Paso Robles councilman turns over 5,000 public records after court order
The next step is for the city to review the documents and determine if anything should be withheld from its perspective, before releasing the bulk to The Tribune.
The Tribune filed its lawsuit after multiple requests for public records stored on Bausch's personal devices went unfulfilled — and after city attorney Elizabeth Hull told The Tribune in February that the councilman had 'explicitly refused' to follow public records law without a court order.
But now, after the order was issued by Judge Michael Kelley on May 9, Bausch appears to have turned over the sum of his responsive public records to the city.
Robert Egger, the attorney representing the city, confirmed during a court hearing Thursday that Bausch produced documents on May 16 — the day after the court's official deadline. The delay was caused by technological issues related to the file sizes, Egger said.
The Tribune has yet to see any of Bausch's records — but it should soon.
Kelley ordered the city to deliver an initial production of documents by June 6, with the remainder to be delivered by June 16.
Egger's statements during court were consistent with comments provided by Bausch during Tuesday night's Paso Robles City Council meeting, where he delineated exactly how many records were turned over.
'I think everybody will be pleased to know that I have finally delivered all relevant and nonprivileged documents requested ... aka the PRA requests as submitted by the SLO Tribune and all others,' Bausch began.
'When all was said and done, I have reviewed nearly 60,000 emails, many of them multiple times due to the redundancy of the SLO Tribune's searches,' he continued. 'I have labeled the responsive documents according to their respective PRA requests, again, often irrespective of the redundancy of the request. I have submitted over 2,000 emails that, when combined, clocked in at over 1.5 gigabytes.'
Bausch added that when he attempted to upload the documents to the city server, the system requested that he compress the files. He began that process on May 15, the court's deadline, but did not finish the process until May 16, he said.
'As to the text messages, I reviewed over 26,863 text messages, extracting 3,763 responsive conversations that, when printed out, take up 743 pages,' Bausch reported. 'All of these have been submitted to BBK for their review.'
BBK is Best Best & Krieger, the city's law firm.
According to Egger, Bausch's text messages were delivered to the city in PDF format, which could make the process of reviewing and redacting them more complicated.
Egger also added during court that some of the email files were duplicates. After extracting those, the city was left with around 1,000 nonduplicative emails, he said.
It was unclear from Bausch's comments during City Council whether or not he withheld any documents due to privilege exemptions that he determined himself — a point Egger also brought up during court.
If Bausch did make his own privilege determinations, Kelley said he would be required to provide a privilege log — a document that typically outlines what records were withheld and what exemptions they fell under.
Kelley also asked Bausch to file a signed declaration attesting to the thoroughness of his search to the court by May 30. The declaration should affirm that Bausch turned over all responsive and nonprivileged documents, Kelley said.
Bausch was represented Thursday by his new attorney, Craig Robson. The councilman had previously been representing himself in the case after the city elected not to do so. Robson said during court that he believed the city should have been representing Bausch 'from day one.'
Robson was amenable to the court's requests that Bausch submit a declaration as well as a privilege log if the situation requires.
The next court hearing in The Tribune's case was set for June 27.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Corporations follow talent, not taxes
The Tribune's recent editorial about corporations leaving Chicago due to high taxation misses the mark when it comes to explaining company motives for locating in or leaving Chicago ('Brandon Johnson and friends think it's 'a privilege to do business in Chicago.' Wrong,' Aug. 7). Let's look at some of the examples: Boeing moved to Washington, D.C. to be closer to the Pentagon (its primary customer) and the Federal Aviation Administration (its regulator) as well as seeking engineering talent. Citadel leader Ken Griffin cited rising crime in the city as the primary reason for the company's departure. (Since the departure, this administration's investments in violence prevention, youth jobs and mental health programs have produced one of the lowest crime rates of major cities). Caterpillar (actually headquartered in Deerfield) was attracted to the luxury lifestyle in suburban Irving, Texas where 'a lot of celebrities live, and there are also a lot of gated communities that C-suite level executives find attractive.' In this same time period, Google greatly expanded its Chicago workforce, purchasing the Thompson Center, Kellogg moved a division to Chicago, and Abbott moved 450 jobs to Willis Towers. In all, 111 firms expanded or relocated to Chicago in 2022. So what brings, and keeps jobs in this city? Our people and our infrastructure. Quality of life that people feel and can afford. Things like reductions in crime when we invest in violence prevention, stability when residents are able to access affordable housing, improved well being through access to mental health care from city clinics, investments in small businesses that make our neighborhoods thriving. Being a world class talent hub. Having such a diverse array of colleges, universities and ongoing education that brings people into this city and invests in their growth. Building unrivaled logistics and infrastructure. This infrastructure makes Chicago a logistical powerhouse, critical for businesses that rely on supply chains and global connectivity. We can't do these things without this city investing in its people and its infrastructure. With groceries and rent prices through the roof, and the federal government folding in front of our eyes, everyday Chicagoans cannot afford an even higher cost of living from increased property taxes — the foregone conclusion without asking more from businesses. Taxing large corporations to support investments in quality of life for Chicagoans makes life better for you, me and the talent that businesses hope to Donald Trump named Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni as head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, replacing Erika McEntarfer, whose last jobs report was unfavorable to Trump and got her fired. The only surprising thing about this was the immediate panning of the appointment by a number of conservative economists on the basis that Antoni was not a competent economist, that he would be in over his head in this position. Interesting, but beside the point. Antoni was not appointed for his economic credentials. The real reason was noted by other — again, conservative — economists. For example, Stan Verger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute stated that Antoni's work at Heritage has included errors that 'bias his findings in the same partisan direction'. Dave Hebert, an economist at the American Institute for Economic Research stated that 'I've been on several programs with him at this point and have been impressed by two things: his inability to understand basic economics and the speed with which he's gone MAGA.' Economist Justin Wolfers said that he is a '1,200%, 1,300%, maybe 1,400% in-the-tank Trumper, with few credentials beyond a long history of misrepresenting or misunderstanding basic economic statistics.' If Antoni is confirmed by the Senate, the analysis of him by conservative economists and the history of Trump appointees tells us that the next jobs report will show not only a marked improvement in August, and that the July report will be revised from negative to positive. That is the point of his nomination. Results seems Jed Hoyer is more concerned about the Cubs of 2032 than this year's ballclub. For those of us who remember the Cub's 1945 World Series appearance, and more importantly, the team's dramatic victory in the 2016 Series, maybe just maybe, we should remind Hoyer that there's nothing like the present to ring up a 2025 World Series championship. There's where his focus should be; otherwise he might not be around much longer to worry about op-ed ''Made in America' is alive, well and misunderstood' (Aug. 14) presented a good argument for entrepreneurship and the amount of patents that are issued in the United States. But, the notion that universities are responsible for the issuances of these patents is statistically true, but overlooks the number of ideas brought to life by the end users in the field. Not noted in this article are the advances made years ago in manufacturing by the workers on the line seeing better and more efficient ways to produce products. Relying on universities is fine; if you have ever assembled a product with instructions written by these university minds you may have a change of heart. Assembly instructions written by the users are more easily understood and straightforward as they are the ones using the product and are more familiar with it than a university mind. Products are made overseas because the labor rate is substantially lower than American labor and as Americans we want the best of everything but do not expect to pay high prices. Automobiles may be assembled in America but approximately 40% of the parts are made overseas. Nippon has purchased United States Steel with the promise of maintaining union jobs in the new facility. Reviewing history, the likelihood is the antiquated blast furnaces and systems in place will be demolished and replaced with modern technology involving robotics or they will simply be demolished to eliminate competition. With respect to universities, the costs have become prohibitively expensive and there are thousands of American kids who would love to go to school and contribute but unfortunately cannot afford the high cost. Coupled with a college education oftentimes not providing a large enough advantage in the job market, we are producing a generation who tread water and live in their parents' basements. As a kid growing up in the 1960s we always looked at the tag on clothing to make sure the item was made in America. It made a difference then because the manufacturing techniques in foreign countries produced an inferior product. Today? If we had to rely on 'made in America' we would have bare shelves in our closets and we would be wearing hand me downs that are 'made in America' of course. Along with the 'made in America' label was a strong sense of pride. Pride in workmanship. Pride of place. Pride in our schooling. Pride in government. As we are now scratching to remain competitive in a global economy, perhaps dismounting our high horse, rolling up our sleeves and getting down in the dirt and working will reinvigorate the pride we once had. Then we can focus on patents and making goods in America.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
A look at consumer prices 6 months into the second Trump administration
It's been a little over six months since President Donald Trump assumed office for his second term. In that time, the economic landscape has shifted quite drastically: The new administration has implemented broad tariffs on U.S. trade partners, the stock market has both plummeted and soared to historic heights, hiring is down, fears of a recession are on the rise and, perhaps most notably for everyday Americans, consumer prices are changing. Now $6.34, the cost of ground beef hit all-time highs for the sixth consecutive month, jumping another 4% since June. But it's not just backyard barbecues and ballpark dogs that are getting more expensive — bananas, electricity and chicken also remain at or less than a cent away from their record prices, according to the latest data from the Consumer Price Index. Across the board, consumer prices are about 2.7% higher than they were this time last year, an increase economists largely attribute to the president's sweeping tariffs pushing costs higher. And with even greater import taxes on more than 90 countries taking effect last week, it may not be the last time the price of consumer goods and services tips the scale. What US consumers can expect from new tariffs on imported goods The Tribune is tracking 11 everyday costs for Americans — eggs, milk, bread, bananas, oranges, tomatoes, chicken, ground beef, gasoline, electricity and natural gas — and how they are changing, or not, under the second Trump administration. This tracker is updated monthly using CPI data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. To see the average U.S. price of a specific good, click on the dropdown arrow below and select the item you wish to view. Egg prices have dropped for a fourth month straight, tumbling another 18 cents from June to July. According to the latest data, the average cost of a dozen large Grade A eggs is $3.60 nationwide. The sharp decline in egg prices is likely due to a decrease in bird flu cases in commercial and backyard flocks since the start of the year. In the first two months of 2025, tens of millions of birds were affected by highly pathogenic avian influenza across 39 states, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data. As of July, the virus was detected in only one flock in Pennsylvania — representing less than 30,000 U.S. birds. Currently, the cost of eggs is about 13% less than it was in December 2024, before Trump took office. The cost of milk, meanwhile, is trending up again, jumping 13 cents month-over-month. There are a number of factors that could be driving this price increase. Like egg-laying hens and poultry flocks, dairy cows have been affected by bird flu. In April and May, the number of reported cases shot up again, so shoppers could be seeing the lingering effects of that disruption on the supply chain. Additionally, rising costs may be a result of lower milk production and fewer dairy products being imported into the country in recent months, according to Tribune analysis of USDA data. A gallon of fresh, fortified whole milk cost $4.16 in July. That price is 1.5% higher than it was in the last month of the administration of President Joe Biden and up 4.5% from a year ago. The average price of white bread fell for the third month straight, landing at $1.85 per pound in July to mark a nearly three-year low. Shoppers can expect to pay more for their next bunch of bananas. The staple fruit cost a record-breaking $0.66 per pound in July — just a fraction more than the previous high set two months ago. Inflated prices are likely due to Trump's trade war, with tariffs imposed on the country's top banana suppliers. Imports from Guatemala and Honduras are levied at 10%, while Ecuador and Costa Rica's tariff rates are set at 15% and Mexico is subject to a 25% tax. No data on orange prices was available for July. In June, the cost of navel oranges went up more than 4% for an average price per pound of $1.63 nationwide. Is it a fruit? Is it a vegetable? Wherever you fall on the tomato debate, they may be getting more expensive. In July, the cost of field-grown tomatoes was approximately $1.79 per pound. That's 5 cents higher than the previous month but down roughly 13% since Trump took power. These changes, however, are largely tied to the harvesting season. Tomato prices vary depending on the time of year, rising through the late summer and fall, peaking in the early winter months and then plummeting in the spring. But there may soon be price movement outside the standard seasonality. Last month, the Trump administration announced it was placing a 17% tariff on most Mexican-grown tomatoes, which make up the vast majority of all tomatoes sold in the U.S. As a result, agricultural business experts anticipate American grocers will start charging more for the staple food. The average cost of fresh, whole chicken fell slightly month-over-month to $2.08 per pound. Prices remain less than a cent off June's all-time highs and are the second highest on record — going back more than 45 years. So why the elevated prices? It could be a result of rising feed costs, the lingering effects of bird flu on the supply chain or that more measurable increases in beef prices are driving a shift in consumer demand toward cheaper meat options like chicken. The cost of ground beef is climbing up, up and up. In July, prices again notched record highs, with a pound of 100% ground beef chuck setting you back about $6.34. The rising cost can be attributed to a confluence of factors. The U.S. cattle inventory is the lowest it's been in almost 75 years, and severe drought in parts of the country has further reduced the feed supply, according to the USDA. Supply challenges and rising feed costs stateside mean the country is importing more. But beef and cattle sourced from other nations isn't necessarily a cheaper alternative. New tariff rates on top beef importers like Canada and Brazil took effect in August, raising the countries' already steep import taxes to 35% and 50%, respectively. Plus, last month the U.S. suspended all live cattle imports from Mexico due to concerns over a flesh-eating parasite, further straining the country's supply of beef and cattle. With increased costs both locally and abroad, this may not be the last time shoppers see record prices this year. From Laos to Brazil, President Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers. But even the winners will pay a price. At approximately 19 cents per kilowatt-hour, the current price of electricity is one fraction of a cent off last month's record. Month-over-month changes in electric costs typically register at less than a cent, but that doesn't mean consumers won't feel it in their pocketbooks. Prices have been steadily increasing throughout the year, and in fact, July was the first month since January that the national average didn't notch a new high. As for Chicago, ComEd, the city's primary electric utility, announced earlier this year that a massive supply rate increase would hit this summer, warning that the cost for an average residential customer was expected to go up by $10.60 per month. For some Chicagoans, that supply increase translated to triple-digit hikes on their latest bills. Since December, the average price per kilowatt-hour has increased by more than 7%, and with long, hot summer days ahead, most Americans won't see lower rates anytime soon. Planning an end-of-summer road trip? You'll be happy to know gas prices are falling again — albeit only slightly. A gallon of regular unleaded costs $3.29, dropping 2 cents month-over-month. Prices in Chicago tell a different story. Now $3.52, the cost of gas in the city went up from the previous month and currently hovers about 7% higher than the national average, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Nationally, gasoline prices are up 4.5% under the Trump administration — a difference of 14 cents per gallon. The nationwide cost of piped utility gas, or natural gas, has fallen for the first time in a year. From June to July, the price dropped 1 cent to $1.64 per therm. Yet, on average, Americans are paying close to 8% more to heat their homes, ovens and stovetops than when Biden left office. Year-over-year, that difference is even more drastic: a roughly 17% change. Sign in to access your portfolio
Chicago Tribune
01-08-2025
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: A moderate Republican's thoughts on the immigrant crackdown
President Donald Trump and his immigration czar have directed that all immigrants who are in the country illegally be rounded up like cattle and deported. My grandmother would have called it 'tossing the baby out with the bathwater,' while I call it 'government without brains.' The Tribune's story ('Immigration crackdown felt in Chicago's suburbs,' July 27) about a 17-year employee being fired by Nestle Corp. for not having proof of citizenship and Tribune coverage of many law-abiding contributors to our society being arrested and deported for noncitizen status are reporting on an abomination. Many states recognize common-law marriage in which a couple living as husband and wife for a lengthy period of time confers legal marital status. There are states that confer ownership of property after many years of a steward ably working the land. As a country, we recognize statutes of limitations dictate whether criminal charges can be brought after a lengthy period of time. Why is it so hard to apply some intellectual honesty and informed judgment for noncitizens who behave responsibly and demonstrate a work ethic that is indicative of the American Dream? Undocumented immigrants who work hard to provide for and raise their families should not be treated worse than we treat actual criminals. I am a moderate Republican who is disgusted with the hypocrisy and 'one-size-fits-all' of the Trump administration. Congress and Trump should not be surprised when I and my like-minded friends and family hold our collective noses and vote for whoever is running against the Republicans in future to the always-erudite Jonathan Zimmerman for extolling the virtues of intellectual and viewpoint diversity ('Why higher education needs diversity in viewpoints,' July 25) at the country's so-called institutions of higher learning, including Ivy League universities such as Harvard (and, while unmentioned, his own University of Pennsylvania) while still decrying the Donald Trump administration's efforts to prod institutions in that direction. The professor may be correct in saying that the government cannot constitutionally compel universities to promote such diversity of thought, but I think he misses two important practical points. The first is that private universities in particular — such as Harvard and Penn — also have no constitutional claim to the federal tax dollars on which they have long relied in shockingly massive amounts to support an essentially medieval guild system, the increasing cost of which for decades has far exceeded the rate of inflation of most other goods and services. And he who pays the piper calls the tune, just as the Barack Obama administration did with its infamous 'dear colleague' Title IX letter some years back. The second is that without the Trump administration's overly aggressive prodding, American institutions of higher education would have had no incentive to change their one-sided ideological bias at the teaching and research levels. The leftist bias of faculties and administrators is well documented, and Zimmerman cites striking examples, but let me add one. Some years ago, when Peter Salovey was announced as the incoming president of Yale University, I asked him at a reception in Chicago what he would do as president to increase political and philosophical diversity among the Yale faculty. Salovey's response was essentially that he would do nothing; it was not his fault that all the intelligent people were on the left. Trump is in many ways a bull in a china shop. But perhaps his greatest contribution in his second term as president may be forcing people in all sectors of society to confront important issues in education, immigration and citizenship that have for far too long operated on autopilot with little concern for the ultimate consequences. Certainly, Zimmerman shows signs that point in that a recent Tuesday at 7:05 p.m., I received a call from my representative in the U.S. House, Darin LaHood. I was getting ready to go into a meeting but answered the call. A recording invited me to hold on to be transferred into a town hall meeting, where I could have my questions answered, but I had my meeting commitment. The next day, I tried to send a message to LaHood through his website, but after entering everything, I found out it was not functioning. The next day, the congressman posted on his Facebook page that one of the most important parts of his job is hearing directly from his constituents and that he had 52,000 people on that call! I'm sure LaHood is getting ready to run for either the Senate or governor since he now posts almost daily on Facebook with very safe pieces about how in touch he is, but a robocall town hall with 52,000 people doesn't even come close to counting. I have so many questions about why he and the rest of the Republican Congress have almost totally abdicated to the president their responsibility to govern, what his thoughts are on several key issues and if he is personally OK with an increasing number of the president's actions. If he runs for higher office, he won't be able to hide in his safely gerrymandered district and will have to let us know where he actually stands on some real issues that a significant percentage of us believe are going in a very wrong thoughts are with Northwestern University, my alma mater and former employer, and all the current employees affected by these cuts. I can't help but ask: 'For what?' The horrific acts of Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, to slaughter so many innocents in Israel initiated worldwide debate and demonstrations. As the response from Israel made many ask about the equally horrific impact and death of innocents in Gaza, those debates and demonstrations heightened, particularly on college campuses globally. Certainly, there were excesses of speech and actions on both sides of the debate and demonstrations for a period of time. However, how are the actions of the Donald Trump administration, under the guise of addressing antisemitism on U.S. college campuses, in any way in equal measure to those excesses? Slashing billions in university funding because of the use of free speech, no matter how uncomfortable? When overwhelmingly these demonstrations were peaceful, even if they were loud and uncomfortable? Even when cases of violence and abuse at these demonstrations were addressed by law enforcement and campus administrators using principles of the rule of law and judicial process? And particular to NU, even when opposing parties, including the Jewish NU community, came to a mutually negotiated resolution to the demonstrations on campus? The overreach of the Trump administration in this matter is too much. No one voted for this. This is wrong.I read that hundreds of government employees were diverted from their responsibilities to read the 100,000 pages of Jeffrey Epstein files four times, looking for red flags. Wouldn't it have been more cost-effective to simply release them and let the public and journalists do that work for free?My family makes regular use of the Chicago Public Library, and I write with deep concern over the federal government's decision to eliminate funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS). This action will have a direct and devastating impact on libraries across the country, including our own here in Rogers Park. In fiscal year 2025, Illinois received $5.7 million through the IMLS Grants to States program, placing it among the top recipients nationally. These funds have a broad impact on statewide services, individual library grants, and library operations and programs. In light of the government shutdown of IMLS, it's more important than ever to stand together for libraries and the vital role as public spaces — this especially in a time and climate in which isolation and fragmentation have done so much damage to community, decency and public goodwill.
