A 58-year-old woman has died of a rare neurological condition. The cause of death? Being injected with hormones taken from a corpse.
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
A woman in the U.S. has died from severe neurological symptoms that were caused by an abnormal protein — which she was unknowingly injected with nearly 50 years earlier.
Having shown no neurological symptoms in the decades since the injection, the 58-year-old recently began experiencing tremors and changes in her ability to balance while walking. In the following weeks, she developed urinary incontinence, difficulty speaking and abnormal breathing. After being admitted to hospital, she entered a coma and later died, according to a case report published May 14 in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.
A follow-up MRI scan while she was in hospital revealed damage to her brain, and further testing showed positive results for an abnormal protein called a prion.
Prions are found in cell membranes, the wall that surrounds every one of our cells, and are thought to be one of the molecules involved in cellular communication and other interactions.
Though prions can exist safely in the body, when these proteins accumulate in the brain they can cause surrounding proteins to contort and "misfold," damaging nerve cells. Infection with an abnormally 'folded' prion from an external source – like eating contaminated meat, as in the case of 'mad cow' disease – can also spark a chain of misfolding in the body.
The brain damage caused by prion diseases is always fatal, with most patients dying within one year of first developing symptoms, according to Mayo Clinic.
In this case, the woman was diagnosed with Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), an extremely rare and fatal brain wasting disease caused by prions.
Related: Here's how dangerous, deadly prions spread to the brain
It is thought the woman was given prion-infected hormones sometime between 1971 and 1980, while receiving treatment for a condition called panhypopituitarism. People with this condition have a lack of hormones produced by the pituitary gland, the organ that secretes a range of hormones including those involved in growth and sexual development.
In the 1970s, panhypopituitarism was treated by injecting patients with human growth hormones extracted from the healthy pituitary glands of people who had died. At the time, this was common practice — as well as being used to treat pituitary conditions, hormones from cadavers were also given to women whose ovaries were not producing eggs.
However, in 1985 researchers identified the first U.S. outbreak of CJD related to treatments with cadaver-derived growth hormones. The treatment was quickly suspended, and later a synthetic alternative hormone, produced by genetic engineering, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
RELATED STORIES
— Alzheimer's comes in at least 5 distinct forms, study reveals
— Shingles vaccine may directly guard against dementia, study hints
— 13 proteins tied to brain aging seem to spike at ages 57, 70 and 78
So far, 0.4% of those treated in the U.S with growth hormones taken from the organs of deceased individuals have gone on to develop CJD. How these hormones were infected with prions is still unknown, and scientists cannot yet explain why there is such a long latency period between the infection and the symptoms arising.
There is currently no treatment available to those with CJD, or any other form of prion disease. However, ongoing research projects seek to uncover treatments for the conditions.
The researchers involved in the recent case study said that while the number of people developing CJD as a result of growth hormone treatment has slowed over the years, it is still possible that new cases will arise.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can adults grow new brain cells?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The developing human brain gains billions of neurons while in the womb, and tacks on some more during childhood. For most of the 20th century, the conventional wisdom was that the brain cells grown before adulthood would be the only ones we would have for the rest of our lives. But over the past few decades, more and more research is challenging that belief. So is it actually possible for adults to grow neurons? While some experts believe there's strong evidence that we can gain brain cells after childhood, others are still skeptical of this notion. The process of creating new brain cells is called neurogenesis. Researchers first observed neurogenesis after birth in lab animals of various ages, including mice, rats and songbirds. In adult mice, they found new neurons growing in parts of the brain collectively called the subventricular zone, an area closely linked with sense of smell, as well as in the hippocampus, a structure that's central to memory. Researchers think that neurogenesis in these brain regions is important for plasticity, or the brain's ability to adapt and change over time. Plasticity underlies the ability to learn and form memories, for instance. In mice, it's clear that lifestyle factors such as living in a stimulating environment and exercising can promote the growth of new neurons. Conversely, in mouse models of diseases like Alzheimer's, neurogenesis is hampered. What's still up for debate is whether these findings extend beyond mice and other lab animals. "Most of our knowledge about adult neurogenesis came from studies in animal models," Hongjun Song, a professor of neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, told Live Science in an email. "Whether such knowledge can be directly translated to human studies is a challenge." That's because many of the studies that have established the existence of adult neurogenesis in animals used methods that aren't possible in human studies, such as injecting radioactive tracer molecules into the brain. These methods enable scientists to visualize if and where new neurons are growing, but the tracers themselves can be toxic. These methods also require dissecting the brain after the animal has been euthanized. "Unfortunately, there is no way to measure neurogenesis in the living person yet," Gerd Kempermann, a professor of genomics of regeneration at the Center for Regenerative Therapies in Dresden, Germany, told Live Science in an email. Related: Is there really a difference between male and female brains? Emerging science is revealing the answer. There are, however, some rare cases in which scientists have been able to apply similar methods to track neurogenesis in humans. For example, the radioactive tracer molecules used in animal neurogenesis studies are also sometimes used by doctors to track tumor growth in patients with brain cancer. While these radioactive tracer molecules are too toxic to give to healthy people, their benefits outweigh their risks in patients who already have cancer. Scientists behind a 1998 study published in the journal Nature Medicine used this approach and analyzed the brains of cancer patients after their deaths. They reported that, in addition to flagging cancer cells, the tracer molecules had marked new neurons in the hippocampus. This finding suggested that humans could grow new neurons well into adulthood, given the patients were 57 to 72 years old. Later, a 2013 study in the journal Cell used a form of radiocarbon dating to look for new neurons in humans. Radiocarbon dating usually determines the age of a sample by comparing the relative proportion of two different forms of carbon, or carbon isotopes, called carbon-14 and carbon-12. But to study neurogenesis in humans, scientists instead looked at carbon-14 concentrations inside the DNA of cells. Their approach took advantage of the fact that there was a spike in carbon-14 levels in the atmosphere caused by nuclear bomb tests in the 1950s and 1960s. People's bodies absorbed this carbon-14 via their diets, and it became incorporated into their DNA. The amount of carbon-14 in a given cell corresponds to the isotope's concentrations in the atmosphere at the time the cell formed, making it possible to roughly pinpoint the "birthday" of that cell — and determine whether it formed after its owner's birth. By analyzing postmortem brain tissue from people ages 19 to 92, this radiocarbon study identified newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus. But while compelling, the study's methods were so complex that the results have never been replicated. That said, there are also more indirect markers of neurogenesis, such as certain proteins that are only present in growing neurons. Using these methods, both Kempermann and other research groups have uncovered additional evidence of newborn neurons in the adult human brain. "There are many different markers that are more or less specific for adult neurogenesis," Kempermann said. "In tissue sections, one can study these markers under the microscope and look for patterns that are consistent with neuronal development." But some researchers aren't convinced by this evidence. Arturo Alvarez-Buylla, a professor of neurological surgery at the University of California, San Francisco, has spent his career studying the growth of new neurons. While he's observed new neurons being formed in children and adolescents, he's found little evidence to support the notion of neurogenesis in adults. Alvarez-Buylla believes there are a number of issues that may lead other researchers to find signs of neurogenesis in adult humans. For example, the chemical markers that some labs use to track new neurons may also show up in other cell types, such as glia, which are cells in the brain that support neurons' function in various ways. This may make it appear that new neurons are growing when they're actually not. He's also skeptical of the use of carbon-14 dating for this purpose, calling it "creative" but arguing that researchers can't confirm that the new cells are neurons, or if there could be other potential reasons for varying carbon-14 levels in cells. But Alvarez-Buylla isn't ruling out the possibility of human adult neurogenesis; he's only saying that — so far — the evidence hasn't convinced him. "I would say that is a rare phenomenon," said Alvarez-Buylla. "If it happens, it's very, very few cells." Kempermann, on the other hand, is a firm believer that people can grow new neurons well into adulthood. "The positive reports outnumber the critical papers by far, their take is much wider, and their quality is overall higher." The researchers said that understanding whether adult neurogenesis exists will continue to be a key question for the field of neuroscience. RELATED STORIES —Could we ever retrieve memories from a dead person's brain? —What happens in your brain while you sleep? —How much of your brain do you need to survive? "The question about whether adults can grow new neurons has tremendous implications for the plasticity of the adult brain," Song said. If new neurons can be grown and integrated into the brain, he explained, those mechanisms could form the basis for new therapies for a variety of conditions, including brain injuries and neurodegenerative disorders. Alvarez-Buylla said that even if he doesn't believe neurogenesis happens frequently in adults, it may nonetheless be possible to harness the mechanisms used by animals to grow new neurons for human therapies. "The whole idea that it can happen opens a huge door for repair," he said. "I hope that we can keep our plasticity open to things going either way."
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northern lights may be visible in these 23 US States tonight
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Northern lights could put on an impressive show tonight (June 1) as ongoing geomagnetic storm conditions may push auroras farther south than usual, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Earth is currently reverberating from a speedy coronal mass ejection (CME) impact that struck in the early hours of June 1, wreaking havoc on our planet's magnetic field — great news for anyone hoping to see the northern lights. Space weather forecasters from the U.K. Met Office predict frequent G1 to G2 level storming and occasional G3 and even G4 level storm intervals possible June 1-2. Read more: Aurora alert: Ongoing powerful geomagnetic storm could spark more northern lights across the US tonight The NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center predicts that the Kp index will peak at 7.67 over the next 24 hours. For an up-to-date breakdown of timings, check out NOAA's 3-day forecast. (Kp is a measurement of geomagnetic activity, with an index that ranges from 0 to 9; higher Kp indicates stronger auroral activity.) Aurora chasers, get those cameras charged, fingers crossed and your eyes firmly fixed on the skies! You can also keep up with the latest forecasts and geomagnetic storm warnings with our aurora forecast live blog. Alaska has the highest chance of seeing the northern lights tonight. If G3 or even G4 storm levels are reached, auroras could be visible at high-latitude states, including Michigan and Maine, according to NOAA. Below, we have listed all 23 states that appear either fully or in part above the possible view line for auroras tonight according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center. They are ordered most likely to least likely based on their proximity to the auroral oval's center and how much of each state is within or near the view line. But remember, auroras are fickle — sometimes they appear much farther south than predicted, and other times they barely show up at all. Many conditions have to align for the perfect display. Alaska Montana North Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin Michigan South Dakota Vermont New Hampshire Maine Idaho Washington Oregon New York Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island Nebraska Iowa Wyoming Illinois Indianna Pennsylvania If you find yourself in one of the 23 states forecasted to have a chance of seeing the northern lights tonight, head to a north-facing vantage point as far away from light pollution as possible. But as we approach the summer solstice on June 20/21, the window of darkness for observing northern lights is shrinking; the early morning hours around 1 and 2 a.m. might be the best time to try and see the northern lights. Interested in tracking space weather and knowing when and where to spot auroras? Download a space weather app that provides forecasts based on your location. One option I use is "My Aurora Forecast & Alerts," available for both iOS and Android. However, any similar app should work well. I also use the "Space Weather Live" app, which is available on iOS and Android, to get a deeper understanding of whether the current space weather conditions are favorable for aurora sightings. Editor's note: If you snap a great picture of the northern or southern lights and would like to share it with readers, send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google's AI push overshadowed by an awkward date error
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Google was all about AI at its annual I/O event last week. The tech giant wants its Gemini AI model everywhere and plans to put it in all of its devices. It also plans on bringing its AI into more of its services. One of those services getting the AI upgrade is Gmail. Over the course of the upcoming weeks, Gmail users will begin seeing AI summaries of their email, according to a blog post from Google. This summary will provide bullet points of what was in the email as well as any follow-up replies to make sure you're up to date. This feature will only be available on emails in English. Those who don't care for AI summarizing their correspondence can opt out of the feature, but it will be enabled by default. Google began instituting AI features into Gmail last year by having Gemini provide instant replies that no longer sounded generic. At the same time, Google is implementing new AI features, but some people have found the company's AI is far from perfect. A post on Reddit went viral earlier in the week when a screenshot of an interaction with an AI summary on Google Search was unable to determine what the current year was. And yet we can't turn this off from r/google In the screenshot, the individual did a Google search asking, "Is it 2025?" The AI summary they received apparently had issues with the question saying, "It is not 2025. The current year is 2024." Other people on X posted similar results. Wired did multiple tests over this prompt and confirmed the issue. In one case, the AI summary reiterated that it was 2024, but said that in parts of New Zealand and Russia, it was 2025. It even went on to contradict itself, saying that it was 2025 after claiming it was 2024. A Google spokesperson says it was working on the problem. 'As with all Search features, we rigorously make improvements and use examples like this to update our systems. The vast majority of AI Overviews provide helpful, factual information, and we're actively working on an update to address this type of issue,' Meghann Farnsworth, a Google spokesperson, told Wired. As of the publication of this article, Googling "is it 2025" returns with an AI summary saying, "Yes, according to the provided information, the current year is 2025." It remains to be seen if this problem will happen again in 2026. Google makes a bold pitch for an all-encompassing AI: "Project Astra" Google and XREAL announce Project Aura, XR smart glasses for Android An exclusive look at Google's NotebookLM app on Android and iOS