Give tender contracts to SCs, demands Vidasam
Addressing the media on Tuesday, Mr. Venkata Rao said the government had allocated ₹20,281 crore for SC Sub-Plan, and of this, ₹9,000 crore has been allocated to social security pensions and other schemes. The remaining ₹11,000 crore has been allocated to various projects intended to benefit SCs, he said, adding that the works of these projects should be given to SCs only.
Works like laying of roads, water tanks, water pipelines and electricity lines should be given to SCs, he demanded. He said the government spends ₹150 crore on the supply of various commodities such as vegetables, eggs, pulses and others for providing meals to more than 1.04 lakh students in 750 social welfare hostels and 50 residential schools in the State, but not a single contract was given to the SCs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
A historic move, but still unequal
Hoping to bring down the curtain on the three-decade-old struggle for internal reservation, the Karnataka government on Tuesday agreed on a matrix for slicing up the overall 17% reservation for the Scheduled Castes (SCs) in the State. The Madiga community (Dalit left), who led the struggle from the front, will now get a 6% share in the overall matrix. The relatively better-off Dalit right (Holeya) group will receive 6%, while the 'less backward' communities of Lambanis, Bhovis, Korama, and Koracha — along with 59 microscopic communities — have been allocated 5%. The demand for internal reservation, which gained momentum over the past decade and a half, received judicial clearance last August, when the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of creating a matrix within the larger SC quota. In Karnataka, 101 castes have been notified as SCs. The government mostly relied on the recommendations of the one-man commission headed by retired judge H.N. Nagamohan Das, who submitted a report on August 4. The report recommended classifications following a two-month house-to-house survey, which collected empirical data on the socio-economic and educational backwardness of about 93% of Karnataka's estimated 1.16 crore SC population. The Cabinet's decision, announced by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, appears to have been weighed down by political compulsions. While the commission recommended five categories based on backwardness, the government reduced these to three to accommodate the demands of the politically stronger Dalit right and 'less backward' communities. In doing so, the State government let go of Category A, which was recommended for 1% reservation by the commission for the most backward 59 microscopic communities, many of which have double-digit populations and no representation in bureaucracy or politics. The Cabinet also dropped the 1% reservation recommended for Adi Karnataka, Adi Dravida, and Adi Andhra communities under Category E. They have been split between right and left groups. Under the new categorisation, microscopic communities — around 4.97% of the total SC population — will now have to fight with relatively better-off 'less backward' SC communities that have made strides in securing education and finding public sector employment. While many concede that bringing consensus among all groups vying to have a bigger pie in the matrix was not easy, it was believed that in the jockeying for a higher share, the microscopic communities — many of them nomadic — did not get the justice they had hoped for. Of the six Dalit Ministers in the Cabinet, none represents these communities, and there was no voice in their favour. In the final decision, both Dalit right and 'less backward' communities received 1% more than the commission's recommendations. In Karnataka, the Dalit left is seen as veering towards the BJP, while the Dalit right is believed to be with the Congress. The 'less backward' communities are believed to be divided between the BJP and Congress. The question of internal reservation has been an important component of Dalit politics in Karnataka over the past two decades. While the A.J. Sadashiva Commission, set up in 2005, submitted its report in 2012, the internal reservation remained mostly rhetoric as Dalit right groups successfully brought pressure on the government not to implement its recommendations. The judiciary then had also not cleared the internal reservation. The BJP government in 2022 tried to tinker with the recommendations and came out with its matrix that was unacceptable to Dalit right and 'less backward' communities. It also increased the overall reservation for SCs from 15% to 17%. Ahead of the 2023 Assembly elections, the Congress promised in its manifesto to introduce internal reservation. Following the commission's recommendations, though not officially released, Dalit right groups have been vigorously campaigning against the report, urging the government to drop it in what was seen as a posture for hard bargaining. While the clearing of the internal quota is historic, in the end, the relatively more powerful communities within the larger SC population seem to have gained an upper hand, while the most marginalised still have a long fight.
Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
K'taka Cabinet decides to provide internal reservation among SCs
The Karnataka Cabinet has decided to provide internal reservation among Scheduled Castes by categorising 101 castes among them into three categories, official sources said. In a special meeting on Tuesday, the cabinet discussed the recommendations of the Justice H N Nagmohan Das Commission report, aimed at providing internal reservation among Scheduled Castes (SCs). The commission had submitted its 1,766-page report to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on August 4, and it was placed before the cabinet on August 7. The internal reservation is aimed at slicing up the 17 per cent reservation matrix given to 101 scheduled castes. According to sources, the cabinet decided to accept the Justice Nagamohan Das Commission's report, but made some alterations.
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
House panel endorses govt-funded quotas for SCs, STs, OBCs in pvt higher education institutions
Article 15 (5) empowers the state to make special provisions for the educational advancement of socially and educationally backward classes, including SCs and STs, in private unaided educational institutions (excluding minority institutions). The Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports, chaired by Congress Rajya Sabha MP Digvijay Singh, tabled its 370th report Wednesday on the implementation of Article 15(5) of the Constitution regarding special provisions for reservations for SCs, STs, and OBCs in educational institutions, including private ones. New Delhi: Noting the significantly low OBC admissions and 'abysmally low' SC and ST enrollments in private universities in India, a parliamentary panel has recommended implementing reservations in private higher education institutions for marginalised students, with full financial support from the government to ensure equal access to quality education. Under the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006, and as enabled by Articles 15(4) and 15(5) of the Constitution, central educational institutions in India provide 15 percent reservation for SCs, 7.5 percent for STs, 27 percent for OBCs, and 10 percent for EWS. However, private educational institutions are not legally required to implement reservation policies, as no statute mandates them to do so. According to the report, there is a significant gap between official data and actual enrollment figures. The committee noted that, as per data from the Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, private HEIs reportedly have 40 percent OBC, 14.9 percent SC, and 5 percent ST students. However, data provided by the private universities themselves reflect much lower OBC admissions and 'abysmally low' SC and ST enrollments. The report highlights lower admissions in OBC, SC and ST categories in esteemed private universities including Birla Institute of Technology and Science (BITS), OP Jindal Global and Shiv Nadar University. It states that during the 2024-25 academic year at Birla Institute of Technology and Science, out of 5,137 students, approximately 514 (10 percent) are OBC, 29 (0.5 percent) are SC, and 4 (0.08 percent) are ST, with some students not declaring their category. Similarly, at O.P. Jindal Global University, out of 3,181 students, only 28 SC and 29 ST students are enrolled, each constituting less than 1 percent. At Shiv Nadar University, among 3,359 students, SCs number 48 (1.5 percent) and STs 29 (about 0.5 percent). 'The Committee, therefore, recommends that the Department of Higher education implement reservation quotas in educational institutions, including private ones, in proportion to the population of SCs, STs, and OBCs,' the report stated. It further urged the establishment of a central oversight mechanism—such as the UGC, National Commission for Backward Classes, and SC/ST Commissions—to monitor implementation of Article 15(5) of the Constitution ensuring that institutions submit annual admission data to ensure compliance. Also Read: Indian universities must not mimic Ivy Leagues. Global rankings won't build Viksit Bharat Divide in higher education According to government data cited by the parliamentary panel, India has 685 government-managed universities (including 240 central and 445 state institutions) and 473 private unaided universities. Among the country's 45,473 colleges, only 21.5 percent are government-run, 13.2 percent are privately aided, and a majority—65.3 percent—are private unaided institutions. The Standing Committee noted a growing divide in Indian higher education between a small number of well-resourced private and select government institutions, and the majority of higher education institutions that struggle to match their quality. 'The Committee strongly emphasizes that education must be a key instrument of attaining social justice in this country, and noted that the current absence of reservations in private HEIs may be an impediment to the same,' the report stated. To address this imbalance, the committee recommended that Article 15(5) of the Constitution be implemented in full through parliamentary legislation. The committee specifically proposes reserving 27 percent of seats for OBCs, 15 percent for SCs, and 7.5 percent for STs in private higher educational institutions. It also noted that the high fees charged by private universities make education inaccessible for marginalized students and urged the State to legislate financial and structural support to ensure effective implementation of these reservations. The committee also recommended that the department take steps to improve the quality of data collected on student composition in both private and public HEIs. 'It is important for HEIs and the department to understand the social composition of the student body as well as the prospective pool of applicants. The current system of making caste declaration optional may result in a caste-blindness of the admissions process,' the report stated. Also Read: The history of Indian caste censuses is the history of Indian statecraft Financial support from govt The committee stated that any introduction of reservations for SCs, STs, and OBCs in private higher educational institutions must be fully funded by the government. It recommended adopting a model similar to the 25 percent quota under Section 12(1)(c) of the Right to Education Act, where private schools are reimbursed by the government for admitting students from disadvantaged backgrounds, in the higher education institutions as well. Observing that expanding reservation will require increasing seats and infrastructure like classrooms, hostels, faculty, the committee recommended that central and state governments should allocate dedicated funds for private HEIs to increase seats, build infrastructure, and hire faculty in institutions implementing reservations. 'The Central and state government should also supplement resources through Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in education. The Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, through Higher Education Funding Agency (HEFA) should provide low-interest loans to HEIs/ Universities for infrastructure expansion, ensuring no reduction in general category seats to avoid reducing general category opportunities,' the report stated. The Committee recommends that the department of higher education develop certain model programmes (bridge courses, free coaching for entrance exams, etc.) that private HEIs can adopt to support effective implementation of Article 15(5). 'Similarly, the Department may also provide scholarships which can bear the burden of living costs in hostels to students taking admission through quotas in private HEIs,' the report added. Reacting to the report, Congress general secretary in charge of communications Jairam Ramesh posted on social media platform X, 'The legitimate demand of SC, ST, and OBC communities for reservations in private higher education institutions can no longer be ignored.' He added that the party's 2024 Nyay Patra had pledged to legislate the implementation of Article 15(5), and the Committee's report has given fresh momentum to this commitment. Also Read: India's higher education system needs to level up. A third pillar of experts can help
