logo
Commentary: Before they open a book: the politicization of Orange County's public libraries

Commentary: Before they open a book: the politicization of Orange County's public libraries

The Huntington Beach Public Library is a community paragon and is expected to unveil its 50th anniversary plaque this month — a plaque that has sparked controversy with its politicized messaging. Emblazoned with the MAGA acronym and slogans from previous presidents, the plaque is one of many ways politics have infiltrated Orange County libraries, especially the children's sections.
Politicization through book bans, extremely partisan city councils and physical signage has skewed our youngest readers' perception of literature. To combat literary politicization, the state of California recently chartered the Freedom to Read Act, restricting book banning in state-funded facilities. Will this be enough to protect Orange County children's right to read?
Every new parent is urged to create avid readers for a reason. Reading is key to a child's development. It is known to improve children's critical thinking and concentration, develop their senses of empathy and creativity, and introduce them to different cultures and experiences.
Orange County public libraries support families' reading goals with their children's sections and events such as story time, reading challenges and family book clubs. Yet our public libraries have faced roadblocks to free access in recent years.
According to the American Library Assn., book bans have been on the rise in the last few years, and nowhere is this clearer than in Huntington Beach. Although free access to literature is considered a protected 1st Amendment right under free speech, Huntington Beach officials have been among those who believe children's sections should be monitored. Just last year The Huntington Beach City Council ordered its central library to move books with 'sexual content' out of the children's section. The 'sexual content' in question? Books on potty training, puberty, and anatomy — subjects integral for children's development.
The state of California seeks to reduce such instances of book banning. The Freedom to Read Act, AB 1825, dictates that by Jan. 1, 2026, all state-funded libraries must write and publish a collection development policy. Collection policies cannot allow the removal, relocation, or restriction of books based on political, LGBTQ+, or racial content, topics that frequently justify book bans. This act would especially affect children's sections, cementing diverse stories on children's shelves. Supporters view this act with optimism toward a bipartisan state library system, especially for littles; in contrast, some municipalities, including Huntington Beach, expressed contempt for AB 1825 and seek to fight against it.
Book bans are not the only conduits of library politicization; city councils and infrastructure are politicized as well. While AB 1825 aims to reduce politicization of public libraries, it only focuses on library content. Despite librarians, volunteers and patrons alike voicing concerns about the presidential slogans on the Huntington Beach Public Library's 50th anniversary plaque, the City Council unanimously approved the design. When the plaque is unveiled, families will encounter politicized messages from both the left and the right before even cracking open a book. Despite its best efforts, AB 1825 will not eliminate politicization by a long shot.
Orange County citizens are responsible for protecting the integrity of our libraries, especially for our children. Community members can directly support public libraries by simply going to their local library and taking out a library card. This increases the library's door count and card count and can dictate its allocated resources. Advocate for children's free, bipartisan access to literature in public libraries by voicing concerns at city council meetings and reaching out to representatives. Relatives of school-age children can attend school board meetings and defend librarians and teachers. Parents should discuss what content their children should and should not be reading at their age while encouraging curiosity on diverse stories.
Orange County public libraries have encouraged both proper development through reading and love for books in thousands of children; it is up to its citizens to protect the libraries from politicization so thousands more can experience the benefits of free access to literature.
Meredith Starkenburg is a lifelong Orange County resident who studies education and English at the College of William and Mary.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Perspective: From Trump v. Musk to Carlson v. Levin, are Republicans losing sight of the mission?
Perspective: From Trump v. Musk to Carlson v. Levin, are Republicans losing sight of the mission?

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Perspective: From Trump v. Musk to Carlson v. Levin, are Republicans losing sight of the mission?

What started as something like a barroom brawl devolved quickly into a cage fight, which was distressing for those of us who don't drink and don't enjoy mixed martial arts. The symbolism, however, was rich. Just two months ago, Elon Musk and Donald Trump were ringside in Miami watching the Ultimate Fighting Championship; this week, they were the ones pummeling each other while all of social media watched, wide-eyed and open-mouthed. But Trump and Musk are not the only ones sparring. Political brawling has broken out across the country in ways that feel unusual, as if we are just a couple of social-media fisticuffs away from bringing back the great American duel, the kind that killed Alexander Hamilton. Dueling, however, has been called 'the violence of gentlemen,' so maybe we are safe because gentlemen are scarce in the current political landscape. It's not just Trump and Musk. Tucker Carlson and Mark Levin are feuding, so are Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh, and we're not that far past Shapiro's epic battle with Candace Owens and Marjorie Taylor Greene's heated drama with Lauren Boebert. There are other battles not suitable for mention in a family publication. It's tempting to say that the recent infighting is all within the GOP, and all about divisions between MAGA versus Never Trump, but it's not. Witness the Democrats' piling on Karine Jean-Pierre, the White House press secretary under Joe Biden, who is about to scorch Democrats in her forthcoming book. For Republicans, who under Trump have grown accustomed to governing with the gloves off, the infighting may be accelerating because they've temporarily lost their chief rival, the Democratic Party. The fortunes of the Democratic Party have fallen so low that they're spending millions on initiatives designed to win back young men while one of their star contenders for 2028, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, is picking the brains of conservatives on his podcast. Absent a robust foe, Republicans are like a desolate Rocky Balboa with no one to fight, and so have turned on their own tribe. But what is happening is also a predictable result of when politics turns transactional instead of relational. Once the transactions are over, or once the transactions curdle and sour, there's nothing foundational to sustain the human relationship. We've seen this before with Trump, in his transactional relationship with Mike Pence. Many of us had hoped that there was something deeper there with Musk, with whom Trump seemed to have an almost fatherly relationship. It was not coincidence that much of the social media discourse about their 'breakup' was couched in terms of family — either divorce or estrangement. And while it was, on one level, train-wreck, cringe entertainment, like watching 'Housewives' or 'Tiger King,' it was also painful since so many of us know what it's like to have a close relationship implode. Utah Sen. Mike Lee spoke for many when he posted a photo of both men, with the caption 'But ... I really like both of them.' On his radio show Friday, Glenn Beck urged Trump and Musk to reconcile and to keep sight of their shared mission. It is that mission that is too often a casualty when two formerly aligned parties or individuals fall out, whether in politics or in a marriage. A mission can be hard to define; it can be too vague or have too many components. 'Essentialism' guru Greg McKeown says that a 'priority' is one thing, not many, and we risk failure when we set 'priorities.' Maybe that's part of what happened here. Trump and Musk had priorities, and some were in conflict with each other. It's much too early to say that the breakup is permanent; the men have mutual alliances and shared friends who presumably will work hard to bring about a reconciliation. But if the fissure lasts, the relationship that unfolded over the past year — with iconic moments like Musk jumping on the stage at a campaign event and Musk's son trotting after Trump on the White House lawn — was not really a relationship, but a transaction between two powerful men. And Democrats stand ready to reap the rewards.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges - Anderson Cooper 360 - Podcast on CNN Audio
Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges - Anderson Cooper 360 - Podcast on CNN Audio

CNN

time6 hours ago

  • CNN

Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges - Anderson Cooper 360 - Podcast on CNN Audio

Kilmar Abrego Garcia Returned To U.S. & Facing Criminal Charges Anderson Cooper 360 47 mins The man mistakenly deported to an El Salvadorian prison has been returned to the United States and indicted. We are now learning the prosecutor in charge has resigned over it. Plus, what Elon Musk and Donald Trump are saying now about their breakup. Also, a look at how Musk's insinuation about the President and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is landing with the MAGA faithful.

Poll Shows Most Americans Taking the Same Side in Musk vs. Trump
Poll Shows Most Americans Taking the Same Side in Musk vs. Trump

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poll Shows Most Americans Taking the Same Side in Musk vs. Trump

Forget picking sides—Americans want out of the Trump-Musk drama altogether. 52 percent of Americans picked 'neither' when asked who they would side with in the bitter feud between President Donald Trump and his ex-buddy Elon Musk, according to a new YouGov survey. Trump drew more support overall, with 28 percent backing him compared to just 8 percent for Musk. Another 11 percent said they were 'not sure.' The online poll was conducted with 3,812 U.S. adults Thursday, the same day the president and the world's richest man went to war with each other. Across nearly all of YouGov's demographics, most Americans distanced themselves from both men—with 51 to 53 percent choosing 'neither' in every age group—except when the results were divided by political party. Republicans backed the president by a wide margin—71 percent—while giving the Tesla CEO just 6 percent support. Twelve percent chose neither. This indicates a dramatic shift in Musk's standing among the right, sending a clear message that Republicans' loyalties lie firmly with their MAGA leader, rather than the tech billionaire. Just a few months ago, 73 percent of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents viewed Musk favorably, according to a Pew Research poll. In the same survey, 85 percent of Democrats and Democratic leaners held an unfavorable view of Musk. Predictably, 80 percent of Democrats chose neither side in Thursday's poll, although 11 percent sided with Musk compared to just 4 percent backing Trump—whom Musk claimed Thursday is 'in the Epstein files.' Women were more likely to reject either man at 57 percent, compared to 47 percent for men. Twenty-seven percent of women sided with Trump, versus 30 percent of men. Just 5 percent of women picked Musk, while 11 percent of men chose the billionaire's side. Support for either man was especially low among Black Americans, 68 percent of whom picked 'neither'—a full 20 percent higher than white respondents. During Thursday's explosive spat, Trump threatened to end the subsidies and contracts held by Musk's companies, like SpaceX. Musk promptly fired back on X, 'Go ahead, make my day.' YouGov's poll found 41 percent of all respondents supported ending Musk's subsidies and contracts, while 21 percent opposed the move and 38 percent weren't sure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store