Ohio Democrats elect Kathleen Clyde as new party chair ahead of 2026 election
The Democrats' executive committee tapped Clyde to replace former party chair Liz Walters, who resigned to become CEO of a political data firm in Washington, D.C. The shakeup came months after a brutal election for Ohio Democrats, leaving state Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Brunner as the only Democrat in statewide office.
Get The Scoop!: Sign up for our weekly Ohio politics podcast
Despite past defeats, Clyde believes the party has an opportunity to capitalize on backlash against President Donald Trump and reclaim power in 2026. In her new role, she'll help recruit and support candidates, raise money and organize get-out-the-vote efforts.
"Democrats need to unify around a message that shows what these harmful policies coming out of Washington and the statehouse mean for our economy, our health care, social security," Clyde told the statehouse bureau ahead of the June 10 vote. "We need to offer a compelling message about what Democrats do when they're in power."
Clyde, a Portage County native who lives in Columbus, was once considered a rising star in the Ohio Democratic Party. She served four terms in the Ohio House and unsuccessfully ran for secretary of state in 2018. After that, she was appointed to the Portage County Board of Commissioners, but lost when she ran for her seat two years later.
Clyde had the backing of former Sen. Sherrod Brown, who Democrats hope will run for governor or U.S. Senate in 2026. Several Democrats challenged Clyde in the race for chair, but her biggest rival − state Sen. Bill DeMora of Columbus − dropped out before the vote.
DeMora said he wasn't supporting any remaining candidates, including Clyde.
As party chair, Clyde said she wants to tackle urban, suburban and rural areas with different strategies and work with county parties to meet voters where they are. She said Democrats also need to address depressed turnout in Ohio's largest cities and ensure they listen to the needs of Black voters who abandoned the party.
"I feel confident that we can come together as Democrats and focus on the work ahead of turning the state around and winning at all levels of government for the working people and putting the needs of Ohioans first," Clyde said.
State government reporter Haley BeMiller can be reached at hbemiller@gannett.com or @haleybemiller on X.
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Kathleen Clyde to lead Ohio Democratic Party for 2026 election
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zohran Mamdani is a political risk Democrats shouldn't take
In a twist of comic irony, New York City — the embodiment of American capitalism — may soon have a democratic socialist mayor in 33 year old Zohran Mamdani. That being said, assuming Mamdani wins November's general election, the joke may be on national Democrats. Put another way, even as a mayoral candidate, by dint of New York City's status and his elevation into a national figure, Mamdani presents severe risks to the Democratic Party on the national stage. And as the party looks to regain even one chamber of Congress next year, there is a very real chance that Mamdani's extreme, socialist policies put the entire party's political fortunes in jeopardy. The first risk is if Mamdani's primary victory portends, or ushers in, a seismic shift for the wider Democratic Party. Coming at a time when Democrats are at a crossroads, Mamdani's win may embolden progressives, sideline moderates and drive the party further to the left. If this is the direction the Democratic Party moves in, they will end up even less politically relevant than they are today. At the same time, Mamdani's views are considerably out of line with what mainstream Democratic views should be — particularly on the economy and public safety. The U.S. is a capitalist nation. Although more can be done to ensure everyone has an equal opportunity and is protected by a social safety net, the U.S. is not a socialist country. And on public safety, Mamdani, a past proponent of 'defund the police,' is pledging to move 'billions of dollars (from the NYPD budget) to a new Department of Community Safety' that emphasizes soft on crime measures, according to New York Post reporting. With Democrats already struggling to overcome perceptions that they can't be trusted to handle the economy or public safety. And given New York City's prominence, Mamdani's policies may quickly become the face of the entire party, a gift to the GOP. The second, and arguably biggest, risk Mamdani poses lies in how he would govern. Mamdani campaigned on endless handouts backed by huge tax increases, replacing police officers with social workers, and Soviet-inspired government-run grocery stores. Whether Mamdani is able to implement any, or all, of these campaign pledges or not, Democrats will find themselves between a rock and a hard place. Either Mamdani is seen as ineffective, and just another Democrat who promised utopia but was unable to actually deliver on his lofty promises. Or, more dangerously, New Yorkers get a firsthand lesson on the dangers of socialism, sparking a considerable backlash against the Democratic Party as a whole. Worse, with New York City being a global center of culture, finance and entertainment, the entire country will witness the damage from Mamdani's policies. When government-run grocery stores show themselves to be a horrendous idea, which the Soviet Union has already shown them to be, Republicans will immediately pounce on this failure to underscore the danger in electing any Democrat. Should crime spike due to a sharp reduction in the number of police officers, Democrats across the country will be branded as soft on crime. Similarly, if excessively high taxes on the city's high-earners cause capital flight, a destruction of the city's tax base and drastically lower the overall quality of life, voters' trust in Democrats to handle the economy will sink, and it's already tremendously low. Finally, there is the issue of how Mamdani will govern the city with the world's largest Jewish population outside of Israel. Due to his history of antisemitic remarks, whether his refusal to condemn 'globalize the intifada' or unwillingness to accept Israel as a Jewish state, vitriol he's never shared for other ethnoreligious states, there are very real concerns that under his leadership, New York City will be even more hostile for Jews. Far from being a local issue, if Mamdani fails to protect New York's Jewish citizens, it will reinforce perceptions that the Democratic Party is rife with antisemitism. To be sure, national Democrats seem to be aware of the risks Mamdani poses. Some moderates, such as Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), have been blunt, saying Mamdani's 'policies do not comport' with Democrats' agenda. Others, including House Minority Leader Hakeem Jefferies (D-N.Y.) have taken a softer approach, but still indicate some unease with the socialist who has become the face of the Democratic Party. Speaking to CNBC's 'Squawk Box' on Thursday, Jefferies refused to endorse Mamdani or even say whether he was 'convinced' about Mamdani and the kind of mayor he would be. Asked about Mamdani's policy proposals, Jefferies said, 'Now, he's going to have to demonstrate…that his ideas can actually be put into reality.' Hardly a show of confidence from a party leader. Taken together, the elevation of Mamdani and his extreme views may deepen the animosity and alienation many voters feel when they think about today's Democratic Party. If voters see Mamdani's leadership devastating New York City and come to believe that this is what the Democratic Party has to offer, it stands to reason that Democrats across the country will pay the price, and likely for many election cycles to come. 'The End of Democracy? Russia and China on the Rise and America in Retreat.'
The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump targets mail-in ballots, ‘seriously controversial' voting machines
President Trump announced Monday that he plans to sign an executive order to eliminate mail-in ballots and 'seriously controversial' voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In a statement on his Truth Social platform, Trump leaned into his long-standing disdain for mail-in voting, saying other countries have abandoned the practice 'because of the MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD ENCOUNTERED.' 'I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election,' Trump wrote in his post. 'WE WILL BEGIN THIS EFFORT, WHICH WILL BE STRONGLY OPPOSED BY THE DEMOCRATS BECAUSE THEY CHEAT AT LEVELS NEVER SEEN BEFORE, by signing an EXECUTIVE ORDER to help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm Elections,' he added. Trump for years has pushed unproven claims about widespread voter fraud involving mail-in ballots. He repeatedly described his 2020 election defeat as 'rigged,' pointing to expanded mail-in balloting that was allowed during the coronavirus pandemic. Nearly a third of ballots cast in the 2024 election were submitted by mail, according to a U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) report released in June. While mail-in ballots didn't hit the record 43-percent level seen during the height of the pandemic four years, they accounted for 30.3 percent of all ballots cast in the election, well above pre-pandemic levels. An effort to dramatically overhaul the way federal elections are run has faced legal roadblocks in recent months. In June, a judge blocked part of Trump's March executive order that sought to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day but arrived later. The judge said the president lacked the authority to impose state election rules. Trump, in his post on Monday, appeared to preempt concerns about the lack of authority. 'Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do,' Trump said. The president accused Democrats of being 'virtually Unelectable without using this completely disproven Mail-In SCAM' and pledged to fight to prevent election integrity. 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,' Trump wrote. 'I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS.' 'THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!! REMEMBER, WITHOUT FAIR AND HONEST ELECTIONS, AND STRONG AND POWERFUL BORDERS, YOU DON'T HAVE EVEN A SEMBLANCE OF A COUNTRY.'
American Military News
28 minutes ago
- American Military News
World Food Program Warns Of ‘Unprecedented' Hunger Crisis In Afghanistan
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission. Kabul residents have told RFE/RL that they are begging for rice and 'ready to accept death,' as the World Food Program (WFP) said it was 'turning hundreds of thousands of people away' from nutrition centers. WFP Country Director John Aylieff said drought, dramatic aid cuts, and the forced return of 1.5 million Afghans from Iran and Pakistan had combined to create 'rising acute malnutrition' in the poverty-stricken country. 'We need to do everything we can to avoid famine,' he told RFE/RL. 'It could be unprecedented because during the winter, there could be 10 to 15 million people needing food assistance. And at the moment, we have no funding and there will be no response.' For the coming six months, the WFP in Afghanistan said it requires nearly $539 million for all programs to reach the most vulnerable families across the country. But multiple donors have slashed contributions. For 2025, the WFP in Afghanistan said it received some $155 million. This compares with nearly $560 million the year before, and nearly $1.6 billion in 2022. 'The US has been a phenomenally generous donor in Afghanistan for decades, providing the lion's share of humanitarian assistance, along with other generous donors from around the world,' Aylieff said. 'Now is not the moment for anyone to reduce or walk away.' RFE/RL has asked the White House for comment. In his first few months in office, President Donald Trump cut more than 7,400 foreign aid programs globally worth $80 billion, according to a report published last month by Senate Democrats. A State Department spokesman told RFE/RL on August 4 that 'over the last approximately four years, foreign assistance intended for the people of Afghanistan was systematically diverted and expropriated by the Taliban — a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group.' Nearly four years since their takeover of Afghanistan, 'it is due time that the Taliban provide for the welfare of the Afghan people,' the spokesman added. 'Ready To Accept Death' The situation has devastating results for people like 42-year-old Kabul resident Gul Dasta. She used to work as a cleaner at the Labor and Social Affairs Ministry. When the Taliban seized power in August 2021, they announced a ban on women working in government offices, and she was fired. Dasta's husband has severe diabetes and cannot work. The couple have a 9-year-old son and two daughters, aged 14 and 16. They have not received an international food aid package for five months. 'There have been days that we had nothing to eat. I have boiled some rice that I begged from the neighbors and fed my children with. Every day in life is so difficult. There have been days that I cried all day,' she told RFE/RL in a phone interview. Another Kabul resident we spoke to broke down in tears during the call. Abeda, 54, is a widow who lives with her 15-year-old son, 26-year-old widowed daughter, and two grandchildren. She was a cleaner at a girls' high school until the Taliban closed it as part of a campaign against education for females. 'Last Thursday I had nothing at home. Not even potatoes or tomatoes. I hated my life. Life is full of pain and trouble. Last Thursday I was even ready to accept death,' she said, during an interview on August 11. Turning People Away Aylieff said the situation was even worse in rural areas, where some 400 clinics providing nutrition had closed down due to lack of funds. 'The result of that is that we're turning hundreds of thousands of people away,' he said. 'Sometimes they would have to walk for five hours to a clinic, the nearest one. Imagine the anguish of showing up and finding the clinic is closed.' Aylieff added that the WFP was currently able to provide food to around 1 million people, compared to 5 million a year ago. But it will soon run out of money, he said, meaning food assistance will stop 'almost completely' by October. Taliban officials have largely avoided public comment on the hunger crisis, instead making vague remarks blaming foreign actors for the country's general economic hardships. For example, a statement by the Economy Ministry back in February said, 'In addition to the financial and economic sanctions imposed by the United States, the freezing of assets has affected Afghanistan's national economy.' RFE/RL has been unable to operate freely in Afghanistan since the Taliban seized power.
