Major ice storm causes $342M in insured damages across Ontario and Quebec
The Catastrophe Indices and Quantification Inc. estimates that the ice storm at the end of March caused approximately $342 million in insured damage.
The storm downed trees and power lines, flooded basements and damaged vehicles, with over 1 million homes and businesses in Ontario and 70,000 in Quebec without power.
The Insurance Bureau of Canada said that in some cases, properties were without power for over a week due to strong winds and heavy rainfall that prevented hydro crews from completing necessary restoration work.
'Many people had their lives disrupted and property damaged from this event. Insurers are here to help residents and businesses recover and rebuild from this storm,' said Amanda Dean, vice-president of the bureau for Ontario and the Atlantic region.
Story continues below advertisement
Dean notes that insurance companies are continuing to work with policyholders impacted by the storm.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
'Storms of this magnitude can take significant emotional and financial tolls on those affected,' said Dean.
The bureau warns that the frequency and severity of flooding and extreme weather in Ontario, Quebec and across Canada continue to increase each year.
In 2025, home insurance rates have risen 5.28 per cent, well above the rate of inflation, according to a report published by My Choice Financial, a Canadian insurance aggregator and comparison website.
While there are several factors, insurance experts say climate change is a major driving force.
The Insurance Bureau of Canada reported record-breaking losses of $8.5 billion paid out in 2024, triple that seen in 2023 and 12 times the annual average between 2001 and 2010.
Amid increased risk, the bureau notes that it is collaborating with the provincial and federal governments to try to find solutions to mitigate the risks of severe weather.
The bureau is urging all levels of government to take steps to adapt to extreme weather.
The bureau's recommendations include no longer building unprotected homes and businesses in high-risk flood and wildfire zones, enhancing flood defences in communities at high risk of flood, helping homeowners understand their risks, subsidizing home retrofits to help homeowners reduce their exposure to floods and wildfires, and investing in improved emergency preparedness, response and recovery capacity.
Story continues below advertisement
More information on protecting your property from potential risks is available on the Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
an hour ago
- Montreal Gazette
Libman: Maybe it's time to hit pause on our dizzying dance with Trump
I remember as a kid frenetically chasing after a rubber Superball as it bounced around, careening off everything, not knowing where it would bounce next, constantly out of reach. That's what it must feel like to deal with Donald Trump and try to figure out a way to pin down a complicated trade agreement, of all things. International trade, commerce and business need economic stability and predictability. In Canada's history, we've never had to face such a wild card U.S. presidency and been forced to navigate as volatile a relationship with our largest trading partner. Every day seems to bring a different turn. The goalposts seem to move whenever a new idea or insult pops into Trump's head — which he broadcasts on social media — surprising our politicians. There's often no common-sense rationale with Trump. It's dizzying, infuriating and in many ways surreal. One day his chiding of Canada could be related to fentanyl, the next illegal immigrants or imaginary trade imbalances. Perhaps disdain due to slights by our former prime minister still lingers, or maybe current PM Mark Carey hasn't been flattering enough. Who knows? Many Canadians boldly want to see an 'elbows up' approach of defiance. But let's face it — economically we're at the mercy of our much bigger U.S. neighbour. Particularly with this president, as with most bullies or egomaniacs, any attempt at fighting back is likely to backfire. When Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to impose a 25-per-cent surcharge on electricity exports to three U.S. states, Trump roared, threatening a 50-per-cent retaliatory tariff the next day, causing Ford to meekly scurry backwards. Trump's flunky, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, said '(Trump) needed to break some guy in Ontario who said he was going to tax American energy.' Lutnick himself often looks foolish, talking in a vacuum without any idea what his boss might decide the next day. Our politicians don't seem to have any game plan or know how to handle this, as they have no idea what to expect next. Federal ministers Dominic LeBlanc, François-Philippe Champagne, Anita Anand and Mélanie Joly seem to be running like hamsters on a wheel. You also get the sense Carney is constantly biting his tongue to avoid criticizing the president, knowing it could boomerang. Last week, not having reached a deal by the Aug. 1 deadline, Trump raised the tariff rate from 25 to 35 per cent on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, again evoking Canada's failure to control the 'ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs.' Fentanyl seizures from Canada are less than 0.1 per cent of total U.S. seizures of the drug, but facts are irrelevant in this alternate reality. Perhaps it's time our federal government just went back to governing and stopped this dance. The more we dance, the more Trump will make us dance. If a deal is struck, fine — but patience may be a more sensible approach than scrambling for a deal, any deal. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington is soon expected to rule on whether Trump's tariffs are even legal under the Constitution, which grants Congress powers over trade. Trump has circumvented this by claiming he can use presidential emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, something the judges hearing the case have skeptically questioned. Also, the cost impact of tariffs — the higher wages to American workers to produce goods and materials in the U.S., rather than importing at a lower price — presumably will soon start hitting Americans in their wallets. Only if Americans wake up and start questioning Trump's policies will he likely blink. Maybe it's time to stop chasing the ball for now and let the courts and other economic indicators shape the narrative. Robert Libman is an architect and planning consultant who has served as Equality Party leader and MNA, mayor of Côte-St-Luc and a member of the Montreal executive committee. He was a Conservative candidate in the 2015 federal election.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
John Weissenberger: Canada fought for Quebec. Would it do the same for Alberta?
Article content Quebec's transformation into a linguistic monoculture and distinctly second-tier economy was done consciously and deliberately. A fascinating social experiment, but why are we subsidizing it? Article content Article content Western aspirations unfolded differently. Former prime minister Pierre Trudeau's national energy program mandated below-market energy prices for eastern Canada at the West's expense. Alberta's revenue from oil and natural gas fell from about 60 per cent of its budget in 1981 to just over 20 by mid-decade, while unemployment reached 11 per cent, tripling between 1981 and 1983. Tens of thousands lost their homes and businesses as the '80s became a lost decade. Unfortunately, the large western contingent in Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's 1984 majority failed to change the pattern. Ottawa remained focused on Quebec — notably awarding a massive fighter-jet servicing contract to Montreal's Canadair in 1986, despite Winnipeg-based Bristol Aerospace's cheaper, superior bid. Chalk up another $3.5 billion (2025 dollars) to Quebec at the West's expense. Article content Westerners have responded with repeated calls for change. The Reform party, founded in 1987, had explicitly federalist goals — 'The West wants in' — but was not exactly welcomed by Central Canada. Subsequently, there was the 2001 'firewall' letter by Stephen Harper and 'Calgary School' academics, followed by then-premier Jason Kenney's Fair Deal Panel (2020) and the Free Alberta Strategy. All sought ways to free Alberta from the arbitrary whims of the federal government. Article content Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's 2022 Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act aims to counter unconstitutional federal laws, while her 2025 Alberta Next initiative kicked off by demonstrating how myriad Liberal laws and policies cripple Alberta — to the tune of $500 billion in lost investment capital over the last 10 years. With the Mansell numbers, that adds up to $1.1 trillion in economic punishment meted upon one province. Article content So far, no love from Central Canada. Reaction seems rather to channel the old Liberal adage from the late Keith Davey — 'Screw the West, we'll take the rest.' In 2001, Jean Chrétien mused that Alberta's 'fortunate position' was 'creating pressure on neighbouring provinces' and that others had 'the right to have their share of these opportunities.' Article content Article content More recently, Justin Trudeau observed in 2012 that, 'Canada is struggling right now because Albertans are controlling the … social democratic agenda.' Asked whether Canada would be better off with more Quebecers in power than Albertans, Trudeau replied: 'I'm a Liberal, so of course I think so.' Recent Donald Trump-fuelled Liberal Maple-Leafism also leaves many westerners cold, given that five minutes ago, Trudeau said Canada was an irredeemably racist post-national state. Article content Meanwhile, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet says Alberta's complaints are mundanely economic, and is 'not certain that oil and gas qualifies to define a culture.' Seemingly, decades of lost livelihoods and unrealized potential are mundane. Article content Kudos to such multi-generational consistency, from Pierre Trudeau asking farmers in Winnipeg, 'Why should I sell your wheat?' (1968), to Chrétien and Justin Trudeau, with little sign that the government of Prime Minister Mark Carney will abandon course. Given one party's 60-year imposition of policies inimical to the West — and that it's in power more often than not — the question facing Albertans, and westerners more broadly is: will we continue to acquiesce? As Reform party founder Preston Manning said: 'I don't support secession but, if separate, I wouldn't advocate joining.' Article content
Montreal Gazette
6 hours ago
- Montreal Gazette
Accord Announces Banking Facility Update
By Accord Announces Banking Facility Update For further information, please visit or contact: Irene Eddy Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Accord Financial Corp. 602 – 40 Eglinton Avenue East Toronto, ON M4P 3A2 (416) 961-0304 ieddy@ Accord Financial Corp. ("Accord" or the "Company") (TSX– ACD) today announced that it has reached an agreement with its lending syndicate on a second short-term extension of its main credit facility to August 15, 2025, following the initial extension from July 26, 2025 to August 8, 2025. The Company and its lenders are in discussions relating to an amendment to the credit facility which is expected to extend the maturity date to December 2025; the extension will provide additional time for the amendment to be finalized. About Accord Financial Corp. Accord Financial is one of North America's most dynamic commercial finance companies providing fast, versatile financing solutions for including asset-based lending, factoring, inventory finance, equipment leasing (Canada), trade finance and film/media finance. By leveraging our unique combination of deep experience and independent thinking, we craft winning financial solutions for small and medium-sized businesses, simply delivered, so our clients can thrive. Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" and certain "forward-looking information" as defined under applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intend", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe", "continue", "plans" or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements, management's beliefs, expectations or intentions regarding the financial position of the Company, and the extension of the Company's credit facilities. Forward-looking statements are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions that, while believed by management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties including the fact that there is no assurance on the ability of the Company to enter into arrangements with its lenders to further extend the maturity date of its credit facilities on reasonable terms, or at all, and the Company's overall liquidity and capital resource position and its ability to repay its debt obligations when due, and those risks identified in the Accord's periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. See Accord's most recent annual information form and most recent management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition for a detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting Accord. Such forward-looking information represents management's best judgment based on information currently available. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. This story was originally published
