Christchurch Casino agrees to pay $5.06m over compliance issues
In December 2024, 1News reported the casino faced legal action over alleged compliance issues with the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009.
As part of the settlement announced today, the casino has agreed to the High Court imposing a $5.06m penalty, as recommended by the Department of Internal Affairs.
The casino also admitted seven causes of action in the department's amended state of claim, which stretched from December 2018 and December 2023.
In a statement, the department said Christchurch Casino had failed to establish, implement and maintain a programme compliant with the Act, adequately monitor accounts, conduct complaint-enhanced customer due diligence, terminate existing business relationships when required, and keep records as required by the Act.
ADVERTISEMENT
Christchurch Casino was not alleged to have been directly involved in money laundering or the financing of terrorism.
Internal Affairs' director of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism group, Serge Sablyak, said the agreement was a "significant and positive outcome".
"It's encouraging to achieve our intended result without the time and expense of court proceedings," Sablyak said.
"While the regulatory breaches were serious, we acknowledge Christchurch Casino's decision to admit to the breaches and take responsibility for what were substantial failings.
"We're proud that our work has strengthened the integrity of New Zealand's financial system and has helped build public confidence in the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing."
The Department of Internal Affairs and the casino recommended the High Court proceed to a penalty hearing, to determine the appropriate penalty to be imposed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
10 hours ago
- 1News
He went to collect 200kg of meth, but police and Customs were way ahead of him
A West Auckland builder is today starting a jail sentence for importing what he thought was 200kgs of the drug methamphetamine. Joshua Auina-Anae was expecting to collect what Judge Evangelos Thomas called one of our biggest commercial methamphetamine importations. But he found himself at the centre of an international law enforcement operation involving China's Anti-Smuggling Bureau (ASB), NZ Customs and Police. The drugs had been switched out en route from China and he was picked up by New Zealand police when he went to collect the haul. Today Auina-Anae was sentenced at the Auckland District Court to five years in prison. He had previously admitted attempting to possess meth for supply. ADVERTISEMENT Suspicions in China The attempted drug importation first raised suspicions in China on October 16, 2023. Court documents reveal the ASB examined a consignment of two pallets of granite and found the meth stashed inside. Officers removed the drugs and replaced them with a dummy substance before tipping off New Zealand officers. The granite then left aboard the ship the NYK FUSHIMI from Yantian Port. It landed at Ports of Auckland on November 7 that year with Customs and police working on a planned "managed delivery". The granite slabs left the port on November 16 for a freight forwarding company at Airport Oaks and then onto an Avondale storage facility. On November 28 at about 1.15pm a truck, not involved in the importation, picked up the granite and was followed by a Hiace van registered to Auina-Anae. ADVERTISEMENT The vehicles then travelled across the city to a Hobsonville commercial space where the slabs were dropped off. Auina-Anae was observed coming and going from a unit there. At 3.21pm, members of the police's special tactics group arrested Auina-Anae inside the unit. The statement of facts before the court said: "Mr Auina-Anae had smashed the top of one of the granite slabs and had begun accessing the area where the drugs had previously been stored. "Mr Auina-Anae had removed the thin layer of placebo from the top and exposed scoria-type rocks underneath." When officers busted in he had begun placing the dummy substance he thought was meth into containers and had a sledgehammer and crowbar. In a statement to police, Auina-Anae said he received orders to do the job from an unknown person. 'Bottom of the chain' ADVERTISEMENT In the Auckland District Court this afternoon Auina-Anae's lawyer Jasper Rhodes said his client was the definition of a "capture", someone who was at "the bottom of the chain" and "responsible for taking all the risk" but not expecting the profits of those at the top of the operation. Auina-Anae nodded when Judge Thomas told him he had previously been a person of "good character" who had let down his supporters. They filled out the public gallery and their soft crying could be heard throughout the sentencing. Judge Thomas said police caught Auina-Anae "redhanded" after he'd extracted what he thought was methamphetamine, also making the point that if it had been the drug Auina-Anae would've been facing life imprisonment. Judge Thomas noted his sentencing starting point was eight years' imprisonment and listed pleading early, previous good character and time already served as possible discount factors of about 45%. Still, Judge Thomas told the court that applying all of them wouldn't have done justice to the scale of the offending. "This was one of the biggest attempts to manufacture and to import methamphetamine that we have seen. There is a incalculable public interest in deterring methamphetamine crime of any kind," he said. "Having said that, I must still impose the lowest sentence that I possibly can for you, and I do that. "Your sentence is five years in prison." * 1News will have further coverage on the operation to catch Auina-Anae tomorrow.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Sweeping reforms to money laundering laws
Photo: 123RF The government has unveiled sweeping reforms to the country's anti money laundering laws to crack down on dirty money. Set to be in place by the next election, the changes to New Zealand's Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regime aim to shut down dodgy deals, tighten financial loopholes, and take on the criminal underworld, while cutting unnecessary red tape for law-abiding citizens. It is estimated that a staggering $1.35 billion is generated from money laundering in New Zealand every year. The Detail talks to Lloyd Kavanagh, a financial services lawyer and deal maker from Minter Ellison Rudd Watts, about the changes, which include giving police greater powers to freeze bank accounts more quickly, banning cryptocurrency ATMs, introducing a more risk-based system for selling property from family trusts, and making it easier for parents to open bank accounts for their children. Kavanagh also welcomes efforts to streamline and simplify the system by introducing one supervision layer to oversee the rules. "Currently, we have three supervisors who supervise different segments of the market," he tells The Detail. "You have the Reserve Bank, who is the AML supervisor for banks, you have the FMA who oversees securities market participants broadly, and then you have the Department of Internal Affairs, who looks after casinos and everybody else... lenders, lawyers, accountants, real estate agents, and quite a wide range of smaller businesses. "What the government is proposing is... we should have a single supervisor so that they can be consistent in the guidance that they give to reporting entities, and have a total overview of what's going on in the sector. So that is one measure which I think will have a significant impact. "Some of the other measures ... are actually to relieve the administrative burden - one of them is, at the moment, you have to verify your customer's address, which proves to be really difficult for a lot of people.... so, the change will mean you only have to do that if you have got reasons for thinking it's a high-risk customer. "I am actually optimistic that by removing some of the mandatory bureaucracy, resources will get refocused in doing what I think, and I certainly hope all New Zealanders are keen to do, which is to use the pressure on what happens to the proceeds of crime to help us detect crime in the first place." He does have some concerns about giving greater powers to police - "I'm a little reserved about simply giving additional powers to the police if you don't have the right checks and balances" - and questions the ban on cryptocurrency ATMs, which are kiosks that allow users to buy and sell cryptocurrency using cash. "I'm somewhat puzzled by that inclusion because I haven't seen the evidence as to why that would be a particular priority." But ultimately, he believes the law changes will make a difference. "We all benefit if there is less crime in New Zealand. These people [money launderers] make business decisions as to which countries are easier to operate in and profitable to operate in. "And we know from the reports that have come from the government over the last year that New Zealand has an increasing level of drug abuse. We know that we are more and more connected in a world where there are all sorts of transactions going on. "What we need to do is just make ourselves a little bit harder to do bad things in. So, I think these [law changes] are positive steps." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Couple take previous home owner to court after she refuses to leave
A couple who bought a Pāpāmoa Beach house needed a High Court order to remove the previous owner after she refused to leave the property. New owners Benjamin and Chelsea Brown bought the two-bedroom home at a mortgagee sale this year, with settlement taking place on May 21. But the previous owner, Terina O'Connell, said she had been trying to "negotiate a solution with ASB for two years" and had not consented to the sale of her home. As a result, she refused to move out and even went as far as reaching out to people on social media and asking them to come to her home and support her before settlement day. The new owners sought a trespass order on May 22 to remove O'Connell and her supporters, and when that didn't work, they took their case to the High Court. 'The bank does not own my property' According to a recently released High Court decision, Justice Dani Gardiner held a telephone conference on June 6, where O'Connell's position could be heard by all parties. The court was also referred to a Facebook post she made, where she invited supporters to join her at the house. There are two posts still on her Facebook page, in which she did a "call-out" for support, saying "all I know is that the supposed settlement is Tuesday, 20 May 2025 – tomorrow". She said the purchasers had "made a deal with the devil" and that "the bank does not own my property, I have no business with you and I am not bound by any contract you made". She posted that she "would appreciate some support at my home ... tomorrow afternoon ... tomorrow night and for the next couple of days". While not discussed in the High Court judgment, there was also a livestreamed Facebook interview that O'Connell did with Counterspin Media in which she explained her views on the "alleged debt" owed to the bank. In it, she said she had paused her mortgage repayments while the bank refused to provide her with documentation she had requested or answer questions she had. Judge: Any issues between her and bank, not new owners The judge summarised O'Connell's position as primarily taking issue with the mortgagee sale process conducted by ASB. O'Connell told the court she'd tried to "negotiate a solution" for two years, had not consented to the mortgagee sale and said ASB went ahead with the sale anyway. She also said ASB's solicitor advised her of the settlement date, but said she was told the couple's lawyer would contact her about vacating. O'Connell said that never happened and, the day after settlement, the new owner arrived at the property, followed by security guards and police, and she had been "harassed". She rejected the couple's claim that her presence at the house, with others, had posed a risk of damage to the property, adding they were there to "support her through this stressful time" and that she would experience emotional and financial hardship if forced to leave. But Justice Gardiner's decision said the Browns were the registered owners and any issues that O'Connell had before the mortgagee sale were "between her and ASB". "These issues do not affect the plaintiffs' legal ownership of the property," Justice Gardiner said. The judge said while it may have been unfortunate if O'Connell had been unaware the couple intended to take possession of the property immediately on settlement, that was the usual case. She also accepted there was a risk of damage to the property by O'Connell or her supporters. The High Court judgment also noted that while O'Connell remained at the property, the couple were in breach of their insurance policy, as they couldn't change the locks or get an electrical warrant of fitness. They were also unable to rent the property to service their mortgage, which placed them at risk of default. The judge made an order requiring O'Connell and any other occupants to vacate the property by Monday, June 9. Are mortgagee sales on the rise? Cotality New Zealand data showed a "minor lift" to 81 mortgagee sales in the second quarter of this year, up on the previous quarter when there were 52. This marked the highest number since the fourth quarter of 2023, when there were 101 mortgagee sales. However, Cotality head of research Nick Goodall said the number was "still very low in a longer-term context, especially compared to the Global Financial Crisis". "I think this illustrates a more stable financial lending environment over the last decade or so, as well as the willingness and ability of banks to work closely with borrowers who may be struggling, rather than resort to mortgagee sales, which doesn't really benefit either party." OneRoof has 58 properties currently listed as "mortgagee sales" in New Zealand, with the total number of properties listed sitting at just over 38,000. New Zealand Banking Association chief executive Roger Beaumont said banks are responsible lenders. They typically have dedicated teams to deal with those experiencing financial difficulty and mortgagee sales were "rare and always a last resort". "There are several options that banks may offer ... depending on their particular circumstances. That may, for example, include temporarily moving to interest-only repayments." Beaumont said in the six months from July to December 2024, there were 1.4 million home loans across 1.1 million customers. "As an indication of potential financial issues, of the total number of home loans in that period, 17,445 loans switched from principal and interest repayments to interest-only repayments." By Hannah Bartlett, Open Justice reporter
