
Britain's best-selling car has gone electric
Published: Updated:
The best-selling car in the UK has gone electric. Having topped the new model sales charts for the last two years, Ford has fitted its volume-selling Puma with a battery in a bid to take over the EV registrations leaderboard too. From the outside - apart from a few tweaks like the three-stripe big cat headlights and closed grille - the new electric Puma Gen-E looks almost identical to its combustion-engined sibling, so it's not going to put any noses out of joint.
But underneath the familiar bodywork is a completely revised electric drivetrain and chassis upgrades that will make it feel very different to drive to the petrol Puma we've come to know and love. The big question is, does it still have all the ingredients that has seen Britons buy more Pumas than any other car over the last 24 months? We've been testing Ford's touted 'best ever Puma' at the official launch in Spain to see if it will appeal to both EV converts and those still dead against owning a battery-powered car...
Petrol Puma's best-selling credentials
Before we get into the new Puma Gen-E, it's worth a brief reminder about the sales success of the standard car. Ford launched the Puma in 2019 , reintroducing a nameplate previously reserved for its mid-nineties, affordably-priced, two-door coupe. This time, the Puma badge has been stamped onto the bootlid of a compact 'crossover' - a growing segment that is showing no sign of waning right now. It replaced the best-selling Fiesta - on which it is mechanically based and shares a platform - as the growing demand for SUVs led Ford to substitute its iconic small car with a jacked-up alternative.
In 2023, the year Fiesta production ended , Puma became the UK's best-selling new car. With 49,591 registrations, it dethroned the Nissan Qashqai by 7,270 sales that year and in 2024 Ford sold a further 48,340 Pumas to take the number one spot for a second consecutive term. Ford says more than two in five (43 per cent) of all new cars it delivers in Britain are Pumas today.
The electric Puma: Ford's first sub-£30k EV – what do you get for that money?
The Puma is an important moment for Ford because it's the first time that the American brand has delivered a genuinely affordable EV to the market. Ford has historically been the maker of attainably-priced cars, dating back to the original Model T of the early 1900s. So, it's somewhat surprising that it's taken the Michigan brand four attempts in recent years to bring to market an EV that's below that crucial £30,000 benchmark.
Its Mustang Mach-E SUV costs from £43,340, t he Explorer EV from £39,285 , and the Capri EV from £42,085 . Not what you'd call cheap. But Ford has felt the pressure mounting from rivals who have started to bring truly affordable EVs to market; think Renault's £22,975 5 E-Tech , Citroen's £22,095 e-C3 and Dacia's budget-friendly £14,995 Spring . Dacia has also recently announced it will add another sub-£15k EV to its arsenal, while Chinese newcomer BYD is due to bring its Dolphin Surf to the UK with a similar price tag. Unfortunately, Ford is still no match for any of these.
The Puma Gen-E starts from £29,995, which is still far above the reasonably-priced competition, but one bonus is that Ford has a simple line-up of just two trims: the entry-level Gen-E Select and the Gen-E Premium costs £31,995. On top of that there are only three packs (Comfort, Winter, ADAS) and five extra spec options (19-inch alloy wheels, panoramic roof, contrast roof, two bar and all-season tyres). Both versions are full of standard kit. This includes a 12-inch touchscreen and 12.8-inch digital instrument display, wireless smartphone connection with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, rear view camera, ambient lighting, pre-collision alert, auto beam headlights – the list goes on.
What's it like to drive?
I'm fortunate enough to have already driven Ford's three other EV models - and Puma Gen-E is the one I've enjoyed most form behind the wheel. This fun hatchback is a welcome break from the smooth - though rather dull - SUVs the US brand has brought us already, and it has a petrol-esque personality. The ride is firm (but not too harsh) and it handles its weight (200kg more than the petrol version) very well. It's not particularly fast. It certainly doesn't give you that throw you back in your seats EV instant acceleration kick, though it will hit 60mph in eight seconds, which isn't too shabby for a small crossover like this.
There's plenty of punch for both town and country driving and it will reach 70mph on a short motorway-entry slip road so you merge at the same pace as the rest of the traffic. Grip levels during our drive were excellent. There's very minimal roll in the corners and it was engaging and rewarding to drive on the winding roads of Barcelona's wine region. While it handled any uneven surfaces in towns well at low speeds, it can jolt and become less stable on rough tarmac and bumps when you're travelling at pace.
We'll have to reserve judgement on how it performs on Britain's pothole-ravaged highways until we test it here, rather than basing our assessment on the silky-smooth, crater-free, Spanish routes. With its regenerative braking, the initial bite of stopping power is quite sharp. This, however, can be adjusted with a button the steering wheel stalk between D (regular drive mode) and L (not quite full one pedal drive) which applies tweaked regen performance across Puma Gen-E's four driving modes. Elsewhere, the infotainment system is by no means my favourite of the recent systems I've tested, but the hassle of trying to tailor (by which I mean turn off!) driver assistance features - like the drowsiness alert and intelligent speed assistance - really is a headache at best and dangerous at worst.
While the steering wheel is about half the size of my 5ft3 frame, which makes little sense in a car of this size, it could be easily adjusted along with the very comfortable and not over-cladded seats to create a perfect driving position. And the steering itself is very responsive and thoroughly enjoyable to thread around tight mountain turns. In summary, this is an EV with spirit. I could even go so far as to say it's a bit of a 'driver's' small electric car, which could make it a genuine rival to the Renault 5 E-Tech.
Battery, range and charging costs
The Puma Gen-E is available only with a 43kWh battery, though the two trims levels have slightly different ranges; the Select does 233 miles on a single charge while the Premium can cover just 226. In real life, we found it fell short of this with a real-world range of less than 200 miles (Ford gives the Gen-E an efficiency figure of 4.5kmi/kWh but it's more like 4.2mi/kWh in reality). While this will still be more than enough for the average British driver's weekly travel requirements, its not as impressive as some rivals with cheaper price tags.
Charging times are around 23 minutes for 10 to 80 per cent charge on 100kW speeds and around seven hours on a 7kW wallbox home charger. But it's the charging costs that add to the affordability tag. Ford calculated (as of 19 March) that a full Gen-E charge costs £3.23 (based on Intelligent Octopus Go tariff) while the total cost to fill up a petrol Puma is £12.64. It also currently has a deal on offer where all new EV purchases come with a free home charger , including the cost of installation.
Storage space: The Puma Gen E's boot keeps on giving
The Gen-E is a nice, small EV to cover miles in. There's lots of storage throughout the cabin – the raised centre console gives additional storage – and it's very comfortable during long-distance treks. The cabin feels light and airy, especially with the panoramic roof that opens up, and it's generally an upbeat interior, which helps draw attention away from a few of the cheaper materials dotted around. The dash divided my peers on the launch, but I think it looks neat enough if not actively exciting. The B&O soundbar on top - only available in the Premium trim - adds dimension as well as much improved acoustics.
However, Ford's SYNC4 infotainment system with Alexa is definitely not winning points from me: it's a pain to use and the navigation has a longer lag time than a tortoise doing the 100 metre sprint. Another pitfall is the rear seats and lack of head room. It's definitely not suitable for six footers on long trips, but then it is a pretty small car with a sloping roof. But we forgive and forget those bugbears (not least because you can just wireless connect Apple CarPlay and that problem goes away) because Ford has managed to give a small crossover 523 litres of boot space. We'll repeat that: 523 litres. That's more than the Explorer, Mach-E and only (two litres) shy of the Capri - all of them far bigger motors.
It also puts EV models from bigger body segments, like Vauxhall's Mokka-e (310 litres), Volvo EX30 (318 litres) and VW ID.3 (385 litres) to shame. Even a much larger Tesla Model Y SUV has only 554 litres. How? Because Ford's has managed to install the 'Gigabox' boot feature (available in the petrol Puma), which provides masses of underfloor storage. This is particularly useful for those who are nervous about leaving items in the boot, with your goods tucked way out of sight. It's also waterproof and has a plug in it so you can use it for electrical appliances. Bolstering the luggage capacity is a small froot (front boot) measuring 43 litres in total. However, you're likely to keep the charging cable here, so much of the storage area is used. The total space throughout the car is 574-litres of storage space – that's lot for a little vehicle.
Ford Puma Gen-E: The Cars and Motoring verdict
Ford's no stranger to the best-sellers list. In the 54 years that registrations have officially been tracked, a model with the blue oval badge has topped the charts an astonishing 51 times. And we think the arrival of the Gen-E will help Puma cement the position for a 52nd time. I would go as far as saying this is the volume-selling EV the market has been begging for from Ford for years. It's a bit let down by the range, but now Ford's joined the sub-£30k EV party with a spacious, good-to-drive and comfortable small car, you can somewhat overlook this one issue. And many people will feel most comfortable buying an electric equivalent to a car they're already familiar with or driving. So, considering an awful lot of UK drivers already drive a Puma - or intend to buy one - then the electric version should be a no-brainer for those considering a more eco-conscious option. For those not yet ready to make the switch, the 'mild hybrid' petrol Puma remains on sale today with a start price of £26,580.
Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Visit our profile page and hit the follow button above for more of the news you need.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business News Wales
3 hours ago
- Business News Wales
New Reports Highlight Path to Net-Zero Windfarm Operations
Offshore charging for both battery-powered crew transfer and service operation vessels could be on the horizon for windfarms of the future, according to two studies commissioned by green energy company ScottishPower Renewables. The two reports – by MJR Power & Automation and Oasis Marine – are the last in a series of three commissioned by ScottishPower Renewables (SPR) to explore options for decarbonising and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from offshore windfarm operations. The studies consolidated initial findings that the electrification of offshore operations was technically feasible using battery-powered Service Operation Vessels (E-SOVs), which stay out at sea for extended periods. They also looked at the potential to decarbonise offshore operations using electric crew transfer vessels (CTVs) that could be used for windfarms located closer to shore, with findings confirming that it is technically and operationally feasible. In both scenarios, windfarms would also benefit environmentally and economically, with a significant reduction in both GHG emissions as well as fuel costs. Ross Ovens, ScottishPower Renewables' Managing Director for Offshore, said: 'These latest studies have the potential to help the industry take a step closer to a new era for offshore windfarm operations – not just here in the UK, but right across the globe. 'The valuable depth and insight this research offers – regardless of whether you're considering an SOV or CTV operating model – could help inform future windfarm operations as the country continues to build the green generation we need to meet the expected doubling of electricity demand. 'Our thanks to MJR Power & Automation and Oasis Marine, who have helped shine a light on the potential to decarbonise marine operations and how that could help support a cleaner, greener and better future.' The MJR study found that electrical solutions are particularly suitable for offshore windfarm operations, due to the possibility of regular charges directly at offshore energy production sites and at shore-based quay sides. It also identified that operations and maintenance electric vessels will become cheaper than their Marine Gas Oil (MGO) alternatives within the next few years, with operating expenses already competitive with MGO-powered equivalents for SOVs, and fully competitive for CTVs in a couple of years. Paul Cairns, Managing Director, MJR Power & Automation said: 'We were delighted to be commissioned by ScottishPower Renewables to support its Operation Zero project, which represents a major step forward in advancing offshore charging solutions. Working with such a forward-thinking team to help shape the future of sustainable offshore operations has been a fantastic experience. At MJR Power & Automation, we're proud to contribute our expertise toward accelerating the industry's journey to net zero and we hope that our findings are helpful to both ScottishPower Renewables and the wider offshore wind sector in its push to further decarbonise.' The Oasis Marine study identified that using electric CTVs, enabled by installing Oasis Power Buoys in the windfarm, provides protection from volatile fossil fuel price and the high costs of alternative green fuels; enabling costs to be predictable and in line with the operator's business model. Its findings were based on the use of three electric CTVs instead of diesel-fuelled vessels at a case study windfarm. The study identified potential savings of 140,000 tonnes of CO2 emissions and fuel saving costs of around £15 million over the windfarm's anticipated 25-year lifetime. George Smith, Chief Technical Officer of Oasis Marine, said: 'We're pleased to have worked with ScottishPower Renewables to conduct this study into the technical and operational feasibility of installing Oasis Power Buoys as an offshore windfarm charging solution. The study has concluded that the operations and maintenance activities of windfarms can be conducted by electric vessels. This is not only feasible, but can deliver strong environmental and economic benefits. The report summarises and generalises the findings and gives an excellent snapshot of where Oasis Marine's offshore charging technology is today and the potential emission and cost savings it unlocks.' The findings are being shared through the Operation Zero initiative, which was launched at COP26 in Glasgow and brings together developers and supply chain companies committed to making zero-emission operations and maintenance vessels a reality. Leo Hambro from the Operation Zero Steering Committee, added: 'It's great to see developers and the supply chain working together to develop the solutions and best practice that will be a game changer for the industry as a whole. Through studies like these, we will be able to learn, innovate and accelerate the adoption of zero-emission vessels and technologies to achieve a sustainable maritime future.'


Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major bank to close 23 more branches this month in huge blow to UK high streets
Keep reading for the full list of closures below CHEQUE PLEASE Major bank to close 23 more branches this month in huge blow to UK high streets Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR bank is set to close 23 branches this month, as British high streets struggle to survive. The first round of Santander's closures is underway, after the bank announced in March of this year that they would be shutting at least 95 sites nationwide. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Santander is set to close 23 stores this month Credit: Getty They cited the reason for the closures as customers moving increasingly online, reducing the need for in-person services. A statement on its website reads: "We last did a major review of our branches in 2021. "Since then, many of our customers are choosing to use Mobile, Online and Telephone Banking more, and branches less." However, there are concerns about the impact these closures could have on vulnerable people with limited access to online facilities. Charities like Age UK are campaigning to maintain some in-person banking options, with 4 million older Britons unable to manage their finances online. Caroline Abrahams, charity director at Age UK, said: 'Physical spaces – whether a bank or building society branch, Banking Hub, or alternative suitable provision – must continue to exist so people can still carry out face-to-face tasks. "The disappearance of face-to-face banking risks cutting a significant minority of the older population out of an essential service, making it difficult if not impossible for them to manage their money and maintain their independence.' The only alternative is 'Banking Hubs' which have been launched to give customers access to cash and services, regardless of which bank they are with. In addition to the 95 closures countrywide, Santander will also be making changes to surviving branches. This includes reduced opening hours, converting some to 'counter-free' businesses, and opening work cafes. These 'work cafes' provide free co-working spaces, bookable meeting rooms and banking facilities, available to anyone, even if you aren't a Santander customer. Santander's £130 Million Recovery: What You Need to Know The closures are part of a wider financial shift in which banks are prioritising online services. According to consumer group Which?, more than 6,300 bank and building societies have closed since January 2015. This averages out to 53 store closures per month. 2 Banks have reduced in-person services as customers move online Credit: Getty Other major banks have also made the decision to close a number of branches, with 102 set to close across different banks this month. This includes major providers like Lloyds, Natwest and Halifax, in addition to Santander's closures. Meanwhile Nationwide has promised to keep its nearly 700 branches open until the start of 2028 as they claim more customers are visiting their stores. Santander is set to close even more stores over the coming months, with the dates of 18 branches still yet to be announced. Reduced hours will come into effect on June 30, with 36 stores affected. Here is the full list of June closures:


Auto Blog
8 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Senate Moves to End Fuel Economy Fines That Hit Automakers Hardest
Several automakers were projected to face billions of dollars in penalties by 2032 from a fuel economy fine that Congress may repeal. Legacy automakers could save billions with Congress's recent proposal Senate Republicans have proposed ending fines for automakers not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) rules as part of President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' CAFE fuel economy standards have been active since 1975, with the initial penalty at a $5 fine per 0.1 mpg below the standard, multiplied by the number of vehicles sold in the US market. In 1997, this fine increased to $5.50, and today, the penalty is $14 per 0.1 mpg below the standard, with some automakers significantly more affected than others. 0:08 / 0:09 Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure' Watch More Stellantis has paid the highest amount of recent fines, including $156.6 million for the 2016 and 2017 model years, a record $235.5 million for the 2018 to 2019 period, and $190.7 million for the 2019 and 2020 periods. General Motors (GM) paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. In 2001, BMW paid a $27 million CAFE fine. If Congress doesn't change CAFE rules, GM, Ford, and Stellantis are projected to pay over $10 billion in penalties from 2027 to 2032 under stricter regulations set by the Biden administration, according to Transport Topics. Stellantis sign at the company's North American office in Auburn Hills, Michigan. — Source: Stellantis Politicians have their eyes on emissions requirements, too Senate Republicans also proposed lowering emissions requirements, ending the $7,500 electric vehicle (EV) tax credit, imposing a $250 annual EV registration fee, and phasing out EV battery production tax credits in 2028. Tesla earned almost $2.8 billion last year by selling regulatory credits to other automakers, helping competitors meet government-established car emissions rules, many of which are in California. Competitors who don't manufacture enough zero-emission vehicles face steep fines if they don't purchase regulatory credits from Tesla. If rolled back, new emissions requirements would save automakers $200 million, Reuters reports. The Transportation Department also declared that former President Biden's administration exceeded its authority by assuming a high EV adoption rate in calculating fuel economy rates, increasing the likelihood of looser CAFE standards. Under President Biden, 2027 to 2031 model-year passenger cars faced a 2% annual fuel economy increase requirement, with trucks subject to a 4% increase. However, new final rules would keep the 2027 to 2031 passenger car fuel economy at 2% while lowering the annual increase for trucks from 4% to 2% for 2029 to 2031 models. However, separate legislation may eliminate CAFE fines altogether. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) headquarters in Washington, DC — Source: Getty Automakers could still face tailpipe emissions rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), even if Congress eliminates CAFE fines. While Congress can overturn EPA rules, its most recent CAFE proposal doesn't impact EPA penalties. As of 2025, automakers are subject to EPA penalties up to $45,268 per non-compliant vehicle or engine, $4,527 per tampering event or sale of defeat device, and $45,268 per day for reporting and record-keeping violations. Final thoughts If passed, Congress's proposal could significantly shape the U.S. EV adoption rate in favor of lowering immediate costs for legacy automakers. 'We are making vehicles more affordable and easier to manufacture in the United States. The previous administration illegally used CAFE standards as an electric vehicle mandate, raising new car prices and reducing safety. Resetting CAFE standards as Congress intended will lower vehicle costs and ensure the American people can purchase the cars they want,' said current Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy regarding Congress's proposal to end CAFE fines. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile