logo
Meet the ‘unguns': The new trend in ‘less-leathal' weapons

Meet the ‘unguns': The new trend in ‘less-leathal' weapons

New York Post18-05-2025

Chandler Crumblish Paine is a full-time mom and regular jogger who lives in Fort Worth, Texas. She's never owned a gun, but last year she became increasingly concerned about her safety, especially because she often exercises early in the morning or in the evenings.
'My family has guns, my brothers have guns, my husband has guns. But I just didn't feel comfortable carrying one,' she tells The Post. So she found an alternative to a firearm, purchasing what's known as a less-lethal pistol from a brand called Byrna.
9 Donald Trump, Jr. — one of many high-profile fans of weapons by Byrna. The company has become one of the nation's leading makers of less-lethal weapons.
The Massachusetts-based company makes pistols — which look a bit like a Glock — that forcefully discharge pepper-spray projectiles or hard plastic pellet spheres.
'One day it just hit me — I'm a young woman out running at 4 a.m. with nothing to protect myself,' she says. 'It's a less lethal option and it will give you a chance to get away if need be.'
Blake Nance, the co-founder of Kodai, a security consulting company in Los Angeles, recently bought a Byrna too. A former Marine and Beverly Hills police officer, Nance has always been comfortable handling guns. Even so, he wanted to find a different option that is unlikely to end someone's life if he has to use it.
9 Byrna recently began a partnership to retail their less-lethal weapons at Sportsman's Warehouse.
Kate Collins / Elmira Star-Gazette via Imagn Content Services, LLC
'It's very similar to a paintball gun and how it uses a CO2 cartridge to launch a projectile that is really painful on impact,' says Nance of his Byrna gun. 'I just want something that will allow me to defend myself and just go home.' The Byrna will do the trick in most situations, he believes. 'I think it would take the fight out of anybody if they came at you,' says Nance.
Both gun owners (like Nance) and people who say they aren't comfortable owning firearms (like Crumblish Paine) are fueling a rise in sales of these types of less lethal weapons, which some have called unguns. In 2023, the global 'less-lethal' market was estimated to be worth just over $1 billion, according to a report from Grand View Research, which predicts this number will more than double by 2030.
9 Sean Hannity, pictured using his Byrna weapon.
Courtesy of Byrna Technologies
Over the last 12 months, Byrna, for instance, has racked up $100 million in revenue, a record for the 20-year-old business, which is generally considered the first less-lethal weapons company to successfully position itself as a consumer brand. Byrna — whose fans have included Sean Hannity, Lara Trump, Megyn Kelly and Bill O'Reilly — has recently opened a string of retail stores across the country, from Oregon and Arizona to Tennessee, and kicked off a nationwide partnership with Sportsman's Warehouse. In April, Byrna also launched a new, more compact model, the CL Launcher.
Axon Enterprises, the maker of Taser guns, also targets the consumer market, with two models, the Pulse 2 and the Bolt 2, that it promotes as 'personal safety technology.' While the company primarily supplies Tasers for police and military use, Axon vice president Angelo Welihindha says that he sees sales to everyday users as a growth area. 'We're putting more engineering resources than we ever have into the consumer line. It's a really big bet for the company,' says Welihindha, who declined to share sales numbers for Taser's consumer models.
9 A Bolt 2 Taser from Axon, which also specializes in weapons that harm but do not kill.
Courtesy of Axon
Competitors in the projectile launcher market include JPX International, which sells a launcher called the Jet Protector. It fires a projectile that releases a mist of pepper spray that carries a 400,000 rating on the Scoville Heat scale (which is based on the potency of the peppers found in pepper spray). The company, which sells to both police departments and consumers, claims its spray is twice as powerful as standard police pepper spray. Projectile launchers have also become popular with hikers and campers who carry them for protection from wildlife like mountain lions and bears.
These weapons, from launchers to Tasers, sell for between $380 and $595. Most are available throughout the country and can be purchased online. But some cities, notably New York City, restrict their use to inside one's home and Byrna won't ship its weapons to NYC.
Scott Brent, the CEO of JPX International, underscores that one of the selling points of less-lethal weapons is the issue of liability, contending that a weapon with bullets is simply riskier to carry.
9 'It's very similar to a paintball gun and how it uses a CO2 cartridge to launch a projectile that is really painful on impact,' says Blake Nance of his Byrna gun
Courtesy of Blake Nance
'Everybody says, 'Hey, I've got a handgun permit,' ' says Brent. 'But let me tell you something, in most situations you're not going to use a handgun because if you kill or severely injure someone, you're going to get sued and you could be indicted. You may not be found guilty, but it's going to completely upend your life.'
Axon's Welihindha agrees: 'A lot of gun owners are getting savvy to the civil consequences of making the wrong choice. They think of the Taser device as something that reduces the consequences if they get that self-defense decision wrong.'
According to Byrna CEO and president Bryan Ganz, gun owners actually account for two-thirds of the company's customers, while just a third of Byrna buyers are non-gun owners. As Ganz sees it, these two groups are converging on this less-lethal middle ground for two countervailing reasons. One, of course, 'is the rising perception of crime and a fear for one's safety and the safety of their families,' says Ganz. 'This is driving folks to find a way to protect themselves.'
At the same time, he contends, 'People don't want to see the level of gun violence that we are currently seeing in America. People are afraid of crime, they are fed up with gun violence, and less-lethal provides a solution that they need.'
9 Scott Brent, the CEO of JPX International, says that one of the selling points of less-lethal weapons is the issue of liability — users are less likely to face the legal consequences a gun death, even if it is in self-defense.
Courtesy of JPX International
Another element Byrna's customers have in common, adds Ganz, is that they are 'people who are going to fight back and not be a victim.'
Less-lethal weapons aren't likely to put a dent in America's gun-death problem anytime soon though. Last year, gun violence resulted in nearly 41,000 deaths in the United States, though that was down 9% from 2023. And the total number of firearms sold in the US dwarfs those in the less lethal category, with an estimated 15.3 million guns purchased in 2024, according to The Trace.
There's also a certain class of gun owners who are unlikely to adopt less-lethal weapons, says Ohio State University professor Randall Roth, author of the book 'American Homicide.' 'The trend since the early 1970s has been for a smaller and smaller portion of households to buy more and more guns. It's probably unlikely that those households will change technologies.' The most likely buyers of less-lethal options he sees as 'households that own a single firearm for protection.'
9 Axon vice president Angelo Welihindha says that he sees sales to everyday users as a growth area. 'We're putting more engineering resources than we ever have into the consumer line. It's a really big bet for the company,' Welihindha says.
Of course, any life that is saved is a win. And the makers of less lethal weapons are explicit that preventing unnecessary deaths is part of their mission. Axon's founder Rick Smith has stated that its technology will one day 'make the bullet obsolete,' adding, 'Why are we shooting people with bullets? It's nuts. When that technology was invented hundreds of years ago, the world looked very different.' And Byrna states on its website that 'our product has empowered individuals to protect themselves and their loved ones, without causing irreversible harm.'
Making substantive changes to how Americans engage with guns may be easier than changing human behavior as a way of addressing gun violence, according to David Hemenway, director of the Harvard Injury Control Research Center. 'Fairly small tweaks in design and engineering could save countless human lives,' he has said.
Still, while launchers and Tasers are designed not to kill, no weapon can be called non-lethal. 'There's no such thing as non-lethal. You can kill somebody with a butter knife or a toothpick,' says Aaron Jones, the founder and CEO of International Protective Service, a private security company with offices in seven states.
9 A JPX 2 model weapon, with a LEVEL II Safety holster and four 2-shot OC cartridges. These weapons can damage and maim, but are less likely to kill.
Courtesy of JPX International
But there are a number of potential downsides to the weapons. If someone pulls a launcher when police are present, it could be mistaken for a real gun, though both Byrna and JPX offer orange versions of their pistols, which are signals of their less-lethal status. There is also the possibility that the launchers will become reclassified as firearms in the future or that more cities will ban their use.
And not everyone is convinced less lethal alternatives offer true protection. Jones, for one, acknowledges that while projectile launchers are a 'great product,' he doesn't see them as a 'be all and end all' solution in a dangerous situation. 'When bad guys come at you, they aren't carrying less lethal,' says Jones. 'The average bad guy will not be stunned by a pepper ball device. There always is the possibility it will work, but . . . I carry a firearm.'
9 The Pulse 2 taser from the less-lethal weapons-maker Axon.
Courtesy of Axon
But Nance doesn't see it that way. 'Look, we're living in America and there are lots of guns that are out there,' he says. 'But most of the robberies that I investigated as a police officer did not involve a gun. I don't feel like I'm going to die every time I walk down the street.' But if he's attacked, he says he wouldn't hesitate to use his less-lethal launcher. 'I'd pop them with this thing in a heartbeat if they needed to get popped. You want the will for them to hurt you to just be stopped.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor
Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Jewish leaders condemn John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor

Jewish leaders and activists have signed an open letter condemning Queens state Sen. John Liu for endorsing staunch Israel foe Zohran Mamdani for mayor, The Post has learned. The letter, signed by more than 60 mostly Jewish residents in the borough, called Liu's endorsement a betrayal. It is set to appear as an ad in local Queens Jewish publications, said the letter's organizer, Michael Nussbaum, a board member of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York and former head of the Queens Jewish Community Council. Advertisement 3 New York City Jewish leaders condemned state Sen. John Liu for endorsing Zohran Mamdani for mayor. Brigitte Stelzer 'Mamdani has made it clear that he is a virulently anti-semite in words and deeds… As a leader in our county, and a representative of a large Jewish population, we consider your endorsement a slap in our face,' states the missive, which shows the Israeli flag with the Star of David in the top right corner. 'Given the history of hateful acts against our community, this support will not go unnoticed,' it says. Advertisement Liu's 16th District in northeast Queens has a significant Jewish population and his endorsement was a coup for Mamdani. Mamdani supports the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel and has opposed its right to exist as a Jewish state. Liu, a former city comptroller and councilman, is an Asian-American trailblazer who is widely respected. 3 Liu endorsed Mamdani despite saying they have a 'big disagreement' on Israel. X / @ZohranKMamdani Advertisement Nussbaum told The Post he has known the state senator for decades and respects him as a gifted politician and good public servant — and that's why he was shocked that Liu was backing the most anti-Jewish and Israeli candidate in the race. 'Why would he attach his name to someone who is an enemy of Israel and the Jewish people?' Nussbaum asked. During his June 2 endorsement of Mamdani, Liu noted that he had a 'big disagreement' with the Democratic socialist assemblyman on the 'the issue of Israel and how the Jewish community needs to be viewed in this social climate.' Nussbaum said he didn't 'buy Liu's explanation' for backing Mamdani. Advertisement 3 The letter to Liu from Jewish leaders. The wellbeing of the Jewish people is the defining issue in this race given the rise in antisemitism, he said. Other signatories of the letter include former CUNY trustee Jeffrey Wiesenfeld, Yaniv Meirov, CEO at Chazaq Organization; cantor Alan Brava of the Free Synagogue of Flushing, Zev Berman, executive vice president of the Queens Jewish Community, retired judges Jeremy Weinstein and Jeff Leibowitz, and David Aronov of the UJA Federation of New York. In closing, the letter quotes scripture: 'Even my close friend whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me.' Liu, in a statement on Tuesday, defended his endorsement of Mamdani but also said he would continue to stand with the Jewish community. 'This public rebuke – and the many private protestations – come from respected individuals and organizations with whom I've worked for many years, and I accept them and the consequences they will bear,' Liu said. 'Notwithstanding the deep disapproval of my endorsement, I will continue to stand with and up for the Jewish community.'

As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war
As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

As Russia inches closer to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, new Ukrainian region might soon be at war

Moscow said its troops had crossed into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast and were conducting offensive operations in the region, a claim Kyiv quickly denied as 'Russian disinformation.' Russian troops have been pushing toward Dnipropetrovsk Oblast for months, trying to solidify the southern flank to capture Pokrovsk and the remaining parts of the adjacent Donetsk Oblast. Western military experts who spoke to the Kyiv Independent said it was clear that Russian troops would eventually penetrate the southeastern region. But they didn't expect either side to throw 'a significant amount of forces' in this sector, as the capture of Donetsk Oblast remains Moscow's main objective. Emil Kastehelmi, an analyst at the Finland-based Black Bird Group, confirmed that geolocation shows Russian troops entered Dnipropetrovsk Oblast in recent days. Russian troops will likely advance 'at least somewhat' deeper in the coming months, though it won't change the overall dynamic of the front line, he added. Kastehelmi believes that Russian troops could try advancing northwest from the southern flank of Pokrovsk to encircle the city that is already penetrated from the southern and eastern sides. 'The Russians probably have understood that if they want to make a proper encirclement threat, they need to widen the flanks and then continue operations near Pokrovsk,' Kastehelmi told the Kyiv Independent. The Russian Defense Ministry said on June 8 that its troops were pushing forward in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast — a region adjacent to Donetsk and Zaporizhzhia oblasts but have thus not seen combat actions. It added that the Russian military's 90th Guards Tank Division units had reached the western border of Donetsk Oblast and were thrusting forward into the industrial Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. The Ukrainian military immediately denied the claim, saying that the fighting continued inside Donetsk Oblast, calling Russia's claims 'disinformation.' The Ukrainian monitoring project DeepState has put the proximity of Russian troops to the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border at about two kilometers, yet painting that distance between the regional border and the alleged position of Russian troops as no man's land. The Kyiv Independent requested a comment to the General Staff of Ukraine's Armed Forces but has not heard back in time of publication. Even if militarily not as significant, the Russian penetration into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast would mean yet another Ukrainian region would be now a warzone. It could also help strengthen the Russian negotiation position as the U.S. continues to push both sides to hold peace talks to end the war at all costs. "If they [russians] find a weak spot, they will try to exploit it.' Russia had begun its long-expected offensive in April but has only made limited gains since then, besides opening a new front in the northeastern Sumy Oblast by occupying a number of border villages there. Kastehelmi from the Black Bird Group said that the Ukrainian defense of Pokrovsk would be compromised if Russian troops are able to widen their flanks, which would enable them to bring their support elements forward. 'It can mean that they may be able in the summer to threaten the remaining supply routes to the city in a way which makes it even more dangerous for Ukrainian units,' Kastehelmi said. Kastehelmi added that it would be 'an operational success' for Moscow if it is able to first expand its flank westward toward Dnipropetrovsk Oblast and then begin attacking northward, while also building on the eastern flank. But he stressed that Russian troops have not been the best at coordinating attacks, even if it looks 'doable' on paper. Jakub Janovsky, a Prague-based military analyst at the Oryx open-source project tracking Ukrainian and Russian equipment losses, said that it likely won't make 'any difference' if Russian troops advanced a kilometer or two into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. He added that Russia appears to be continuing to rely heavily on small infantry group assaults, either on foot or motorcycles, thus decreasing the use of Soviet-era BMP fighting vehicles or tanks. 'It seems more likely that Russia will focus on Donetsk Oblast,' Janovsky told the Kyiv Independent. 'But it's entirely possible that if they find a weak spot, they will try to exploit it.' Read also: Inside Russia, calls for peace come with conditions — and Kremlin talking points We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

China's Petrochemical Reliance on U.S. Outweighs Rare Earth Trade
China's Petrochemical Reliance on U.S. Outweighs Rare Earth Trade

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

China's Petrochemical Reliance on U.S. Outweighs Rare Earth Trade

US petrochemical producers may have found themselves on the front line of global trade wars, BNEF reports, with China's dependence on the US for feedstocks (see "Chinese Plastics Factories Face Mass Closure As US Ethane Supply Evaporates") blunting the impact of its dominations of exports of rare earth metals. China imported more than 565,000 barrels per day of petrochemical feedstocks from the US in 2024 according to the Energy Information Administration, with a value of over $4.7 billion. That dwarfed the $170 million of rare earths the US imported last year, about 70% of which came from China, according to the US Geological Survey. The figures show the dependence the US and China have developed on each other by ever tightening trade links over the past few decades. While China has a tight grip on refining many metals crucial for industry, it also takes in niche chemicals from the US that are difficult to buy elsewhere. China leans on naphtha to produce most base chemicals, which are processed further to end up in everyday items like electronics and clothing. However, some plants can switch to cheaper propane when the economics make sense, which they do regularly. Propane dehydrogenation plants however can't process alternatives like naphtha. The US accounted for over half of all China's propane imports in 2024. US producers have looked to China to buy their ballooning volumes of feedstock, the market value of which has almost quadrupled since 2020. China accounts for almost half of all new mixed-feed ethylene and propylene production capacity set to come online globally over the next four years, based on data compiled by BloombergNEF. A forced divorce The honeymoon period may be about to end. Following the implementation of tariffs by President Donald Trump's administration in April, China retaliated with its own on US imports — including a 125% tariff on feedstocks like propane and ethane. The duty effectively killed the economics of importing US feedstocks. Alternative sources of propane may be hard or expensive to come by, with producers in the Middle East sending most of their supplies to India, South Korea and Japan. While some rerouting could take place, Middle Eastern players could use the lack of alternatives for China's propane dehydrogenation plants to charge a premium. China's propane dehydrogenation operators, like Hengli Petrochemical, have already suffered from weak margins over the past years. Many may opt to shut their operations temporarily. A messy settlement China moved quickly to remove tariffs on US ethane as trade talks commenced. However, while China seems willing to buy US ethane, the US administration may no longer allow it. Enterprise Products Partners — the largest US-based exporter of petrochemical feedstocks — received a notice on Wednesday from the Bureau of Industry and Security at the US Department of Commerce, denying licenses to export ethane to China on the basis that such flows 'pose an unacceptable risk of use in or diversion to a 'military end use' in China.' Energy Transfer received a similar communication. China's ethane cracking capacity is dwarfed by its capacity to process naphtha and propane, but almost all of its ethane imports come from the US. The restrictions will have a significant impact on the Lianyungang and Tianjin plants, owned by Satellite Chemical, Sinopec and INEOS. SP Chemicals, a Singapore-based producer, sources most of its feedstock from Enterprise Products Partners. As the trade war continues, it appears commodities may lead the confrontation, with players on both sides set to feel the pain. By More Top Reads From this article on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store