Irish in Germany are caught between starkly different perspectives on the war in Gaza
Simon Harris
to discuss on Friday in
Berlin
with his new
German
foreign minister colleague, Johann Wadephul. After a chilly meeting of
Irish
and German foreign ministers last year, no joint press conference was planned this time around.
Berlin and Dublin, traditionally close partners on
EU
and foreign policy, have found themselves far apart following the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7th 2023, which claimed at least 1,200 lives.
In his January 2024 visit, then-tánaiste Micheál Martin suggested Berlin's view of the
Gaza conflict
was constrained 'by the historical prism of the Holocaust', though 'evolving'. Germany's position has evolved quite a bit further since then, with growing public outrage here over Israel's Gaza blockade, settler violence in the West Bank and a Palestinian death toll nearing 60,000. A more critical tone towards Israel from the new German government, however, has yet to be matched in any significant policy shift.
The current Israel-Hamas conflict, for many Irish people living in Germany, resembles what John le Carré once called a 'looking glass war'. In their daily lives here and during visits back to Ireland, the German-Irish negotiate two separate minefields with one common denominator: dissent from the majority opinion – or attempts at differentiation in the public debate – are often denounced.
READ MORE
The most visible sign of tension surrounds
two Irish citizens who face expulsion from Germany
in connection with their alleged role in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, including a violent confrontation at a Berlin university.
Their precise role in what happened there has yet to be established and, in an emergency injunction, a Berlin court has halted expulsion proceedings until after trial, likely in the autumn. That didn't stop Berlin's governing mayor Kai Wegner prejudging them, in a national newspaper, as 'anti-Semitic criminals'.
Many Irish people here who join Gaza solidarity marches, as they would if they were in Ireland, report harassment in their workplace and police violence.
Some face charges they view as spurious and – after 18 months and counting – the charges have neither come to trial nor been dropped. That keeps them flagged in police databases, making every re-entry to Germany a stressful business of arbitrary delays and border police questions. For them, this is official Germany's intentional chilling effect for holding the 'wrong' views on Gaza. (A similar chilling effect, critics of Israel's Gaza war say, follows German efforts since November 2023 to outlaw every public utterance of 'from the river to the sea' as an illegal slogan supporting the proscribed Hamas group. In May a Berlin court
dismissed one such prosecution
as a politicised endeavour lacking evidence and any legal standing.)
The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict
All of this is attracting outside attention. Last month the Council of Europe, the continent's leading human rights body, sent a two-page letter of concern to the Berlin federal government. Police violence, limits to freedom of assembly and 'the blanket classification of criticism of Israel as anti-Semitism', the letter warned, do a disservice to democracy and may even endanger it'.
While German officials dismiss such concerns, campaigners are already collating information about the crackdown they see. And writer Maxim Biller has even devised a diagnosis for the motivation:
Morbus Israel,
Germany's Israel disorder. 'At the core of [this] neo-German Orient neurosis is, very loosely: Germans' disappointed love for their former victims,' he argued in a column for Die Zeit weekly. His polemical text was later removed from the Zeit website following protests over his description of the 'strategically correct but inhumane hunger blockade of Gaza'.
[
An Irishman in Berlin: 'For Germans, everything is forbidden unless it allowed'
Opens in new window
]
As the conflict drags on, though, some Irish in Germany wonder – quietly and cautiously – if Ireland has a disorder of its own. Earlier in the conflict, before everything was eclipsed by the real and justified horror over children being starved – or shot dead by Israel soldiers – one Irish acquaintance asked: where was the Irish protest over Hamas contempt for – and human rights violations of – its own people?
Given the unprecedented degradation in Gaza, such questions may seem like cynical what-aboutery. Yet another middle-aged Irish acquaintance, living in Germany as long as the Belfast Agreement, wondered aloud recently how Irish people, who resented the IRA killing people on their behalf, feel about Hamas doing the same for Palestinians?
The colonial framing of the Gaza conflict, as popularised by Kneecap, gets an airing in Germany, particularly in universities, but others reject it as ill fit for the complexities of the conflict.
After a strange start, Germany's debate has shifted radically in recent months. The popular Bild tabloid still ignores the reality in Gaza and denounces Palestinian solidarity marchers as 'Jew haters', but other outlets offer a broader and more challenging range of views.
[
Israeli foreign minister finds shifting moods as he visits Berlin
Opens in new window
]
On Wednesday, the Süddeutsche Zeitung daily printed a harrowing 5,000-word report on the starve-or-be-shot reality in Gaza. A day later, it ran a full-page essay by French-Israeli sociologist Eva Illouz, asking 'Is anti-Zionism a form of anti-Semitism?'
With large Jewish, Israeli and Palestinian communities, Germany's Israel-Gaza-Hamas debate is messy, emotional, confused and conflicted. A diverse range of voices compete to be heard, airing grievances which not all share but are nonetheless real. Two conflicts are playing out, as Berlin arms one side and tries to feed the other. Attempting to meet two non-negotiable postwar obligations – to Israel and human dignity – has created a domestic conflict of conscience with an equally unpredictable outcome.
By comparison, many Irish living in Germany perceive Ireland's debate as Irish people telling other Irish people, at no personal cost and from a safe distance, how terrible things are for the Palestinians.
A recent public television poll here asked who respondents feel is responsible for the plight of the civilian population in Gaza. Some 69 per cent said the Israeli government was fully or partly to blame while 71 per cent said the same of Hamas. How would a similar poll look in Ireland?
Ireland and Germany hold competing views on the conflict, yet both have considerable credibility among Palestinians and Israelis respectively. How can our two countries leverage that good will for a better future in the Middle East? That is a debate worth having.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
After the Train: Irishwomen united – a book to be passed down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind
After the Train: Irishwomen United and a Network of Change Author : Evelyn Conlon and Rebecca Pelan editors ISBN-13 : 978-1068502309 Publisher : UCD Press Guideline Price : €30 From 1975 to 1977, Irishwomen United (IWU) – and the culture of change it generated – radically fed into the emancipation of Irish society that led to 2018's referendum to lift the constitutional abortion ban. In their deeds and words, IWU threw off much of the misogynistic, theocratic, social and mind control that was so oppressively exerted from 1922 with the formation of the postcolonial Irish 'Free' State. 'Lest they forget,' and as a blueprint for ongoing social justice transformation, After the Train has been durably designed and produced to weather many decades of reading and rereading: to be passed from hand to hand, and down the generations, with future cultural insurgency in mind. The 'train' of the title refers to the Irish Women's Liberation Movement 1971 stunt of bringing contraceptives from Belfast to Dublin's Connolly Station; a spark of civil disobedience which the IWU took up again in 1976 with its aptly named CAP (Contraception Action Programme). CAP openly and illegally distributed contraception, enacting the principle that women's control of their own fertility is the bedrock of female equality. Reading how inferior women's social and legal status was in Ireland in the early 1970s compared to now demonstrates the far-reaching impact of IWU and its cultural offshoots. Contributor Anne Speed writes: 'A wife was officially the property of her husband; rape was legal in marriage; contraceptives were banned since 1935; divorce was unconstitutional; a woman could not sit on juries; by law, children's allowances were paid to the husband, and it was legal to pay women less than men for the same job.' READ MORE IWU seized the narrative through the development of feminist publishing; set up organisations to tackle rape, the abortion ban and the plight of single mothers; and lobbied powerfully to affect equality through law reform and the trade union movement. [ From the archive: A history of Irish women in 50 objects Opens in new window ] Here's reader testimony to the revolutionary power of this skilfully edited collection: as the mother of a disabled adult son, I'm at the coalface of human rights travesties that have barely begun to be recognised as such by wider Irish society. My desire for disabled people's self-determination, inclusion and equality, and my understanding of how these might be achieved, feel turbocharged with After the Train on my shelf and in my heart.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Will the Government really put McDonald's ahead of children in poverty?
With billions flowing into the Government's coffers from our corporation tax bonanza, there were some big winners from last year's pre-election budget. Among the biggest were the children of wealthy parents. While CSO statistics show that an average person receives about €100,000 in gifts or inheritances from their parents over a lifetime, Budget 2025 announced a €25,000 tax cut for the tiny fraction who receive more than €400,000. Such giveaways contrast sharply with below-inflation increases to most social welfare payments over recent years. This has left core rates of payments worth less today than they were in January 2020: a remarkable situation given the strength of economic growth and the tens of billions in new spending announced. These real-terms cuts have contributed to stagnating incomes for the poorest households as well as stubbornly persistent levels of child poverty. READ MORE Research published by the ESRI in partnership with Community Foundation Ireland has shown that 250,000 children live in households below the poverty line after accounting for housing costs: more than one in five children. A wealth of evidence shows this has enormous economic and social costs , with a lack of adequate resources compromising the ability of children to grow and thrive, even in adulthood. The importance of reducing child poverty has been recognised by successive governments, with ambitious targets set out in various plans, strategies and roadmaps since 1997. However, we have seen no real progress for the best part of two decades. Shockingly, the share of children below the poverty line after housing costs is no lower than during the worst years of the financial crisis. The reason child poverty persists is that whenever the opportunity comes to translate words into action there is always some higher priority. This year that higher priority looks to be the hospitality sector, which has engaged in a sustained, well-funded lobbying campaign for even more preferential VAT treatment than it currently enjoys. VAT is currently levied on accommodation, catering and restaurant services at a reduced rate of 13.5 per cent, compared with the standard rate of 23 per cent. Estimates by Revenue suggest this amounts to a tax relief of almost €2 billion per year. Cutting the rate further to 9 per cent would cost more than €800 million more a year, sucking up most of the space available for new measures in the forthcoming budget. This is despite the fact the sector is – by any objective measure – doing well. CSO data shows that hospitality employment was 7 per cent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than a year earlier, while figures from the Companies Registration Office show there were 11 new companies incorporated for every liquidation in the sector. Even if the sector were struggling, a VAT cut makes little economic sense. Rather than supporting struggling small restaurants or cafes, the biggest beneficiaries would be large operators with the highest turnover. On what grounds can a multimillion-euro tax cut for outlets such as McDonald's possibly be justified? Yet the Tánaiste's recent elevation of this expensive and economically illiterate tax cut to a 'solemn commitment' would seem to place it ahead of all other promises in the programme for government. This includes a pledge to 'lift more children out of poverty, giving them the futures they deserve'. Doing so would have immense benefits, but unavoidably requires spending money. The most effective way of spending this money is to introduce a second-tier of child benefit. This would leave the current universal child benefit payment as it stands but give an additional amount to lower-income families with children, replacing the inadequate patchwork of existing supports. Recent estimates from the ESRI suggest such a reform would reduce child poverty by more than a quarter. This amounts to lifting more than 50,000 children out of poverty at a cost of €772 million. While substantial, this cost is about a quarter of achieving the same reduction by increasing the universal child benefit payment. Strikingly, it is also less than that of the planned cut to VAT for the hospitality sector. This is the reason a second tier of child benefit has been called for since 2007 by a range of expert bodies, including the last government's Commission on Taxation and Welfare (which I was part of). A second tier of child benefit would mirror reforms implemented in the UK over the 2000s by then chancellor Gordon Brown. Writing in these pages last year, he described the approach as a 'progressive universalism' that ensures 'a floor of basic social rights for all, but with more support for those who need it most'. When Brown gave a keynote address to the Irish Government's inaugural Child Poverty Summit last year, he was introduced by then taoiseach Simon Harris, who declared that 'ending child poverty is a defining challenge for any leader' . After 20 years without progress in reducing – let alone ending – child poverty, it is a challenge our leaders are failing. Whether that failure defines their legacies depends on the decisions they take in the coming budgets. Dr Barra Roantree is director of the MSc in economic policy at Trinity College Dublin
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Aontú has held talks with two high-profile people on presidency but won't divulge their names
Aontú has held talks with two high-profile people who may be interested in running in the presidential election later this year, party leader Peadar Tóibín has said. The Meath West TD said on Friday that the party, which holds two Dáil seats, had spoken to 'two people who are really well recognised' about the possibility. However, he refused to name either would-be candidate, saying he needed to respect their privacy and the private nature of the conversations held to date. Mr Tóibín said neither person was aligned with any political party, but they would both make outstanding candidates. READ MORE While neither person aligned fully with the views of his party, he suggested they could potentially secure the support of several parties or groups. 'Some views we share, some views we are not on the same page,' Mr Tóibin said. 'They are both making up their minds about taking it forward. I expect the decision to be made at the end of next week, or shortly afterwards.' The Aontú leader said he strongly believed in the importance of having a robust and engaged presidential election campaign. 'The President is a very important position in the State. It is very healthy to have a good debate about what the values we expect the holder of the office to hold,' he said. Fine Gael MEP for Ireland South Seán Kelly said he was '50-50' on deciding whether or not to seek a nomination from his party. He said he would make his mind up over the next week. Saying his intentions have varied from day to day, the former GAA president added: 'A lot of people are encouraging me, and I'm looking at the various options and what's involved in it.' Asked if he would be prepared for a robust campaign involving personalised criticism, Mr Kelly said in his time at the GAA they were trying to open Croke Park to other sports 'and we got a lot of stick over it'. 'If you go for something, you have to be able to take the rough with the smooth and just get out if you can't.' Asked for a response to an Irish Times report on his Fine Gael colleague Mairead McGuinness's office allowances when she was an MEP , he said he would never comment on another politician's situation. Earlier, Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary ruled out a bid for the presidency, calling it 'the most useless, valueless, wasteful job'. He said he would be 'happy to endorse' Ms McGuinness if she was to launch a campaign. 'I think she's been a terrific success on the European stage, both as an MEP, vice-president of the European Parliament and a European Commissioner,' he told RTÉ's Claire Byrne Show. Mr O'Leary said he has 'absolutely not' been asked to run for the Áras, adding that 'it sure as hell wouldn't be me'. 'I have a useful, valuable job here in Ryanair,' he said. Independent Senator Aubrey McCarthy, the founder of the Tiglin charity, said he has not been in talks with any party. However, he said there have been approaches from members of parties for 'broad conversations' about the presidency, with some expressing the view that he might appeal to a wider base. It is understood that the Independent Minister of State Michael Healy-Rae was mentioned at a meeting of Independent parliamentarians as a possible candidate. When asked about this on Friday, the Kerry TD said he was not aware of the meeting and had no knowledge of the conversation and its context.
