
West: Iran's Nuclear Drive Nearing Point of No Return
Europe and the United States on Wednesday expressed grave concern over Iran's nuclear escalation and called on Tehran to cooperate fully and effectively with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
In a joint statement, the E3, including France, the UK and German, said they consider triggering the snapback mechanism to address threats to international peace and security arising from Iran's nuclear program, in the absence of any diplomatic progress.
On Wednesday, the IAEA Board of Governors started discussing Chief Rafael Grossi's report on Iran's implementation of its nuclear commitments under the JCPoA.
Western nations are planning to table a resolution at the agency's meeting that will find Iran in non-compliance with its so-called safeguards obligations for the first time in 20 years.
As IAEA Board of Governors met in Vienna, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issued a stark warning to European powers against the potential censure resolution.
In a post on X on Wednesday, he accused the three European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal, of failure to fulfill their obligations and cautioned them against committing another 'major strategic mistake.'
'Instead of displaying remorse or a desire to facilitate diplomacy, the E3 is today promoting confrontation through the absurd demand that Iran must be punished for exercising its right under the JCPOA to respond to non-performance by counterparts,' he wrote on X.
Meanwhile, Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's deputy foreign minister said on Wednesday that the country is prepared to take 'immediate technical measures' should the resolution is passed.
'The necessary decisions have already been made within the state structure,' Gharibabadi was quoted as saying by state media.
Commenting on the threat of reimposing UN sanctions through the JCPOA's 'snapback mechanism,' Gharibabadi said the deal no longer exists in practice and that Western parties have forfeited any legal standing due to their non-compliance.
For its part, the EU on Wednesday said it remains gravely concerned by the expansion of Iran's nuclear program, affirming it is a key security priority for the Union to ensure that Tehran does not acquire a nuclear weapon.
In a statement at the IAEA Board of Governors on the NPT Safeguards Agreement with Iran, the EU expressed support for a diplomatic solution and urged Iran to reverse course and return to compliance with its nuclear-related commitments.
The EU also called on Iran to fully cooperate with the IAEA and expressed support for Director General Rafael Grossi's efforts to re-establish monitoring access.
'Iran's unabated nuclear advances over the last five years are of utmost concern,' the EU said. 'These actions have no credible civilian justification and carry very significant proliferation-related risks.'
Also, the EU said that Iran is now producing more than one significant quantity of uranium enriched to 60% each month.
The EU further said that former Iranian officials have made public statements about the country having all capabilities to assemble a nuclear weapon, deepening suspicions about Tehran's intentions.
The Union then said that Iran has reduced its cooperation with the IAEA following Tehran's withdrawal from the Additional Protocol to the NPT in February 2021, negatively impacting verification and control activities by limiting the IAEA's access to Iranian nuclear facilities and information.
Also, the EU condemned Iran's decision to cease implementation of monitoring measures and to remove IAEA surveillance equipment, actions that it said have irreparably disrupted oversight.
'The agency has lost continuity of knowledge in relation to the production and current inventory of centrifuges, rotors and bellows, heavy water and uranium concentrate, which it will not be possible to restore. This has detrimental implications for the agency's ability to provide assurance of the peaceful nature of Iran's nuclear program,' it said.
Therefore, the EU urged Iran to reverse course and return to compliance with its nuclear-related commitments.
'We strongly urge Iran to return to the provisional implementation of the Additional Protocol, to ratify it, and to resume implementation of all JCPOA-related verification measures.'
In a similar move, the E3 countries handed a joint statement to the IAEA Board of Governors on Iran's implementation of its nuclear commitments under the JCPoA.
They praised Grossi for his latest report on Iran's nuclear program, which they said demonstrates the Agency's professional, independent and impartial work providing objective reporting on Iran's nuclear program and its implementation of its nuclear-related commitments under UN Security Council resolution 2231.
But the three countries said the content of Grossi's latest report is far from positive. 'Iran is moving even further from its JCPoA commitments, while at the same time it fails to improve its cooperation with the IAEA, despite the Board's appeals.'
The E3 added, 'Iran's enrichment to 60% is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons, and has no credible civilian justification. The IAEA is currently unable to verify that Iran's escalating nuclear program is exclusively peaceful. That must be a concern for us all.'
Meanwhile, it said, Iran refuses to re-designate several experienced Agency inspectors. 'This is a politically motivated decision which seriously affects the IAEA's ability to conduct its verification in Iran, particularly at its enrichment facilities.'
Also, the E3 statement said as a result of Iran's continued non-cooperation and lack of implementation of almost all transparency commitments made under the JCPoA, the Agency has permanently lost the continuity of knowledge on key parts of Iran's nuclear program that relate to the production and inventory of centrifuges, rotors and bellows, heavy water and uranium ore concentrate.
It added that it has been four years since Iran stopped provisionally applying its Additional Protocol, thus denying the Agency complementary access to any sites or other locations in Iran.
The E3 has consistently worked towards a diplomatic solution to address Iran's nuclear program and to remove all doubts about its exclusively peaceful nature, the statement noted.
Yet, in 2022, it said Iran twice refused a viable deal that would have brought it back into compliance with the JCPoA, with a return to US participation, and instead Iran chose to continue to expand its nuclear activities.
And this year, it added, while engaging in dialogue with the US and the E3, Iran has continued its nuclear escalation unabatedly, even further beyond any credible civilian justification.
In this regard, the E3 called again on Iran to urgently change course, reverse its nuclear escalation and refrain from making threats regarding a change of its nuclear doctrine.
They also urged Iran to return to comply with its JCPoA commitments, restore full transparency with its nuclear program and implement the verification measures it committed to under the JCPoA and other transparency commitments.
'The E3 wants to see a diplomatic solution. We welcome the ongoing efforts to achieve this,' it said.
Later, the US envoy to the IAEA Board of Governors said Iran continues to accelerate its nuclear activities without any credible civilian justification.
'Iran now has a clear opportunity to build confidence... by implementing the Additional Protocol, not limiting inspections,' the envoy said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
5 hours ago
- Arab News
Trump says Iran has ‘second chance' to come to nuclear deal after Israeli strikes devastate Tehran
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump on Friday urged Iran to quickly reach an agreement on curbing its nuclear program as Israel vowed to continue its bombardment of the country. Trumped framed the volatile moment in the Middle East as a possible 'second chance' for Iran's leadership to avoid further destruction 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' The Republican president pressed on Iran as he met his national security team in the Situation Room to discuss the tricky path forward following Israel's devastating strikes, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to keep up for 'as many days as it takes' to decapitate Iran's nuclear program. The White House said it had no involvement in the strikes, but Trump highlighted that Israel used its deep arsenal of weaponry provided by the US to target Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he had warned Iran's leaders that 'it would be much worse than anything they know, anticipated, or were told, that the United States makes the best and most lethal military equipment anywhere in the World, BY FAR, and that Israel has a lot of it, with much more to come — And they know how to use it.' Just hours before Israel launched its strikes on Iran early Friday, Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that the long-simmering dispute could be resolved without military action. Now, he'll be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the US from foreign conflicts. In the aftermath of the Israeli strikes, the US is shifting its military resources, including ships, in the Middle East as it looks to guard against possible retaliatory attacks by Tehran, according to two US officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. The Navy has directed the destroyer USS Thomas Hudner to begin sailing toward the Eastern Mediterranean and has directed a second destroyer to begin moving forward, so it can be available if requested by the White House. As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, Iran had signaled the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Friday's strikes came as Trump planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with the Iranian foreign minister. Witkoff still plans to go to Oman this weekend for talks on Tehran's nuclear program, but it's unclear if the Iranians will participate, according to US officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private diplomatic discussions. The president made a series of phone calls Friday to US television news anchors to renew his calls on Iran to curb its nuclear program. CNN's Dana Bash said Trump told her the Iranians 'should now come to the table' and get a deal done. And Trump told NBC News that Iranian officials are 'calling me to speak' but didn't provide further detail. Trump also spoke Friday with British Prime Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron about the evolving situation, as well as Netanyahu. Meanwhile, oil prices leapt and stocks fell on worries that the escalating violence could impact the flow of crude around the world, along with the global economy. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating' in the military strikes. But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for US personnel in the region. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who's on Democrats' shortlist for top 2028 White House contenders, said if Israel can set back Iran's nuclear program with the strikes 'it's probably a good day for the world.' 'But make no mistake: We do not want an all-out war in the Middle East,' Shapiro said. 'That's not only bad for the Middle East, it's destabilizing for the globe, and it's something that I hope will not occur.' Iran late Friday launched hundreds of ballistic missiles toward Israel after firing dozens of drones earlier in the day. The US military assisted Israel intercept the missiles fired by Iran in the retaliatory attack. Trump, in the hours before the Israeli attack on Iran, still appeared hopeful in public comments that there would be more time for diplomacy. But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department and US military on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their loved ones from some US diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president, who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the US and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the Obama administration-brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X on Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.'


Al Arabiya
5 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
France's Macron says Iran responsible for destabilizing region
French President Emmanuel Macron said on Friday that Iran bore a heavy responsibility for destabilization of the Middle East and that it had pushed ahead with an unjustified nuclear program, but he also urged restraint after Israel struck Iran. After a day of talks with regional and international leaders following Israeli strikes on Iranian military targets, notably its nuclear sites, Macron said Tehran was close to a 'critical point' in acquiring a nuclear weapon. Iran has consistently denied seeking one. 'Iran bears a very heavy responsibility for the destabilization of the region,' Macron said. 'Iran is continuing to enrich uranium without any civilian justification and to levels that are very close to what is needed for a nuclear device,' he said. While he urged restraint, Macron acknowledged that resuming diplomatic efforts, specifically US negotiations on a nuclear deal with Iran that started two months ago, would be difficult. 'The current situation has a risk of uncontrolled escalation,' he said, adding that Iran's activities threatened Europe. Warning of a possible impact on the global economy, Macron said France would defend Israel if it was attacked by Iran as it had done in the past, but he ruled out taking part in any operation against Tehran. France and Israel, traditionally close allies, have had frosty relations in recent months with Macron increasingly critical over Israel's war in Gaza. Macron said France's support for Israel was not unconditional and that Paris has the right to disagree with some Israeli government decisions because 'they are sometimes against Israel's security interests.'


Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
EU brings Turkiye into its security fold
Turkiye has long insisted on being a part of Europe's defense programs and having a say in how Europe shapes its security. Yet, for decades, European states viewed Turkiye mostly through the lens of its EU membership bid and political disagreements. But today, geopolitical matters — especially growing security threats — are shifting that perspective. Now, both Ankara and Brussels recognize that they face similar security concerns. This growing sense of mutual insecurity was highlighted this month, when Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler said that European allies must not only spend more on defense, but also do so wisely — by including Turkiye's fast-growing defense industry in their planning. Although many EU states have long been hesitant to increase their defense spending, US President Donald Trump pushed them to rethink and open their wallets. One major step was last month's creation of a €150 billion ($173 billion) EU defense fund, known as the Security Action for Europe scheme, which is aimed at strengthening its arms industry. A few years ago, the idea of integrating Turkish defense companies into Europe's security systems might have seemed unrealistic. But several factors have changed that. Turkiye's falling-out with the US over the F-35 program, increasing regional threats, Russia's aggression in Ukraine and Europe's doubts about long-term US security commitments have all helped bring Ankara and the EU closer together and make EU-Turkiye defense cooperation more appealing. The combination of these factors has created a major shift in their relationship, which is now reflected in more regular meetings between Turkish and European defense officials. Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time Dr. Sinem Cengiz Turkiye has been building strong bilateral defense ties with individual EU countries for some time. The recent cooperation between Italy's Leonardo and Turkiye's Baykar — the company behind the well-known Bayraktar drones — is a significant example. Ankara is already joining several EU defense initiatives, such as the European Sky Shield Initiative. It is also involved in joint projects — like making ammunition with Poland, supplying military vehicles to Romania and working on naval programs with Portugal. This bilateral cooperation signals a new type of partnership between Turkiye and the EU states that goes beyond traditional parameters. Turkiye's success in building a strong defense industry — especially with its popular Bayraktar TB2 drone — has impressed many in Europe and boosted Ankara's leverage. Turkiye also has key strategic advantages. It has NATO's second-largest army and a central position near the Black Sea, Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East — areas where Europe needs security support. Its ability to help counterbalance Russian influence adds to its importance. With these advantages, Turkiye not only wants to sell its defense products to EU states, it wants a real seat at the table, shaping Europe's defense strategy and becoming part of the continent's industrial defense base. However, this potential partnership comes with some challenges. Not all EU countries are on the same page when it comes to Turkiye's integration into Europe's defense programs. The main challengers are Greece and Cyprus. Their concerns are not related to today's security realities, but rather to long-standing issues in Turkish-Greek relations. Despite these divisions, the insecurity caused by the broader global uncertainty is pushing many EU countries to move ahead with defense partnerships with Turkiye. They are trying to persuade Greece to accept closer cooperation with Turkiye in this field, emphasizing the bigger picture: a stronger and more self-reliant European security system. Thus, the pros of integrating Turkiye into EU defense programs are related to Turkiye's geographical position, its military strength, growing defense industry and mutual security concerns in a time of global instability. On the other hand, the cons and challenges are related to the fragmented EU approach. While some member states prioritize security and pragmatism, seeing Turkiye as essential for regional stability, some have long-standing issues with the country. Moreover, some remain wary of certain Turkish foreign policy moves that clash with EU interests, such as in Libya, the Eastern Mediterranean and Syria. Genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm Dr. Sinem Cengiz Given these challenges, genuine political will and a clear sense of mutual benefit is required to achieve strategic goals in the defense realm. What is meant by mutual benefit is that, while the EU keeps talking about the importance of Turkiye's role in European security, it is not offering any commitments relating to Ankara's membership of the bloc. The EU's often ambiguous approach raises questions about its sincerity and how it perceives Turkiye. European heavyweights such as Germany — which sees Turkiye's support to Europe's security as significant — often seem to turn a deaf ear and a blind eye when it comes to the issue of Turkish membership. Turkiye's experience with the 2016 migrant deal with the EU further deepens this skepticism. At the time, the agreement had raised hopes in Ankara that Turkiye's role within the EU framework would be strengthened. However, several factors have made both sides doubtful about the other's direction. According to Ankara, inclusion in EU defense planning not only strengthens its own economy and geopolitical standing, but it also increases its bargaining power in other policy areas with the EU. From Turkiye's perspective, defense ties could serve as a steppingstone to resetting broader relations with the EU after years of political friction. There are now even larger expectations that are likely to guide the Turkiye-EU defense partnership. Thus, if a new era is to begin, lessons from the past must guide the new EU approach so that this momentum will not end up as a missed opportunity. • Dr. Sinem Cengiz is a Turkish political analyst who specializes in Turkiye's relations with the Middle East. X: @SinemCngz