Middle-aged Americans more lonely than older generations: Study
The peer-reviewed research, published in Aging and Mental Health, shows loneliness generally increases with age -- with only the US and the Netherlands representing places where middle-aged people feel more lonely than older generations.
'There is a general perception that people get lonelier as they age, but the opposite is actually true in the US where middle-aged people are lonelier than older generations,' said lead author Robin Richardson, a social and psychiatric epidemiologist and assistant professor at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health.
Advocacy and interventions to address the loneliness epidemic have historically focused on older adults and adolescents. Middle-aged adults represent a critical population that is being overlooked, he mentioned.
Loneliness is a significant public health concern, responsible for a wide range of physiological, cognitive, mental and behavioural health outcomes that decrease quality of life and increase the risk of disease.
Using data from 64,324 older adults in countries across Europe, North America, and the Middle East, Richardson collaborated with experts from Columbia University; McGill University in Canada; and Universidad Mayor in Santiago, Chile.
The team found that while loneliness generally increased with age, the size of the increase was greater in some countries than others. Adults in Bulgaria and Latvia reported the most substantial increase in loneliness as people age. They found that adults in Cyprus and Greece had the highest prevalence of loneliness among adults aged 50–90 years.
The US had a substantially higher prevalence of loneliness among middle-aged adults, a pattern shared with only one other country, the Netherlands.
Being unmarried, not working, depression and poor health were major reasons why loneliness varied with age, but the importance of these contributors and the combination of factors were different in each country.
For example, in the US, not working was the top reason for a higher amount of loneliness among middle-aged adults, while in other countries it resulted in more loneliness among older adults.
The authors suggest this could be due to the unique social circumstances middle-aged adults face, such as highly constrained leisure time to socialise due to competing work, childcare, and aging parents' caregiving demands.
Given that loneliness varies across location and life circumstances, health policies and social programs to reduce loneliness should first confirm which age groups are at highest risk of loneliness in a particular setting, the authors noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
6 hours ago
- Economic Times
US: At least 600 CDC employees are getting final termination notices, union says
Synopsis The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is issuing permanent termination notices to at least 600 employees following a recent court decision. These cuts affect various departments, including violence prevention, impacting experts trained to address such issues. AP The campus of Centers for Disease Control and Preventio, in Atlanta At least 600 employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are receiving permanent termination notices in the wake of a recent court decision that protected some CDC employees from layoffs but not others. The notices went out this week and many people have not yet received them, according to the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 2,000 dues-paying members at CDC. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday did not offer details on the layoffs and referred an AP reporter to a March statement that said restructuring and downsizing were intended to make health agencies more responsive and efficient. AFGE officials said they are aware of at least 600 CDC employees being cut. But "due to a staggering lack of transparency from HHS," the union hasn't received formal notices of who is being laid off," the federation said in a statement on Wednesday. The permanent cuts include about 100 people who worked in violence prevention. Some employees noted those cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer. "The irony is devastating: The very experts trained to understand, interrupt and prevent this kind of violence were among those whose jobs were eliminated," some of the affected employees wrote in a blog post last week. On April 1, the HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of a sweeping overhaul designed to vastly shrink the agencies responsible for protecting and promoting Americans' health. Many have been on administrative leave since then - paid but not allowed to work - as lawsuits played out. A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted diseases. But the ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency, including in the freedom of information office. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were told. Affected projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children - an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals. "There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace," said Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
Heart health: US cardiologist reveals why LDL cholesterol above 60 is a red flag for your heart; recommends early blood tests
Heart disease is still the #1 killer in the U.S., claiming more lives each year. In 2022 alone, nearly a million Americans lost their lives to cardiovascular disease, a massive number that hits about one person every 34 seconds. Scary, right? What's worse: almost half of all American adults already have some form of cardiovascular disease, whether they know it or not. Multiple risk factors like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, smoking, and plain old genetics can sneak up on anyone. High blood pressure and cholesterol especially keep creeping higher, and estimates say that by 2050, more than 180 million Americans will have hypertension and obesity, with diabetes cases also soaring. Recently, Dr Alo, a US cardiologist took to Instagram to share two blood tests that according to him can detect heart disease risk decades earlier. Cholesterol: The good, the bad, and the confusing When you get a 'cholesterol check,' your doctor probably looks at your total cholesterol, LDL ('bad' cholesterol), HDL ('good' cholesterol), and triglycerides. For years, LDL was seen as the main villain, believed to clog up arteries and cause heart attacks or strokes. Dr Alo warns of LDL levels above 60mg/dL. "The higher above 60, the faster it takes to get things worse," warns the doctor. LDL cholesterol, often called 'bad cholesterol,' is well known for its role in raising the risk of heart disease and stroke if it's too high. Most doctors recommend keeping LDL levels below 100mg/dL for generally healthy adults, if you have heart disease, your target is below 70mg/dL, as per the American Heart Association . A meta-analysis in JAMA Cardiology found that pushing LDL cholesterol below the old 'safe' cutoff of 70 mg/dL isn't just okay, it's actually really good for your heart. Researchers looked at a huge group of patients with heart disease whose LDL levels averaged 70 or lower. For every 39 mg/dL drop in LDL, their risk of heart attacks, strokes, and other cardiovascular events went down by about 20%. To put that in perspective, if someone's LDL dropped from 70 down to around 31, their odds of having a serious heart event were 20% lower. That's a big deal. What's more, it didn't matter how people lowered their LDL. Whether through statins (which reduce production in the liver), ezetimibe (which blocks absorption in the gut), or newer injectable PCSK9 inhibitors (which help the liver clear LDL from the blood), the benefits were the same. And here's the kicker, there were no added risks even when LDL was driven super low, as low as 20 mg/dL. No spike in diabetes, liver issues, cancer, or bleeding strokes. Bottom line: lower really is better when it comes to LDL. Also, 'good' cholesterol (HDL) isn't always protective, especially across different race and ethnic groups, and higher HDL levels don't mean lower heart disease risk for everyone. So, while it's important, the regular cholesterol check might not tell the whole story. ApoB: The undercover predictor Here's where apolipoprotein B (ApoB) enters the chat. Every 'bad cholesterol' particle (LDL, VLDL, IDL) carries one molecule of ApoB. This means the ApoB blood test actually counts the number of these dangerous cholesterol particles, offering a clearer picture of just how clogged your arteries could get even if your regular LDL looks normal. Recent research from US experts shows the standard cholesterol panel can miss people who look 'fine' on paper but actually have a hidden, high-risk profile based on their ApoB. In fact, some doctors now believe ApoB is the best single marker for cholesterol-related heart disease risk, beating out LDL alone. Why catching this early matters Heart disease takes decades to build up before it causes symptoms, says Dr Alo. If you want to sidestep a heart attack or worse down the line, the secret weapon is catching warning signs early, sometimes in your 20s, 30s, or 40s. The earlier you know if you're at risk, the sooner you can change your diet, get moving, or start meds to stack the odds in your favor.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
US: At least 600 CDC employees are getting final termination notices, union says
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is issuing permanent termination notices to at least 600 employees following a recent court decision. These cuts affect various departments, including violence prevention, impacting experts trained to address such issues. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads At least 600 employees of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are receiving permanent termination notices in the wake of a recent court decision that protected some CDC employees from layoffs but not notices went out this week and many people have not yet received them, according to the American Federation of Government Employees, which represents more than 2,000 dues-paying members at U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on Wednesday did not offer details on the layoffs and referred an AP reporter to a March statement that said restructuring and downsizing were intended to make health agencies more responsive and officials said they are aware of at least 600 CDC employees being "due to a staggering lack of transparency from HHS," the union hasn't received formal notices of who is being laid off," the federation said in a statement on permanent cuts include about 100 people who worked in violence prevention. Some employees noted those cuts come less than two weeks after a man fired at least 180 bullets into the CDC's campus and killed a police officer."The irony is devastating: The very experts trained to understand, interrupt and prevent this kind of violence were among those whose jobs were eliminated," some of the affected employees wrote in a blog post last April 1, the HHS officials sent layoff notices to thousands of employees at the CDC and other federal health agencies, part of a sweeping overhaul designed to vastly shrink the agencies responsible for protecting and promoting Americans' have been on administrative leave since then - paid but not allowed to work - as lawsuits played out.A federal judge in Rhode Island last week issued a preliminary ruling that protected employees in several parts of the CDC, including groups dealing with smoking, reproductive health, environmental health, workplace safety, birth defects and sexually transmitted the ruling did not protect other CDC employees, and layoffs are being finalized across other parts of the agency, including in the freedom of information office. The terminations were effective as of Monday, employees were projects included work to prevent rape, child abuse and teen dating violence. The laid-off staff included people who have helped other countries to track violence against children - an effort that helped give rise to an international conference in November at which countries talked about setting violence-reduction goals."There are nationally and internationally recognized experts that will be impossible to replace," said Tom Simon, the retired senior director for scientific programs at the CDC's Division of Violence Prevention.
