announced a fracking ban in 2021, spearheaded a lawsuit to hold major oil companies liable for climate change damages and pushed legislation to consider a cap on oil industry profits — all while castigating the industry as a corrupt force fleecing Californians. 'They have been raking in unprecedented profits because they can,' Newsom said in October while signing a bill requiring refiners to store more gas to prevent shortages, a concept the industry warned would backfire. 'They've been screwing you for years and years and years.' Fast forward to June, when Newsom's administration unveiled a suite of proposals to keep refineries solvent, including streamlined permitting for more in-state drilling in Kern County. Newsom's office has since circulated a draft bill mirroring those recommendations. 'Refineries all across the globe are struggling,' Newsom said after the proposals were released. 'We've got some challenges, and so just require some new considerations.' And even some environmentalists are having second thoughts after Phillips 66 announced in October that it would close its Southern California refinery by the end of 2025, followed in April when Valero announced the planned closure of its Northern California facility in 2026. 'I think Democrats sort of failed to read the room, perhaps in a way that, unfortunately, Trump did,' said Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California director for the Environmental Defense Fund. 'If we're not acknowledging people's day-to-day reality and the challenges they face, it's really hard for them to care about the existential threat that is climate change.' Newsom spokespeople pointed to the governor's comments during a press conference last week where he called the approach 'completely consistent' with the state's climate agenda, which has 'always been about finding a just transition.' While recent polling shows California voters still want their leaders to fight climate change, the state faces a unique set of circumstances that make the transition particularly complicated. California has long operated as a fuel island, meaning it doesn't have the infrastructure necessary to pipe in refined gasoline from its neighbor and quickly respond to gas shortages when refineries go offline. That leads to price spikes like in 2022 and 2023, when average prices soared past $5 per gallon. Colin Murphy, deputy director of the University of California, Davis' Policy Institute for Energy, Environment and the Economy, said that isolation has given the handful of oil companies that operate refineries in the state outsize power to control the market, and that California lawmakers underestimated the industry's willingness to wield that power. The oil industry intends to continue pressing its advantage. Andy Walz, Chevron's president of downstream, midstream and chemicals, said California officials have made the state 'uninvestable' for companies like his and is pushing to unwind key pieces of the state's climate agenda, like its cap-and-trade program and rules aimed at reducing emissions from oil tankers and other ships that dock in the state's ports. 'I don't think they believed the industry was in trouble,' Walz said of California officials. 'I think they misread what was really going on, and it took some real action by some competitors to get them woken up.' Newsom's draft bill does include olive branches to environmental justice groups that have been left feeling burned — including a well stimulation ban and a requirement for drillers to plug two wells for every new well they make — but that hasn't dampened their frustration. EJ advocates are preparing to go to the mat in what's setting up to be an end-of-session brawl. 'It seems like a lot of our elected officials are driven above all by a fear that they'll be blamed for high gas prices,' said Bill Magavern, policy director at Coalition for Clean Air. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! REFINING THE LANGUAGE: Environmental justice groups have their counter-offer to Newsom's proposal to bolster in-state oil supply to stop refineries from closing and keep gas prices in check. Fifty environmental and community groups signed onto a Friday letter to Newsom, Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire and Speaker Robert Rivas asking to significantly amend Newsom's draft oil legislation. The groups include the Los Angeles chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, the Asian Pacific Environmental Network and the VISIÓN Coalition (notably, they do not include major environmental organizations like the Environmental Defense Fund and the Natural Resources Defense Council.) Among their chief asks: if state officials are going to streamline more crude extraction in Kern County, they should cap the number of new wells at 500 (compared to the nearly 3,000 in the local ordinance Kern County adopted earlier this year) and include a 2035 sunset date. They also want to require refiners to disclose more of their business when they tell the state they are considering closing. Faraz Rizvi, APEN's campaign and policy manager, said the goal was to offer a counter-solution to the oil and gas industry's wish list. 'We are trying to hold the line as best as we can to ensure we're protecting communities while also understanding the way the winds are turning,' he said. — CvK CHARGED UP: California's network of batteries installed at peoples' homes is now capable of moving the needle on the state's entire grid, according to a new industry report commissioned by Sunrun and Tesla. A group of virtual power plant aggregators delivered an average of 535 megawatts to the California grid last Tuesday from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m., according to a report from research firm Brattle. The energy came from over 100,000 residential batteries, mostly Tesla-manufactured. It was the most energy Sunrun, the largest aggregator of the group, has dispatched from a single distributed power plant in a night. The deliveries were part of a pre-planned test to assess the performance of virtual power plants ahead of the state's hottest months, when their services are most needed. And to Sunrun execs, it was a success — and a major step toward the dream of having batteries on everyday people's property provide utility-scale value to the grid. 'This is no longer a future thing, this is a now thing,' said Chris Rauscher, Sunrun's VP of grid services and electrification. The state was rocked by blackouts in 2020. That led to a push for increased storage to help keep the lights on during extreme heat. At the time, California had about 245 megawatts of residential battery storage capacity. That figure has climbed seven-fold to 1,829 MW as of this April, according to California Energy Commission data. — NB GRID GAMES: Environmental groups are opening their pocketbooks in a fight over how much control California should have over a proposed regional energy market. EDF Action and NRDC Action Fund — political arms of the Environmental Defense Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council — announced a six-figure ad campaign Monday pushing state lawmakers to amend Sen. Josh Becker's SB 540, which would establish a West-wide energy market. The ad calls on lawmakers to 'fix' the bill by removing language they argue would dissuade other states from joining an expanded regional market, including a proposed regional council that could remove California energy providers from the market. EDF and NRDC, original co-sponsors, pulled their support last month after Becker amended the bill to include the council after pushback from some unions and ratepayer advocates who argue a regional market could allow the Trump administration to hamper the state's climate goals and expose residents to rate hikes. Backers of the original language say giving California officials too much control of the market would 'make it unappealing or even impossible' for regional energy suppliers to join. Newsom and Assembly Speaker Rivas have committed to getting regionalization over the finish line this session, though the governor has made clear that the policy could come through a different vehicle than SB 540. — AN SETTING THE AGENDA: On Wednesday, Aug. 27, POLITICO is hosting its inaugural California policy summit: The California Agenda. Come see the Golden State's most prominent political figures — including Sen. Alex Padilla and gubernatorial candidates Katie Porter and Xavier Becerra — share the stage with influential voices in tech, energy, housing and other areas at the forefront of the state's most critical policy debates. The live and streamed event is free, but advance registration is required. Stay tuned for more on speakers and discussion topics, and request an invite here. — NASA will announce plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon, according to documents obtained by POLITICO. — State water regulators told Los Angeles decades ago to take less water from Mono Lake, but the city still hasn't met its requirements. — Are you wondering how tariffs could impact clean energy? Just look at past U.S. solar panel policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store