Goa assembly clears to bill to regularise unauthorised houses on community lands
The Goa Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction Bill, 2025, was passed on Thursday night, with the House being adjourned twice after the opposition benches created a pandemonium.
Comunidade land refers to a system of communal land ownership and management in Goa, where land is collectively held by a community and governed by its members.
The bill, moved by state Revenue Minister Atanasio Monserrate, amends the 2016 Act to widen the scope for regularising certain categories of illegal constructions, including those on comunidade lands.
The legislation introduces provisions allowing the regularisation of houses built on comunidade and government lands if these have already been regularised under relevant land laws by competent authorities.
The permissible built-up area for regularisation has been allowed to 500 sq metres in village panchayat areas and 600 sq metres in municipal areas, subject to floor area ratio norms of the respective regions.
The bill makes it mandatory for the applicant to get consent from the respective comunidade bodies by paying them relevant fines.
The opposition benches argued that the government was attempting to regularise illegal constructions, especially of non-Goans.
The opposition MLAs walked into the well of the House, forcing Speaker Ramesh Tawadkar to adjourn the proceedings twice for 10 minutes and five minutes, respectively.
Opposition MLAs also staged a sit-in protest outside the assembly complex after the session was over.
Talking to reporters after the passage of the bill, Chief Minister Pramod Sawant said that the legislation will benefit 35,000 houses, of which 30,000 structures belong to Goans.
He said houses that completed 15 years as of February 28, 2014, will be eligible for regularisation only after receiving consent from the respective comunidade bodies and paying fines.
Sawant said the bill was drafted after several orders from the Goa Bench of Bombay High Court and the National Green Tribunal feared demolition of houses that were as old as 40 years.
"The government's intention is clear that Goans should benefit from the bill," he said, adding that beneficiaries should apply within 30 days, and a special officer would be appointed to oversee the process.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘A dream comes true after 40-45 years of struggle': CJI inaugurates HC bench in Kolhapur
Chief Justice of India B R Gavai inaugurated a circuit bench of the Bombay High Court in Kolhapur on Sunday and said that the dream of lawyers and citizens has finally come true after decades of struggle. 'This is the day when the dream of lawyers and citizens for a high court has come true after a 40-45 years of struggle,' he said, highlighting the efforts and hardships that went into getting the high court bench in Kolhapur. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, state ministers Chandrakant Patil and Hasan Mushrif, Congress MP Shrimant Shahu Maharaj, Sangli MP Vishal Patil, MLC Satej Patil, Bombay High Court Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and local MLAs, representatives of various Advocates Bar Associations were present at the inaugural function. The Kolhapur bench is the fourth bench of the Bombay High Court. It has other benches at Nagpur, Aurangabad (now Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar), and neighbouring state of Goa. A notification for setting up of the Kolhapur circuit bench was issued by Bombay High Court Chief Justice Alok Aradhe on August 1. The bench has come up after demands from litigants and lawyers who have to travel over 300-350 km all the way to Mumbai. The bench, which will start functioning from Monday, will hear matters relating to PILs, civil writ petitions, first appeals, family court appeals and other civil and criminal cases from six districts— Kolhapur, Satara, Sangli, Solapur, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg. Addressing a gathering after the inauguration, the CJI said, 'Through the Kolhapur circuit bench, the common man will get social and financial justice. The circuit bench should soon make way for a Bombay High Court bench.' The CJI said the lawyers from six districts struggled for years to get the HC bench in Kolhapur. 'The people and lawyers from these districts struggled for 40-45 years, demanding the high court. Some of the old-time lawyers have passed away. When a committee was formed to find out whether the HC bench could be set up, two judges gave conflicting reports. However, the report of judge Ranjit More who suggested setting up of the HC bench in Kolhapur was accepted. Finally, after 11 years the day has dawned,' he said. The CJI said that he pursued the matter after taking charge on May 14. 'I have always believed that justice should reach the doorstep of the people..I had told the high court chief justice that the bench should be set up by August… We then decided that we should set up the Kolhapur bench a day after Independence Day. We decided that people should get freedom from their problems in getting justice and therefore the bench should be set up as soon as possible,' he said. The CJI praised the state government and the public works department for setting up the bench in a short period of time. 'The building of the high court bench was set up in barely 20-25 days. The old grandeur of the building has been retained. The public works department led by Shivendraraje Bhosale has done outstanding work. This should actually make it to the Guinness Book of World Records… Those who said Maharashtra was behind in judicial infrastructure have been given a befitting reply,' he said. The CJI said that HC Chief Justice Alok Aradhe was not confident that the Kolhapur bench would be set up in August. 'He (Aradhe) is possibly not aware of the Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister. May be because of the newspaper reports which said Maharashtra was lagging in ensuring proper judicial infrastructure. He had doubts whether the Maharashtra government would be able to set up the bench by August 15. However, the CM assured us that it would be ready by August 15,' he said. 'I am of the opinion that Maharashtra is not behind when it comes to judiciary's infrastructure. Government is always behind the judiciary when it comes to infrastructure,' the CJI said. CJI Gavai stated that the Kohapur bench will ensure social and economic justice for the common man. 'The Kolhapur bench will ensure social and economic justice for the common man. The setting up of the bench is a good opportunity for budding lawyers. A hostel should also be set up for them at the circuit bench.' Expressing happiness over the high court bench being set up on the land of Maratha ruler Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj, the CJI said, 'It was Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj who had given 50 per cent reservation to the people from Backward Class for the first time. It was Shahu Maharaj who put a stop to devdasi system. Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj had said that whatever wealth we have it is meant for others. And therefore we celebrate his birth anniversary as Social Justice Day.' Chief Minister Fadnavis, in his address, termed the setting up of the circuit bench of the high court in Kolhapur 'historical'. 'The 50 year old struggle of lawyers and people from Kolhapur, Sangli, Satara, Ratnagiri and Sindhudurg has finally culminated with the inauguration of the circuit bench of the high court in Kolhapur,' he said. Fadnavis said that in his first term as chief minister, the state cabinet had decided to set up the high court bench in Kolhapur on May 12, 2015. 'When Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Kolhapur for an event, a request to set up the bench in Kolhapur was placed before him. After that, Chandrakant Patil had led an all-party delegation to me pressing for the HC bench in Kolhapur. The state government then pursued the matter with the Bombay High Court. We told the HC that we were ready to set up the judicial infrastructure. However, things picked up after CJI Bhushan Gavai took charge. He himself personally monitored the progress of the circuit bench plan,' Fadnavis said. The Chief Minister said his government would soon bring in a law to ensure safety of advocates. 'A demand has been repeatedly made to enact a law to ensure the safety of lawyers. Our government is positive about bringing in the legislation,' he said. With PTI inputs
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
37 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha adjourned till noon amid noisy protests by Oppn on SIR in Bihar
Lok Sabha proceedings were adjourned till 12 noon on Monday following vociferous protests by opposition parties demanding a discussion on the voter roll revision in Bihar and other issues. When the House met at 11 am, opposition MPs, including those from the Congress, were on their feet, raising slogans and showing placards with their demand for discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar. Initially, Speaker Om Birla tried to continue the business of the House -- Question Hour -- by allowing members to ask six questions related to several union ministries and departments amidst the din. After about 15 minutes of proceedings, the Speaker asked the protesting members to go back to their seats and warned that if they try to damage government properties, he would be forced to take strong action against them. "No one has the right to damage government properties. If you try to do so, I will be forced to take action," he said, adding there were instances in some assemblies where action had been taken against members for damaging government properties. It was not immediately clear as to what the speaker was alluding to. Birla also said that the kind of force the opposition members were using in sloganeering, it would have been good had they used similar kind of force in raising people's welfare issues. As the opposition MPs ignored his pleas, the Speaker adjourned the House till 12 noon. The opposition has been demanding a discussion on the SIR exercise initiated by the Election Commission in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections there. Barring discussions on Operation Sindoor in both House, Parliament has seen little business ever since the Monsoon session began on July 21 due to repeated adjournments initially due to opposition demand for discussion on Operation Sindoor and then demanding a discussion on SIR. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court affirms HC order quashing FIR in Mohan Delkar death case
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 18, 2025) did not intervene in the quashing of a suicide abetment case in connection with the death of Member of Parliament Mohan Delkar. The Bombay High Court had quashed the case registered against nine persons accused in the case, including Praful Khoda Patel, the Administrator of the Union Territories of Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu and Lakshadweep. A Bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice Vinod Chandran affirmed the High Court order of September 2022. A Division Bench of the High Court had quashed the case on petitions filed by the administrator Praful Khoda Patel, former District Collector Sandeep Singh, former Superintendent of Police Sharad Darade, then Deputy Collector Apurva Sharma, Manasvi Jain (Sub-Divisional Officer), Manoj Patel (Police Inspector, Silvassa), Rohit Yadav (official of Dadra Haveli administration), Dilip Patel (a revenue official in Silvassa) and Fattesingh (political leader), to quash the FIR against them. On February 22, 2021, Delkar, 58, a seven-term parliamentarian, was found dead in a hotel room in Marine Drive. An FIR was registered on March 9, 2021 by the Marine Drive police station under section 306 (abetment to suicide), 506 (criminal intimidation), 389 (putting a person in fear of accusation of offence in order to commit extortion) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of Indian Penal Code and under provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The High Court had quashed the FIR, saying it was 'a fit case for the court to quash the case to prevent abuse of law' Suicide prevention helpline: Sanjivini, Society for Mental Health. Telephone: 011-4076 9002, Monday-Saturday. (Those in distress or having suicidal thoughts are encouraged to seek help and counselling by calling the helpline numbers here)
