logo
California doesn't need DOGE, but there's plenty of wasteful spending and bureaucracy to cut

California doesn't need DOGE, but there's plenty of wasteful spending and bureaucracy to cut

Yahoo14-03-2025

Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, known shorthand as DOGE, launched under President Trump in January and since has sent shockwaves through Washington and the rest of the country. As California's former chief data officer, I've watched this experiment with a mix of alarm and reluctant admiration.
DOGE's methods — unilateral power grabs, reckless data access and a cavalier disregard for legal boundaries — are a masterclass in what not to do. Yet its core aim, slashing wasteful spending and forcing accountability on a bloated bureaucracy, is a goal no serious leader can ignore.
California, with its $322 billion budget and perennial fiscal crises, desperately needs a similar reckoning. Any candidate for governor in 2026 must embrace this challenge — not with Musk's sledgehammer, but with a scalpel guided by data and transparency.
DOGE's rollout has been a circus. Shutting down entire agencies like USAID overnight, seizing control of Treasury systems that hold sensitive taxpayer data, and wielding AI to slash budgets without congressional oversight isn't reform, it's chaos. Lawsuits piling up from unions and states underscore the legal quicksand Musk has stepped into.
California cannot afford such recklessness. Our state's challenges, such as wildfire recovery, housing shortages and Medi-Cal expansion, demand precision, not a billionaire's blunt force trauma.
But let's not kid ourselves: California's government is rife with waste. As a state data official, I saw firsthand how departmental silos obscure spending, how outdated systems hide inefficiencies, and how fraud festers in a budget so vast it defies comprehension. The Legislative Analyst's Office routinely flags billions in questionable allocations, yet we rarely see follow-through.
DOGE's aim to save taxpayers money resonates here, where taxes soar and deficits loom. The idea of a top-to-bottom audit of every department isn't radical — it's overdue.
What California needs is a smarter playbook. We can look to Maryland, where then-Gov. Martin O'Malley implemented StateStat nearly two decades ago (now called the Performance Improvement Office), or Washington with Results Washington — both data-driven systems that tracked the performance of agencies in real time. From crime rates to infrastructure delays, these platforms create accountability, cut costs and delivered results, without burning the house down.
California could build its own version: a government-wide dashboard exposing spending, outcomes and inefficiencies for all to see. Pair that with a full audit — independent, rigorous and public — and we'd have a blueprint to root out waste and fraud without Muskian theatrics.
The 2026 gubernatorial race is the moment to demand this. Candidates can't just tinker around the edges with feel-good promises. Our budget isn't just gigantic — it's a labyrinth. Medi-Cal alone, at $161 billion annually, begs for scrutiny. Are we overpaying providers? Are duplicated services draining funds? What about the California Department of Transportation, where highway projects balloon past deadlines and budgets?
A StateStat model, backed by an audit, could answer these questions and potentially save billions of dollars that we could redirect to schools, housing or tax relief.
Critics will cry that this is austerity in disguise. It's not. Efficiency isn't about slashing services — it's about ensuring every dollar delivers. When I oversaw California's data strategy, we uncovered redundancies that could've funded entire programs if redirected. Fraud, too, isn't a victimless crime; it siphons resources from the vulnerable.
Any governor who ducks this fight is complicit in the status quo.
DOGE may be a cautionary tale, but its ambition should wake us up. California's next governor must wield data, not headlines, to tame our sprawling government. A full audit, a StateStat-like system and a relentless hunt for waste aren't optional — they're the price of leadership in a state stretched to its limits. Voters should settle for nothing less.
Zac Townsend is the CEO of Meanwhile. He was previously the inaugural chief data officer of California under Gov. Jerry Brown and the chief technology officer of Newark, New Jersey, under then-Mayor Cory Booker.
This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: California doesn't need DOGE, but there's plenty of waste to cut

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Magic dust and mayhem: The Great GOP Panic over Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' narrowly passed the House by a single vote and is now stalled in the Senate. We take a closer look at this massive tax plan that gives permanent breaks for the wealthy while slashing Medicaid, food assistance, and clean energy programs. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, it would add at least $2.4 trillion to the national deficit–hardly a win for fiscal conservatives. Even Elon Musk slammed it as a 'disgusting abomination.��

‘Idiocy': Sac PD must rectify situation with Sen. Sabrina Cervantes
‘Idiocy': Sac PD must rectify situation with Sen. Sabrina Cervantes

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Idiocy': Sac PD must rectify situation with Sen. Sabrina Cervantes

'Sacramento police must apologize for harming a California state senator | Opinion,' ( May 30) My wife and I live down in Riverside County, in Sen. Sabrina Cervantes' district. We know her and we believe in her. We believed immediately in the senator's protest because the allegation that she was driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol was so preposterously out of character. Aside from the city budget deficit, is this idiocy an example of what the Sacramento Police Department is wasting their time and taxpayers' money on? To Sacramento Police Chief Kathy Lester: Shame on what your officers have been encouraged or taught to do. It just may backfire on the department when the city takes up the budget for next year. Brian Finander Moreno Valley 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Rep. Kevin Kiley claims to support Medicaid, but his vote for a congressional budget that guts the program tells another story. By backing cuts that threaten healthcare for millions — including over 100,000 of his own constituents — Kiley is turning his back on children, seniors and people with disabilities who rely on this essential lifeline. He blames Medi-Cal expansion for the strain, but that's no excuse for dismantling a program that serves our most vulnerable. Even more galling, the same budget that slashes social safety nets hands massive tax breaks to the wealthy — ballooning the national debt while sacrificing essential services. You can't claim to support Medicaid while voting to destroy it. John Bergmann Lincoln 'Nine California Republicans voted for Trump's cruel budget bill. Remember them,' ( May 22) Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley just voted for the largest ever transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich in American history. The budget bill they passed insures that the richest 0.1% percent will gain while the rest of us will lose vital services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid. The most vulnerable among us — hungry and uninsured kids and seniors — will be directly affected; but the middle class will also see increasing home electric bills, health care premiums and costs and higher interest rates. These cuts don't reduce the debt, they exist so billionaires can pay even less in taxes and buy more yachts. Republicans are solely focused on enriching billionaires, no matter the cost to you, me or the country. Kiley's priority should be his constituents, not his wealthy donors. Edward Farinsky Browns Valley 'How Newsom wants to fill 'Trump slump' fueled $12B deficit,' ( May 14) With annual state funding, the California Peer-Run Warm Line has been providing free emotional support to residents statewide 24/7 via phone, text or chat since 2019. Its success has enabled more growth: the CalHOPE and Spanish Warm Lines. March and April each saw nearly 40,000 contacts — about double their monthly average. Why would we give up on such a vital resource seeing skyrocketing demand? The cuts in Gov. Gavin Newsom's May Revise are so severe that we would only be able to answer about 5% of requests for help, leaving tens of thousands to suffer in silence. We wouldn't be able to stay open. We urge the Legislature to prioritize mental health and to fully fund the warm lines. Such investments often prevent people from going into crisis, which require more expensive treatment. Mark Salazar Mental Health Association of San Francisco

Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending
Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending

President Donald Trump referred to his former ally Elon Musk as a 'big-time drug addict' as he processed the end of their relationship, according to a new report. As Musk began publicly attacking Trump, the president started calling up confidants and acquaintances to discuss the falling out. During one such call, the president made the allegation about the Tesla CEO's alleged drug habits as he attempted to understand his behavior, reports The Washington Post. Musk has said that he uses ketamine for depression. According to The New York Times, he used ketamine on the campaign trail to such a degree that it was affecting his bladder, and he traveled with a pill box with Adderall markings. White House officials said Trump was concerned about Musk's drug use, and it was one reason the relationship eventually came to an explosive end, The Post noted. However, Trump took a calmer tone in pushing back on Musk in his social media posts than advisers and friends alike expected. Two people with knowledge of the situation told the paper that, following the Thursday feud with Musk, Trump instructed those around him not to escalate the confrontation. Speaking to Vice President JD Vance about how to address the Musk situation in public, Trump urged caution. However, the relationship between Musk, Trump, and the rest of the administration had deteriorated long before Thursday. Musk alienated White House staff and cabinet members, reportedly getting into a physical altercation with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, according to The Post's report. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, who worked in Trump's first term, told The Post that he was informed that as Bessent and Musk exited the Oval Office following an April meeting, the pair began insulting each other. Bessent mentioned Musk's claim that he would find more than $1 trillion in waste and abuse of government spending, something the billionaire had not yet achieved. 'Scott said, 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,'' Bannon told the paper. Musk subsequently pushed his shoulder into Bessent 'like a rugby player,' he added. Bessent struck back at Musk, and several people stepped in to break up the scuffle. 'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,'' said Bannon. 'President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Post. However, administration officials have discussed taking steps to retaliate against Musk. Trump took to TruthSocial to suggest that Musk's government contracts be scrutinized, potentially putting his businesses at risk. Musk has been consistently critical of the president's main congressional priority, the so-called 'big, beautiful bill,' expressing his concerns about the significant amount it adds to the deficit. Trump has threatened Musk with 'serious consequences' if he uses his massive wealth to fund Democratic challengers to Republicans who vote for the spending bill. Musk has also suggested that he may start a third political party to represent the '80 percent in the middle.' 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce, where you're just saying, 'I really wish Mommy and Daddy would stop screaming,'' Texas Senator Ted Cruz said on his podcast Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store