American kids have become increasingly unhealthy over nearly two decades, new study finds
Much of what researchers found was already known, but the study paints a comprehensive picture by examining various aspects of children's physical and mental health at the same time.
'The surprising part of the study wasn't any with any single statistic; it was that there's 170 indicators, eight data sources, all showing the same thing: a generalized decline in kids' health,' said Dr. Christopher Forrest, one of the authors of the study published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has brought children's health to the forefront of the national policy conversation, unveiling in May a much-anticipated 'Make America Healthy Again' report that described kids as undernourished and overmedicated, and raised concerns about their lack of physical activity. But the Trump administration's actions — including cuts to federal health agencies, Medicaid and scientific research — are not likely to reverse the trend, according to outside experts who reviewed Monday's study.
'The health of kids in America is not as good as it should be, not as good as the other countries, and the current policies of this administration are definitely going to make it worse,' said Dr. Frederick Rivara, a pediatrician and researcher at the Seattle Children's Hospital and UW Medicine in Seattle. He co-authored an editorial accompanying the new study.
Forrest and his colleagues analyzed surveys, electronic health records from 10 pediatric health systems and international mortality statistics. Among their findings:
1. Obesity rates for U.S. children 2-19 years old rose from 17% in 2007-2008 to about 21% in 2021-2023.
2. A U.S. child in 2023 was 15% to 20% more likely than a U.S. child in 2011 to have a chronic condition such as anxiety, depression or sleep apnea, according to data reported by parents and doctors.
3. Annual prevalence rates for 97 chronic conditions recorded by doctors rose from about 40% in 2011 to about 46% in 2023.
4. Early onset of menstruation, trouble sleeping, limitations in activity, physical symptoms, depressive symptoms and loneliness also increased among American kids during the study period.
5. American children were around 1.8 times more likely to die than kids in other high-income countries from 2007-2022. Being born premature and sudden unexpected death were much higher among U.S. infants, and firearm-related incidents and motor vehicle crashes were much more common among 1-19-year-old American kids than among those the same age in other countries examined.
The research points to bigger problems with America's health, said Forrest, who is a pediatrician at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
'Kids are the canaries in the coal mine,' he said. ' When kids' health changes, it's because they're at increased vulnerability, and it reflects what's happening in society at large.'
The timing of the study, he said, is 'completely fortuitous." Well before the 2024 presidential election, Forrest was working on a book about thriving over the life span and couldn't find this sort of comprehensive data on children's health.
The datasets analyzed have some limitations and may not be applicable to the full U.S. population, noted Dr. James Perrin, a pediatrician and spokesman for the American Academy of Pediatrics, who wasn't involved in the study.
'The basic finding is true,' he said.
The editorial published alongside the study said while the administration's MAHA movement is bringing welcome attention to chronic diseases, "it is pursuing other policies that will work against the interests of children.' Those include eliminating injury prevention and maternal health programs, canceling investments in a campaign addressing sudden infant death and 'fueling vaccine hesitancy among parents that may lead to a resurgence of deadly vaccine-preventable diseases," authors wrote.
Forrest said risks highlighted by the MAHA report, such as eating too much ultra-processed food, are real but miss the complex reality driving trends in children's health.
'We have to step back and take some lessons from the ecological sustainability community and say: Let's look at the ecosystem that kids are growing up in. And let's start on a kind of neighborhood-by-neighborhood, city-by-city basis, examining it,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
18 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: RFK Jr.'s PAC stirs, fueling speculation on a 2028 campaign
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 's super PAC co-hosted an organizing call for supporters and influencers last week, stirring speculation that he's positioning for a run at the White House in 2028. Why it matters: Last Wednesday's Zoom call involving hundreds of RFK Jr. supporters was aimed at energizing his grassroots "Make America Healthy Again" movement and discussing ways to build enthusiasm for the Health and Human Services secretary. A 2028 presidential campaign wasn't explicitly discussed, but two people with knowledge of the call came away believing it was a step toward another campaign for Kennedy, whose long-shot run in 2024 wound up helping Donald Trump to victory. Driving the news: Those leading the call included MAHA PAC leader Tony Lyons, vaccine scientist-turned-skeptic Robert Malone, and Kennedy's top adviser Stefanie Spear, according to two people who were on the call and two others familiar with it. Entertainer Russell Brand and motivational speaker Tony Robbins also spoke on the call, two of the sources said. Several who were involved saw Lyons' participation as a sign that the PAC would help prepare a campaign and fundraising machine in-waiting for Kennedy, to be ready if he chooses to run. Spear, a longtime Kennedy aide who is his top deputy at HHS, highlighted changes he has made at the agency and asked supporters to be patient as he pushes for more changes in health policy, two sources said. During his tenure at HHS, Kennedy has persuaded several food companies to strip artificial dyes from their ingredients lists, pleasing health advocates. Kennedy also drew criticism for firing top scientists and creating a new, handpicked vaccine review board that was seen as a triumph by the vaccine-skeptical and anti-vaccine communities. Spear didn't respond to a request for a comment about the call, which lasted more than an hour. Zoom in: Kennedy's robust network of "MAHA" grassroots supporters and online influencers propelled his independent campaign last year. Kennedy — the son of former Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of President John F. Kennedy — would need to significantly build on his base if he decided to run again. During the 2024 campaign Kennedy polled as high as 15% in some polls. It was the best-performing independent bid since Ross Perot's in 1992, but Kennedy struggled with fundraising, gaining ballot access and growing his support base. Between the lines: Financial pledges were taken during last week's call, two sources said, but Lyons did not comment about how much money was raised or the prospect of a 2028 campaign. Lyons started the American Values 2024 PAC to support Kennedy in the last election cycle. Lyons has since rebranded the group as the MAHA PAC, which aims to support a health "revolution." Lyons ran the 2024 PAC as its president, main fundraiser and patron of Kennedy's work. He's also Kennedy's publisher and gave away Kennedy's books at PAC events last year. He also has made inroads with the Trump family, publishing First Lady Melania Trump's memoir last fall. Flashback: Kennedy's whirlwind entry into electoral politics last cycle began in the Democratic primary. He then quit his family's party to run as an independent before ultimately endorsing Trump. The latest: Kennedy's candidate campaign account is still active with the FEC, and its latest filing released Tuesday indicated the campaign has paid its debts from 2024. It also showed a small number of "campaign consulting" and "administrative consulting" payments were made in June to a few contractors, including $21,000 to an LLC registered to the 2024 campaign's chief operating officer. The FEC's database indicates Kennedy's campaign account remains active and has less than $400,000 cash on hand. What they're saying:"It's alarming to see a dark money super PAC wield campaign money to prop up a cabinet secretary," said Xavier Becerra, HHS secretary under President Biden.
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
States pass privacy laws to protect brain data collected by devices
More states are passing laws to protect information generated by a person's brain and nervous system as technology improves the ability to unlock the sensitive details of a person's health, mental states, emotions, and cognitive functioning. Colorado, California, and Montana are among the states that have recently required safeguarding brain data collected by devices outside of medical settings. That includes headphones, earbuds, and other wearable consumer products that aim to improve sleep, focus, and aging by measuring electrical activity and sending the data to an app on users' phones. A report by the Neurorights Foundation, an advocacy group that aims to protect people from the misuse of neurotechnology, found that 29 of 30 companies with neurotechnology products that can be purchased online have access to brain data and "provide no meaningful limitations to this access." Almost all of them can share data with third parties. In June, the American Medical Association called for greater regulation of neural data. In April, several Democratic members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation asked the Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether companies are exploiting consumers' brain data. Juliana Gruenwald Henderson, a deputy director of the FTC's Office of Public Affairs, said the agency had received the letter but had no additional comment. Although current devices gather relatively basic information like sleep states, advocates for brain data protection caution that future technologies, including artificial intelligence, could extract more personal and sensitive information about people's medical conditions or innermost thoughts. "If you collect the data today, what can you read from it five years from now, because the technology is advancing so quickly?" said Democratic state Sen. Cathy Kipp, who sponsored Colorado's 2024 neural data protection bill when she was in the state House of Representatives. As both excitement and trepidation about AI build, at least 28 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands have enacted some type of AI regulation separate from the privacy bills protecting neural data. President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" included a 10-year halt on states passing laws to regulate AI, but the Senate stripped that provision out of the budget reconciliation bill before voting to approve it on July 1. The spirit of laws in Colorado, California, and Montana is to protect the neural data itself, not to regulate any algorithm or AI that might use it, said Sean Pauzauskie, medical director for the Neurorights Foundation. But neurotechnology and AI go hand in hand, Pauzauskie said. "A lot of what these devices promise is based on pattern recognition. AI is really driving the usability and significance of the patterns in the brain data." Cristin Welle, a professor of neurosurgery at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, said that AI's ability to identify patterns is a game changer in her field. "But contribution of a person's neural data on an AI training set should be voluntary. It should be an opt-in, not a given." Chile in 2021 became the first country to adopt a constitutional amendment for neurorights, which prioritize human rights in the development of neurotechnology and collection of neural data, and UNESCO has said that neurotechnology and artificial intelligence could together pose a threat to human identity and autonomy. Neurotechnology can sound like science fiction. Researchers used a cap with 128 electrodes and an AI model to decode the brain's electric signals from thoughts into speech. And two years ago, a study described how neuroscientists reconstructed the Pink Floyd song "Another Brick in the Wall" by analyzing the brain signals of 29 epilepsy patients who listened to the song with electrodes implanted in their brains. The aim is to use neurotechnology to help those with paralysis or speech disabilities, as well as treat or diagnose traumatic brain injuries and brain disorders such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's. Elon Musk's Neuralink and Synchron, funded by Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, are among the companies with clinical trials underway for devices implanted in the brain. Pauzauskie, a hospital neurologist, started worrying four years ago about the blurring of the line between clinical and consumer use of neural data. He noted that the devices used by his epilepsy patients were also available for purchase online, but without protections afforded by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in medical settings. Pauzauskie approached Kipp two years ago at a constituent meetup in his hometown of Fort Collins to propose a law to protect brain data in Colorado. "The first words out of her mouth that I'll never forget were, 'Who would be against people owning their own brain data?'" he said. Brain data protection is one of the rare issues that unite lawmakers across the political aisle. The bills in California, Montana, and Colorado passed unanimously or nearly unanimously. Montana's law will go into effect in October. Neural data protection laws in Colorado and California amend each state's general consumer privacy act, while Montana's law adds to its existing genetic information privacy act. Colorado and Montana require initial express consent to collect or use neural data and separate consent or the ability to opt out before disclosing that data to a third party. A business must provide a way for consumers to delete their data when operating in all three states. "I want a very hard line in the sand that says, you own this completely," said Montana state Sen. Daniel Zolnikov, who sponsored his state's neural data bill and other privacy laws. "You have to give consent. You have the right to have it deleted. You have complete rights over this information." For Zolnikov, Montana's bill is a blueprint for a national neural data protection law, and Pauzauskie said support of regulatory efforts by groups like the AMA pave the way for further federal and state efforts. Welle agreed that federal regulations are needed in addition to these new state laws. "I absolutely hope that we can come up with something on a national level that can enshrine people's neural rights into law because I think this is going to be more important than we can even imagine at this time." KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF — the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism.
Indianapolis Star
20 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Planned Parenthood fills health care gaps after Indiana's Medicaid cuts
Deputy Opinion Editor Jacob Stewart's column, 'Defunding Planned Parenthood won't stop virtual abortions in Indiana,' would be laughable if the Statehouse Republicans he used to work for hadn't already done costly and dangerous damage to reproductive health in this state. Indiana is the third-worst state in the nation when it comes to maternal mortality because the state is too focused on passing laws against abortion instead of funding programs that keep people alive. Stewart calls Planned Parenthood 'an abortion clinic." However, abortions make up only 4% of the services they provide. 24% of services they provide involve contraception. Studies have shown that increasing access to contraception reduces abortion rates. Criminalizing abortion does not. Another 54% of the services provided by Planned Parenthood are STI testing and treatment. Planned Parenthood is an available and reachable option for those who no longer have coverage for these services following state and federal legislation limiting access to Medicaid. While Stewart bemoans the ability of patients to access abortion care via telehealth, which one can only assume comes from his personal opinion of when life begins, he does not mention the demise of accessible and affordable health care for living breathing people.
