Trump and Musk slashing and burning through USAID is unwise - and possibly illegal
So, this is mostly an inside-the-beltway spitting match between an administration hell-bent on shaking up Washington and an agency offering a lustrous menu of help, financial and otherwise, motivated in part by noble altruism and in part by a mission to spread American methods and values throughout the world.
When I was a media consultant, I worked under contracts issued by IREX and Internews, two prominent media nonprofits that have spread the ideals and practices of good journalism throughout the world for decades. I drew on my five decades of experience in various news organizations, including CNN, Radio Free Europe and USA Today. I retired in 2014, soon after the current, less admirable trends in broadcast news took root.
Most of my work was funded under USAID contracts.
My assignments between 2003 and 2010 included:
Helping a television station in Podgorica, Montenegro, seeking to be the dominant independent news outlet in that emerging Balkan republic. I taught the owners and staff the basics of TV news gathering, production and broadcasting, as well as the professional and ethical principles that guided my profession during my career. The station enjoyed a good run before it was bought and then closed in 2014.
Creating an online news service in Kosovo to provide credible, reliable news scripts for the many mom-and-pop radio stations sprouting in that newly independent state. Last time I checked, KosovaLive was in business.
Teaching TV journalism principles to a small class of young Armenian broadcast news professionals who had won a competition to participate. For five weeks, they attended my class every morning to learn about the basics of how to do TV news the right way. Then they produced stories for a simulated newscast they produced. Some of the stories also ran on mainstream Yerevan television stations. The kids were talented and motivated. After the program, they returned to their stations and used what they had learned about professional practices and ethics in their real jobs (if their bosses let them).
Helping an Albanian entrepreneur start up his 24-hour Albanian language TV news channel called Alsat. I counseled everyone from executives to studio techs on how to get the channel up and running and how to keep it running in terms of news production and business administration. The broadcast center near downtown Tirana was state of the art, but the owner worried more about profits than professionalism (imagine that) and it eventually folded. Nevertheless, the staffers had profited from real-time experience in hands-on news production with lessons that stayed with them long after Alsat closed.
In 2010, creating a sustainable business plan for an Afghan nonprofit organization called the Nai Media Institute. Its mission was to foster professional, independent journalism in Afghanistan, particularly in the surprisingly robust and competitive TV news industry that blossomed after Taliban rule was overthrown. I created a detailed plan for how Nai could survive financially while it provided the Afghan news industry guidance and training to emulate the standards accepted by the world's open societies. It thrived until late January, when it suspended operations without explanation. See Taliban.
So, what's the point? These tasks and thousands like them were funded and supervised by USAID. The goal was simple: Teach accepted principles of journalism in countries where new media were emerging or were in danger of succumbing to the corrupt demands of politicians and oligarchs. Free and open news media — that seemed to be a concept most Americans could embrace.
Now I'm not so sure. The agency fostering those and other American ideals is being hammered and gutted by an administration whose modus operandi seems to be slash and burn.
If the new administration wants to curtail or even dissolve USAID, that's its right. It won the election and its party controls all three branches of government. But there are laws and regulations and court decisions and even — wait for it — the U.S. Constitution that serve as guardrails for such reforms.
Trump and Elon Musk (how did I miss his Senate confirmation hearings?) are bludgeoning their way to their political and ideological goals. In the process, they are battering one institution that promotes the very American principles they claim to cherish.
USAID, like most government programs, is not perfect. In my work, I saw a number of projects that were misguided or even naive. However, I have to believe the bulk of USAID programs around the world made peoples' lives better and enhanced the reputation and appreciation of the United States.
USAID might need some reforms and reorganization, but the current MAGA methods appear harsh and maybe even illegal. It's hard to see which group or institution (Congress? the Supreme Court?) can stop this purge.
The Trump administration could probably achieve its goals at USAID and other agencies if it followed the established rules and laws to reach an outcome to its satisfaction.
But that takes analysis, planning, time and patience. What's going on now at USAID and elsewhere is not reform, not reorganization. It's a regime's tantrum. It's so disturbing. And so unnecessary.
Theodore Iliff is a retired journalist and writer. He lives in Olathe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House aims to fast-track key Federal Reserve pick
The White House is working over the August recess to build momentum for a key Federal Reserve nominee the administration wants in place next month. Stephen Miran, whom President Donald Trump tapped to temporarily serve on the Federal Reserve's board, has been meeting with members of the Senate Banking Committee, which will need to green-light his nomination before the full Senate can vote on confirmation. Miran met Tuesday with Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ind.), a member of the panel, and had a call last week with Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott (R-S.C.). Miran is scheduled to have additional meetings with senators in the coming days, with invitations for one-on-ones extended to Republican members of the Banking panel. 'The White House has been aggressively pushing Dr. Miran's nomination to the Federal Reserve Board, setting the stage for his quick confirmation when the Senate returns in September,' said a White House official Tuesday. 'With the President's strong backing, there's clear momentum to get this done.' Underscoring how big of a priority it has become for the Trump administration to seat Miran quickly, Banks said in a statement he returned to Washington Tuesday to meet with him, instead of waiting until after the Senate's current weekslong break. 'It's so important that he is confirmed before the Federal Reserve's September meeting,' said Banks. Installing Miran by this time would represent a lightning-fast confirmation process for the Senate, which is in recess until Sept. 2. Banks added that Miran has 'done a great job as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to advance President Trump's pro-working class agenda and I look forward to voting for his confirmation ASAP.' Miran, who currently serves as Trump's chief economist, was tapped to temporarily fill the vacancy created on the bank's rate-setting committee by the resignation of Gov. Adriana Kugler. If confirmed, he would hold the seat until Kugler's term expires on Jan. 31, 2026. He'll be coming up for consideration at a time when multiple Senate Republicans have publicly tried to sway Trump against firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell, warning that any perception of meddling in the agency's independence would have severe consequences for the market. Trump, who has relentlessly criticized Powell and surveyed a group of Republicans last month on whether he should remove him, has nevertheless said repeatedly that he doesn't intend to fire the Fed chief, whose leadership term ends in May. Still, Miran's confirmation would give Trump a close political ally at the central bank, which is designed to be insulated from short-term political pressure — and questions about Miran's links to Trump are all but guaranteed to come up as the Senate debates the nomination. Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, vowed to have 'tough questions' for Miran 'about whether he'd serve the American people as an independent voice at the Fed or merely serve Donald Trump.' Yet as long as Republicans on the panel stick together, they would be able to advance Miran's nomination over opposition from Democrats. Republicans can lose three of their own members on the floor and still let Vice President JD Vance break a tie. Miran is likely preparing for the line of inquiry. Though he haspreviously called for overhauling the structure of the Federal Reserve, he told CNBC in an interview earlier this month that "I've always been clear that the independence of the Fed is of paramount importance.' Victoria Guida contributed to this report.
USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Get rid of mail-in voting? Trump goal sparks debate, threatened lawsuits
Trump has long railed against mail-in voting but experts say states and the Congress control election rules rather than the president. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump's latest push to end absentee voting has ignited a firestorm of criticism and intense debate about the nation's election rules as the next midterm and presidential campaigns kick into gear. Election-law experts said a president has no role in governing elections. Advocacy groups threatened lawsuits aiming to block Trump. And Democrats braced for a political fight heading into the 2026 and 2028 election cycles as they look to rebound after a disastrous 2024 campaign. 'The Constitution gives states and Congress the power to run elections," said Michael Waldman, CEO of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. "Presidents have no lawful role.' But White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Aug. 19 that Trump would work with lawmakers to end mail-in voting because "this is a priority for the president." Here's what you need to know: How popular is mail-in voting? Mail-in voting is widespread and popular. Out of 155 million votes cast in 2024, nearly 47 million were mailed in, according to the Election Assistance Commission. Most states allow absentee voting for no reason, but some states require an excuse to avoid showing up in person. Eight states and Washington, DC, allow elections to be conducted entirely by mail, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington state mail ballots to all registered voters. Oregon Secretary of State Tobias Read said vote-by-mail elections are secure, accurate and honest. 'If he actually understood or cared about the American people, he'd know mail-in-voting is the best way to protect everyone's right to vote, especially rural folks, elderly people and hourly workers,' Read said. 'Mail-in-voting meets citizens exactly where they are: in their living rooms and around their kitchen tables.' Trump seeks to end mail-in voting Trump said Aug. 18 he would sign an executive order to abolish mail-in voting, which he slammed as vulnerable to fraud. Trump has long complained about absentee voting, since before the COVID-19 pandemic that shut down many in-person events. 'We're going to end mail-in voting," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. "It's a fraud." Trump's announcement came while special House races are pending in Arizona and Tennessee; New Jersey and Virginia will be choosing governors in November this year; and some big-city mayors will be chosen in New York and elsewhere. The whole country will be voting on House races and one-third of the Senate 2026, and for president in 2028. Despite Trump's claims, election experts said voting is the most secure in history. "As we have said repeatedly, our election infrastructure has never been more secure and the election community never better prepared to deliver safe, secure, free and fair elections for the American people," Jen Easterly, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said after the 2024 election. David Becker, executive director of the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation and Research, which works with election officials of both parties to ensure secure elections, said ballots are the most verifiable and recountable in history with only Louisiana not voting on paper. Audits confirm the results, he said. And Congress approved ID requirements to register to vote in the 2002 Help America Vote Act, which followed the razor-thin victory of President George W. Bush over Al Gore in 2000. Trump, Democrats expect political fight over mail-in ballots Trump argued the 2020 presidential result was rigged after what his aides called a "red mirage" of an Election Day lead disappeared as mail-in ballots were counted and Joe Biden won the White House. "I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS," Trump said in a social media post Aug. 18 advocating an end to mail-in voting. During the 2024 campaign, Republicans supported mail-in voting to avoid handing Democrats an advantage even as Trump occasionally criticized them. But the GOP sought an Election Day deadline for mailed ballots to be counted. Leavitt said the White House will work with lawmakers at federal and state levels to change the law. 'When the Congress comes back to Washington, I'm sure there will be many discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill and also our friends in state Legislatures across the country to ensure we're protecting the integrity of the vote for the American people," Leavitt said. But Democrats vowed to fight Trump efforts to undermine mail-in voting. While Republicans in the House could potentially approve a bill, it would face a steep challenge in the Senate, where 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster and where the GOP holds a 53-47 majority. 'Senate Democrats will make sure that any and every measure that would make it even more difficult for Americans to vote will be dead on arrival in the Senate and will continue to fight to protect our democracy," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York. Experts: States control election rules, not presidents The Constitution unambiguously says states regulate elections and only Congress can change that, Becker said. 'Getting rid of mail voting, which has been around since at least the U.S. Civil War, and which is offered by the vast majority of states, red and blue, is an incredibly bad idea that would make our elections much less secure and vulnerable to interference,' said Becker, a former election lawyer at the Justice Department. 'He has zero power to change election policy with the swipe of the pen, as the founders expressly stated.' Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said Trump "has no constitutional authority to end mail voting by executive order." "The Framers of the U.S. Constitution took care to keep the main responsibility for administering elections with the states and localities, which are in no way mere 'agents' of federal authorities," Olson said. Advocacy groups expect lawsuits if Trump moves against mail-in voting Federal courts have repeatedly recognized the state role in elections, including when a judge largley blocked Trump's March executive order dealing with elections. In Massachusetts, U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of President Barack Obama, blocked parts of Trump's order that sought to require voters to prove they are citizens and to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots after Election Day. Trump is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," Casper wrote. Advocacy groups said getting rid of mail-in voting could discourage millions of people who appreciate the flexiblity of avoiding voting in person on Election Day. "Many veterans, grappling with service-related disabilities like mobility impairments or PTSD, rely on this accessible method to vote independently and privately from home, avoiding the physical and emotional toll of in-person polling," said Naveed Shah, political director for Common Defense, a group representing military veterans and their families. Advocates from several groups expected lawsuits to challenge any Trump order seeking to abolish mail-in voting. 'We are prepared to protect mail-in voting in court against unfounded and unconstitutional attacks, as we have in Pennsylvania, Mississippi and other states,' said Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project. 'Access to mail-in voting is necessary to a fair and inclusive electoral process.'
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump says he's ended 6 (or 7) wars. Here's some context.
Every U.S. president has world conflicts land on his desk, and Trump has used the power of his office, including the threat of economic penalties, to intervene in several this year, leading to an end to fighting. In some cases, warring parties have credited him with advancing peace or calming hostilities. In others, his role is disputed or less clear — or fighting goes on. Asked for clarification, the White House provided a list of the six wars he says he has resolved. It did not respond to a subsequent question about the seventh. Advertisement Armenia and Azerbaijan Trump brought the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan to the White House this month to sign a joint declaration aimed at bringing their long-running conflict closer to an end. It was not a peace deal, but it was the first commitment toward one since fighting broke out in the late 1980s when a weakening Soviet Union unleashed interethnic strife in the Caucasus. Advertisement Both leaders praised Trump, who stepped into a conflict that had long been mediated by Russia, until President Vladimir Putin's attention shifted after his 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As part of the agreement, Armenia said it would grant the United States rights to develop a major transit corridor through its territory, the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity. The project has been described as an economic game changer for the region that would better connect Europe with Azerbaijan and Central Asia. But it is not clear when the route will open and on what terms. And major barriers to a lasting peace remain. Azerbaijan continues to demand that Armenia change its constitution to remove mentions of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan took over in 2023. Azerbaijan also occupies small areas of Armenia, citing security concerns, and the countries have not agreed on a shared border. For now, the border between the two nations is closed, diplomatic ties remain broken. Congo and Rwanda In June, the top diplomats from Rwanda and Congo came to the Oval Office to sign a peace agreement aimed at ending a war that has raged for over three decades. Qatar also played a major role in the deal, which was intended to pave the way to a full peace agreement. Trump called the accord 'a glorious triumph.' But talks on a comprehensive agreement have since faltered and deadly fighting has continued. On Monday, the main rebel group in eastern Congo, known as M23 and backed by Rwanda, threatened to renege on the U.S.-backed deal, claiming that its primary foe, the Congolese army, had broken its terms. Advertisement India and Pakistan Trump has taken credit for mediating an end to a military escalation between the two nuclear powers that broke out after a terrorist attack in Kashmir this spring killed 26 civilians. India has acknowledged the American role in mediating but says it negotiated an end to the fighting directly with Pakistan. India claims that Pakistani officials asked for ceasefire talks under pressure from India's military assaults. Pakistan denies this and has thanked Trump for helping to end the hostilities. The differing accounts have contributed to a deterioration of relations between Washington and New Delhi, which is also playing out in Trump's trade war. Pakistan, which said it would nominate Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for his mediation, faces U.S. tariffs of 19%. India, on the other hand, faces a crippling 50% tariff, a rate that could crush the country's exporters. Israel and Iran After 12 days of strikes in June that included U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump abruptly announced a ceasefire agreement. He said the United States had mediated it and claimed that Israel had turned around its warplanes at his behest. 'It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!' he posted on Truth Social. Although neither side has disputed the American role in the truce, its durability remains in question. Talks have broken off between Iran and the United States on the future of Tehran's nuclear program, which Israel considers an existential threat. And while American intelligence assesses that the U.S. bombings badly damaged Iran's most advanced nuclear enrichment site, some experts believe Tehran could eventually resume enriching uranium, which is needed to build a nuclear weapon, at other sites. Advertisement Cambodia and Thailand The two Southeast Asian neighbors engaged this summer in days of fighting that killed at least 42 people and displaced more than 300,000, one of the bloodiest conflicts between them in decades. At the time, the Trump administration was discussing trade deals with a host of countries, and Trump said he had told the leaders of Thailand and Cambodia that he would stop trade talks unless they agreed to a ceasefire. Two days later, officials met in Malaysia for talks organized by Malaysian and U.S. officials and reached a deal to pause hostilities. 'They will hopefully get along for many years to come,' Trump said afterward. Critics of Trump's approach say his intervention did not address the underlying issues of the conflict, though fighting has stopped. Egypt and Ethiopia Egypt and Ethiopia face not a military conflict but a diplomatic dispute over Africa's largest hydroelectric dam. Still, there are fears that it might descend into fighting. (Trump said in 2020 that Egypt had threatened to 'blow up' the dam.) Trump's diplomacy has done little to resolve the dispute. Ethiopia recently announced that it had completed the dam, with an official opening scheduled for next month. Egypt and Sudan continue to oppose the project, fearing it will limit the flow of water from the Nile River to their countries. This article originally appeared in .
