Speaker accuses Government of ‘appalling' breaches of ministerial code
Sir Lindsay Hoyle would like to take the Government to task for 'appalling' ministerial code breaches, but he has 'not got the power', MPs have heard.
The Commons Speaker said on Tuesday that the extent of his authority, 'if the House wishes, needs to change', because on his watch the situation 'would be different'.
The Government's own code sets out the 'high standards of behaviour' which ministers are expected to maintain.
According to the document, they should keep 'commercially sensitive material' under wraps until it is published, without letting the media see it first.
But a row broke out over the Government's handling of the recent Strategic Defence Review (SDR), when journalists were allowed to see the document before MPs received their copies.
'At 10.30am on the Monday morning (June 2), journalists were invited to a reading room in Horse Guards Parade, where they were given access to the White Paper,' Conservative shadow defence minister Mark Francois said.
He added that this was 'clearly a breach of the code' and continued: 'It was also seen by members of defence companies, trade associations, academics, think tanks and trade unionists at the same time that the markets were opening at eight o'clock.'
Mr Francois said this raised 'a possibility of insider trading'.
Sir Lindsay replied that he had raised this 'at the time'.
The Speaker said: 'But what I would say is that I have no responsibility for the ministerial code.
'That, if the House wishes, needs to change because unfortunately, it makes a nonsense.
'There is a ministerial code there. The fact is that it is not being kept as we expect it to, but it is for this House, if it wishes to change the ministerial code – please do so.
'Or, I'm more than happy for the Government to change it, if they cannot accept it.
'But what we cannot have is this continuation of breaking the ministerial code.
'It is appalling. It is unacceptable, because in the end – it is not a political point – I am here to uphold the rights of the backbenchers. The backbenchers should be the ones that hear it first.
'The fact that documents are going to be given – they should be given to MPs. It is about me supporting MPs, but unfortunately, in this particular area I have not got the power.
'I wish I had, because it would be different.'
Defence Secretary John Healey made a statement on the SDR in the Commons more than two weeks ago – on June 2 – when he told MPs it was 'a plan to meet the threats we face, a plan to step up on European security and lead in Nato, a plan that learns the lessons from Ukraine'.
Sir Lindsay had criticised the Government for briefing out parts of the document the previous weekend.
'I'm disappointed once again that the Government appears to have breached the principle set out in paragraph 9.1 of the ministerial code – that when Parliament is in session, the most important announcements of Government policy should be made in the first instance in Parliament,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Reviews show Tories wasted billions of pounds on HS2, transport secretary to say
The Conservatives wasted billions of pounds on HS2 through poor management, badly negotiated contracts and constant design changes, the transport secretary will say on Wednesday. Heidi Alexander will tell MPs the last government overspent on the high-speed rail line in multiple ways, including signing contracts even when advised not to and drawing up expensive plans for redesigning Euston station in London before scrapping them. She will announce the findings of two reviews into the troubled project, even as ministers brace to swallow another increase in the projected price tag to a reported £100bn. 'Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management,' Alexander will tell the House of Commons. 'It's an appalling mess. But it's one we will sort out.' Referencing recently reported claims of fraud by contractors supplying workers, she will add: 'There are allegations that parts of the supply chain have been defrauding taxpayers, and I have been clear that these need to be investigated rapidly and rigorously. If fraud is found, then the consequences will be felt by all involved.' A Labour source said: 'The cost inflated out of all control, billions were wasted due to political indecision. There was a failure of ministerial oversight from the then transport secretary and a delivery company not fit for purpose. It's a comedy of errors, but no one's laughing.' The Conservatives were contacted for comment. Alexander will lay out the results of two reviews into the scheme: one by James Stewart into what went wrong and what it can teach ministers about how to run future infrastructure projects, and an initial assessment by Mark Wild, the chief executive of HS2 Ltd, looking at how and when to construct the rest of the phase one line from London to Birmingham. The problems identified in those reports go beyond the escalating costs of tunnelling and environmental mitigations such as the £100m bat tunnel, which has been singled out for criticism by the prime minister, Keir Starmer. Phase one of the HS2 scheme was projected in 2012 to cost £20bn, but more recent estimates now put that figure at as much as £57bn. Wild's review, according to sources quoted by the rail expert, Christian Wolmar, could lead to the full budget being restated at current prices at more than £100bn. Alexander will tell MPs that among the mistakes made by the previous government was the decision to sign a series of construction contracts despite having been advised by a review in 2020 not to do so until the scope of the project had been fully decided. The Oakervee review, which was commissioned by Boris Johnson as prime minister, recommended in 2020 that the government renegotiate key contracts to build the scheme and hold off signing further ones until making political decisions about its future. The transport secretary will tell MPs on Wednesday that contracts continued to be signed even when those decisions had yet to be made. Ministers were also commissioning two sets of designs for a new station at Euston at a total cost of over £250m, only to scrap both of them. They also spent £2bn on the northern leg from Birmingham to Manchester before it was cancelled by Rishi Sunak as prime minister in October 2023. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Soon after the northern arm was axed, Sunak announced a Euston ministerial task force to oversee improvements to the station. That committee was due to include ministers from the Treasury, the transport department and the levelling up department, but government sources now say it never held a meeting. More recently, HS2 Ltd has begun an investigation into claims that one of its labour suppliers on the project charged overinflated rates for staff. A spokesperson for HS2 Ltd said at the time: 'We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation. Furthermore, HS2 Ltd has formally reported the allegations to HMRC.' One of the measures Alexander is taking to try to get the project back on track is to appoint Mike Brown, the former commissioner of Transport for London (TfL), as the new chair of HS2 Ltd. He will replace Jon Thompson, who stepped down in the spring after a series of colourful public interventions, including disclosing the bat tunnel saga. Brown worked under and then succeeded the current rail minister, Lord Hendy, in running TfL. Meanwhile, Wild has written to Alexander setting out the broad terms of a 'reset' for the project to keep costs down and get construction back on track. He carried out a similar role with TfL on the Elizabeth line to eventually deliver it successfully within a revised timescale and budget. However, in the short term it is likely to mean that HS2's full opening, even on the reduced network, is pushed back further into the 2030s, while the budget is likely to soar in real terms.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Can I fix the housing crisis? Yes, I can…
In a recent exchange in the House of Commons, I was pressed by one of my Tory shadows on whether we will meet our target of building 1.5 million homes in this parliament. A punchy question from a party whose own record in government on housebuilding was marked by missed targets, failed targets and ultimately, 'let's scrap targets altogether'. My answer? Underestimate me at your peril. People have done this all my life. But this government has a bold vision to fix the housing crisis and a strategy to deliver both investment and reform. We're overhauling the planning system to speed up approvals and unlock land – a clear statement of intent. So is our commitment to the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation – £39bn over 10 years. And today we are taking another major step to fix a broken system that has held back too many hard-working families – and the country – for far too long. Our new national housing bank will transform housebuilding, using public funds to unlock private capital as a publicly owned arm of Homes England. With £16bn of new government investment, on top of £6bn of guarantees, the bank will attract over £53bn of private investment. That means spades in the ground, cranes in the sky – and around half a million new homes built across the country. Who benefits? People, and the places they live, as well as businesses and the economy. It's a cornerstone of our Plan for Change. We're backing small and medium builders, who are crucial for small community sites, with new lending products that will give them the certainty to plan a pipeline of future projects. We're focused on building more social and affordable homes. The bank will use part of the £2.5bn in low-interest loans announced at the spending review to build properties where they are most needed. And we're also supporting the bigger, more complex projects that help drive growth with infrastructure finance and £5bn in grants for projects that otherwise wouldn't get off the ground. We're giving the bank the tools and the scope to make long-term investments and take smart, calculated risks to reform the housing market and deliver real returns. We know, as a government, and I know, that having a home is the foundation of a stable life. I saw that growing up, living in a council house that for me spelled security. For too many people in this country, however, a home they can afford remains out of reach. We're changing that. We are investing in the skills and jobs needed to build new homes and supporting local leaders and builders to work with urgency. We're tackling the housing crisis we inherited head-on because a safe, decent home is not a luxury – it is a necessity. Our commitment to build 1.5 million homes as part of our plan for change is a stretching target, but not one I will shy away from. To those with doubts, I repeat: underestimate me at your peril. Yes – the road ahead is tough. But we are committed, as this is about more than just numbers. It's about giving fresh hope for millions of people across Britain and creating communities where families can thrive and children grow up in safety. It's about making sure a generation is no longer locked out of homeownership – and ensuring children aren't growing up in temporary accommodation. The shadow of Tory housing failure looms large. The last government failed to meet the challenge. We are rising to it. The new national housing bank is just the latest part of our plan to invest in Britain's future – and back the builders. This Labour government is turning the tide on the housing crisis we inherited, and charting a new course for housing in this country. The foundations of Britain's future are being laid today – so we can write a new chapter that we can all be proud of.
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer to delay HS2 after ‘litany of failure' revealed
Sir Keir Starmer will delay the opening of HS2 as a damning official report reveals a 'litany of failure' that has driven up costs by £37 billion. The Telegraph can reveal that on Wednesday Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, will announce the remaining section of the high-speed line, between London and Birmingham, will no longer be completed by 2033. A delay of at least two years is likely. She will say that the Conservatives increased the cost of HS2 by £37 billion between 2012, when the line was approved by the Coalition government, and the general election last year. Ms Alexander will raise concerns that taxpayers may have been defrauded by subcontractors who have inflated costs, and pledge that 'consequences will be felt'. She will accuse the Tories of turning British infrastructure projects into a 'laughing stock'. She will accept 89 recommendations of an independent review into infrastructure projects prompted by issues with HS2 that was carried out by James Stewart, the former chief executive of Crossrail. The Government will also appoint Mike Brown, the former Transport for London commissioner, as the new chairman of HS2 Ltd, the company that runs the project. HS2 was given the go-ahead in 2012 with the idea it would speed up travel between London and other major cities, and reduce the burden on existing railways. It has since been decried as a white elephant that has run far behind schedule and over budget. In a statement to the House of Commons, Ms Alexander will say she has drawn a 'line in the sand' on the project, which has been a 'litany of failure', after billions were wasted on 'constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management'. She will say; 'There are allegations that parts of the supply chain have been defrauding taxpayers, and I have been clear that these need to be investigated rapidly and rigorously.' 'If fraud is found, then the consequences will be felt by all involved.' A dossier of failures to be published on Wednesday includes a 'Euston Ministerial Taskforce' announced in March 2024 to oversee the London terminal of HS2, which did not meet once before the July election. The report will also say that the previous government spent £2 billion on the two legs of the project between Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds, before scrapping both, and that HS2 Ltd spent more than £250 million on two failed designs for a new station at Euston. When the company was asked to provide a plan that would be cheaper than its first attempt, it submitted a second design costing £400 million more than the original. The new report's comments are the latest in a long line of criticism of HS2. In 2020, Lord Berkeley, the deputy chairman of a review into the project, claimed that costs had run 'completely out of control'. In 2022, a whistleblower was fired after raising concerns that costs were being misrepresented. Stephen Cresswell, a risk management consultant, later won more than £300,000 in compensation. Meanwhile, the company came under fire for spending £20,000 on a scale model of the proposed Old Oak Common station the size of a kitchen table built from 15,000 Lego bricks. Perhaps the biggest outcry came after plans were revealed for a £100 million 'bat tunnel', built to shield wildlife from trains in ancient Buckinghamshire woodland. Government officials now believe the first HS2 trains are unlikely to run on the line until at least 2035, although independent estimates have suggested they may not begin until the late 2030s. It is the first time the Government has admitted that meeting the 2033 deadline for services between Old Oak Common in North West London and Birmingham is no longer realistic. Mark Wild, who was appointed as HS2 Ltd's chief executive last May, will continue to review the project and provide an updated cost estimate and a timeline for its completion in the coming months. Suspected fraud One HS2 subcontractor has already been reported to the taxman for suspected payroll fraud, and insiders said the review has uncovered additional examples of contracts that appeared designed to inflate costs. The delay is the latest in a series of setbacks for HS2, which was first announced with a notional budget of £20 billion by Gordon Brown in 2009. The first trains were originally due to run in 2026 and provide fast transport links between major northern cities and London, with a further 'Northern Powerhouse Rail' line to follow. Since the project was announced, the cost has risen to £57 billion, while delivery of the services is now likely to be delayed by a decade. Jon Thompson, HS2 Ltd's former chairman, has said the final bill could be £9 billion higher still, at £66 billion. Independent estimates have put the total cost as high as £100 billion, factoring in inflation and other unforeseen costs. The project has become a major hurdle for successive governments, which have resented the high cost of construction, legal fees and land purchase. Labour did not mention HS2 in its election manifesto last year, but pledged shortly after taking power that it would continue with construction of Phase One. Ministers are planning to use the recommendations of the Stewart review when proceeding with the Lower Thames Crossing and Northern Powerhouse Rail projects later in this Parliament. Government sources said more details of future projects would be announced in the £725 billion infrastructure strategy to be announced by Rachel Reeves later this month. The Government is concerned that without the planned HS2 Phase 2a, between Birmingham and Crewe, it cannot ease capacity on the West Coast Main line. Officials are considering a plan backed by Andy Burnham, the Labour mayor of Greater Manchester, to build an HS2-lite track between those cities at a lower cost and with private finance. The 89 recommendations of the Stewart review will include that HS2 Ltd changes its contracts to encourage providers to deliver on time and under budget. When the company renews contracts, it will include clauses that will give firms a financial incentive to perform better. Insiders say deliberately open-ended contracts have been a key driver of delays and cost overruns over the last 13 years. 'Lack of trust' It will also find that ministers have failed to oversee the project, allowing the company's former management to build the line virtually unsupervised, with taxpayers footing the bill. Ms Alexander will describe the issue as a 'fundamental lack of trust between my Department and HS2 Ltd', pointing to former Tory transport secretaries and Treasury ministers who skipped meetings that were designed to keep the cost of HS2 under control. Mr Wild and Mr Brown, who will now run HS2 Ltd, previously worked with Ms Alexander on the Crossrail project, when she was serving as Sadiq Khan's deputy in City Hall. 'Mark and Mike were part of the team, with me, that turned Crossrail into the Elizabeth line,' she will say. 'We have done it before, we will do it again.' Sources said HS2 was likely to adopt some lessons from Crossrail, which became the Elizabeth line, including a phased opening that allows the railway to sell tickets before it is fully complete. The Elizabeth line opened in May 2022, more than three years late and more than £4 billion over budget, although its budget was increased much less as a proportion of its total cost than HS2, which is expected to cost at least three times more than planned. Although ministers will argue that the delay to HS2 was an inevitable consequence of management by the Conservatives, the latest news is likely to be received poorly by residents affected by construction works between London and Birmingham. Protests against the project have included locals unhappy about disruption to picturesque villages and environmental activists who believe the new rail line will destroy habitats. More than £120 million has been spent by HS2 Ltd on managing the cost of protests, which has included removing demonstrators from tunnels between Old Oak Common and Euston station. A government source told The Telegraph: 'It's now crystal clear that previous Conservative governments have serially mismanaged HS2, with taxpayers and passengers paying the price. 'The cost was inflated out of all control, while billions were wasted due to political indecision. 'There was a failure of ministerial oversight from the then Transport Secretary and a delivery company not fit for purpose. It's a comedy of errors, but no one's laughing. 'In the wake of these fresh revelations, this government is learning the lessons needed to restore trust and rebuild Britain.'
