Concerns raised over Fort Regent development plans
Public concerns have been raised during a government presentation of its vision to develop a prominent part of St Helier.
At an event on Tuesday, Jersey Development Company outlined its plans for Fort Regent, including a cinema, bowling alley, bars and restaurants, a skate park and cable cars connecting the fort with the town.
Some islanders at the meeting expressed unhappiness with the plans and sports clubs which use the fort said they had not been properly consulted.
Constable Andy Jehan, infrastructure minister at the States of Jersey, said he was confident solutions could be found to the issues raised.
Roisin Pitman, 63, said she been involved with Fort Regent for 54 years and founded her Aikido club there in 1987.
She said she was unhappy to be asked to relocate her club to another venue.
"We feel, as long standing users, that we have been forgotten and just farmed out to what they said are suitable premises," said Ms Pitman.
"But with the martial arts side of it, we've been told we will be one of seven groups that are fighting for space in just one room at Oakfield."
Ms Pitman was also unsure about the future vision for Fort Regent.
She said: "I'm not sure about having so many cinemas at Fort Regent, the current users of Fort Regent are not being given a second thought.
"By giving health and well-being possibilities we are taking the strain off health and social services, but we could go out of business if we don't find suitable homes."
James Evans, 39 said the government should put more focus on keeping sports clubs at the fort.
"The government said they have spare rooms they aren't utilising and they have no plans for them, yet they are pushing these people out into various parts of the island that they don't want to be and can't use," he said.
Michael Kidman, 65, also expressed concerns about the plans.
He said: "I think they are unrealistic, they look marvellous but in looking marvellous I don't think they are workable.
"The expense sheet is too big, I think you want to utilise the money progressively and there are 40 groups up there who have nowhere to go and if you lose those you lose a lot of money."
Mr Kidman said he felt the government had not made enough effort to engage with groups currently using the site.
He said: "They haven't made the effort to contact the support groups.
"I've been there every step of the way and I said tonight let's start on a fresh footing so we will see."
Jehan said he had taken the various concerns raised on board and would be looking for solutions.
He said: "I need to do more engagement personally, there is no doubt about that.
"I have been given assurances that things have happened but from what I hear tonight maybe they haven't happened as well as I'd been told.
"So I'm going to spend time with user groups and individual sports to see if we can find solutions for them.
"I'm confident that with the large estate we have on the island we can find solutions."
Jehan said he wanted to hear more opinions on the proposed uses for Fort Regent, including the cinema.
He said: "I think we are going to wait for the feedback from all islanders, clearly tonight we had a lot of people that have got an interest in Fort Regent from a sport perspective."
Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
New £110m redevelopment plans for Fort Regent
Fort Regent plans backed by entertainment boss
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23-04-2025
- Yahoo
Concerns raised over Fort Regent development plans
Public concerns have been raised during a government presentation of its vision to develop a prominent part of St Helier. At an event on Tuesday, Jersey Development Company outlined its plans for Fort Regent, including a cinema, bowling alley, bars and restaurants, a skate park and cable cars connecting the fort with the town. Some islanders at the meeting expressed unhappiness with the plans and sports clubs which use the fort said they had not been properly consulted. Constable Andy Jehan, infrastructure minister at the States of Jersey, said he was confident solutions could be found to the issues raised. Roisin Pitman, 63, said she been involved with Fort Regent for 54 years and founded her Aikido club there in 1987. She said she was unhappy to be asked to relocate her club to another venue. "We feel, as long standing users, that we have been forgotten and just farmed out to what they said are suitable premises," said Ms Pitman. "But with the martial arts side of it, we've been told we will be one of seven groups that are fighting for space in just one room at Oakfield." Ms Pitman was also unsure about the future vision for Fort Regent. She said: "I'm not sure about having so many cinemas at Fort Regent, the current users of Fort Regent are not being given a second thought. "By giving health and well-being possibilities we are taking the strain off health and social services, but we could go out of business if we don't find suitable homes." James Evans, 39 said the government should put more focus on keeping sports clubs at the fort. "The government said they have spare rooms they aren't utilising and they have no plans for them, yet they are pushing these people out into various parts of the island that they don't want to be and can't use," he said. Michael Kidman, 65, also expressed concerns about the plans. He said: "I think they are unrealistic, they look marvellous but in looking marvellous I don't think they are workable. "The expense sheet is too big, I think you want to utilise the money progressively and there are 40 groups up there who have nowhere to go and if you lose those you lose a lot of money." Mr Kidman said he felt the government had not made enough effort to engage with groups currently using the site. He said: "They haven't made the effort to contact the support groups. "I've been there every step of the way and I said tonight let's start on a fresh footing so we will see." Jehan said he had taken the various concerns raised on board and would be looking for solutions. He said: "I need to do more engagement personally, there is no doubt about that. "I have been given assurances that things have happened but from what I hear tonight maybe they haven't happened as well as I'd been told. "So I'm going to spend time with user groups and individual sports to see if we can find solutions for them. "I'm confident that with the large estate we have on the island we can find solutions." Jehan said he wanted to hear more opinions on the proposed uses for Fort Regent, including the cinema. He said: "I think we are going to wait for the feedback from all islanders, clearly tonight we had a lot of people that have got an interest in Fort Regent from a sport perspective." Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to New £110m redevelopment plans for Fort Regent Fort Regent plans backed by entertainment boss
The Hill
27-03-2025
- The Hill
Judge: High heat in Texas prisons unconstitutional
A federal judge found the extreme heat in Texas prisons is 'plainly unconstitutional,' but did not order the state to begin installing air conditioners. While U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman affirmed some of the claims about incarcerated conditions in the state, advocates will have to continue pressing their lawsuit in a trial, The Associated Press reported. 'This case concerns the plainly unconstitutional treatment of some of the most vulnerable, marginalized members of our society,' Pitman said in his ruling, noting that he believes excessive heat is unconstitutional punishment. The suit was originally filed in 2023 by Bernie Tiede, a former mortician serving a life sentence, until prisoner rights groups joined his effort. The lawsuit argues the heat in Texas prisons can amount to cruel and unusual punishment. Summer heat can easily be above 100 degrees Fahrenheit in the state, particularly as summers continue to get warmer due to climate change. The plaintiffs are asking the state to install air conditioning in state facilities and while the judge stopped short of ordering the state to spend the billions of dollars on the installation, Jeff Edwards, the lead attorney for prisoners, said it was a victory. 'We proved our case,' he said. 'The court made it very clear what the state is doing is unconstitutional and endangering the lives of those they are supposed to be protecting.' Edwards said he wishes they could have protected prisoners for the upcoming summer months but will continue to work on their goal. Pitman noted that it would take months to install temporary air conditioning and billions for a permanent solution. He expects the case to go to trial, where advocates can continue their case, though the state Legislature has not made moves on the matter for years. The AP noted that about a third of the state's roughly 100 prison units are fully air conditioned and the rest only have partial air conditioning or no electric cooling.
Yahoo
08-02-2025
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks Texas SCOPE law keeping kids from ‘democratic exchange of views online'
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A federal judge blocked enforcement of a Texas law that he found to restrict Texas minors' First Amendment rights, calling into question Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's claims that the law protects minors from content he calls 'harmful.' PREVIOUS: Texas social media safety law faces court challenge The Securing Children Online through Parental Empowerment (SCOPE) Act or HB 18 requires websites like Facebook and TikTok to implement strategies to prevent a minor from accessing content that 'promotes, glorifies or facilitates' suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, substance abuse, stalking, bullying, harassment, grooming, trafficking, child [sexual assault material], or other sexual abuse. Paxton suing TikTok, referencing SCOPE Act violations Western Texas District Court Judge Robert Pitman said in the order that this part of HB 18 was 'as content based as it gets,' and thus deserving of strict scrutiny. Under that standard, Paxton must show a compelling state interest in censoring the content. KXAN has reached out to Paxton for his response to the ruling. 'It is far from clear that Texas has a compelling interest in preventing minors' access to everysingle category of information listed above,' Pitman wrote. 'Many interests are not compelling, such as regulating content that might advocate for the deregulation of drugs (potentially 'promoting' 'substance abuse') or defending the morality of physician-assisted suicide (likely 'promoting' 'suicide').' He also cited the Supreme Court's opinion in the 1975 case Erznoznik v. Jacksonville, where it found that 'speech that is neither obscene as to youths nor subject to some other legitimate proscription cannot be suppressed solely to protect the young from ideas or images that a legislative body thinks unsuitable for them.' 'In its attempt to block children from accessing harmful content, Texas also prohibits minors from participating in the democratic exchange of views online,' Pitman wrote. 'Even accepting that Texas only wishes to prohibit the most harmful pieces of content, a state cannot pick and choose which categories of protected speech it wishes to block teenagers from discussing online.' Pitman noted that many terms used in HB 18 are 'too vague' and 'politically charged.' Specifically, he called out the terms 'promoting, glorifying, substance abuse, harassment and grooming.' The lawsuit was brought by Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, and law firm Davis Wright Tremaine on behalf of three minors who said that their access to content and ability to post about their experiences had been limited. 'This is a tremendous victory against government censorship, especially for our clients—ordinary citizens—who stood up to the State of Texas,' said Adam Sieff, partner at Davis Wright Tremaine. 'The Court enjoined every substantive provision of the SCOPE Act we challenged, granting even broader relief than its first preliminary injunction. We hope this decision will give other states pause before broadly restricting free expression online.' You can read Pitman's ruling below: Order-Granting-In-Part-and-Denying-in-Part-Plaintiffs-Motion-for-Preliminary-Injunction-Students-Engaged-in-Advancing-Texas-v.-PaxtonDownload Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
