logo
Two-child benefit cap to end in Scotland from March 2026

Two-child benefit cap to end in Scotland from March 2026

The mitigation was first announced in 2023, but First Minister John Swinney said ministers needed time to put a system in place.
READ MORE
The benefit cap was introduced by then Chancellor George Osborne in his 2015 Budget.
The policy, which came into effect in 2017, prevents households claiming child tax credit or universal credit from receiving support for a third or subsequent child born after 6 April that year.
While popular with voters, campaigners have long blamed the limit for a surge in the relative poverty rate for children.
It rose from 27% to 30% between 2010–11 and 2022–23 — an increase of 730,000 — with the rise entirely driven by a surge in relative poverty among families with three or more children.
Labour is under pressure to reverse the policy, with Sir Keir Starmer saying he would be 'looking at all options' to tackle child poverty.
The UK Government has so far resisted calls to scrap the cap, instead announcing a child poverty taskforce to look at tackling the "root causes" of child poverty., which essentially kicked the issue into the long grass.
Shirley-Anne Somerville said the Scottish Government could not wait for the UK Government (Image: Newsquest) Ms Somerville said Scotland could not afford to wait.
'The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two child cap,' she said.
'Reports suggest they are reviewing the policy's impact, but the evidence is clear. Families — and Scotland — cannot wait any longer for Westminster to make up its mind.
'The Two Child Limit Payment will begin accepting applications in March next year.'
She noted the policy would launch just 15 months after it was announced — the fastest rollout for a social security benefit in Scotland to date.
'This builds upon the considerable action we have taken, including delivering unparalleled financial support through our Scottish Child Payment, investing to clear school meal debt, and continuing to support almost 10,000 children by mitigating the UK Government's benefit cap as fully as possible,' she added.
'However, austerity decisions taken by the UK Government are holding back Scotland's progress. Modelling published in March shows that if the UK Government acted decisively on child poverty, they could help lift an estimated 100,000 children out of poverty this year.'
According to the Scottish Fiscal Commission, the new policy will cost around £150 million in its first year, rising to nearly £200m by the end of the decade.
In March, the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned the policy could unintentionally discourage some low-income families from working more.
While they said the Scottish Government mitigation was a cost-effective way to reduce child poverty, it could worsen 'cliff edges' in the benefits system.
These occur when small increases in earnings result in large losses in benefits, meaning some families could be financially worse off by working extra hours.
Anti-poverty charities have welcomed the Scottish Government decision and repeated calls for Westminster to abolish the cap nationwide.
READ MORE
John Dickie, Director of the Child Poverty Action Group in Scotland, said: 'It is absolutely right that the Scottish Government acts to effectively scrap the UK Government's two child benefit limit in Scotland.
'Families affected — most of whom are working — are facing real hardship, and the sooner these payments can be made, the better.
'The two child limit is the single biggest driver of child poverty across the UK. The Westminster Government must scrap it at source as a matter of utmost urgency.
'When it does, that will free up resources in Scotland to increase the Scottish Child Payment to the £40 a week that campaigners, including CPAG, have called for — helping make even more progress toward meeting Scotland's child poverty targets.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'
Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

Rhyl Journal

time4 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Independent water commission chair denies probe into reforms is ‘tinkering'

Sir Jon Cunliffe addressed recent criticism that he has been 'tinkering' with the industry's deep-rooted issues as he was quizzed by MPs on Tuesday. The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The final report is expected in mid-July but earlier this month, the commission published an interim report which said the industry needs a 'fundamental reset'. But this initial paper was criticised for not going far enough to deliver recommendations that would engender a complete industry overhaul. The Government outlined the scope of the probe to focus on what changes could be made within the current privatised regulated ownership model rather than considering a wholesale shift to other models such as not-for-profit or nationalisation. Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said the interim report was tinkering around the edges and he called for the commission's final recommendations to 'end pollution for profit' as well as 'reshape the water industry to put public health and environment first'. Asked by MPs if the review is 'tinkering' given the broken culture found across the sector, Sir Jon said: 'No I don't accept it at all. I just don't, I'm sorry. 'First of all, you wouldn't expect me to think, to accept, that this was a report that was tinkering. 'But just moving past that… I do not think the problems you see in the culture of the water companies that you've identified, and the problems we've seen in performance, are the inevitable consequence of the ownership model that we have.' Sir Jon continued to say the commission will look at other ownership models, such as not-for-profit, and make recommendations where companies are feasibly able to make a transition without public spending. Challenged on how he can assure MPs he will look at other models of ownership given the current failures, he said the commission could do so only in certain circumstances. 'But what we won't do is say: 'We need to move the whole sector to a different model' for two reasons,' he said. We've published our report on priorities for the water sector, calling on Sir Jon Cunliffe and the Water Commission not to shy away from 'root and branch' reforms. Read the report: — EFRA Committee (@CommonsEFRA) June 16, 2025 Sir Jon outlined that he is not sure how the sector can do this without large public spending to buy the assets but also that he has not found a 'strong correlation' between models and outcomes. 'It's not tinkering, it's trying to be evidence-based,' he said. His comments come after the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee released its own report into the sector on Tuesday morning, which concluded the industry is 'failing' while water firms are 'deaf to the crisis' it is facing. The MPs also argued the Government 'should feel able to use its temporary nationalisation powers' when needed. Sir Jon was also questioned about criticism that the review is not truly independent from the Government due to Environment Department staff helping to carry out the work. In response, he said: 'I'd like to put this on the record, if I can chair. 'I've been given a secretariat of high-quality Defra officials. 'I have not felt in any way that I am being channelled down any particular route outside of my terms of reference and I'd also say that they are incredibly hard-working, and they are in seeker after truth mode.' He added that while the commission has had to draw on some departmental expertise, the recommendations 'will be my own'.

Welsh Government pledges full co-operation with grooming gangs inquiry
Welsh Government pledges full co-operation with grooming gangs inquiry

Rhyl Journal

time4 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Welsh Government pledges full co-operation with grooming gangs inquiry

Eluned Morgan said she welcomed the decision by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to hold a statutory inquiry into child abuse across England and Wales. Baroness Casey's report, published on Monday, found the ethnicity of perpetrators had been 'shied away from', with data not recorded for two-thirds of offenders. The rapid national audit looking at the scale of grooming gangs across the country was first announced in January as part of a series of measures to tackle the issue. Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. Speaking at First Minister's questions in the Senedd, Ms Morgan said: 'This is an incredibly sensitive issue and whenever we discuss these issues, it's really important that we put the needs and concerns of the victims right at the very centre of what we do. 'I want to reassure you that there's absolutely no complacency in the Welsh Government. 'If women or children are being abused, I want to know about it and I want us to step in and to prevent it. 'That's why we know that there's already been this independent inquiry into child sexual abuse that was chaired by Alexis Jay and we are already undertaking the recommendations set out there. 'As you will be aware, the steps that happened was that the Prime Minister commissioned Baroness Casey to carry out an audit in relation to grooming gangs. 'We didn't say we were rejecting it, we said let's do the audit first. 'That audit is now taking place and Baroness Louise Casey herself has now said that she's changed her mind about a national inquiry. 'We welcome the decision made by the Prime Minister to undertake a national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs and of course they will have our full co-operation.' The First Minister was responding to questions from Senedd Conservative leader Darren Millar who had first raised the issue of a Wales-only inquiry in January. 'In the absence of a UK inquiry into the prevalence of grooming gangs, I called upon your Welsh Government to establish a Welsh grooming gang inquiry,' he said. 'You refused. You suggested that the issue had been politicised to the point where people feel threatened and twice expressed disappointment that I was raising the issue in the Senedd. 'When describing the experiences of just one Welsh victim, I was jeered at, heckled and interrupted by members of this Senedd, including, I'm very sorry to say, members of your own Welsh Government. 'We're now in June, and finally, after many months of delay, and more hurt and harm caused to those brave victims who've spoken out about their experiences, the UK Government has finally agreed to a national inquiry into grooming gangs. 'Do you regret rejecting the calls of victims and survivors for an inquiry last January? 'Do you accept that the delay has caused further harm and hurt? 'Will you now give a full, public commitment that the Welsh Government will back that UK inquiry and instruct all public bodies under your control here in Wales to cooperate fully with it, because victims and their families deserve nothing less?' Mr Millar cited the Jay inquiry finding evidence of children being sexually abused in Swansea, and other reports detailing abuse in Newport and Wrexham. 'The evidence is clear, sexual exploitation has been happening right under our noses here in Wales,' he said. 'The Casey report also suggests that the Welsh Government has failed to provide information that she also requested and it warned that fear of being accused of racism has deterred authorities from action both here in Wales and in other parts of the UK.' In reply, the First Minister said the Welsh Government would be looking at the recommendations of the Casey report 'to ensure there is full cooperation'. 'I have written to the Home Secretary to ensure that Welsh issues and any recent events, as well as historic events will be investigated and analysed by this inquiry,' she told the Senedd. 'It is clearly an issue that needs to be addressed. I think lessons need to be learnt. We mustn't shy away from collecting data on the ethnicity of perpetrators. 'I think abuse is abuse and it must be condemned irrespective of where it comes from. 'But what we will do is to ensure that we comply and we work with the inquiry to make sure that we do everything we can to stop this hideous approach and the things that are happening to young girls in our community stop.'

MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'
MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'

Rhyl Journal

time4 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'

It is expected MPs will have a vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since November's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is now weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacing of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have also been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists. Disability campaigners have voiced worries about coercion and how vulnerable people could be caught up in any new law, although the proposed legislation is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball as well as former director of public prosecutions Sir Max Hill. On Tuesday, Mr Streeting confirmed no money has yet been allocated for the setting up of an assisted dying service and reiterated the Government is neutral on the Bill. Mr Streeting voted no last year and has since indicated he remains opposed to the Bill. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. He was asked by Labour MP Katrina Murray, who also voted no in November, whether the NHS has the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. 'Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral (on assisted dying). It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, fellow Labour MP who is also opposed to the Bill, claimed an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources'. She said: 'When asked today in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources and could become the trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. 'I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and the three-member expert panels would cost an average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, although overall implementation costs of a service were not possible to work out yet. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Commons Leader Lucy Powell for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesperson pointed out that it is a Private Members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store