Over 30 Palestinians killed trying to reach US group's food distribution sites, Gaza authorities say
DEIR AL BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli troops opened fire Saturday toward crowds of Palestinians seeking food from distribution hubs run by a U.S.-, Israeli-backed group in southern Gaza, killing at least 32 people, according to witnesses and hospital officials.
The two incidents occurred near hubs operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.
The organization launched operations in late May with backing from the U.S. and Israel. The two governments are seeking to replace the traditional U.N.-led aid distribution system in Gaza, saying that Hamas militants siphon off supplies. The U.N. denies the allegation.
While the GHF says it has distributed millions of meals to hungry Palestinians, local health officials and witnesses say that hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli army fire as they try to reach the distribution hubs.
The army, which is not at the sites but secures them from a distance, says it only fires warning shots if crowds get too close to its forces.
The GHF, which employs private armed guards, says there have been no deadly shootings at its sites, though this week, 20 people were killed at one of its locations, most of them in a stampede. The group accused Hamas agitators of causing a panic, but gave no evidence to back the claim.
The army and GHF did not immediately comment on Saturday's violence.
'Indiscriminate fire'
Most of Saturday's deaths occurred as Palestinians massed in the Teina area, around three kilometers (2 miles) away from a GHF aid distribution center east of the city of Khan Younis.
Mahmoud Mokeimar, an eyewitness, said he was walking with masses of people — mostly young men — toward the food hub. Troops fired warning shots as the crowds advanced, before opening fire toward the marching people.
'It was a massacre … the occupation opened fire at us indiscriminately,' he said. He said he managed to flee but saw at least three motionless bodies lying on the ground, and many other wounded fleeing.
Akram Aker, another witness, said troops fired machine guns mounted on tanks and drones. He said the shooting happened between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m.
'They encircled us and started firing directly at us,' he said. He said he saw many casualties lying on the ground.
Sanaa al-Jaberi, a 55-year-old woman, said she saw many dead and wounded as she fled the area.
'We shouted: 'food, food,' but they didn't talk to us. They just opened fire,' she said.
Monzer Fesifes, a Palestinian-Jordanian, said his 19-year-old son Hisham was among those killed in the Teina area.
'He went to bring food from the failed US, Zionist aid to feed us,' the father of six said, pleading for the Jordanian government to help evacuate them from the Palestinian enclave.
The Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said it received 25 bodies, along with dozens wounded.
Seven other people, including one woman, were killed in the Shakoush area, hundreds of meters (yards) north of another GHF hub in Gaza's southernmost city of Rafah, the hospital said. The toll was also confirmed by the health ministry.
Dr. Mohamed Saker, the head of Nasser's nursing department, said it received 70 wounded people. He told The Associated Press that most of the casualties were shot in their heads and chests, and that some were placed in the already overwhelmed intensive care unit.
'The situation is difficult and tragic,' he said, adding that the facility lacks badly needed medical supplies to treat the daily flow of casualties.
Humanitarian crisis
Gaza's more than 2 million Palestinians are living through a catastrophic humanitarian crisis, and the territory is teetering on the edge of famine, according to food security experts.
Distribution at the GHF sites has often been chaotic. Boxes of food are left stacked on the ground inside the centers and, once opened, crowds charge in to grab whatever they can, according to witnesses and videos released by GHF itself.
In videos obtained recently by the AP from an American contractor working with GHF, contractors are seen using tear gas and stun grenades to keep crowds behind metal fences or to force them to disperse. Gunshots can also be heard.
Hamas triggered the ongoing 21-month war in Gaza when it stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking 250 others hostage.
An Israeli military offensive has killed over 58,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, displaced nearly all of Gaza's 2 million people and caused widespread destruction.
The ministry does not say how many militants are among the dead, though it says over half were women and children. The ministry is part of the Hamas government, but is seen by the U.N. and other international organizations as the most reliable source of data on war casualties.
Israel and Hamas have been holding ceasefire talks in Qatar in recent weeks. But international mediators say there have been no breakthroughs in the talks.
___
Magdy reported from Cairo.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
2 minutes ago
- Vox
What makes Israel's starvation of Gaza stand apart
is a correspondent at Vox, where he covers the impacts of social and economic policies. He is the author of 'Within Our Means,' a biweekly newsletter on ending poverty in America. Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023. Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images 'We are imposing a complete siege on [Gaza]. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel — everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we must act accordingly.' That was Yoav Gallant, then the Israeli defense minister, two days after Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, killed some 1,200 Israelis and took 250 more hostage. The following week, Israel's national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir echoed a similar sentiment: 'So long as Hamas does not release the hostages,' he posted on X, 'the only thing that should enter Gaza is hundreds of tons of air force explosives — not an ounce of humanitarian aid.' So why is it that it took this long for the world to turn its attention to this humanitarian disaster? Part of the answer is that in recent weeks, the situation really has gotten much more dire, after Israel ended its 42-day ceasefire with Hamas in March and stopped allowing any aid into Gaza for two months, as my colleague Joshua Keating recently wrote. But there's another factor: The images coming out of Gaza have been absolutely heart-wrenching. Photos and videos have gone viral — on news sites and on social media — clearly showing malnourished babies starving to death, as well as those showing children and adults with their skin clinging to their bones with barely anything in between. 'It is tragic that it takes those types of really graphic, really horrible images to break through,' said Alex de Waal, an expert on famine who serves as the executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University. 'And that is such a terrible commentary on just a gargantuan failure.' This, of course, is nowhere near the first time horrific images from Gaza have surfaced and sparked outrage around the world. But there's something about the visibility of a human-made famine that, for many people — including some of Israel's most ardent supporters — crosses a moral threshold. Starving an entire population cannot be spun as collateral damage or merely the cost of war — a messaging tactic that Israel has turned to to justify its killing of innocent people despite plenty of evidence that it has routinely targeted civilians. 'You can't starve anyone by accident. It has to be deliberate and sustained,' de Waal said. 'It is beyond dispute that you have to starve people systematically because it takes so long.' Indeed, Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023, and both Gallant and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare. Israel's mass starvation of Gaza is, by definition, a form of collective punishment — imposing potentially fatal consequences on every Palestinian living in the enclave, whether they are a combatant or an innocent civilian. That's why using starvation as a weapon of war is illegal under international law. But that wasn't always the case. What Israel is doing is part of a long history of weaponizing food and basic resources. Still, while there are many examples of countries intentionally creating or exacerbating famine conditions on populations, there are also aspects of Israel's current policies in Gaza that are unique. How countries have used starvation as a weapon of war Using starvation as a weapon of war wasn't always explicitly illegal under international law. The siege of Leningrad by the Nazis and their allies, which lasted from 1941 to 1944, was one of the deadliest sieges in history, killing more than one million people. Many of these deaths were attributed to starvation. An American-run tribunal, however, determined that the forced starvation was compatible with international law. After all, it was a tactic that the Allies themselves had used as well, notably in their blockades of German-occupied territories and in Japan. There are many examples throughout history of famines that were either entirely engineered or deliberately made worse through reckless colonial and war policies. In 1943, as the British empire's colonial rule of the Indian subcontinent was nearing its end, the Bengal famine killed up to 3 million people. Since then, studies have uncovered scientific evidence that the famine was not a result of climate conditions like serious drought. Instead, British policies, under Prime Minister Winston Churchill — which included confiscating rice and boats from the coastal parts of Bengal and exporting rice from India to other parts of the empire — seriously exacerbated famine conditions. Churchill denied this, saying that the reason there was a famine was because Indians were 'breeding like rabbits' and suggesting that if the situation was indeed as dire as people claimed, then Mahatma Gandhi would be dead. Another example is the Holodomor, the famine that killed millions of Ukrainians under the Soviet Union in the early 1930s. Joseph Stalin pursued a range of policies that engineered famine conditions — including restricting the movement of people, seizing grain even when there wasn't enough to feed the local population, and exporting grain even as Ukrainians starved — in part, historians argue, to tamp down Ukrainian nationalist movements. Several countries and scholars have since recognized the famine as an act of genocide. The US also used blockades as a means to advance its war interests. One of its military campaigns against Japan during World War II was named 'Operation Starvation' — which aimed to destroy Japan's economy by limiting the distribution of food and other imports. The military assault deprived Japan of essential raw materials and led to food shortages. That, along with naval blockades and America's destruction of agricultural infrastructure contributed to widespread malnutrition and starvation. It was only after World War II that the Geneva Conventions of 1949 established some rules about the responsibility to allow food and other essentials into enemy territory for vulnerable populations. But even then, by and large, starvation tactics were still permissible. 'The reason it was permitted was because the Americans and the British rather liked using it,' de Waal said. 'It really wasn't until the British and the Americans had abandoned their colonial wars — the American one being Vietnam in the '70s — that they thought, 'Okay, now we're not going to fight these kinds of wars, and we can get around to banning it.'' The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which were agreed to in 1977, finally prohibited the 'starvation of civilians as a method of warfare [or combat].' And just over 20 years later, in 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court officially codified weaponizing starvation as a war crime. How Israel's starvation of Gaza is different 'Here, what we see is all the ingredients coming together in a deliberate way. We see the [Israeli leaders'] statements; we see the total bombing of all the food production,' said Neve Gordon, a professor of human rights law at Queen Mary University of London. 'I don't think there's [another] case in history, because other cases had to do with other stuff going on that were not human-made. Here, the whole starvation — from beginning to end — is human-made.' Israel has also significantly limited traditional aid groups' operations and, for months, entirely blocked aid from entering Gaza. Generally, UN-coordinated aid providers, which include UN agencies and established NGOs, have been able to enter and operate in war zones. But since the ceasefire ended in March, Israel has placed unprecedented constraints on those organizations. Instead, since May, Israel has been coordinating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a newly formed US- and Israel-backed private entity that operates militarized distribution sites in central and southern Gaza. Israeli troops have also shot at aid-seekers at GHF's distribution sites, and, according to the UN, some 1,000 Palestinians have been killed trying to get aid from GHF. Gordon calls GHF 'a famine profiteering company,' adding that it 'does not actually provide the necessary food, while producing these hunger games that everyone was watching, [showing] starving people are going to get food and getting shot at.' While Egypt has been complicit in enforcing the blockade through its border with Gaza, the reality is that even aid going into Gaza through the Egyptian border has to go through Israeli inspection. The result is that Israel has effectively vacuum-sealed Gaza, with full control of what aid gets in. Israel could have chosen to prevent a famine at any point. Instead, it has repeatedly hampered or entirely rejected efforts to deliver life-saving aid to Palestinians — all in contravention of international law. 'Israel is not unique at all in using hunger as a weapon of war,' de Waal said. 'What is unique about the Israeli one is just how rigorous and how sustained it is, and how it is in defiance of an international humanitarian capacity that can respond just like that. So if Netanyahu wanted every [child in Gaza] to have breakfast tomorrow, it can be organized.' One example of Israel's (and the world's) capacity to stop the worst from happening is the polio vaccination campaign that happened last year. When polio — which had been eradicated from Gaza for 25 years — resurfaced as a result of the humanitarian and sanitation crisis imposed by Israel's war, governments around the world pressured Israel to agree to a humanitarian pause in combat, in order to vaccinate children across the Gaza Strip. In the middle of the war, the vaccination campaigns were successful, reaching 95 percent of the target population. An effort to stop malnutrition can be similarly efficient.
Associated Press
2 minutes ago
- Associated Press
The Paris office of Israeli airline El Al is vandalized with graffiti
PARIS (AP) — Israeli airline El Al said Thursday that its Paris office was vandalized with anti-Israel graffiti, calling the act a 'deeply disturbing' incident as tensions between France and Israel run high. The graffiti was discovered Thursday morning. El Al said the offices were unoccupied at the time of the incident and no one was harmed. Photos shared on social media showed red spray paint across the glass doors and walls, including the phrase 'El Al genocide airline.' The airline said it was handling the matter with the 'utmost gravity' and working 'in close coordination' with authorities in France and Israel.' El Al added it 'unequivocally condemns all forms of violence, particularly those driven by hatred,' and said its planes 'proudly' display the Israeli flag. Israeli Transportation Minister Miri Regev condemned the act and blamed the policies of French President Emmanuel Macron. 'Today it's El Al, tomorrow it's Air France,' she wrote on social media. 'When President Macron makes announcements that give gifts to Hamas, this is the result.' The incident comes amid diplomatic friction following Macron's pledge last month to recognize a Palestinian state — a move welcomed by some European allies but strongly opposed by Israel. Israel's Foreign Ministry also condemned what it called an antisemitic attack and urged the French government to ensure the safety of El Al staff and offices and to bring the perpetrators to justice. In May, several Jewish sites across Paris were defaced with green paint, including the Shoah Memorial, three synagogues and a Jewish restaurant. France is home to Western Europe's largest Jewish population, with an estimated 500,000 Jews — approximately 1% of the national population. In recent years, antisemitic incidents have surged, with a sharp increase reported in 2023 after the Oct.7 Hamas attacks in Israel. These include physical assaults, threats, vandalism, and harassment, prompting alarm among Jewish communities and leaders.
Atlantic
31 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Israel's Settler Right Is Preparing to Annex Gaza
After Hamas massacred some 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023, the Israeli settler right converged on a plan. In 2005, Israel had uprooted about 8,000 settlers from Gaza, ceding the territory to Palestinian control. Many of the settlers never forgave the state for removing them; now they saw a chance to return. And so while other Israelis mourned, the hard right went to work, methodically building a political movement to retake the Gaza Strip, annex it, and repopulate it with Jewish settlements. As I warned in late 2023, these activists planned on 'displacing or expelling Palestinians,' and their dream was 'not restricted to the political fringes, and should not be expected to stay there.' Since then, more than a third of the lawmakers in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government have joined the cause. The Israeli security establishment opposes this land grab. So do most Israelis, surveys have found for years. That dissent spilled into view last week when thousands of settler activists toured the Israeli border region near Gaza. 'I hear these things and I'm horrified,' a soldier tasked with protecting the group told a reporter. 'It's revolting, because I know that my friends and younger brother are the ones who will guard those settlements.' Referring to one of the activists, he added: 'My greatest fear is that your vision will come true, and that keeps me up whole nights. I don't want my friends to sacrifice their lives for a goal that sanctifies the death of innocent people.' But popular opinion may not matter, because Netanyahu is not responsive to popular opinion. The prime minister's coalition received just 48.4 percent of the vote in Israel's most recent election, and only came to power thanks to support from far-right anti-Arab parties. Without them, Netanyahu's government would collapse, and he would have to hold elections that polls show he would lose. In other words, the Israeli leader is beholden precisely to those who aim to annex Gaza and the occupied West Bank. The Biden administration worked to combat this influence, but President Donald Trump has not only relieved that pressure—he has joined the other side, calling for Gazans to be relocated to make way for a 'Riviera in the Middle East.' The result: The obstacles to the far right's blueprint for conquest and ethnic cleansing have been removed, and its agenda has effectively become Netanyahu's policy. Yair Rosenberg: The worst-kept secret of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict Unsurprisingly then, the push for settlement and annexation has escalated. Last week, 22 lawmakers in Netanyahu's coalition signed a letter pressing Israel's defense minister to allow activists into northern Gaza itself to scout potential settlement locations. 'The return of the Jewish people to these places is not just a strategic step,' they wrote, 'but a return to Zion in the deepest and most practical sense.' On Sunday, the far-right minister Itamar Ben-Gvir visited the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, the hotly contested holy site, and declared, 'We are relaying a message that from today on, we are conquering the entire Gaza Strip, announcing our sovereignty on the entire Gaza Strip, taking down every Hamas member, and encouraging voluntary emigration'—his preferred euphemism for ethnic cleansing. Right-wing media in Israel have also begun seeding the idea of resettlement in earnest. Last Thursday, Makor Rishon, a newspaper that serves the settler community, ran a story titled 'Negotiations on the Verge of Collapse: Israel Prepares for Annexation.' Amit Segal, the best-sourced journalist on the Israeli right, recently promoted a poll with the headline 'A Majority of Israelis Support Jewish Settlement in Gaza.' The not-so-resounding results of that survey? Fifty-two percent for, 48 percent against. The poll was commissioned and published by Israel Hayom, the pro-Netanyahu newspaper founded and funded by the late right-wing casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, and it was an outlier on the topic. Other leaked reports suggest either that Netanyahu plans to fully reoccupy Gaza—a course consistent with potential resettlement—or that he intends to pursue a comprehensive hostage deal that would lead to a negotiated conclusion to the war. These competing narratives reflect an internal information war over Israel's next steps. Not coincidentally, 19 former heads of Israel's security services released a video on Sunday calling for Israel to end the war, which they argue has crossed moral and strategic red lines and is now serving another agenda. 'There are moments that represent a 'black flag' in which one must stand firm and say: This far and no further,' Netanyahu's former defense minister Moshe Ya'alon declares in the clip, claiming that the government has been suborned by 'messianic zealots.' For now, something intermediate might be in the offing. Segal has reported on a plan to annex the border regions of Gaza as a way to pressure Hamas to release its hostages, because the group 'cares more about land than human lives.' Conveniently, this piecemeal annexation could be presented as a military maneuver against Hamas, while also advancing the goals of the settler right—the sort of dual-use policy that Netanyahu has pursued to keep his partners on side since this war began. Annexation in any form would undoubtedly be met with international opprobrium, threats of sanctions, and further isolation of Israel on the world stage. The cascade of Western countries recognizing a Palestinian state can be understood as an attempt to oppose Israeli designs on the territory. But with Trump still backing Netanyahu, the Israeli leader has little immediate incentive to alter course. Netanyahu is a master of pivoting when politically convenient—including on seemingly core principles—but he tends to choose whatever option keeps him in power, which means that changing his direction requires changing his calculation as to what will accomplish that. Franklin Foer: Israel's last chance Over the weekend, Jews around the world observed Tisha B'av, Judaism's day of mourning that commemorates the destruction of the First and Second Temples in Jerusalem. On Monday, Netanyahu opened his cabinet meeting with a reference to those events: '1,955 years ago, following Tisha B'av, we suffered the greatest defeat in our history,' he said. 'At that time, we were divided, splintered, and fighting with one another.' Today, by contrast, 'we are in the midst of a great war in which we attained historic achievements because we were not divided, because we stood together and fought together.' Netanyahu's boast of Israeli solidarity—made as protests against his war policy and his attempt to fire the attorney general investigating his government roiled the country—rang hollow. But the prime minister's reference to Tisha B'av was apt, if not for the reasons he thought. As the Talmud tells it, when the Romans first laid siege to Jerusalem and the Second Temple, the walled city had supplies to withstand the blockade for years to come. The rabbinic sages counseled patience, seeking a diplomatic accommodation that would avert mass bloodshed. Instead, a group of Jewish zealots burned the city's storehouses in order to force the population to fight rather than wait out or appease their adversaries. Jerusalem was conquered and the Temple destroyed. A radical minority yoked the entire polity to a messianic policy—and the result turned out to be a national catastrophe.
