logo
‘There are no rules on the high seas': Australia to play a key role on ocean protections

‘There are no rules on the high seas': Australia to play a key role on ocean protections

Australian mining billionaire Andrew 'Twiggy' Forrest will seek to partner with at least three countries to help fund marine protection zones, in a world-first plan to bolster poorer nations' capacity to fight unsustainable fishing practices.
Forrest will attend the United Nations Oceans Conference in France on Monday, where he is expected to hold talks with world leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron.
'It's absolutely clear that the world fishing industries are in a race to the bottom, a race to make oceans extinct of life, and that is because it's a rule-less order [on the high seas],' Forrest said.
Environment Minister Murray Watt said Australia would play a leading role at the talks, and announced on Sunday that the Albanese government would introduce legislation enabling Australia to ratify the High Seas Biodiversity Treaty.
Twenty-eight countries have ratified the treaty, which needs 60 member states to come into force. The UN-led treaty seeks to protect vast swaths of ocean in international waters – covering nearly half the planet – from overfishing.
Loading
'All Australians understand the importance of the ocean. It's at the heart of our national identity, and it connects us with our region and the rest of the world,' Watt said.
'Australia is a world leader in ocean protection, working domestically and with our Pacific and Indian Ocean neighbours to protect this precious and incredibly important shared resource.'
Just over half Australia's oceans are in marine-protected areas, although only 22 per cent are 'no-take' zones that prevent trawling and other commercial fishing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bank revolt to grow as RBA cut looms
Bank revolt to grow as RBA cut looms

Perth Now

time26 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Bank revolt to grow as RBA cut looms

Cash-strapped Aussies are tipped to rush out and refinance their home loan, should the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates again on Tuesday. Fresh data released by Mortgage Choice shows there was a 22 per cent spike in the number of Australians looking to refinance over the June quarter thanks to an interest rate cut in May. Mortgage Choice chief executive Anthony Waldron says the same could happen if the RBA reduces the official cash rate on Tuesday after its August meeting. 'The Reserve Bank is expected to deliver another cut to the cash rate at its August meeting, which should encourage more borrowers to see if they can access a better rate on their home loan,' he said. There was a 22 per cent spike in Aussies refinancing over the June quarter following the May rate cut. NewsWire / Emma Brasier Credit: News Corp Australia 'This aligns with findings from the survey data, which show that 72 per cent of homeowners review their home loan at least once a year, up from 59 per cent a year ago.' According to Mortgage Choice, 49 per cent of Aussies chose to refinance their mortgage to lower their interest rate, while 11 per cent wanted to consolidate debts and 10 per cent wanted to lock in a fixed rate or switch from fixed to variable (or vice versa). Separate data released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics shows over the first quarter, $60bn worth of home loans with an estimated 97,835 loans were refinanced with a new lender. That's a 3.1 per cent increase in both the value and number compared with the December quarter. The next quarter stats are due out on Wednesday. Should Aussies refinance Mortgage holders who can afford to keep up with their repayments could be thousands of dollars better off in the long-term. Research released by Canstar shows the average Australian borrower with $600,000 debt could save $272 a month on their repayments if there is a third interest rate cut. Australians could be out of debt three years earlier if they continue with higher repayments. NewsWire / Nicholas Eagar Credit: NewsWire But if that same owner kept the additional $272 a month on their mortgage, they could be out of debt three years and three months earlier. They would also pay $76,536 less in total interest over the life of their loan. Australians are being reminded of the benefits of paying more than needed on their monthly repayments ahead of Tuesday's highly predicted rate cut. At the time of writing, the money market had factored in a near 95 per cent chance of rate cut, when the central bank announces their cash rate decision at 2.30pm. Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said while a predicted third interest rate cut 'will give real relief' to struggling households, those in a financial position could be significantly better off if they hold their payments. 'For those managing to hold their budgets together, consider keeping your repayments exactly the same,' Ms Tindall said. 'Every rate cut is another opportunity to invest back into your mortgage and potentially be debt-free months, if not years early.'

Young, conspiracy-drawn teens are potential terrorists
Young, conspiracy-drawn teens are potential terrorists

Perth Now

time26 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Young, conspiracy-drawn teens are potential terrorists

The changing face of terrorism from horrific acts by extremist Islamist groups to radicalised young men under 18 tapping away at their keyboards in regional areas is prompting a review into who is a terrorist. The Independent National Security Legislation Monitor is looking at whether Australia's laws are fit-for-purpose, contain appropriate protections for individual rights, remain proportionate to threats and remain necessary. The Australian definition of a "terrorist act" has not changed since it was enacted in 2002. "Next year will be the 25th anniversary of 9/11 and that's the event that really shaped out understanding of terrorism," monitor Jake Blight told AAP. "When we made this law it was followed by the Bali bombings. These were international organisations that were well-funded and executed mass casualty events." Citing ASIO's most recent threat assessment released in February, Mr Blight said the typical profile of who is a terrorist has markedly shifted. "But now and especially since COVID, it's mostly young people, mostly acting along, they're radicalised online and with basic weapons or not even a really fully fledged plan," he said. "They're mostly Australian-born, they're male, they're minors and they're from families previously unconnected to extremism." The average age of those under investigation for violent extremism was 15. He said less than half the potential terrorist matters investigated by ASIO in 2024 were religiously motivated. Those under investigation were not just confined to major cities but were spread out across rural and remote communities. All involved lone actors or small groups, almost all involved minors and almost all individuals involved were unknown to ASIO or the police. None appeared to be directly inspired by conflict in the Middle East or directed by offshore extremists, the assessment found. More than 300 federal, state and territory laws contain offences, obligations and powers that rely on the 2002 definition, Mr Blight found in a 58-page issues paper. These included many exceptional powers and modifications to longstanding legal principles including keeping suspects in detention after serving their sentences and the ability to strip citizenship. "We need to make sure that our terrorism laws are effective but also consistent with our human rights obligations," he said. Mr Blight also cautioned that defining terrorism was a tricky legal minefield and that public figures needed to be careful in their language. "People use the word terrorism to describe horror or abhorrence, it's kind of a short-hand for the worst crime they can think of but that isn't legally accurate," he explained. "There are many terrible and terrifying crimes that are not terrorism." In January, an abandoned caravan packed with explosives discovered in northwest Sydney contained a list of addresses of Jewish institutions. Police did not officially designate the incident as a terrorist event, but Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and NSW Premier Chris Minns labelled it a potential terrorist act. Australian Federal Police officials later said the fabricated caravan plot was a criminal con job.

Macron backs Albanese on Palestinian statehood in face of sharp criticism from Israel
Macron backs Albanese on Palestinian statehood in face of sharp criticism from Israel

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Macron backs Albanese on Palestinian statehood in face of sharp criticism from Israel

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said she had 'deep concern' over the military plan and put this view to Abbas in a phone call on Monday. Meloni believed the Israeli decisions 'appear to be leading to further military escalation' in the Gaza Strip, her office said, and she described this as 'unjustifiable and unacceptable'. The Italian prime minister has argued against recognising Palestine at this point because of her concerns about the timing. 'I am very much in favour of the State of Palestine, but I am not in favour of recognising it prior to establishing it,' she told the Italian media last month. Her comments on the Israeli plan to take Gaza City signal the growing concerns in Europe about Netanyahu and his military strategy, amid warnings about starvation, civilian casualties and lack of medical care in the territory. Israel's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Sharren Haskel, slammed Australia for planning to recognise a Palestinian state when Hamas was refusing to return the last 50 hostages it took in the October 7 attack. 'Fifty of our hostages remain in Hamas's dungeons of torture, being starved to death – being forced to dig their own graves,' she said, in a reference to a video of hostage Evyatar David released last week. 'Yet the Australian government has decided now is the right time to reward the monsters of October 7 with recognition of a Palestinian state.' The Times of Israel reported that Hamas senior leader Ghazi Hamad said last week that the moves to recognise a Palestinian state were the result of 'the fruits' of the October 7 attacks. 'Why are all the countries recognising a Palestinian state today? Before October 7, did any country dare recognise a Palestinian state?' Hamad said on Al Jazeera. Loading 'The fruits of October 7 are what caused the entire world to open its eyes to the Palestinian issue – and they are moving toward it with force. That is, that the Palestinian people are a people who deserve a country.' Albanese has declared that Hamas must have no place in a Palestinian state, a position also taken by European leaders, while also saying the Australian decision on Monday was predicated on assurances that Palestine would accept Israel's right to exist. Haskel cited the Hamas interview to accuse the Australian government of rewarding a terrorist organisation that committed the worst slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust. 'This decision by Australia won't change anything in Israel or Gaza, but let's be quite clear, this is all about domestic politics, not peace,' she said. Palestinian critics of the Australian decision, including several cited by this masthead, also argued the formal recognition of statehood would not change anything in the war in Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store