Jagdeep Dhankhar not the first Vice President to resign midterm — here's who did it before and why
Dhankhar's resignation comes hours after he presided over the sitting of the Rajya Sabha as chairperson during the first day of Monsoon Session of Parliament.
The Vice President of India is the chairperson of the Rajya Sabha.
"To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately, in accordance with Article 67(a) of the Constitution.
The Vice President of India is the second-highest constitutional office in the government of India after the President. In accordance with Article 63 of the Constitution of India, the Vice President discharges the functions of the President when a contingency arises due to the President's resignation, removal, death, impeachment, or inability to discharge their functions.
Dhankhar is not the first Vice President to quit before the end of the term. But he is, perhaps, the first to quit citing health reasons. Dhankar assumed the office on 11 August 2022, succeeding Venkaiah Naidu.
The Vice President holds office for five years. So ideally, Dhankhar should have continued to be the Vice President till August of 2027.
Many Vice Presidents of India have resigned before him from office since the post was established in 1952
To prioritise health care and abide by medical advice, I hereby resign as the Vice President of India, effective immediately.
In most cases, the reason has been to contest the Presidential election.
-In May 1969, Vice President VV Giri resigned following the death of President Zakir Husain. Giri eventually won the elections to become the fourth President of India.
-In July 1987, R Venkataraman resigned as Vice President to contest Presidential Elections. Venkataraman became the President of India, eventually.
-In July 1992, Shankar Dayal Sharma resigned as India's Vice President to contest Presidential polls. Sharma became President on July 25, 1992.
-In July 1997, KR Narayanan resigned as Vice President to contest Presidential elections. Narayanan, like Sharma, became President of India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Not a culmination, but a beginning': Kamal Haasan pens a thoughtful note on making Parliament debut
Superstar Kamal Haasan was sworn in as a Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament on Friday. The Tamil actor and politician took his oath in Tamil to resounding thumps on the table by fellow Parliamentarians. The 'Thug Life' actor expressed his happiness on his significant political milestone. The 69-year-old Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM) founder and actor-turned-politician, talking to media persons outside the parliament earlier, said, 'I am very proud and honoured.' Kamal Haasan's election to the Upper House marks a significant milestone in his political journey, as he assumes a national legislative role for the first time. 'Today, as I rose to take the affirmation as a Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha, I did so with a heart full of humility and a conscience weighed by responsibility. I have sworn to uphold the Constitution of India – not as a ritual of formality, but as a solemn promise to serve its spirit with fidelity, courage, and conscience,' Haasan wrote later in a message on X. Haasan was nominated with the support of the ruling DMK-led alliance, which had promised him a Rajya Sabha seat in return for MNM's support during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. 'This moment is not mine alone. I share it with my people, whose voices I carry into the chambers of power. I share it with the soil of Tamil Nadu that has nurtured me – a land that has produced poets and revolutionaries, thinkers and reformers, and above all, citizens who believe deeply in justice, dignity, and self-respect,' Haasan said in the three-page message. Haasan filed his nomination on June 6 at the Tamil Nadu Secretariat in the presence of Chief Minister MK Stalin, Deputy CM Udhayanidhi Stalin, among other political leaders. On June 12, Haasan, who is the president of MNM, and five others were elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha from Tamil Nadu. The five others elected are DMK's Poet Salma (A Rokkaiah Malik), SR Sivalingam, P Wilson (who enters his second term), and AIADMK's IS Inbadurai and Dhanapal. Haasan promised that he would strive to be the voice of Tamil Nadu in Delhi — clear, compassionate, and committed —and that he would speak not for one community but for the common good. This moment is not mine alone. I share it with my people, whose voices I carry into the chambers of power. "With reverence for the Constitution, with faith in democracy, and with love for my people, I begin this chapter not as a culmination, but as a beginning,' he said. Key Takeaways Kamal Haasan emphasizes the importance of representing the voices of Tamil Nadu in Parliament. His election signifies a broader political strategy and alliance-building in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. Haasan's approach combines reverence for the Constitution with a commitment to serve the common good.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Shruti Haasan promises a brave new world as father Kamal Haasan joins Rajya Sabha
Actor Kamal Haasan was recently sworn in as a Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament (MP) in New Delhi. COngratulating him on the political milestone, his actor-daughter Shruti Haasan wrote an emotional note on social shared a picture with Kamal on her Instagram story which read, "Love you and proud of you Appa. Always." She added another picture on her Instagram post with her father with a message expressing pride over his achievement. Shruti Haasan congratulated Kamal Haasan on being sworn-in as Rajya Sabha MP. (Credit: Instagram/shrutzhaasan) advertisementHer caption read, "My dearest Appa, today marks the journey of your steps into a brave new world . Watching you take your oath in the Rajya Sabha with your signature voice echoing through the chambers with strength and gravitas was a moment forever etched in my mind. As always, I wish for you to be happy and achieve all you hope to achieve." She added folded hands, heart and bad omen emojis. Shruti further wrote, "Love always. always, always." Shruti Haasan joind her father Kamal Haasan in the national capital. (Credit: Instagram/shrutzhaasan) The 'Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire' actor flew to the national capital to support her father. Kamal made his parliamentary debut on Friday, July 25, taking oath as a Rajya Sabha MP in Tamil during the fifth day of the Monsoon Session. The 'Thug Life' actor was elected unopposed to the upper house in June as part of the DMK-led bloc. Following the ceremony, he greeted Deputy Rajya Sabha Chairman to the media ahead of the swearing-in, the actor-turned-parliamentarian said, "I am proud and honoured. I'm going to swear in and register my name. As an Indian, I will do my duty."Kamal's party, Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM), had joined hands with the DMK-led alliance ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. As part of the seat-sharing arrangement, MNM was assured a Rajya Sabha seat in exchange for its actor was last seen in director Mani Ratnam's 'Thug Life' (2025). He will next be seen in 'Indian 3' (2025).Kamal is also likely to have a longer screen time as the antagonist in the sequel to Nag Ashwin's 'Kalki 2898 AD'.- EndsMust Watch
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Motion to remove Justice Varma to begin in Lok Sabha; ‘No doubts remain,' says govt
The notice for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma is likely to be taken up in the Lok Sabha, with that 'received' by former Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar in the Rajya Sabha unlikely to be considered. The announcement by Dhankhar, as Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, that he had 'received' a notice for the removal of Justice Varma from 63 Opposition MPs is believed to have triggered the series of events leading to his resignation as VP. Speaking to reporters on Friday, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said: 'All the political parties have agreed that the removal of Justice Yashwant Verma has to be a joint call. Now there should be no issue with regard to which House it has to be moved. Once we have agreed that it will be moved in the Lok Sabha… it will be concurred in the Rajya Sabha as per rule… So we should not remain under any doubt that the discussion and the motion, everything, will begin in the Lok Sabha, and the Rajya Sabha, as per rule, will give concurrence and there will be a thorough discussion in the Rajya Sabha also.' This was decided by consensus among all parties, Rijiju emphasised. 'The agreement amongst all parties is that the motion for removal of Justice Varma will begin in the Lok Sabha. It will be taken up in the Lok Sabha and then subsequently it will be concurred by the Rajya Sabha. That is the agreement of all the parties.' While presiding over the Rajya Sabha Monday, hours before he resigned, Dhankhar said he had 'received a notice of motion' from the Opposition for constituting a statutory committee for removal of Justice Varma. He added: 'I direct the Secretary General to find out whether a similar motion has been moved in the House of People, the Lok Sabha… This is being done for the purpose that under the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968, the procedure (in such a case) is different.' Under the Act, if a notice to remove a judge is presented in both the Houses of Parliament on the same day, then the committee for inquiry is to be constituted jointly by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. Since Dhankhar's resignation, the post of Chairman is vacant. Having made its intent clear to act on impeaching Justice Varma – over the alleged recovery of a stack of notes from his home – the government, which had initiated its notice in the Lok Sabha, was taken by surprise by Dhankhar's move. The government notice, signed by 145 MPs, including Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, had been handed over to the Lok Sabha Speaker earlier in the day. Dhankhar's move meant the Opposition could steal the government limelight on an issue of crucial import, dealing with judicial accountability. Sources told The Indian Express that officials in the Secretariats of the two Houses are now verifying whether remarks made by Dhankhar as Rajya Sabha Chair on the Opposition notice were 'legally valid'. That rests on determining whether Dhankhar's statement meant that the notice had only been 'received' by the Chair, or 'accepted' by the Chair. As per one line of opinion, Dhankhar's remarks do not amount to 'admission' of the Opposition notice as they 'didn't follow the formalities'. If the notice in the Rajya Sabha is determined to be only 'received' by the House and not yet 'accepted', the motion in the Lok Sabha will be considered to be at play. Former Lok Sabha Secretary General P D T Achary said a mere announcement by Dhankhar didn't mean much, as there is nothing in the process for removal of a judge concerning that. 'When a presiding officer receives a notice, he or she has to make a preliminary examination into the notice, look into the evidence annexed by them and decide the admissibility. They can reject or accept it. In the issue of this notice, the Chairman (Dhankhar) does not seem to have done any of these,' Achary said, adding that 'there is no requirement regarding reading it (the notice) in the House'. Sources said the government is also apprehensive about legal issues if Dhankhar's remarks are considered as 'acceptance' of the notice to remove Justice Varma, as this would entail setting up a joint committee by the Lok Sabha Speaker and Rajya Sabha Chairman to probe the charges against him. Since the office of the Vice President is currently vacant, the presiding officer of the Rajya Sabha is Deputy Chairman Harivansh. Whether Harivansh can take the place of the Chairman in constituting the committee is uncertain legal territory. The constitutional provisions regarding the removal of a judge mention specifically the 'Chairman of the Rajya Sabha' and not the 'Vice President'. But, sources said, the government does not want any room for a legal challenge, delaying the impeachment process against Justice Varma. But, if the notice is considered as accepted only in the Lok Sabha, then it is up to Speaker Om Birla to appoint the three-member inquiry committee, in consultation with the Chief Justice of India. The committee is required to have one member who is either the CJI or a judge of the Supreme Court; a member from among the Chief Justices or judges of high courts; and a distinguished jurist. One reason the government believes it is on solid ground in not considering the Rajya Sabha notice is that there are doubts whether it was 'complete' or 'valid', since it did not have any annexures or supporting material attached to make a case for impeaching Justice Varma. The motion reportedly only cites then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna's communication to the President and Prime Minister calling for impeachment of Justice Varma, along with the findings of the Supreme Court's in-house inquiry report. Sources point out that the Presidential secretariat had communicated with the Lok Sabha Speaker regarding this inquiry report, and not the Rajya Sabha. However, Achary said the law itself does not require attached annexures to accept a notice.
