Meerhof School receives wheelchairs donation, transforming lives of learners
Image: Supplied
Learners with physical and learning disabilities at Meerhof School near Pretoria have received a donation of several wheelchairs, which they said have made a huge difference in their lives in enabling them to move around easier.
It has given them a sense of independence they did not have before, Tshiamo, one of the pupils at Meerhof School using the wheelchairs donated by Medipost Holdings, as part of its annual socioeconomic development (SED) commitment, said.
'We are more comfortable, more confident and hopeful about our futures. We know that more children will get to use them once we outgrow them, or leave the school,' Tshiamo said.
Dr Victor Ramathesele, Group Chief Executive Officer of Medipost Holdings added that according to the World Bank, the unavailability of assistive devices such as suitable wheelchairs is one of the most significant barriers to full social and economic participation for persons with disabilities, limiting education and employment prospects while their cost of living often tends to be higher.
'This school is so vibrant, and the learners are extremely capable and positive young individuals. We encourage them to develop their abilities and do their personal best, rather than compete against others, being led from dependence to independence as reflected in our vision statement,' Meerhof school principal, Kobus van der Merwe said.
Working with a limited budget, the Hartbeespoort, North West, school has maintained high educational standards, achieving a 100% matric pass rate over the past 17 years. It currently has 240 learners from grade R to grade 12, following the CAPS curriculum.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Set in a former World War II hospital, the school's boarding establishment offers residential accommodation for children with mobility requirements, among other things.
'We are awestruck by the difference Meerhof School is making in the lives of children, with many of their past pupils challenging the stereotypes and stigma of disability by going on to become teachers, lawyers and other professional careers that not only demonstrate independence, but also make enormous contributions to society,' Ramathesele said.
He added that it is hoped that the donation of these mobility aids will support learners on their educational journey towards a brighter future. Equipped with a strong school foundation, Meerhof learners have a chance to excel in their chosen fields and challenge perceptions of what can be achieved.
This includes rewriting the narratives that fuel stigma and inequality, opening more opportunities for people with disabilities, Ramathesele said.
Medipost Holdings' wheelchair donation is the latest as part of its annual socioeconomic development commitments, which have also provided bicycles to children in rural areas to help them get to school.
Van der Merwe meanwhile said alongside their fundraising initiatives, donations such as these are invaluable in helping learners grow into well-rounded individuals with the confidence to hold their place in this world.
He concluded that the learners live up to the school's motto 'from dependence to independence".
zelda.venter@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Why foreign loans are a self-imposed straitjacket for SA's economy
Loans from international financial institutions are often celebrated as victories. But we need to ask what these loans are actually financing – and to whose benefit. The increased presence of international financial institutions in South Africa since 2020 should not be seen simply as a turn to cheaper lending. Rather, they are playing a key role in legitimising policy reforms that are aimed at dismantling state power over key economic resources, benefiting domestic and international capital. At first glance, it may seem like South Africa has caught a break. International financial institutions, most recently the World Bank and the African Development Bank (AfDB), have funnelled billions of dollars and euros in loans into the public purse. These loans have been provided at below market interest rates and with generous grace periods, at a time when the debt markets are charging the government a premium to borrow money. These loans are often celebrated in headlines as victories: ' South Africa secures World Bank funding ' or ' AfDB backs green growth reforms '. But we need to ask what these loans are actually financing – and to whose benefit. Curiously, these loans are not for the construction of bridges, roads, rail or tied to mega infrastructure projects such as Medupi. Moreover, according to the media statements and project documents published by the institutions, these loans are not intended to help South Africa refinance foreign currency-denominated debts. In other words, they cannot be regarded as an alternative to the high cost of market borrowing. Instead, these loans are meant to finance the legal and regulatory infrastructure deemed necessary to dismantle the state's control over key economic resources and often include policy conditions in their terms. National Treasury is therefore voluntarily approaching international financial institutions for money it could otherwise acquire elsewhere without the conditionality and political baggage associated with such borrowing. Reading the clues The first clue lies in how these loans are structured. They are neither earmarked nor set aside for a particular infrastructure project, as is often suggested by media reports. Instead, National Treasury classifies these loans as 'general budget support'. This means they are lumped together with all the taxes, market debt and government income generated in a fiscal year. While it is good for the government to have discretion on spending, as is allowed by general budget support loans, this is problematic where there is a hidden or contentious agenda behind the lending. Fortunately, reports provided by international financial institutions provide some more clues: in assessing South Africa's readiness for new loans, institutions evaluate the extent and speed at which the government has been undertaking policy reforms. Let's take the 2025 World Bank loan as an example. The loan agreement document explicitly states that the release of the $1.5-billion is conditional on the World Bank's satisfaction with the 'programme being carried out by the Borrower [Republic of South Africa]'. This 'programme' comprises several pillars largely related to legislative and regulatory changes that are designed to increase the role of the private sector. In the energy sector (pillar one), the World Bank cites the government's mandate for the National Transmission Company of South Africa (NTCSA) to enter into electricity transmission services agreements with independent transmission providers. This, it says, is to promote 'private sector participation' and acts as proof of South Africa's adherence to 'the programme'. Similarly, in the transport sector (pillar two), the government is commended for expediting the unbundling of Transnet through the Transport Economic Regulator Act of 2024. Self-imposed straitjacket That World Bank loan is not an isolated case. The recently approved $476.6-million loan from the AfDB follows the same pattern. The AfDB board was thrilled with the success of the previous $300-million 2023 loan, which they say 'delivered key reforms that bolstered financial stability and increased renewable energy capacity'. The project appraisal for the 2023 AfDB loan outlined the bank's specific contribution. It included its support for the Electricity Regulation Act, which, in their view, would 'provide the legislative framework to restructure and unbundle the electricity industry to create a modern and competitive sector, crowd in large investment into renewable energy, and establish a transmission system operator'. Unlike the classic 'structural adjustment' loans prevalent in the Global South following the 1980s, these loans are a self-imposed straitjacket on economic policymaking as well as an undoing of the developmental principles underpinning the establishment of the South African democratic movement. Government commitments to international financial institutions, as argued by the IMF, are viewed by global capital as a stamp of approval for a country's 'readiness' for investment. It assures the private sector that the government will not reverse its policy stance. No surprises Greater policy certainty is viewed as a precondition for crowding in private sector commitments. The push by the National Treasury and the Presidency to pass these reforms, all of which fall under the banner of Operation Vulindlela, should come as no surprise. Civil society and organised labour have consistently raised the alarm about the nature of these reforms and about whose interests they serve. The South African Federation of Trade Unions views Operation Vulindlela as 'a neoliberal structural reform agenda that is accelerating the privatisation of South Africa's public infrastructure'. The Congress of South African Trade Unions has also expressed concern about the ongoing unbundling of Eskom. Meanwhile, the Alternative Information and Development Centre has noted the link between the acquisition of these loans from international bodies and the acceleration of reforms proposed in Operation Vulindlela. It argues that it serves 'to satisfy the narrow interests of private investors and business elites at the expense of the public good'. In sum, for the National Treasury, the proliferation of foreign loans not only provides certainty to the market that reforms will be carried through and maintained, but also makes it difficult for dissenting voices to trigger policy changes. Ultimately, protecting South Africa's economic sovereignty means ensuring that the vision for our economy is shaped by the people the economy is meant to serve – that is the general public. This would necessitate opening up the space for Parliament and the public to scrutinise and debate the uptake of loans granted by international financial institutions, including their terms, conditions and long-term consequences. It is about ensuring that economic decisions reflect the needs and voices of the people above the preferences of markets or the priorities of lenders. The call by Parliament's Standing Committee on Finance for greater transparency – despite resistance from the National Treasury – must now be taken up more widely. Decisions about who controls our electricity grid, our ports, our budgets, and our future cannot be made behind closed doors. The time for making lending decisions that foreground the interests of South Africans is now. DM
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
G20 South Africa 2025: Defining moment for the nation and the continent
G20, is the world's premier forum for economic cooperation South Africa is preparing to welcome the world in 2025 as it assumes the presidency and hosts the G20 Summit in Johannesburg. This milestone places South Africa, and by extension Africa, at the centre of global dialogue on economic growth, sustainable development, climate resilience, digital transformation, and multilateral cooperation. In the words of South African Deputy President Paul Mashatile, South Africa's goal is to promote mutually beneficial economic growth, create jobs and advance sustainable development for its partner nations. The Group of Twenty, commonly known as the G20, is the world's premier forum for economic cooperation. Representing more than 85% of global GDP, over 75% of world trade, and two-thirds of the planet's population, the G20 convenes the most powerful economies to address pressing global challenges. As the only African founding member of the G20, South Africa's presidency could not be more timely or symbolic. At a time when the world is redefining recovery and resilience in the wake of geopolitical tensions, economic uncertainty, and climate disasters, South Africa brings a grounded, inclusive voice to the table, one that reflects the aspirations of the Global South and the urgent developmental needs of the African continent. The G20 countries' ability to respond collectively to mounting challenges facing the multilateral system will determine both the speed of global recovery and the future of sustainable development. Under the banner of 'inclusive growth for a just world', South Africa's leadership is expected to spotlight issues such as financing for sustainable infrastructure, the global energy transition, youth employment, food security, digital inclusion, and equitable access to global markets. These are not only global concerns, but they are also everyday realities for millions across Africa. The summit will attract heads of state, finance ministers, central bank governors, and global institutions like the UN, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund. Beyond political leadership, the G20 also engages civil society, youth, women, labour, business, and think tanks through structured engagement groups – offering platforms for a wider range of voices to shape global policy. Johannesburg, as host city, will become a strategic hub of diplomacy, business exchange, and cultural showcase. While the summit itself is a high-level, closed-door affair, South Africans can expect a wave of public engagement, community-driven programmes, investment conversations, and national pride as the event draws near. 'The G20 presidency is a powerful opportunity for South Africa to place Africa's priorities at the heart of global decision-making. We are committed to driving an inclusive agenda that ensures no country, and no person, is left behind,' said President Cyril Ramaphosa. For the South African government, this is more than ceremonial. It is an opportunity for G20 members to transform commitments into lasting action. Key issues remain a challenge in the country and the continent, and there is a call for greater accountability to drive tangible progress in the global pursuit of gender equality SA's G20 presidency is also an opportunity to elevate African perspectives, strengthen international alliances, and advance sustainable development goals. It is a chance to reinforce South Africa's commitment to multilateralism and global cooperation at a time when unity is more important than ever. As preparations intensify in the coming months, all eyes will be on South Africa not just as a host, but as a bridge between developed and developing economies. The 2025 G20 Summit is more than just a gathering of nations. It is a moment for South Africa to lead with purpose, to shape global consensus, and to drive transformation that begins on the continent but resonates across the globe. Stay updated by visiting or follow #G20SouthAfrica2025 for news, opportunities, and ways to engage.
IOL News
08-08-2025
- IOL News
Exploring the philosophical, political, and human questions shaping the BRICS+ world
This photo taken on July 3, 2025 shows a logo of the BRICS Summit outside the Museum of Modern Art in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The 17th BRICS Summit will be held here from July 6 to 7. Image: Xinhua Does BRICS Have an Ideology? BRICS has become one of the most talked-about formations on the global stage. Described as a counterweight to Western dominance, a champion of the Global South, or a pragmatic coalition of emerging powers, it raises a vital question: does BRICS actually have an ideology? The answer is layered. BRICS is not an ideological bloc. It is a geopolitical coalition, a space where countries with different political systems, economic strategies, and social realities come together to pursue shared interests. What connects them is not a common vision of the world, but a shared dissatisfaction with how global power has been concentrated for decades in the hands of the United States, Europe, and the institutional networks that have shaped global governance – notably NATO, the IMF, the World Bank, and the broader Bretton Woods system. BRICS provides a platform to push back against this order, while opening debate on how economic and political systems might evolve outside Western hegemony. At its heart, BRICS advances the principle of multipolarity – a geoeconomic arrangement that challenges the idea of a single global centre of power. It champions sovereignty, non-interference, fairer trade, and stronger representation for developing countries in global institutions. For much of the Global South, these demands are a response to long histories of colonisation, resource extraction, debt dependency, and exclusion from decision-making. The BRICS reformist drive to challenge and reshape the IMF, World Bank, and the broader Bretton Woods framework is central to this moment, alongside building alternative institutions such as the New Development Bank (NDB), signalling a desire to redistribute not only global influence, but also the terms of development, debt, and investment. Yet a deeper question emerges: how will this new economic arrangement touch the lives of ordinary people, the masses already dispossessed through austerity, inequality, and structural adjustment programmes imposed under the old order? How will it ensure that prosperity does not remain confined to elites but filters down to uplift the many? Each BRICS+ country offers a unique social landscape. Brazil is a powerhouse of agricultural production and industry, yet its indigenous peoples and rural communities face land dispossession and environmental pressure. Urban centres flourish, but inequality persists. India's digital and industrial growth is remarkable, yet caste hierarchies and rural poverty continue to shape life for hundreds of millions. Russia brings energy strength, geopolitical influence, and a commitment to multipolar partnerships, while also confronting regional disparities and social challenges – yet its strategic role within BRICS positions it as a bridge-builder, especially through energy, infrastructure, and security cooperation. China stands out for its vast poverty alleviation achievements, lifting hundreds of millions out of extreme poverty over recent decades through state-led planning, large-scale investment, and targeted social programmes. This is not only a technical achievement but a social transformation that challenges the idea that global integration must leave the vulnerable behind. South Africa brings the symbolic and moral weight of its anti-apartheid struggle, but its post-liberation economy remains marked by white monopoly capital and a comprador elite that has not yet delivered meaningful redistribution to the majority. Land, employment, and economic inclusion remain unfinished work. The Gulf states contribute energy wealth and sovereign funds but come with monarchic and theocratic systems that raise new questions for social policy. In looking to ethical and philosophical guidance, BRICS might draw on its members' cultural foundations. China's traditions, including Taoist ideas of harmony, social balance, and care for the collective, could inform models of development that go beyond profit. Africa offers ubuntu, an ethic of human interconnectedness, dignity, and collective well-being, alongside the political tradition of Pan-Africanism, which calls for solidarity, sovereignty, and justice among historically marginalised peoples. There are examples from history worth studying. Libya, under Muammar Gaddafi, developed a social model that channelled oil wealth into free healthcare, education, housing, and basic income, aiming to circulate resources directly to the population. This system was violently cut short not by internal collapse, but by US and NATO intervention, which destroyed a social contract rare in the region. China's experience shows how state-directed development can change the life chances of hundreds of millions, challenging neoliberal claims that markets alone can deliver inclusion.
