Prosecutors consider further charges against Lucy Letby
Letby, 35, is serving life in jail after being found guilty of murdering seven newborns and attempting to kill eight more at the neonatal unit of the Countess of Chester Hospital in northern England between June 2015 and June 2016.
Letby has been named the UK's most prolific child killer in modern times. She has maintained her innocence.
Her lawyers are seeking to have the case reviewed, saying there are serious doubts over whether she was guilty of any crimes.
But Letby has been refused permission to appeal.
However, following her convictions, police said they were investigating whether she had committed further crimes, and the Crown Prosecution Service said it was now examining the evidence.
"We will now carefully consider the evidence to determine whether any further criminal charges should be brought."
It said a referral by police did not mean charges would follow.
Since Letby was jailed, some lawmakers and medical experts have publicly challenged the prosecution evidence that was used to find her guilty, with some experts querying whether any babies had actually been murdered at all.
The Criminal Cases Review Commission, which examines potential miscarriages of justice, is currently considering an application from Letby's legal team, and her lawyer Mark McDonald claimed on Wednesday the evidence of her innocence was "overwhelming".
"We will cross every bridge when we get to it but if Lucy is charged I know we have a whole army of internationally renowned medical experts who will totally undermine the prosecution's unfounded allegations," Mr McDonald said in a statement.
On Tuesday, detectives said they had arrested three unnamed senior members of the hospital's leadership team as part of their separate investigation into individuals and the Chester hospital itself.
"Both the corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter elements of the investigation are continuing and there are no set timescales for these," said Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes, who is leading the investigation.
The CPS said it had not yet been asked to consider any charges in relation to the investigation into the staff or the hospital itself.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
‘Future taken away': Family of slain cop Anthony Woods reveal heartbreak as man jailed for manslaughter
The family of a Perth cop killed in the line of duty when he tried to stop a car thief, before being dragged under the vehicle, have revealed their heartbreak at his future being 'taken away'. Reagan Chown, 25, was sentenced in the WA Supreme Court on Thursday to 15.5 years' jail for the manslaughter of Constable Anthony Woods in June 2023. He will be eligible for parole after serving 13.5 years behind bars. Chown was behind the wheel of a stolen Holden Cruze when he reversed and dragged Constable Woods, 28, under the vehicle. Chown had pleaded not guilty to a charge of manslaughter but was found guilty by a jury earlier this year. The court was told police had pursued the stolen vehicle, which had reached speeds of up to 83kmh in a 40km zone, before it stopped in a cul-de-sac in the Perth suburb of Ascot. Constable Woods tried to arrest Chown and tasered him, but the 25-year-old put his car in reverse and hit the accelerator, dragging, trapping the officer under the car. Constable Woods died from his injuries in hospital. On Thursday, Constable Woods' mother Natalie read a victim impact statement to the court before Chown was sentenced. Ms Woods said her heart was ripped away on the day Anthony died and she felt like she had 'died'. 'He was doing his duty and he was protecting his community and his future was taken away,' she said. 'Each anniversary, birthday and any moment we shared with him is now painful for us.' Justice Joseph McGrath said during sentencing that Chown deliberately put his car into reverse and moved it backwards by putting his foot on the accelerator. He said Chown was criminally negligent for the circumstances, rejecting his defence that being tasered made him not criminally responsible for Constable Woods' death. 'Police were still pursuing you to charge you with reckless driving, and you were driving a stolen vehicle,' Justice McGrath said. 'The police had every reason to form a belief that you intended to flee. 'You had reached the end of the road. 'That you are not criminally negligent is unacceptable.' Justice McGrath said Woods was trapped under the car when Chown reversed at speed, losing control of the vehicle. 'I am satisfied you intended to flee from police and that you ignored the officers command and put the car into reverse and put your foot on the accelerator,' he said. 'You decided to get away and tried to escape. 'The movement of the car was done by you.' 'It would be fanciful to make a finding that Constable Woods somehow did wrong here, officers make split second decisions, (you) was speeding through Epsom Ave high on meth when officers intervened. 'This does not come close to some unauthorised discharge.' Chown's defence lawyer told the court his client had become addicted to drugs working as a FIFO worker. He said it was a combination of being away from his family, who lived regionally, having too much time off work in-between his shifts and his drug addiction – for which Chown said he was 'disgusted'. Justice McGrath accepted that Chown did not intend to kill the officer.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Celebrities call for accountability in Combs case as supporters douse themselves in baby oil
The world had been waiting with bated breath to hear the fate of disgraced hip-hop mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs. Across three days, a 12-member New York jury spent 13 hours deliberating before returning a verdict. The jury, which consisted of eight men and four women, found Combs guilty of prostitution-related crimes, but acquitted him of the most serious charges that could have placed him behind bars for life. Celebrities, singers and rappers have responded to the verdict, calling it a failure to deliver justice and sympathising with Cassie Ventura, while others praised the verdict, calling it a "a great day in hip-hop". Outside the courtroom, supporters of Combs even went as far as to douse themselves with baby oil in celebration — a reference to evidence presented in court of Combs's excessive use of the product. Diddy's former protégée Aubrey O'Day, who rose to fame on Combs' Making the Band series in the mid-2000s, said the cultural weight of the decision was "immeasurable" and argued the courtroom failed to deliver justice. "The pattern of behaviour Sean Combs has shown us over the decades is not a mystery. It is a warning," she wrote. "And now, that pattern risks being reframed — and has now been legitimised by the system," she said. "Women, nor men, nor any artists are the property of those with the most wealth, fame and power." Talk show host and comedian Rosie O'Donnell called the decision "a f***ing joke" and said the decision "got her angry". "I guess a jury just never wants to believe that a woman stays because of power and coercion … they just think women stay because what? Money — fame — 'they love the abuse' — what a f***ing joke," she wrote on Instagram. Grammy-nominated singer Kesha, who in 2023 settled a long-standing legal battle with producer Dr Luke over rape and defamation claims, voiced her support for the prosecution's star witness. "Your strength is a beacon for every survivor," she wrote towards Combs's former girlfriend Casandra Ventura, also known as Cassie. Ms Ventura's lawyer Doug Wigdor told CNN the verdict "wasn't exactly" the outcome they wanted. "But we are grateful to the jury for finding a verdict on those two federal crimes," he said, adding that Ms Ventura held the same view. He said that Cassie could have accepted the settlement or filed a lawsuit to shine a light on Combs's behaviour. "She showed great courage, great bravery to choose the latter of those two options," he said. Outside the courtroom, supporters of the rap mogul were seen dousing each other in baby oil in a crazed celebration in the wake of his acquittal charge. Footage posted on social media shows a crowd gathering around a woman who had baby oil poured on her before dancing around, according to an X post by NBC reporter Matt Lavietes. "I want the baby oil," she repeatedly chanted as the crowd filming her, clapped and cheered. Another man also joined in, pouring baby oil on himself, while other people held up signs that read "Free Puff" and "Free Diddy". A family friend of Combs held up a T-shirt outside the courtroom that had "a freako is not a r.i.c.o" written on it. Baby oil played a major role in the case — police found 1,000 bottles when Combs's homes were raided in March 2024. Rapper 50 cent, who has had a long-time feud with Combs, put up a cryptic Instagram post with an AI-generated image of himself. "Diddy beat the R.i.c.o, (racketeer influenced and corrupt organisations act) that boy a bad man! He like the Gay John Gotti," 50 Cent said, referencing a late New York mafia figure. Diddy's son Christian 'King' Combs thanked supporters and told US broadcaster ABC he was "happy and thankful". "I'm so happy my pops coming home, God bless and God bless the whole world," he said. The 27-year-old was accused of sexual assault in May in a lawsuit that named both him and his famous father for aiding and abetting.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
What happens inside the jury room?
The jury in mushroom cook Erin Patterson's triple murder trial has retired to deliberate the verdict, guilty or not guilty. But what happens in there behind closed doors? When they retire to the deliberation room, should they leave all of their personal beliefs and prejudices at the door? And is this even possible? How does it work? In this episode from our special series Inside the Jury Room, which first aired in 2018, Damien Carrick sets out to find the answer. Hear all the other episodes in the series: Inside the Jury Room part 1: The Ouija board jurors: Inside the Jury Room part 2: Juror stress: Inside the Jury Room part 4: Juror misbehaviour:
