Bill looks to allow small egg producers to sell ungraded eggs wholesale
TYLER, Texas (KETK)- A potential bill is being proposed which would expand the sale of ungraded eggs.
If passed, Bill 1864, which is in the House Agriculture and Livestock committee, would expand the sale of ungraded eggs. Currently, the only way you can sell wholesale is to grade your eggs. Which are inspected by a certified grading station.
Tyler police investigate death of 28-year-old woman
'It's not a safety issue. It's not that a grade B egg is not as good as a grade A egg. It just has to do with size and weight and things like that,' State Rep. Brent Money said.
Representative Brent Money serves on the committee and says this would open a lot of doors for small East Texas egg producers.
'Any time you can expand the market and make it easier for them to sell their products, it's better for their business and it's better for the consumer,' Money said.
The Farmer's Garden in Winona has been following the bill through the legislative session. They believe that if it passes, it would be a huge blessing.
'We would be able to know, hey, they need 20 days in a week or whatever, and we can grow our operation to kind of match that demand. It would let us grow faster,' The Farmer's Garden owner, Bethany Reynolds, said.
LIST: East Texas cold homicide cases Texas Rangers are still trying to solve
The farm sells about 20 dozen eggs a week. They have had restaurants reach out to them for eggs, but say not having a grading system has hindered their operation.
'We've looked into the grading for our farm to be able to use that, but it's kind of a complicated thing to figure out to enter, and it's expensive,' Reynolds said.
If SB 1864 makes it to the House floor and passes, it will allow The Farmer's Garden to sell 500 dozen eggs a week. Not only raising their profit, but also allowing them to bring their farm to your fork more easily.
'We've got to protect our farmers. And one of the ways that I think that we do that is by making sure that we are not putting unreasonable regulations and barriers in place for them to get their products from their farm to the market,' Money said.
'Representative money,' says one point of contention right now, is how many eggs a farmer can sell a week, as large commercial businesses are pushing for less to be allowed. Money wants to keep the text as it is and get it on the floor. The House committee will have until May 27th to get the bill to the House floor, and voted on by May 28th. If it doesn't make it out of the committee before the deadline, the bill will die.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Governor signs Medicaid work requirements, Opioid Settlement Fund bills into law
Gov. Kim Reynolds, seen here in a file photo from May 2023, signed two dozen bills Friday. (Photo by Kathie Obradovich/Iowa Capital Dispatch) Gov. Kim Reynolds signed more than 20 bills into law Friday, including funding for the state's Opioid Settlement Fund and state-level Medicaid work requirements. The governor has a little more than a week, until June 14, to sign the remaining bills passed during the 2025 legislative session into law. This week, the governor has held events signing multiple measures into law — including the reduction in Iowa's unemployment insurance tax system. On Friday, she signed into law House File 969, a bill expanding the disability and death benefits for first responders like firefighters, emergency medical services responders and law enforcement officer to cover all forms of cancer. This was not the only measure Reynolds signed into law Friday. She released a list of 24 new laws, which include some state spending provisions and other high-profile policies sent to her desk earlier this year. Here are some of the bills signed into law: As discussions — and conflicts — continue over the federal work requirement proposal for Medicaid coverage included in the GOP budget reconciliation bill, Reynolds signed Senate File 615, into law, a measure setting similar work requirements for the Iowa Medicaid program. The requirements for at least 80 hours of work each month would apply to people receiving health coverage through the Iowa Health and Wellness Plan. IHAWP is the state's expanded Medicaid program for low-income people between ages 19 to 64. There are exemptions to these work and reporting requirements for people with disabilities, serious illnesses or injuries, as well as those with children under age 6. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The law directs the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services to seek a waiver to implement these requirements from the federal government. Iowa HHS has already submitted a waiver with a slightly different work requirement plan for IHAWP — one that sets a 100-hour per month work requirement, or for a person to be earn the equivalent in wages to working 100 hours a month at $7.25 per hour, or be enrolled in education or job skills programs to retain coverage. Reynolds said in a statement on the bill signing, 'it is priority of mine to ensure our government programs reflect a culture of work.' 'If you are an able-bodied adult who can work, you should work,' the governor said. 'We need to return Medicaid back to its intended purpose—to provide coverage to the people who truly need it.' Democrats and others critics have said the legislation will cut off health care coverage for eligible Iowans due to additional red tape, leading to a financial hit for rural hospitals and other health care centers. The measure also contains a component that could have lasting impacts for Iowa's expanded Medicaid program: If the federal government allows Iowa to implement work requirements, then later revokes approval, HHS would be directed to end IHAWP. The move to discontinue the program would require federal approval, and if the decision is not approved, Iowa HHS would be asked to pursue implementing an 'alternative plan' under federal Medicaid administration guidelines. After several years of stalled action, Reynolds approved the Legislature's agreement on how to spend money from opioid lawsuit settlements. House File 1038 distributes $29 million from the fund, money obtained in settlements for lawsuits by states against opioid manufacturers, distributors and pharmacies for their roles in the opioid epidemic. For several years, lawmakers in the Senate and House have failed to reach an agreement on how to spend the funds, which are obligated to go to opioid addiction treatment and prevention. But in the final hours of the 2025 legislative session, lawmakers agreed to a system that provides funding for specific organizations and programs that focus on addition treatment, recovery and prevention in fiscal year 2026. In future years, money in the settlement fund will go to Iowa HHS and the Attorney General's office — entities that will then decide how to allocate the money to organizations in the state. HHS will receive 75% of the funding each year and the AG's office will receive 25%. While some lawmakers said they were frustrated with the money going to these state entities instead of being distributed directly by the Legislature, the bill passed with broad bipartisan support as get the funding into Iowa communities. The governor thanked the Legislature for sending the bill to her desk in 2025. 'The opioid crisis continues to impact Iowa families,' Reynolds said in a statement. 'I'm thankful the legislature reached an opioid settlement fund agreement this session to immediately distribute $29 million to providers and appropriate ongoing available funds to support early intervention, prevention, treatment, and recovery.' The governor also signed House File 706, the bill setting higher penalties for violations of open meetings laws and requiring public officials t9 receive training on open meetings and records laws. The bill was brought forward this year after a similar measure was vetoed in 2024 after a last-minute amendment was added that public records advocates had said would lead to unintended consequences. But Rep. Gary Mohr, R-Bettendorf, said adding heightened penalties and more training was still an important measure to pass as a means of addressing violations of these laws in Davenport related to the collapse of a six-story apartment building and alleged violations of open meeting laws in 2023. The bill was also amended in 2025 by the Iowa Senate to include language add two types of records to the state's list of confidential records — security camera footage from the Iowa Capitol and information from state employee identification card access systems. Senate File 175, also signed into law Friday, is a measure modeled after 'Meet Baby Olivia' laws passed in other states. Though Iowa's law does not reference the 'Meet Baby Olivia' video developed by the anti-abortion group Live Action by name, it requires students in 5th through 12th grade human growth and development classes be shown ultrasound video and computer-generated rendering or animations depicting 'the humanity of the unborn child by showing prenatal human development, starting at fertilization.' The bill was amended by the House to include a provision banning materials in school classrooms on fetal development that come from an entity that performs or 'promotes' abortion, or that contracts, affiliates, or makes referrals to organizations that perform or promote abortions. Democratic lawmakers said this ban would mean material coming from reputable organizations and health care providers, like the Mayo Clinic or the University of Iowa Health System, could be excluded, as the ban would not exclude organizations that perform abortions in cases necessary to save the life of the mother. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk feud continues over ‘big, beautiful bill'
WASHINGTON (NEXSTAR) – Fall out continues after Elon Musk turned on President Donald Trump and launched an online campaign to kill the Republicans' big, beautiful bill. White House sources say the president does not plan to call Musk to smooth things out after he threatened to terminate Musk's many government contracts. The blow-up left Republicans on Capitol Hill rattled as Musk, the richest man in the world, appears dead set on killing a key part of their domestic agenda. 'I hope this gets worked out,' said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.). House Republicans are holding out hope President Trump and Musk will make amends. 'I think they'll figure it out, sometimes brothers fight,' said Rep. Michael Rulli (R-Ohio.). Musk launched a flurry of fiery attacks against the president online and he urged his more than 220 million X followers to call their senators to kill the president's big beautiful bill. House Republican leaders, who narrowly passed the massive tax and spending plan last month, insist Musk's objections hold no weight. 'I mean our membership has never been more united behind President Trump and delivering on the agenda,' said Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.). The president insists the Tesla CEO is turning on the plan simply because it does not benefit his company. 'Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' said Trump. Musk denies the accusation. He argues his beef is with the bill's price tag. 'I'm not glad or whatever. People come and go at the White House. He was a special government employee and an expiration date,' said Senior White House Advisor Peter Navarro. The White House is downplaying Musk's attacks, but they do say the president now plans to either sell or give away the red Tesla he bought from Musk in March. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries says through it all Musk is right about one thing, 'Donald Trump would likely not be the president of the United States of America right now. Without Elon Musk.' Musk spent more than $200 million to help get President Trump elected in November. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Freedom Caucus warns it will ‘not accept' Senate changes on green energy tax credits
The conservative House Freedom Caucus said Friday it would 'not accept' changes that 'water down' its cuts to green energy tax credits as the Senate weighs whether to alter parts of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The House version of the 'big, beautiful bill' would make drastic changes to tax cuts for low-carbon energy sources passed in the Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Climate-friendly energy projects, including wind and solar, would only be able to qualify for the credits under the House bill if they begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment. This brief window would likely make many projects ineligible for the credits, and it is expected to significantly hamstring the development of new renewable power. In a post Friday on social media, the Freedom Caucus warned the Senate against loosening that restriction or others included in the bill. 'We want to be crystal clear: if the Senate attempts to water down, strip out, or walk back the hard-fought spending reductions and IRA Green New Scam rollbacks achieved in this legislation, we will not accept it,' said the post, which was attributed to the Freedom Caucus's board. 'The House Freedom Caucus Board will stand united holding the line. The American people didn't send us here to cave to the swamp — they sent us here to change it,' it added. The Senate has been widely expected to consider changes that could slow the rapid elimination of the tax credit passed under the House version of President Trump's 'big beautiful bill.' Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Jerry Moran (Kan.) and John Curtis (Utah) released a letter warning against a 'full scale' repeal of the tax credits. Senate Republicans can only afford three defections and pass their bill. On Friday, a group of 13 House GOP moderates released a letter calling on Senate leadership 'to substantively and strategically improve clean energy tax credit provisions' in the legislation. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,' the group said in the letter, which was led by Reps. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.). Altogether, the letters illustrate what could be a tough task ahead for Republican leaders as they look to find a measure that will keep at least 50 senators on board and appease the House. Emily Brooks contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
