
The Rise of Social Housing: A Global Shift Toward Inclusive Urban Living
In a world where skyrocketing property prices have outpaced wages and urban centers are increasingly unaffordable for everyday citizens, the importance of social housing has surged back into focus. Once seen as a solution for society's most vulnerable, social housing is now being redefined as a fundamental pillar of sustainable and equitable city development.
From Europe to the Middle East, Asia to the Americas, governments and developers are reexamining what it means to provide dignified, affordable housing—and in many cases, they're getting creative.
Understanding Social Housing: More Than Just Shelter
Social housing refers to homes that are subsidized, price- controlled, or publicly owned to ensure affordability for low- and middle-income groups. It's often developed or managed by local governments, non-profit organizations, or public-private partnerships and can take many forms—from tower blocks to scattered-site housing.
Importantly, social housing is not just about roofs and walls. It's about building communities, providing stability, and reducing inequality. Research consistently shows that secure housing plays a critical role in improving education outcomes, employment opportunities, and even public health.
And in 2025, with housing affordability reaching crisis levels in many global cities, social housing has reemerged as an essential part of the solution.
The Affordability Crisis That Changed Everything
The shift didn't happen overnight. Over the past two decades, cities around the world have experienced steep increases in property prices. In global capitals like London, New York, Dubai, and Hong Kong, even middle-income earners are being priced out of the housing market.
According to a 2024 report by the World Bank, more than 1.6 billion people globally lack access to adequate housing. At least 330 million urban households either live in substandard conditions or are financially overburdened by rent. For city planners, this reality is impossible to ignore.
The affordability crisis, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing inflationary pressures, has forced governments to reconsider market-driven housing models. The result? A surge in social housing investment and innovation.
Europe Leads the Way in Modern Models
Europe has long been a leader in public and social housing, with countries like Austria, the Netherlands, and Denmark providing a blueprint for success. In Vienna, for example, nearly 60% of the population lives in publicly owned or subsidized housing. Far from being stigmatized, this model is admired for its quality design, mixed-income integration, and long-term affordability. Developments like Seestadt Aspern—a 240-hectare smart city project—combine social housing, retail, education, and recreation, demonstrating how subsidized living can be at the forefront of urban design. In France, the government has introduced a policy requiring cities to maintain at least 25% social housing stock, backed by strict enforcement and financial penalties for noncompliance. Paris's suburbs are undergoing extensive regeneration with mixed-use developments that feature affordable rental units alongside market-rate apartments and cultural amenities.
The Middle East's Evolving Approach
In the GCC region, social and affordable housing is taking on a more strategic role. Countries like the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have launched large-scale national housing programs to cater to their growing populations and support homeownership among nationals.
In the UAE, the Sheikh Zayed Housing Programme and Mohammed bin Rashid Housing Establishment are building thousands of subsidized homes for Emiratis. These programs include zero-interest loans, grants, and land allocations. Notably, they have shifted away
from one-size-fits-all villas toward community-based developments that integrate schools, parks, and job opportunities. In Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030 has fueled a robust housing agenda, with the Sakani program delivering over 1.2 million housing solutions since its inception. New urban zones like NEOM and The Line also promise to integrate affordable housing as part of their long-term livability goals.
A New Model in North America
In the United States and Canada, the approach to social housing has long been fragmented, with underinvestment in public housing stock. However, there's a noticeable shift.
In cities like Los Angeles, Toronto, and New York, rising homelessness and housing insecurity have triggered public outrage and political action. In response:
> New York passed a $25 billion housing plan to build 100,000 affordable units by 2030.
> California is investing in modular construction and adaptive reuse (converting old hotels and office buildings into social housing).
> In Canada, the National Housing Strategy is investing CAD 70 billion over 10 years to fund non-profit housing and rent-to-own schemes.
There's also a wave of innovation: community land trusts, cooperative housing, and micro-housing are all being tested to keep costs down and foster resident ownership.
Asia's Mega Cities: Scaling Up with Dignity
In Asia, the scale of urbanization is unmatched, making social housing not just a priority but a necessity. Singapore remains a global benchmark, with over 80% of its population living in HDB flats—public housing that is well-maintained, mixed-income, and integrated with transit and amenities. Ownership is encouraged through leasehold schemes, and flats are built with design quality and social cohesion in mind. In China, a recent pivot from luxury development to "people-first" housing policies has led to a target of 6.5 million affordable rental homes between 2022 and 2025. Meanwhile, India's Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana aims to provide "housing for all," targeting the construction of 20 million urban homes by 2025.
Private Sector Involvement: A Win-Win?
A newer trend gaining ground is the involvement of private developers in social housing delivery. Through public-private partnerships (PPPs), governments provide land, tax incentives, or financing in exchange for developers including a percentage of affordable units in their projects.
This model is especially prevalent in cities like London, Dubai, and Melbourne, where land scarcity and high construction costs make government-only solutions unsustainable. Developers are increasingly aware that long- term profitability can coexist with affordability— especially in mixed-income, mixed-use developments. Additionally, ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) standards are pushing real estate firms to contribute to social impact goals, with affordable housing projects often seen as flagship initiatives.
Technology and Sustainability: The Next Frontier
Technology is also playing a key role. Modular construction, 3D printing, and prefabricated building systems have dramatically reduced construction costs and timelines for affordable housing.
Startups and architecture firms are creating smart, compact housing that is both dignified and efficient. Sustainability is front and center—solar power, green roofs, and low-carbon materials are being integrated into social housing across cities like Amsterdam, Copenhagen, and Dubai South.
In Africa, the combination of tech and microfinance is enabling low-income families to build homes incrementally, using digital platforms and mobile money.
Conclusion: Housing As a Human Right
The rise of social housing in 2025 is a reflection of a changing world—one that recognizes that urban success is not measured by skyscrapers alone, but by how inclusive, livable, and equitable cities are. From mega-developments to micro-housing, from government-led schemes to private partnerships, the global housing ecosystem is adapting. While challenges remain—particularly around funding, land use, and community integration—the momentum is undeniable.
As cities face climate change, migration, and economic inequality, social housing has reemerged not as a charity, but as a necessity—a cornerstone of resilient, modern urban life.
In this new era, housing isn't just about supply— it's about values. And in a world where too many people still sleep without shelter, social housing offers more than real estate. It offers dignity, opportunity, and a place to call home.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wealth funds warm to active management - and China - to weather volatility, report shows
By Libby George and Marc Jones LONDON (Reuters) -The world's sovereign wealth funds are turning to active fund management and investments in China, while central banks are diversifying reserves to weather a volatile global environment, an Invesco survey of sovereign funds and central banks managing $27 trillion in assets showed. Still, the dollar reigns supreme, with the bulk of central banks saying it would take two decades to dethrone it - if ever - as the top reserve currency despite growing concerns. "Institutions with greater than $100 billion - so the pretty large institutions - those are the ones that were most interested in moving more to active management," said Rod Ringrow, Invesco's head of official institutions. Whereas funds liked passive management in predictable market conditions, predictable was "no longer the case," he added. "I think that frames the whole approach... in this move to active management." On average, wealth funds made returns of 9.4% last year, the joint second-best performance in the survey's history. Nevertheless, market volatility and de-globalisation concerns have spiked - and over the 10-year horizon, big worries centre around climate change and rising sovereign debt levels. Over 70% of the 58 central banks polled for example now believe rising U.S. debt is negatively impacting the dollar's long-term outlook. Nevertheless, 78% think it will take more than two decades for a credible alternative to the greenback to emerge. That is a jump from 58% last year while just 11% of central banks now view the euro as gaining ground compared to 20% last year. CHINA FOMO The survey was carried out between January and March - before U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcements and at the peak of excitement around DeepSeek AI's emergence in China. Wealth funds are seeing a major resurgence in interest in Chinese assets with nearly 60% intending to increase allocations there in the coming five years, specifically the tech sector. That number jumps to 73% in North America despite the worsening U.S.-Sino tensions, whereas in Europe it sits at just 13%. Wealth funds, the survey said, were now approaching China's innovation-driven sectors with the "strategic urgency they once directed toward Silicon Valley." "There's a little bit of a FOMO," Ringrow explained, a view that "I need to be in China now" as it shapes up to be a global leader in semiconductors, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, electric vehicles and renewable energy. Private credit has also emerged as a key focus for funds seeking alternative sources of income and resilience. It is now adopted by 73% of wealth funds, up from 65% last year, and with half actively increasing allocations. "This represents one of the most decisive trends in sovereign asset allocation," the report said. There is also growing interest, especially among emerging market wealth funds, in stablecoins - a type of cryptocurrency that is most commonly pegged 1:1 to the dollar. Almost half of funds said stablecoins were the type of digital assets they were inclined to invest in, although that was still behind the likes of bitcoin, where the share was 75%.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Labor Secretary Robert Reich Says, 'If We Want To Make Housing Affordable For Working People, We Must Get Wall Street Out Of Our Homes'
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A growing number of U.S. homes are being bought up by investors instead of regular homebuyers, and former Labor Secretary Robert Reich says that's pushing working Americans out of the housing market. 'If we want to make housing affordable for working people, we must get Wall Street out of our homes,' Reich said in a recent post on X. He shared the comment alongside a video in which he lays out how hedge funds and private equity firms have taken over a larger share of the housing market over the past decade. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Referencing a recent BatchData report, Reich noted that nearly 27% of all U.S. homes sold in the first quarter of this year were purchased by investors—the largest share recorded in over five years. Between 2020 and 2023, the average was 18.5%, according to the translates to 265,000 homes purchased by investors in just the first quarter of this year. Meanwhile, many would-be buyers are sitting on the sidelines due to high mortgage rates and rising prices. 'Rent is skyrocketing and home buying is out of reach for millions,' Reich said in the video he posted on X alongside his comments. 'One big reason why? Wall Street.' Trending: It's no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $250 million in art — Reich, who served in the Clinton administration, pointed out that investors started ramping up their home purchases after the 2008 financial crisis. "The Street's excessive greed created a housing bubble that burst. Millions of people lost their homes to foreclosure," he said. "Did the Street learn a lesson? Of course not. It got bailed out. Then it began picking off the scraps of the housing market it had just destroyed." Reich said investor activity peaked in 2022 and has recently shifted to buying more modestly priced homes, especially in bigger cities and Sun Belt states areas where affordability is already stretched. He also noted that these investors often target neighborhoods with large communities of color. "In one diverse neighborhood in Charlotte, North Carolina, Wall Street-backed investors bought half of the homes that sold in 2021 and 2022," Reich said. "On a single block, investors bought every house but one and turned them into rentals."Reich warns that this trend is creating a 'vicious cycle.' "First, you're outbid by investors," he said. "Then you may be stuck renting from them at excessive prices that leave you with even less money to put up for a new home. Rinse, repeat." In 2024, Reich supported a Democratic bill that aimed to ban hedge funds and private equity firms from buying or owning single-family homes. "If signed into law, this could increase the supply of homes available to individual buyers," he said in the video. It's now up to President Donald Trump and the current Congress to decide whether any such policies move forward. Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . This article Ex-Labor Secretary Robert Reich Says, 'If We Want To Make Housing Affordable For Working People, We Must Get Wall Street Out Of Our Homes' originally appeared on


Forbes
44 minutes ago
- Forbes
Will US Exchanges Follow The Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE)'s Lead In Nudging Chronic Underperformers?
Senso-Ji ancient buddhist temple illuminated at night in Asakusa. Senso-Ji is Tokyo's oldest and ... More most significant temple The TSE asks firms with price to book (P/B) of less than 1 to publish turnaround plans. Around 23% of US firms have a P/B less than 1. In March 2023, the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) put out an interesting rule/nudge or guidance: companies on the TSE, whose P/B ratio was less than one, over multiple years, are encouraged to disclose, on an annual basis, information on specific initiatives to improve profitability and market valuation, as well as the schedule for their implementation. Companies risk delisting if these directives are not followed. This is an intriguing nudge to get under-performers to publicly discuss plans for turning themselves around or for cash hoarders to buy back stock and/or payout dividends. The rule is especially pertinent to a market like Japan where shareholder activism is still at a nascent stage which in turn makes it becomes difficult for shareholder activists such an Elliott or a Trian to target such under-performers. What is so special about P/B struggling at less than one for a while? No one ratio or metric is ever definitive. But, P/B < 1 is a quick and easy heuristic symptomatic of problems that deserve the CEO's and board's attention: (i) the company's future earnings stream does not even pay for the cost of equity held in the firm; (ii) the firm is sitting on assets over-valued in its books and the market is asking the firm to take a write down (a topic I had covered a while ago); (iii) the firm has negative debt (or cash in excess of debt) suggesting that is either under-levered or is better off returning cash to shareholders who can earn a higher rate of return than the firm can generate on cash, either held in marketable securities or invested in the business; or (iv) the firm is doing fine but the stock market has somehow not acknowledged its long term prospects. The US, to some extent, has the same problem. I found 1,547 firms, out of 6,829 firms listed on major US exchanges (including mutual funds and class A and B shares and ADRs), that report a P/B ratio of less than one as of 6/30/2025. Of these, 756 are listed on the NYSE and the remaining 791 are on NASDAQ. Of the 1,547 firms, 1,007 trade at a price above $5 a share, suggesting that many of these firms are not trivially small. Thus, 23% of US firms (1,547/6,829) or nearly a fourth of the sample have P/B ratio of less than one, despite the historical heights that US markets have scaled, of late. When I ran the same screen for the Tokyo Stock Exchange, I ended up with 1,668 firms out of a total of 4,333 firms (38%) with a P/B less than one. Yes, the proportion is higher for the TSE but a 23% number for US exchanges still sounds quite high to me. Surprisingly, many prominent US listed firms report a P/B of less than one: Citibank, Baidu, Rogers Corporation, KB Home, General Motors, Molson Coors, United Bancshares, Arcelor Mittal, Fresh Del Monte Produce, Ziff Davis, Echostar, Honda Motor Company, Deutsche Bank, Harley Davidson, Foot Locker, Murphy Oil, Sirius XM, Barclays, Paramount, Ford Motor Company, Liberty Energy, several Invesco, Nuveen and Blackrock funds, Biovie, Kohl's, Clarivate, and Lloyds Banking Corporation. Nearly a fourth of the market is simply too long a list for activists to go after, even in the US, setting aside any considerations of a financial return to activism. I have highlighted how many of these firms potentially have an agency problem in that the board or the CEO is stuck and somehow unable to break the rut and the usual checks and balance such as relatively passive institutional holders, proxy advisors or even index makers such as S&P have not pressured them to turn things around. When the usual checks and balances fail, can and should the exchange step in? Will US exchanges be willing to follow TSE's lead and announce a similar rule asking managers to share concrete plans for a turnaround? Has the TSE's plan worked in Japan? It might be too early to tell for sure but companies have started sharing concrete initiatives. For instance, A lot of this looks and sounds like Financial Management 101 but it is not a bad idea to force CEOs and boards to acknowledge their laggard status and ask for concrete steps they plan on taking to improve return on shareholder capital. What about enforcement? Aside from the threat of delisting, short-listing the P/B laggards could potentially spotlight these firms and on the margin, goad institutional investors, index providers, proxy advisors, sell side analysts and rating agencies to hold management's feet to the fire in making sure that the announced plans are followed through. Will the NYSE and NASDAQ consider TSE's out-of-the-box idea to pull up chronic under-performers?