RSF blasts Al Jazeera journalist's ‘murder by Israeli army'
PARIS : Reporters Without Borders (RSF) today condemned the 'acknowledged murder by the Israeli army' of Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif in Gaza, who the armed forces admitted they had targeted.
Where Israel accused al-Sharif of being a 'terrorist' affiliated with Hamas, the press freedom campaign group told AFP he was 'one of the most famous journalists from the Gaza Strip (and) the voice of the suffering Israel has imposed on Palestinians in Gaza'.
The NGO 'strongly and angrily condemns the acknowledged murder by the Israeli army' of al-Sharif and other journalists in a strike yesterday on their tent in Gaza City, it added.
Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera said yesterday that five of its journalists had been killed in an Israeli strike.
Al-Sharif, 28, was one of the channel's most recognisable faces working on the ground in Gaza, providing daily reports in regular coverage.
He was killed alongside fellow correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, Al Jazeera said.
The Israeli military said it had targeted al-Sharif, saying he 'posed as a journalist' but was in fact 'the head of a terrorist cell… responsible for advancing rocket attacks against Israeli civilians and IDF troops'.
RSF called the Israeli allegations 'baseless'.
Almost 200 journalists have been killed in the war Israel launched in response to Hamas's Oct 7, 2023, assault, according to RSF.
The media has filed four complaints against Israel at the International Criminal Court for alleged 'war crimes committed against journalists in Gaza'.
'In (yesterday's) deliberate attack, the Israeli army reproduced a known method already tested, notably against Al Jazeera journalists,' RSF said, pointing to the killings of two reporters on July 31 last year.
Israel labelled one of those men, Ismail al-Ghoul, a 'terrorist'.
RSF called on other countries to intervene, saying the UN Security Council should meet to insist on protection of journalists in conflict zones.
'Without strong action from the international community to stop the Israeli army… we're likely to witness more such extrajudicial murders of media professionals,' RSF said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
New row erupts between Israeli defence minister, army chief
Israel's military chief Eyal Zamir favours encircling Gaza City rather than conquering it. (AFP pic) JERUSALEM : Israel's defence minister today reprimanded the country's military chief over appointments made without his approval, as tensions simmered between the military and the executive ahead of a planned expansion of the war in Gaza. A statement from the defence minister Israel Katz's ministry said that deliberations conducted by chief of staff lieutenant-general Eyal Zamir on military appointments 'took place… without prior coordination or agreement' with the minister. The statement added that this was 'in violation of accepted procedure' and that Katz therefore 'does not intend to discuss or approve any of the appointments or names that were published'. In an army statement published shortly afterwards, Zamir responded that he was 'the sole authority authorised to appoint officers from the rank of colonel upwards'. 'The chief of staff makes the appointment decisions – after which the appointment is brought to the minister for approval,' the statement added. Tensions have been simmering for two weeks between the chief of staff and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government over the next steps in the military operation in Gaza, aimed at freeing the remaining hostages and defeating Hamas. Israeli media reported that Zamir was opposed to a plan approved by the security cabinet on Friday to take control of all of densely populated Gaza City. Israeli media reported that Zamir favoured encircling Gaza's largest city, rather than conquering it. The Israeli army controls around 75% of the Palestinian territory which has been devastated by 22 months of war. Zamir, who was appointed in March after his predecessor was dismissed, said last week that he would continue expressing the military's position 'without fear, in a pragmatic, independent, and professional manner'. Katz meanwhile said that the army chief could 'express his views', but that the military would ultimately have to 'execute' any government decisions on Gaza.
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
US watchdog: Taliban divert aid by force, sideline minorities, collude with UN officials
WASHINGTON, Aug 14 — Afghanistan's Taliban rulers divert international aid by force and other means, block minority communities from receiving aid and may collude with UN officials to seek kickbacks, a US watchdog said on Tuesday. The US Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) said its findings were based on input from nearly 90 current and former US officials, UN officials and others. The sources included Afghans in Afghanistan, the report said. 'In Afghanistan, SIGAR found that the Taliban use every means at their disposal, including force, to ensure that aid goes where they want it to go, as opposed to where donors intend,' the report said. Taliban spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat denied the allegations. He said international aid is distributed independently in Afghanistan and government agencies cooperate 'to ensure transparency' and prevent diversion. SIGAR said an employee of an Afghan aid organisation who participated in the report was killed for exposing the diversion of food aid to a Taliban military training camp. But it could not confirm who was responsible. The UN did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reuters could not independently confirm the charges. International donors provided US$10.72 billion (RM45 billion) in aid, including US$3.83 billion by the United States, between August 2021 when the Taliban took over Afghanistan and April 2025 when the Trump administration ended most US aid, the report said. The report said the Taliban used force and regulatory powers among other means to control aid. This included determining which humanitarian groups can operate, directing US-funded aid to favored majority Pashtun communities at the expense of minorities and extorting humanitarian workers. SIGAR also heard from interviewees allegations that UN officials demanded bribes from companies and aid groups for UN contracts, the report said. Taliban officials allegedly 'collude with UN officials to extort bribes from UN contractors and then split the proceeds,' the report said. — Reuters
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Hong Kong court postpones closing arguments in Jimmy Lai trial
HONG KONG: A court hearing for jailed Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai was postponed on Thursday due to bad weather, further lengthening a national security trial that began in 2023. The city's weather observatory hoisted the highest-level rainstorm warning for around three hours on Thursday morning, leading the judiciary to cancel hearings for the day. The 77-year-old founder of the Apple Daily newspaper is charged with foreign collusion under Hong Kong's national security law, which Beijing imposed following huge and sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019. On Thursday lawyers were expected to present closing arguments as Lai's trial enters its final stages. The judiciary said Thursday that those due to attend postponed hearings should return on Friday. The media tycoon has been kept behind bars since Dec 2020, reportedly in solitary confinement, with Western nations and rights groups calling for his release. Aside from the collusion offence -- which could land him in prison for life -- Lai is also charged with "seditious publication" related to 161 op-eds he allegedly wrote. The tycoon gave spirited courtroom testimony over more than 50 days during the trial, fielding questions about his political ideology, management style and overseas contacts. Lai described himself at least twice as a "political prisoner", which drew sharp rebukes from the three-judge panel. Hong Kong authorities have repeatedly rejected criticism related to Lai, saying last month that his case was "handled strictly on the basis of evidence and in accordance with the law". Antoine Bernard of Reporters Without Borders said on Tuesday that Lai's treatment "exposes the authorities' ruthless determination to silence and suppress one of the most prominent advocates for press freedom amid Hong Kong's rapidly deteriorating media landscape". Judges had previously indicated that a verdict could be reached by October.
