logo
Under scrutiny, Oklahoma leader points finger for $43M deficit, contract cancellations

Under scrutiny, Oklahoma leader points finger for $43M deficit, contract cancellations

Yahoo18-04-2025

Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Commissioner Allie Friesen attends a meeting Thursday at the state Capitol in Oklahoma City with House lawmakers reviewing her agency's finances. (Photo by Emma Murphy/Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY — Oklahoma's mental health department faces a $43 million deficit, and letters canceling some provider contracts were sent without the agency head's knowledge, the agency's commissioner said during a special legislative hearing Thursday.
Oklahoma lawmakers questioned Commissioner Allie Friesen for hours amid reports of financial disarray at the Oklahoma State Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services and outrage over provider contracts being 'cut' or 'canceled.' She was one of 11 witnesses called by the committee to testify under oath.
Friesen, who was appointed by Gov. Kevin Stitt in January 2024, said her administration inherited a 'chaotic' situation and former agency leaders failed to make proper budget requests of the Legislature, leading to financial shortfalls.
'What this administration will not tolerate is, 'Make it look good and don't show anybody the bad,'' she said.
The extent of the shortfall has been under question, as officials originally believed it was $63 million. Friesen said further investigation after the deficiency was initially brought to her attention found it was $43 million.
Some providers who have contracts with the agency have said they received notice that their contracts were altered or terminated retroactively, meaning funds for services already provided may not come.
Letters referenced 'incentive or bonus payments,' Friesen said, and some providers 'independently' decided to lay off staff and close facilities.
'As soon as I realized that those are functioning not as a bonus, but rather as a core component of care, we pivoted,' Friesen said. 'And we realized that we needed to quickly ask for a supplemental (appropriation), and we need to make sure that these providers have what they need.'
The agency requested a $6.2 million supplemental appropriation Monday to ensure 'balanced budget and the continued delivery of essential behavioral health services' for the current fiscal year. It was unclear how the agency planned to fill the rest of the deficit.
Other letters canceled contracts for three Tulsa-area certified community behavioral health clinics in relation to a protest to a request for proposal, or RFP.
Friesen said these letters were sent by the Office of Management and Enterprise Services without her or her general counsel's knowledge.
Christa Helfrey, a spokesperson for OMES, said in a statement after the hearing that the process has been reviewed to ensure there is 'no potential lapse in communication or services for Oklahomans' and the agency is 'committed to assisting all agencies with the procurement process.'
Rep. Mark Lawson, R-Sapulpa, who chaired the special committee said there is 'an ongoing dispute' over the process for soliciting bids for services in the Tulsa area that some claim was unfair. He said notices of cancellation, effective May 10, from OMES were sent to Family and Children's Services, CREOKS Health Services, and Grand Mental Health, all of which are involved in the dispute.
Tulsa District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler, who testified Thursday, questioned why all three cancellations were for providers in the Tulsa area and whether they were retaliatory against contractors who 'challenged' the agency's RFP.
In its budget proposal this year, the Mental Health Department requested $569 million from the state Legislature for the 2026 fiscal year, a 48% increase from last year's appropriation. Friesen said the agency is working on an amended budget request to present to the Legislature.
The Legislature must approve a state budget by the end of session in May.
House budget chair Trey Caldwell, R-Faxon, previously told Oklahoma Voice the agency's past administration had been paying prior year bills with new money, and it caught up with them.
The agency has several ongoing financial strains, including a recently approved consent decree expected to cost between $26 million and $45 million over three to five years, and the construction of a new inpatient behavioral health hospital that's $124 million over budget.
Friesen reported Thursday that the agency has reduced the competency restoration waitlist to 154 individuals, which is a 33% reduction from the time the lawsuit that led to the settlement was filed.
A total of four staff members left the agency in December and were asked, but 'not required,' to sign what Friesen referred to as both 'nondisclosure agreements' and 'settlements' during her testimony.
The agency's former chief financial officer, Richard Edwards, previously told Oklahoma Voice he resigned under threat of termination and was being used as a scapegoat for the financial issues.
The agreements did not resolve legal issues or complaints, Friesen said. Lawmakers requested to see the agreements, which Friesen said she will provide within the week, pending a review of their confidentiality.
A handful of investigations into the agency have been requested, including to the state auditor, the Legislative Office of Fiscal Transparency, a 'special investigator,' and Thursday's special House committee.
Ahead of Thursday's hearing, House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, said lawmakers weren't sure how it was going to end and just wanted to 'dig in' to find out 'what in the world is going on.'
'Let's get some answers,' Hilbert said. 'And obviously there's a lot of talk about the numbers, and that certainly matters, the budget matters. But we also have to talk about the people at the end of those numbers that are impacted by the decisions that have been going on.'
Investigations from the state auditor, the House, and LOFT are all in communication and collaborative efforts, he said. He was unsure what the plans of the special investigator were.
Commissioner Friesen on Thursday also briefly referenced an investigation from the Office of the Inspector General, a federal agency that's tasked with rooting out fraud, waste and other abuses and to improve Medicaid and Medicare efficiency.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Stitt said Wednesday that if the committee finds something that needs to be 'fixed,' he'll be the first to take action. He reiterated his stance that funding for the agency is not being cut and said some contracts were under review where the request for proposal process 'wasn't done accurately.'
'What you're seeing now is because (Allie) got rid of her CFO, and she got rid of, like, four or five of her lieutenants, and then everything started coming up,' he said. 'So sometimes, when you have people with agencies that have been there for 30, 40 years, they're moving the ball pretty good. They understand how this, how this building works, and they're paying every invoice so nobody squawks.'
After meeting for over three hours, House lawmakers said they planned to continue the hearing next week.
The Mental Health Department's interim chief financial officer, a former chief of staff, the director of the Legislature's fiscal oversight body, a few providers, and the purchasing director for the state will return next week to testify.
Reporter Nuria Martinez-Keel contributed to this story.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill
Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill

Medicaid churn: How working Americans could mistakenly lose coverage under Trump tax bill Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. A centerpiece of Donald Trump's tax bill would make millions of Medicaid recipients work, volunteer or study to maintain their publicly-financed health insurance. Republicans say the work requirement is vital to protect taxpayers while motivating nondisabled Medicaid recipients to take charge of their physical and fiscal health. Dr. Mehmet Oz challenged this population to "prove that you matter." But health advocacy groups and analysts say most recipients already work in jobs that don't provide affordable health insurance or pay enough for people to afford their own insurance. They say mandating a Medicaid work requirement − combined with more frequent eligibility checks − would create an administrative nightmare that drops coverage for many who qualify for the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled residents. What is Medicaid churn? Medicaid rolls vary from month to month as people lose eligibility due to a new job, a raise or other income source that disqualifies them for coverage. A job loss or change in life circumstances could make someone newly eligible. The constant change of Medicaid rolls is what health policy experts call churn. A person who temporarily loses coverage due to a paperwork issue or mistake then must again sign up. "Churn is what happens when these eligibility systems become difficult to navigate," said Jennifer Tolbert, deputy director of the program on Medicaid and the uninsured for KFF, a health policy nonprofit. The federal government requires state Medicaid programs to check enrollees eligibility once a year. The Trump tax cut legislation would mandate states double eligibility checks to twice a year. And states would have the added duty of verifying a person's employment or exemption status. The legislation, which passed the House and awaits Senate approval, mandates Medicaid recipients who are "able-bodied" adults without children work 80 hours per month or qualify for an exemption such as being a student, caregiver or having a disability. The bill defines able-bodied as people who are not medically certified as physically or unfit for employment. The legislation also would strip coverage from undocumented immigrants who get Medicaid through state-funded programs. Health policy experts say more frequent eligibility checks and red tape will add administrative costs and cut off people who qualify but fall through the cracks due to administrative miscues. "People are going to have to document work status or exemption status multiple times a year, and at each point there's a risk that someone who is eligible could lose coverage," Tolbert said. Thousands lost coverage under Arkansas work requirement During the first Trump administration, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services gave states the option of implementing a work requirement for nondisabled adults on Medicaid. Arkansas' work requirement cut more than 18,000 residents from Medicaid within the first seven months of the program. People were removed often because people were unaware of paperwork requirements to keep their coverage, research shows and analysts said. In April, a study by researchers from the Urban Institute and Loyola University Chicago found the Arkansas uninsured rate jumped 7.4 percentage points among low-income adults age 30 to 49 after the state's work requirement began. The policy's impact on employment among that age group was "negative, small and statistically insignificant," the study said. Arkansas adults who didn't have access to the internet at home were disproportionately harmed by the policy, a sign adults might've had trouble accessing the state's online portal to report work histories or exemptions, the Urban Institute said. If the work requirement for Medicaid recipients is adopted nationwide, health experts say millions of working poor Americans will inevitably lose coverage. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated 10.9 million Americans would lose health insurance coverage through 2034 under the legislation. Most would lose coverage due to the Medicaid work requirement and the twice-a-year eligibility checks, but about 3.1 million would become uninsured from tweaks to Affordable Care Act enrollment, according to a KFF analysis. The ranks of the uninsured could grow larger if Congress doesn't extend the COVID-19 pandemic-era tax credits that have made ACA plans more affordable for consumers. If the tax credits expire and Congress passes the current version of the Trump tax bill, as many as 16 million Americans would lose coverage , according to CBO. "Coverage loss from work requirements should actually be very small," said Kathy Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "But we anticipate it will be very large, because people will not be able to comply with the requirements and will lose their coverage." Dr. Oz: Medicaid spending is 'crippling the system' The Trump administration's top Medicaid official has defended the House legislation as a necessary step to slow spending for the federal health program that covers nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans. In a June 4 interview with Fox Business, Dr. Oz challenged Medicaid recipients who would face work requirements should "prove that you matter." Oz, the Trump-appointed administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said the work requirement asks "able-bodied individuals who are able to go back to work at least try to get a job or volunteer or take care of a loved one who needs help or go back into school. Do something to show you have agency over your future." In a Fox News interview posted on the social media site X, Oz said Medicaid spending has surged 50% since 2019, a pace that is "crippling the system." However, some Republicans have pushed back on the proposed cuts. In a May opinion piece in the New York Times, Sen. Josh Hawley, R- Missouri, said "slashing health insurance for the working poor" is "morally wrong and politically suicidal." Survey: Americans worried about Medicaid cuts The public is paying attention to the proposed Medicaid cuts. Slightly more than half of adults said they're worried significant cuts in Medicaid spending would negatively affect their family's ability to obtain and afford health care, according to a KFF health tracking poll released June 6. The survey this survey of 2,539 U.S. adults was conducted online and by telephone over three weeks in May. The survey said nearly 6 in 10 adults said the Trump administration's policies would weaken Medicaid, but there is a stark divide based on party affiliation. Nine in 10 Democrats but just 2 in 10 Republicans expect the administration's policies would weaken Medicaid. Republicans also were far more likely than Democrats to say that the Trump's policies would strengthen Medicaid. Still, while the survey suggests people are tracking the news, many likely wouldn't know whether their coverage has changed until they try to get medical care. "People don't often know that they've lost coverage until they try and fill a prescription or see a doctor," Tolbert said.

5 things to know about RI's new $14 billion state budget plan
5 things to know about RI's new $14 billion state budget plan

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

5 things to know about RI's new $14 billion state budget plan

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (WPRI) — R.I. House leaders unveiled their draft state budget bill on Tuesday night, releasing a plan that spends about $119 million more than Gov. Dan McKee had proposed back in January. The $14.3 billion budget bill makes major changes to the tax-and-spending plan McKee had put forward. Here are five key takeaways on the plan, which will be debated by the full House next Tuesday. R.I. House Speaker Joe Shekarchi said Tuesday that the primary care crisis was a major focus for lawmakers as they drafted the budget, leading to significant increases in spending. Over $40 million would go to primary care in an effort to shore up more doctors under the budget bill, while $38 million would go to hospitals. Those sums include federal matching dollars. The Hospital Association of Rhode Island (HARI) said in a statement it was 'grateful' for the investments, but warned the state's health care crisis 'cannot be solved in a single fiscal year.' 'HARI remains committed to working with the General Assembly and Governor McKee to create long-term solutions that protect patient access to care, support our health care workers, and ensure long-term financial sustainability for providers and hospitals,' the association said. 'Without clear commitments in these areas, hospitals remain at risk.' The budget also allocated $12 million to nursing homes, once federal matching funds are added to the totals. That money is part of a deal to amend the Nursing Home Safe Staffing and Quality Care Act, a law that was enacted but later halted from implementation amid an industry outcry. That amended law on staffing levels in nursing homes would take effect on Jan. 1. Leaders of SEIU 1199NE, a union that represents many nursing home workers, said the money would cover hiring new staff at facilities that have not met the safe staffing requirement, or raising wages and benefits for workers at facilities that are already in compliance. The proposal unveiled to reporters on Tuesday would raise a variety of taxes, fines, and fees in order to fund health care and education, though House leaders rejected calls for an income tax hike on the wealthy. A review of reimbursement rates paid to primary care providers would move up a year earlier than McKee proposed in his original budget bill, from 2027 to 2026. Lawmakers also plan to generate $30 million annually by adding a new fee on health insurance plans, at an estimated $4 a month per insured person, to fund primary care and other programs. Lawmakers said they want to make raise fines at the R.I. Traffic Tribunal for the first time since 2008. Most fines will rise from $85 to $100. Also of note to drivers: Registration surcharges for licenses and some vehicle registrations would rise from $30 to $40 Electric vehicles would now be charged an annual $200 registration fee Plug-in hybrids would be subject to a $100 registration fee Regular hybrids would be subject to a $50 registration fee Lawmakers also want to implement a statewide property tax on non-owner-occupied homes valued above $1 million. That means that part-time residents, like singer Taylor Swift, would pay more property taxes in the coming year. (Swift owns a home in Westerly.) The budget includes $10 million in expected revenue once the R.I. Department of Transportation restarts the state's truck toll program, which was paused amid litigation but got the green light from a court late last year. 'We're still waiting to hear from DOT regarding the likely target date to reinstate the tolls,' Shekarchi said on Tuesday night. The revised budget calls for a 2-cent gas tax increase that lawmakers said would generate nearly $9 million to help the RIPTA to close its funding gap. The agency would also get an additional $6 million from its share of Highway Maintenance Account funding, bringing its funding infusion to almost $15 million. The funding comes with conditions. RIPTA is required to maintain the RIde Anywhere program for passengers with disabilities, and also to complete an efficiency study examining cost savings and fare hikes. RIPTA CEO Christopher Durand said in a statement on Wednesday that the last time the agency saw a permanent change to its funding structure was over 10 years ago. 'The agency has long needed a consistent funding stream to allow us to better support getting Rhode Islanders to work, school and health care,' Durand said. 'This is a needed improvement, which we are thankful for.' At Tuesday's budget briefing, lawmakers revealed that the R.I. Department of Education had notified them just hours earlier that the department needed nearly $2 million to address a tentative legal settlement. RIDE spokesperson Victor Morente told 12 News that settlement of the civil suit, which dates back to 2014, still needs approval from the Council on Elementary and Secondary Education. Two categories of students with disabilities — those over 21 but under 22 as of Feb. 10, 2012, and those who turned 21 before July 1, 2019 — would be eligible for a share of the money if they did not receive a regular high school diploma and lost access to their legally required public education, according to Morente. Lawmakers dedicated $1.86 million in the budget to repay those students and cover related administrative costs and attorneys fees. The governor was not ready to go into detail about how he felt regarding the revised budget when reporters asked him about it at an unrelated event on Wednesday morning. 'I made sure the budget I put in that didn't have any real broad-based tax increases,' McKee said. 'We'll have to review everything to determine whether the budget that is being proposed, or being presented by the General Assembly, actually fits with our goals.' McKee also said, 'We certainly have had a challenge in this budget session — not only our office, but also the General Assembly. Let me review it and then I'll be able to kind of make comments on it.' The budget bill heads to the full House for a debate and vote next Tuesday, where additional amendments could be made that alter the final policies and price tag. Once the budget passes the House it will head to the Senate, which in most years makes no further changes before sending it on to the governor for his signature. The new fiscal year begins July 1. IN-DEPTH: Taxes, fees going up in $14.3B RI budget as federal relief wanes Alexandra Leslie (aleslie@ is a Target 12 investigative reporter covering Providence and more for 12 News. Connect with her on Twitter and on Facebook. Ted Nesi contributed to this report. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Cody Smith honored with Richard Webster medallion in education
Cody Smith honored with Richard Webster medallion in education

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cody Smith honored with Richard Webster medallion in education

JOPLIN, Mo. — A local university is honoring the service and achievements of a southwest Missouri lawmaker. Missouri Southern State University presented its Richard Webster Medallion to Cody Smith. MSSU leaders cited the former state representative's eight years in Jefferson City and especially his commitment to furthering education. Smith, who also the House Budget Chair, termed out of his representative seat in December. He told us he enjoys seeing the progress being one on the university's 'Roy Blunt Health Science Innovation Center' which benefitted from state funding during his tenure. 'That will be really impactful for the community and region at large, helping young people get into those health science professions that are extremely valuable to them and to our community. And we need more doctors and nurses and technicians. And the more that we can do that locally the better,' said Cody Smith. 'Cody Smith has had a tremendous impact on our state, our region. But certainly, on our university. Not only in terms of not only funding, but advocacy. His understanding of the importance of education. We are deeply grateful for what he has done for this university,' said Dr. Dean Van Galen. This is just the fourth time MSSU has awarded the Webster Medallion, which focuses on civil service. Other recipients have been Ron Richard, Gary Nodler and Robert Warden. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store