Humans may be inhaling 100 times more microplastics than previously assumed, scientists warn
People may be breathing in about 100 times more of these tiny fragments than past estimates indicated — from sources based both outside and indoors, including in homes and cars, researchers revealed in a new study, published on Wednesday in PLOS One.
These tiny, inhaled particles can invade the lungs and cause oxidative stress, while wreaking havoc on the immune system and other organs, according to the study authors.
'Everywhere we look, we find microplastics, even in the air we breathe inside our homes and cars,' they said in a statement. 'The biggest concern is how small these particles are completely invisible to the naked eye.'
While research has thus far largely focused on larger microplastics ranging from 20 to 200 micrometers in diameter, the study authors — from the Université de Toulouse in France — decided to focus on those 10 micrometers or less, which penetrate the lungs more easily.
'Something we can't see can still harm us,' co-lead-authors Nadiia Yakovenko, a postdoctoral scholar at the university, and Jerome Sonke, a research director at the French National Center for Scientific Research, said in joint remarks.
'Our findings show that microplastics in the air, especially indoors, may be an invisible threat we are only beginning to understand,' Yakovenko and Sonke added.
To better quantify the typical number of inhaled microplastics, the scientists said they collected air samples from their own apartments and cars, under realistic driving conditions. The researchers then employed a technique called Raman spectroscopy, through which they measured concentrations of microplastics in 16 air samples.
The median concentration of detected microplastics was 528 particles per cubic meter in the apartment air samples and 2,238 particles per cubic meter in the cars, with 94 percent of all detected particles measuring less than 10 micrometers.
'We inhale thousands of them every day without even realizing it,' the authors said. 'Deep inside our lungs, microplastics release toxic additives that reach our blood and cause multiple diseases.'
After combining their results with previously published data regarding indoor microplastics, the researchers estimated that adults inhale about 3,200 microplastic particles in the 10-300-micrometer range daily.
But they also found that these same individuals breathe in about 68,000 particles of 1-10-micrometer particles per day — more than 100 times more than previous research estimated for these small-diameter fragments.
These findings, the authors stressed, suggest that health risks from inhaling lung-penetrating microplastic could be much higher than previously thought. As such, they called for more research into this critical question.
Yakovenko and Sonke, the co-lead-authors, expressed particular concern about car cabins, which they stressed have limited ventilation — enabling microplastic particles to accumulate and concentrate in the air. Under these circumstances, they explained, people can inhale microplastics in greater quantities during long commutes.
The two researchers said they hope that by raising awareness about this issue, their study could help guide future public health recommendations and indoor air quality standards. Their team, the scientists continued, plans to assess a wider variety of indoor exposures and relevant daily habits.
'We hope to shed light on a more personal and constant route of microplastic exposure through inhalation that has so far remained under the radar,' they added.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why does your mind goes 'blank'? New brain scans reveal the surprising answer
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. You look up from your phone screen and suddenly realize you weren't thinking about anything. It's not a lapse in memory or a daydream; it's literally a moment when you're not thinking of anything at all. Neuroscientists have a term for it — mind blanking — which they define as a brief, waking state when conscious thought simply stops. Scientists used to think our waking minds were always generating thoughts, but recent research shows that's not the case. Mind blanking is now recognized as a distinct conscious state associated with changes in arousal, which in neuroscience refers to alertness and responsiveness to stimuli. Studying this curious state could shed light on how consciousness works, some researchers think. "For some, it's kind of a blip in the mind, and suddenly there's nothing," Thomas Andrillon, a neuroscience researcher at the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research and the Paris Brain Institute, told Live Science. "But not with that feeling, 'There was something that I forgot.'" Often, people are unaware of the lapse until they are prompted to answer "What were you just thinking about?" "When we interrupt them randomly," Andrillon continued, "it's clear it's more frequent than what people realize." Although the frequency of this phenomenon varies among individuals, various studies suggest about 5% to 20% of a person's waking hours may be spent in this state. Related: Super-detailed map of brain cells that keep us awake could improve our understanding of consciousness An investigation of 'mind blanking' In a study published in the July issue of the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Andrillon and his team used electroencephalography (EEG) — which involves placing electrodes on participants' heads — to measure brain activity while people experienced lapses in attention, such as mind wandering or mind blanking. Mind wandering occurs when people's thoughts drift to tasks or ideas unrelated to the one at hand, while mind blanking involves the absence of all thought. While wearing EEG caps, participants watched numbers flash rapidly on a display screen. They were instructed to press a button every time a number appeared except for 3, which they were told to skip. This task tests how quickly people react when a response is required and how well they can inhibit that response, when necessary. Because most of the presented numbers required a response, people often pressed the button by mistake when they saw a 3 onscreen. The researchers paused the task once a minute to ask what the participants were thinking, finding that they were either focused on the task, their mind was wandering, or they were experiencing a "mind blank." Participants pressed the button more quickly when their minds were wandering, whereas their responses slowed noticeably during mind blanking, suggesting these two mental states are distinct. Brain activity told a similar story. The EEG data showed that the participants' brain activity tended to slow down slightly more when their minds were blank than when they were wandering, compared to the baseline of their paying attention. 'The connectivity changes as if the inner workings of the brain were specific, in a way, to that state," Andrillion said. EEG data is great for tracking rapid changes in brain activity, but it can't pinpoint exactly which brain regions are involved. That's in part because it records brain waves through the skull, and the signals blur as they make their way through the brain tissue, fluid and bone. Andrillon explained it's like listening through a wall. You can tell if a group inside is noisy or quiet, but you can't tell who is talking. The EEG results from the study suggest that during mind blanking, the brain's activity slows down globally, but the technique couldn't identify specific areas. That's where functional MRI (fMRI) came in. Related: 'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Hypersynchronization fMRI provides a clearer view of which regions are active and how they interact, but its tracking speed is slower because the technique tracks bloodflow, rather than directly following brain signals. fMRI is more like peeking into the room and seeing who's talking to whom, but not knowing precisely when, Andrillion said. Study co-author Athena Demertzi, a neuroscience researcher at the GIGA Institute-CRC Human Imaging Center at the University of Liège in Belgium, led the fMRI portion of the study. As people rested in an fMRI scanner with no particular task at hand, Demertzi and her team periodically asked what they were thinking. The results were surprising: when people reported mind blanking, their brains showed hyperconnectivity — a global, synchronized activity pattern similar to that seen in deep sleep. Typically, when we are awake and conscious, our brain regions are connected and communicating but not synchronized, as they appear to be during mind blanks. "What we think happens in the case of mind blanking is that the brain is pushed a little bit toward the side of synchronization," Andrillon said. "That might be enough to disrupt these sweet spots of consciousness, sending our mind to blank." Research into mind blanking is still in its early stages, but Andrillon and Demertzi noted that its similarity to brain patterns seen during deep sleep may offer an important clue as to its function. Deep sleep, also known as slow-wave sleep, coincides with important cleanup work for the brain. It clears away accumulated waste, cools the brain, conserves energy and helps reset the system after a full day of mental activity. RELATED STORIES —Why do we forget things we were just thinking about? —Electronic' scalp tattoos could be next big thing in brain monitoring —'Hyper-synchronized' brain waves may explain why different psychedelics have similar effects, rat study reveals Andrillon and Demertzi suggested mind blanking may act as a mini-reset while we're awake. Demertzi said it's like "taking five to steam off" or "to cool your head." Early studies in Demertzi's lab suggest sleep-deprived people report more mind blanks, adding support to this idea. Both researchers stressed that this state is likely a way for the brain to maintain itself, though "it's not ideal for performance," Andrillon said. Andrillon believes it's possible but unlikely that there are people who have never experienced mind blanking. Detecting a mind blank can be a challenge. "It can require being interrupted," Andrillon said, "to realize, 'OK, actually, there was no content.'"
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Climate disasters can alter kids' brains — before they're even born
Climate disasters can alter kids' brains - before they're even born When Superstorm Sandy made a beeline for New York City in October 2012, it flooded huge swaths of downtown Manhattan, leaving 2 million people without electricity and heat and damaging tens of thousands of homes. The storm followed a sweltering summer in New York City, with a procession of heat waves nearing 100 degrees. For those who were pregnant at the time, enduring these extreme conditions wasn't just uncomfortable - it may have left a lasting imprint on their children's brains. That's according to a new study published in June in the peer-reviewed journal PLOS One. Using MRI scans, researchers at Queens College, City University of New York, found that children whose mothers lived through Superstorm Sandy had distinct brain differences that could hinder their emotional development. The effects were even more dramatic when people were exposed to extreme heat during their pregnancy, in addition to the tropical storm, the researchers found. "It's not just one climate stressor or one isolated event, but rather a combination of everything," Donato DeIngeniis, the lead author of the study and a doctoral student in neuropsychology at the CUNY Graduate Center, told Grist. DeIngeniis' study is the first of its kind to examine the joint effects of natural disasters and extreme heat - events that often coincide. A few years ago, scientists dubbed summer "danger season" since it's a time of colliding risks, including heat, hurricanes, wildfires, and toxic smoke. And summertime temperatures keep climbing to new heights. The study analyzed brain imaging data from a group of 34 children, approximately 8 years old, whose mothers were pregnant during Superstorm Sandy - some of whom were pregnant at the time that Sandy made landfall, and some of whom were exposed to heat 95 degrees F or higher during their pregnancy. While the researchers didn't find that heat alone had much of an impact, living through Superstorm Sandy led to an increase in the basal ganglia's volume, a part of the brain that deals with regulating emotions. While that larger size could be a compensation in response to stress, changes in the basal ganglia have been linked to behavioral challenges for children, such as depression and autism, DeIngeniis said. "What we are seeing is compelling evidence that the climate crisis is not just an environmental emergency, it is potentially a neurological one with consequence for future generations who will inherit our planet," said Duke Shereen, a co-author of the study and the director of the MRI facility at CUNY Graduate Center, in a press release. Global warming made Superstorm Sandy more damaging as a result of rising sea levels and higher ocean temperatures that might have amped up its rainfall. Yoko Nomura, a co-author of the study and a psychology professor at the Queens College, CUNY, said that the time before birth is "very, very sensitive" for development because the fetus' body is changing so drastically. The human brain grows the most rapidly in the womb, reaching more than a third of its full adult volume before birth, according to the study. Any added stress at that time, even if small, "can have a much bigger impact," Nomura said. But that extra-sensitive period also presents a window of opportunity. "Developmental science, including the science in this paper, is exciting because it not only tells us what we can do to protect children from the effects of climate change, but it also tells us when we can step in to protect children to make the greatest difference," Lindsey Burghardt, chief science officer at the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, said in an email. Although there's a lot of evidence that prenatal stress generally can affect child brain development, according to DeIngeniis, research on climate-related stress specifically is lacking. "It is still a field that has potential for explosive growth," said Jennifer Barkin, a professor at Mercer University School of Medicine in Macon, Georgia, who is studying the effects of last year's Hurricane Helene on maternal health. DeIngeniis' study offers concrete evidence of how climate-charged events can affect the brain, Barkin said. "People have a hard time sometimes with mental health, because it's not like you can take an X-ray and see a broken bone." But it's easier to understand imaging showing a difference in brain volume based on exposure to environmental stress, she said. Barkin, who developed an index for measuring maternal health after childbirth, says that people are beginning to pay more attention to mothers and their mental health - not just in terms of delivering a healthy baby, but over the long term. "We tend to focus things on the child's outcome, which is important, but to keep the child healthy, the mother has to be healthy, too," she said. "Because when mom's struggling, the family's going to struggle." This story was produced by Grist and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.
The Hill
3 days ago
- The Hill
New tariffs could raise prices of Ozempic, Wegovy
(NEXSTAR) – A trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union is expected to impose a 15% tax on pretty much all goods imported from Europe, from fancy French wines to sleek German cars and in-demand pharmaceuticals. Some of the most recognizable brand names that could be impacted include Ozempic and Wegovy, two injectable drugs that have grown popular in recent years for their abilities to treat diabetes and promote weight loss. Both are made by Novo Nordisk, a Danish company. But the European drugs are extremely popular here in the U.S. Wegovy – the version of the drug that's FDA-approved to treat obesity – has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., according to Novo Nordisk. Even before the new tariffs, many people have found the medications to be prohibitively expensive. Without insurance, they cost about $500 a month. What is the Presidential Fitness Test? It's usually cheaper for those who can get the drug covered by their health plan. Novo says of its patients who have coverage in the U.S., 85% pay $25 or less per month. After the tariffs take effect, the prices of importing these medications into the U.S. will go up, but who will pay that tax isn't straightforward. Rena Conti, an associate professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business, told NBC News that drug companies could just raise their price list right away to offset the higher cost. Those without insurance might notice the sticker price change, but those with coverage could end up paying more in higher premiums. 'The big picture is: The cost of imported drugs is about to become more expensive for all Americans,' Joe Brusuelas, principal and chief economist for RSM US, said in an interview with Axios. Other name-brand drugs like Botox, Viagra and Keytruda (a cancer medication) are also manufactured in Europe and impacted by the tariffs. Some drug generics were supposed to be carved out of the deal, but details were still pending as of Thursday. When asked how Ozempic and Wegovy would be impacted by the new 15% tariff, a Novo Nordisk spokesperson told Nexstar the company 'remains focused on improving patient access and affordability, and we will continue to work to find solutions that help people access the medication they need.'
