logo
China's Percentage Of U.S. Trade Plummets To Lowest Level In 22 Years

China's Percentage Of U.S. Trade Plummets To Lowest Level In 22 Years

Forbes14-05-2025

China's trade with the United States has not been this low in the last 264 months.
China's percentage of U.S. trade hit the lowest level in 22 years, according to my analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data.
And that was for the month of March – before President Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day,' which started the process that eventually sent U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%, essentially embargo territory.
While those tariffs have been reduced dramatically in recent days, at least temporarily to 30%, they escalated quickly during the month of in April, with China's retaliation met by retaliation from the United States.
In March, China accounted for 7.65% of all U.S. trade. The only other month lower in the last 264 months was in March of 2003, when the total was 7.40%.
As recently as March of 2020, China accounted for 18.08% of U.S. trade, though that was at the onset of Covid-19, when China became the go-to source for masks, gloves and other supplies related to the pandemic. A more reliable historical perspective would be the second six months of 2017. From July through December, China accounted for more than 17% of U.S. trade, just prior to the onset of the tariffs Trump put in place during his first term in office.
I wouldn't expect a reversal of the trend in April, when that data is released next month, since that's when the tariffs went skyward, and wouldn't' expect much of one in May, given the nature of trade between the two nations.
Air cargo is much easier to adjust quickly, given the transport time. But most of China's trade with the United States is by ocean. By value, China's ocean cargo imports are worth more than twice that of air cargo. By tonnage, it is more than 99% of the total.
If China accounts for less than 10% of U.S. trade by the time the May data is released, a strong possibility, it puts it on a path to finish with less than 10% of all U.S. trade for the first time since 2003 – the year of the current record monthly low.
That current monthly record low could easily be broken when the April data is released next month.
The more interesting question is how China is likely to respond.
Given that the tariffs Trump put in place during his first term were not removed by President Joe Biden during his four years in office, and that Trump's second term doesn't run out for the better part of four years, will that lead to a further shift in final manufacturing or assembly to Vietnam, Taiwan, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Mexico as occurred during his first term?
One thing the trade war with China has not done, however, is lower the U.S. trade deficit, one of the biggest irritants to Trump. The U.S. deficit – the value of imports over exports -- has increased seven of the last eight years, topping $1 trillion all four years of the Biden presidency.
It looks like 2025 could be another record-setter. Through the first quarter of 2025, the U.S. deficit with the world was $425.49 billion. The 2024 total for the first quarter, which also set a record, was $248.24 billion.
More troubling should be the percentage of U.S. trade that is an export, the "balance of trade." Over the years, the percentage of trade that is a U.S. export has changed only nominally, from 37 cents on the dollar in 2017 to about 41 cents more recently as exports increased more rapidly to 39 cents in 2024 as they increased a little less rapidly. Through the first quarter of this year, that figure dropped to 36 cents on the dollar.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

time32 minutes ago

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. Brehm's attorney, Bradley Girard with Democracy Forward, expressed disappointment with the judge's decision. 'But in our parallel case, Rural Development Innovations v. Marocco, a grantee and two USADF employees have also challenged Marocco's unlawful appointment," Girard wrote in an email. "We are hopeful that the Court will reject the defendants' attempt to ignore the constitutional and statutory requirements for appointing board members to federal agencies.' That lawsuit is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required.

Washington AG exploring potential challenge to new federal travel restrictions
Washington AG exploring potential challenge to new federal travel restrictions

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Washington AG exploring potential challenge to new federal travel restrictions

Jun. 10—Washington is "taking a careful look" at where it has standing to challenge President Donald Trump's recent proclamation restricting travel from 12 countries, Attorney General Nick Brown said during a news conference Tuesday. "The president says his travel ban is about national security, but this racist order will not make anyone safer," Brown said. The restrictions, Brown said, have stalled medical care, "struck fear" into Afghan refugees who previously aided the United States military and could hinder international students looking to study at American universities. "We are actively looking at ways to challenge this ban, but it will be difficult," Brown said, adding that the Supreme Court has upheld other travel bans in recent years. Trump last Wednesday announced that citizens from 12 countries — Afghanistan, Chad, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen — would be barred from entering the United States. The president also partially banned citizens from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. In a video posted on social media, Trump said the "strength of the restrictions we're applying depends on the threat posed" and said countries could be added or removed from the list. "But we will not allow people who enter our country who wish to do us harm," Trump said. "And nothing will stop us from keeping America safe." The restrictions continue a trend by Trump, who issued several bans on international travel during his first administration. The first, which barred travel from seven majority-Muslim countries, faced swift backlash and was challenged within days by then-Attorney General Bob Ferguson. "I'll always be proud that Washington state was indeed the first state to take on that first travel ban, the first state to take on Donald Trump, and the first state to defeat Donald Trump in court," Ferguson said. "It is a little difficult to wrap my mind around the fact that we are back here again on another travel ban." Ferguson said that Washington will lead other states on standing up against Trump's orders. "And I want all Washingtonians to know that," Ferguson said. "We have a new attorney general, but guess what? The good news is he is as deeply connected to this issue, and as resolved to stand up against it, as we were eight years ago." Among those feeling the impact of the travel ban is Katia Jasmin, founder and executive director of Creole Resources in Spokane. During an interview Tuesday, Jasmin said the inclusion of Haiti caught her by surprise. Jasmin said the ban could have wide-ranging effects on Spokane's Haitian community, including deepening the existing trauma that many have experienced. Jasmin said the ban could also result in family separation, as many permanent residents or citizens still have family abroad — something she knows firsthand. "I have my brother that lives in Haiti, and he comes to see us, and now he won't be able to come and see us," Jasmin said. Katia's brother, Jay, was set to serve as the best man in an upcoming wedding — plans that seem to be in doubt. "My brother won't be able to see us, so I don't know how long we'll have to wait to be able to see him," Jasmin said. The restrictions, Jasmin said, will ultimately have minimal impact on safety. "If you people are scared of gang members coming to the States, I don't know how we are scared of the gang members; they don't have visas, they don't have anything. I don't think a gang member from Haiti will come here to the United States to do anything," Jasmin said. "So whatever they try to say that it's for, the security or stuff, it's not true."

Starbucks has received 'a lot of interest' for China business stake, CEO tells FT
Starbucks has received 'a lot of interest' for China business stake, CEO tells FT

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Starbucks has received 'a lot of interest' for China business stake, CEO tells FT

(Reuters) -Starbucks has received "a lot of interest" in the sale of a stake in its China business, its chief executive told the Financial Times in an interview published on Wednesday, as the U.S. coffee chain looks to revive sales in its second-largest market. "The good news is we've got a lot of interest — a lot of interest," Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol told the FT. "People see the value of the Starbucks brand. They see the coffee category is growing. I think they'd love to be partnering up with us in figuring out how we take this from 8,000 to 20,000 (stores)." KKR & Co, Fountainvest Partners and PAG are among buyout firms interested in acquiring a stake in Starbucks' China business, Reuters reported in February. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store