logo
Hospitals shouldn't insist on ID proof of rape survivors seeking abortion: Delhi HC

Hospitals shouldn't insist on ID proof of rape survivors seeking abortion: Delhi HC

Hindustan Times2 days ago

New Delhi, The Delhi High Court has asked hospitals in the national capital to refrain from demanding ID proofs of rape survivors seeking termination of their pregnancy on orders of courts.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma also underlined the pressing need for "clear, practical and sensitive" medical protocols for such survivors, particularly minors.
Lack of clarity on procedures, insistence on identity documents, and the delay in carrying out necessary medical examinations such as ultrasound have all contributed to the further distress of the victim in this case, the court said.
"Hospitals and medical institutions must be sensitised to the fact that cases involving victims of sexual assault, especially minor girls, require a more responsive and sensitive approach," the court said on May 29.
Medical protocols, it said, must align not only with statutory obligations, but also with compassion, practicality, and an understanding of the unique challenges that survivors of sexual violence face.
"Where the victim of sexual assault is accompanied by the investigating officer or has been produced pursuant to direction of a court or CWC, identification proof/ identity card of the victim shall not be insisted upon by hospital and doctor concerned for the purpose of conducting ultrasound or any relevant/ necessary diagnostic procedure. The identification by the IO will suffice in such cases," the verdict said.
The matter at hand related to a minor rape survivor who sought medical termination of pregnancy.
The court issued a slew of directions to all stakeholders to ensure clarity and uniformity in handling cases of sexual assault in which the survivor was pregnant.
The court directed that in all cases, a comprehensive medical examination should be conducted without any delay by the hospital and doctor concerned.
It should be the responsibility of the investigating officer to identify the victim and ensure that when she is produced before the doctor, hospital or medical board, necessary documents and case file pertaining to the victim are carried by the police officer, the court said.
"In cases of rape victims, where the gestational period exceeds 24 weeks, the medical board shall be constituted immediately, and without waiting for any specific direction from the court, the board shall conduct the necessary medical examination and prepare an appropriate report at the earliest and place before appropriate authorities," it said.
The consent for medical termination of pregnancy should be obtained from the victim or her guardian in the vernacular language understood by them, it noted.
"The hospital administration is directed to make available the latest, updated Standard Operating Procedure and relevant legal guidelines in both emergency and gynaecology departments, and to ensure that duty doctors are briefed and sensitised regularly regarding their obligations under the MTP Act, POCSO Act, and guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court and high courts," the court said.
The minor survivor in the case was turned away by the hospital authorities on the ground that a judicial order was first required before any medical assessment could be carried out by the medical board.
The report prepared by AIIMS recorded that there was an urgency in the matter and clinical indications suggested a pregnancy of about 20 weeks.
However, the attending medical personnel at the hospital declined to conduct an ultrasound on the ground that no identity card of the survivor was available and further insisted on conducting an ossification test on her.
She was not examined by a medical board as it was opined by the doctor concerned that a court order was required since the pregnancy exceeded 24 weeks.
Noting the contradictions and to avoid any confusion, the court passed a specific order directing AIIMS to conduct medical termination of pregnancy of the minor rape survivor on May 5 but stressed on passing a reasoned judgment later, addressing the procedural lapses and systemic issues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man abducts & rapes 16-yr-old girl
Man abducts & rapes 16-yr-old girl

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Man abducts & rapes 16-yr-old girl

Bhopal: A 16-year-old minor girl was allegedly abducted and raped by an auto driver in the Nishatpura locality. The accused allegedly held her captive by locking her in a room, and subjected her to sexual assault for 3 months in the city. The incident came to light when the minor's health deteriorated, and her maternal grandmother took her to a hospital, where she was diagnosed as two months pregnant. Following the hospital's report, Nishatpura police recorded the minor's statements and registered a case against the accused on charges of rape, kidnapping, and wrongful confinement under relevant sections of BNS and the POCSO Act. The accused has since been arrested. According to the police, the 16-year-old girl, a student of class eight, resides with her maternal grandparents. Due to frequent travel by auto-rickshaw, she became acquainted with the accused. Based on the information from the hospital, police arranged for a female officer to counsel the survivor. During counselling, the minor disclosed that on March 8, the accused Anil picked her up in his auto and took her to a house in the city. There, the accused allegedly locked her in a room, threatened her, and raped her.

Kin booked for repeatedly molesting minor sisters in Indore
Kin booked for repeatedly molesting minor sisters in Indore

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Kin booked for repeatedly molesting minor sisters in Indore

Indore: A long-time family acquaintance was booked under POCSO Act for allegedly harassing two minor sisters. Police said that two minor sisters from Juni Indore area accused a family acquaintance of molestation. The accused, who visited their home for several years, had allegedly misbehaved with both sisters on multiple occasions. According to police report, the elder sister said that about three years ago, while she was alone at home, the accused made indecent comments and held her hand. When she threatened to scream, he fled the scene. Scared, the girl did not inform anyone at the time. However, the situation worsened over the years. The elder sister said that the man continued to harass her under various pretexts until Nov 2024. On May 3, the younger sister confided in her sister that the accused had behaved inappropriately with her and touched her in a wrong manner, after which the elder sister shared her ordeal too. The sisters then informed their mother, who supported them in filing a police complaint. The accused was since booked under relevant sections and POCSO Act. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tecno Pova Curve 5G - Discover New Horizon TECNO Mobile Buy Now Undo Police are currently investigating the matter and efforts are underway to arrest the accused. Man booked for stalking, harassing 19-yr-old A 19-year-old woman accused a resident of Chhatrapati Nagar of continued harassment and threats despite an ongoing court case against him. The woman residing in Banganga police station area alleged that one year ago, Rahul Porwal lured her under the pretence of marriage and sexually assaulted her. Her family filed a police complaint, leading to his arrest and a court trial. He spent some time in jail before being released. After his release, Rahul allegedly started stalking and harassing the woman. He reportedly engaged in lewd behaviour and issued repeated threats. The situation escalated when he called the victim's mother and threatened to abduct the girl and kill the entire family. Police have registered a new case against Rahul under relevant sections and investigation is underway.

LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court
LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court

Madras high court CHENNAI: Though Supreme Court has not legalised same-sex marriage, individuals can still form a family, Madras high court has said, adding: 'Marriage is not the sole mode to find a family. The concept of a 'chosen family' is now well settled and acknowledged in LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence.' A division bench of Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan made the observation on May 22, while setting at liberty a 25-year-old lesbian woman, who was forcefully separated from her partner and subjected to harassment by her family. 'Not every parent is like Justice Leila Seth. She could acknowledge and accept her son's sexual orientation,' the judges said. 'The mother of the detenue is no Leila Seth. We could understand her feelings and temperament. She wants her daughter to be like any other normal, heterosexual woman, get married and settle down in life. We endeavoured in vain to impress upon her that her daughter, being an adult, is entitled to choose a life of her own,' they added. Also, deprecating the use of the word 'queer' to identify non-heterosexual individuals, the judges said: 'We feel a certain discomfort in employing the expression 'queer'. Any standard dictionary defines this word as meaning strange or odd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 가상화폐 3개이상 가지고 있다면 '이렇게'해라 크립토시그널 더 알아보기 Queering one's pitch means spoiling the show.' 'To a homosexual individual, his/her/their sexual orientation must be perfectly natural and normal. There is nothing strange or odd about such inclinations. Why then should they be called queer?' they asked. The court further placed on record that the jurisdictional police behaved in an insensitive manner in the issue by forcing the detenue to go with her parents. 'We censure the rank inaction on the part of police and the insensitivity shown by them. We hold that govt officials, in particular the jurisdictional police, have a duty to expeditiously and appropriately respond whenever complaints of this nature are received from the members of the LGBTQIA+ community,' the court said. The court then restrained the detenue's family members from interfering with her personal liberty and issued a writ of continuing mandamus to the jurisdictional police to afford adequate protection to the detenue and her partner who moved the habeas corpus petition.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store