Climate ruling victory for the planet, wake-up call for us
The ICJ's opinion is clear. It confirms that states have a legal duty to prevent significant harm to the environment from activities under their jurisdiction. They are obligated to protect and preserve the marine environment from adverse climate change effects.
They are obliged to respect and ensure the effective enjoyment of human rights by taking measures to protect the climate system and other parts of the environment for the sake of communities. It is such an important win for people and the planet.
Predictably, the government's response will consist mostly of howls of outrage. Look at its recent dismissive response to the United Nations asking questions about the Regulatory Standards Bill. No-one is expecting a mature response from it.
But in the face of escalating climate disasters, from vanishing coastlines to wild storms, such complaints from ministers will find little sympathy in New Zealand communities.
Too many families are already suffering the consequences of a warming planet. For the government to deny its duty to act is not just irresponsible. It is immoral.
There has been too much harm, too much damage and too little responsibility.
What is most striking is who drove this legal battle — not the wealthy or powerful, but the young and the vulnerable. The push for an ICJ opinion was led by Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change, alongside youth climate justice groups across the globe.
Of course it was. Who has more to lose from rising seas, extreme weather and the spiralling costs of inaction?
It was Vanuatu, a nation with a GDP of just $1 billion that championed this cause for island states, not New Zealand, which shares the same existential threats but has far greater resources to advocate for solutions to them.
This pattern of those with the least taking the boldest action is echoed at home. Here, students and Māori are leading the legal fight for climate accountability. Students for Climate Solutions awaits a Supreme Court ruling on whether the government must consider climate impacts when approving fossil fuel exploration.
Meanwhile, Mike Smith (Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Kahu) has taken New Zealand's biggest polluters to court, arguing that climate change breaches his whānau's obligations as kaitiaki of their whenua, wai and moana.
The ICJ opinion bolsters these arguments, affirming that environmental protection is a legal and moral imperative, even as the government digs in its heels.
In a shockingly, but not unsurprising, dismissive three-page submission to the ICJ, the New Zealand government outright rejected the idea of a universal "right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment".
This from a government whose entire economy, from agriculture, to fishing, to tourism, depends on that very right. We all rely on the protection of the environment because we all rely on the environment for health and food.
It is pretty clear so far that we cannot rely on the government to keep New Zealanders' interests in a protected climate and environment to the front of their consideration. The recent report by the government's independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment shows where the government is heading.
While the report recognises the need for climate adaptation, its recommendation to withdraw government support for financial assistance and property buy-outs is a moral wrong.
On the one hand the government refuses to accept we have a right to a clean environment and is actively supporting greenhouse gas-emitting industries, and at the same time considering withdrawing any future financial support to the families directly suffering the impacts from those emissions.
Climate change is not an issue for one or other party any more. It is not a matter of political sides. It is a global catastrophe and a local tragedy driven, in my view, by greed.
We know how important climate change effects are in our city; we have felt those impacts. In the next 18 months we have two crucial opportunities to make our right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment the most pressing priority locally, regionally and nationally.
And therefore internationally. It is how we can play our part.
If the most vulnerable can fight for their future, so can we.
■Metiria Stanton Turei is a senior law lecturer at the University of Otago and a former Green Party MP and co-leader.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Local elections 2025: Rotorua rural ward councillor Karen Barker re-elected unopposed
'I'm very grateful I get the chance to serve again, because it's been a particularly enjoyable experience,' said Barker. 'I will take the opportunity to do the best I can, not just for rural people, but everybody and I am very much looking forward to it.' Barker said she was expecting to see more names trickle in before last Friday's nominations deadline. After nothing changed by Monday, she tentatively accepted her re-election. She hoped the lack of challengers was a show of 'confidence' from the rural community about her work. 'It can be a reflection of the kind of job you have done and how comfortable people are with what the council's been doing. So it's not all disengagement, sometimes there's potentially a level of comfort.' She also pointed to the six candidates running for four seats on Rotorua's Rural Community Board as a sign rural constituents were not apathetic about local politics. 'That is particularly encouraging,' she said. 'It shows that the rural people are engaged, and they want to have their say and they want to try and support me in my role.' Karen Barker was first elected in 2022. Photo / NZME Rotorua's rural ward was established after a drawn-out representation review concluded in April 2022. The Local Government Commission also instituted three Māori ward and six general ward seats. The rural ward covers an area with around 8000 residents including parts of the Ngongotahā Valley and Hamurana, Rerewhakaaitu, the Kaingaroa Forest, Lakes Rotomā and Rotoiti, Waiotapu, Reporoa, Mamaku and others within the Waikato portion of the Rotorua district. Barker highlighted rates affordability, community halls and rural subdivision rules as key issues in the ward for the next three years, as well as wider Rotorua projects such as water, sewerage, infrastructure investment and the museum. She said she was committed to still attending pre-election events to remain 'as engaged as possible'. There was a 'great choice' of candidates available across the other council wards, she said. Barker was congratulated by fellow councillors at Wednesday's Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting, which she chairs. Don Paterson and Conan O'Brien both passed on their well wishes, while Robert Lee said she had 'conducted herself admirably' in her role. Mathew Nash is a Local Democracy Reporting journalist based at the Rotorua Daily Post. He has previously written for SunLive, been a regular contributor to RNZ and was a football reporter in the UK for eight years. – LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
The Spinoff
2 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The government may be turning away from te Tiriti – but the people aren't
Two authors of books about te Tiriti o Waitangi discuss the modern relevance of the nation's most important document and shifting attitudes towards it, despite pushback from the government. We recently shared the stage for a public kōrero on te Tiriti o Waitangi. The event, held during Matariki as part of the Tāmaki Untold series, filled the Whare Wānanga. People stayed after to talk. They asked thoughtful, sometimes difficult questions as they connected over cups of tea. We're seeing this kind of energy across the country. People are showing up not to argue or feel guilty – but to learn. What makes that so striking is how few New Zealanders were ever taught the basics about te Tiriti. That's not an individual failing, it's a systemic one. Some of the people in government who speak most confidently about te Tiriti may know less than the average person in the audience. That's why we sometimes need to start from the beginning. One of the questions Roimata was asked at our talk was: 'Which is the authoritative document – te Tiriti or the Treaty?' It's a common and important question. She laid it out like this: Māori discovered Aotearoa. Moriori discovered Rēkohu. They held tino rangatiratanga – complete authority – over their lands and lives. That's not ancient history; that's most of our history. By 1840, Queen Victoria's representatives wanted the exclusive right to buy land and a way to control British settlers. They promised protection and partnership. These were the terms discussed and recorded in te Tiriti o Waitangi, in te reo Māori. It reaffirmed Māori authority, echoing He Whakaputanga o te Rangatiratanga o Nu Tireni, the 1835 Declaration of Independence. But a different version – the Treaty of Waitangi – was written in English, asserting that the Queen would have 'sovereignty' – the power to make laws over everyone, including Māori. That was never discussed or agreed. It's important to set this all out when giving the short answer: only te Tiriti was agreed to, so only te Tiriti can be authoritative. Still, since 1840, the Crown has acted on the English version, using it to justify a flood of laws that have harmed Māori and enabled the loss of more than 60 million acres – nearly 97% of Māori land. When people hear this for the first time, they're often stunned. Sometimes there are tears. But when people are met with compassion rather than shame, they lean in. They keep learning. They tell their friends. And they begin to expect better from our institutions. We've both seen this shift up close. Avril met a woman after a talk who shared that her group was about to sign an MOU with their local hapū. She has been hosted by treaty education groups, who have been working in their communities, educating, leading protest actions and building networks for years These efforts are part of a growing nationwide movement. The commitment to te Tiriti is real – and it predates this government and will outlast it. Today, there are more tauiwi who outwardly support te Tiriti than ever before. And what's most heartening is that this movement is grounded in hope. At a time when public conversations are often dominated by fear, misinformation or division, we are generally seeing the opposite in our communities: courage, curiosity and kindness. In town halls, classrooms, marae and boardrooms, it's ordinary people – not politicians – who are stepping up. They're asking questions, challenging old assumptions, and imagining a future where Te Tiriti isn't a source of tension, but a foundation for justice, understanding and shared strength. It takes courage to admit you were never taught this history. It takes hope to believe things can be different. And it takes both to stay in the room, keep learning and take action. In workplaces too, change is continuing. Despite government reversals, many organisations are choosing to keep investing in Tiriti education, co-designing projects with Māori partners, and ensuring staff have a basic understanding of tikanga and pronunciation as part of respectful engagement. This matters. Non-Māori have a critical role to play – not just in backing Māori-led initiatives, but in educating our own communities, challenging our institutions and supporting the enactment of tino rangatiratanga in practice. Yes, people still get nervous. Some worry about being tokenistic. Others fear making mistakes or overstepping. But the reality is that mistakes are inevitable in any learning journey. The key is to treat them as part of the process, not a reason to pull back. Being useful looks different in different contexts. Sometimes it means stepping back and letting Māori leadership guide the kaupapa. Other times, especially where there are few Māori voices in a space, it means stepping up – but doing so under the direction of Māori colleagues and communities. In the end, it's about relationships. Te Tiriti was always meant to be a partnership – a mutually beneficial agreement between peoples. That vision still exists. Māori haven't withdrawn the invitation. The door is still open and we're seeing more and more people walk through it. That's what gives us hope. The future of this country will not be shaped solely by whoever is in power at any given moment. It's being shaped every day by teachers, parents, kaumātua, rangatahi, social workers, union delegates, health workers, and neighbours – people who are choosing honesty over defensiveness, and connection over fear. New Zealanders are ready to engage – if the facts are made accessible. We know that once people begin to understand, they often want to act. Hope grows fastest where knowledge replaces silence. The momentum is already here. And if it continues, the future of this country – grounded in te Tiriti – could be brighter than many dare imagine.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Children The Priority For The Social Investment Fund
Children of families with complex needs are the priority groups for the first round of the Social Investment Fund, Secretary for Social Investment Andrew Coster announced today. "To qualify for funding under this initiative, organisations that provide social services will need to be working with one (or more) of the following groups: children whose parent(s) are currently or have recently been in prison, children of parent(s) who experienced the care system, and children that were stood down or suspended from school when they were 12 or younger. "We know children who have had these experiences are more likely to experience poor outcomes and require significant social support throughout their lives. We want to work alongside organisations in the community to support these whānau and families to ensure the best outcomes for tamariki. "The Social Investment Fund is designed to work differently to ensure government, the social sector and other partners can work smarter to make a positive difference in the lives of New Zealanders. We've heard from the sector that they want to work differently with government, and we're committed to doing that through the Fund. "This funding opportunity is the first of four potential pathways providers can access through the Social Investment Fund, all aimed at unlocking opportunities to deliver better services, change the way government works with these partners and use data to improve the impact of government investment in social services," Mr Coster said. The Fund will open for applications on 25 August 2025. Information on the Social Investment Fund is on the Social Investment Agency's website: Note The Social Investment Fund (round one) will be open for applications on 25 August 2025 The first three initiatives that have already been announced by the Social Investment Fund as demonstration projects are: Autism New Zealand's early screening and intervention programme that provides services and support for family/whānau, caregivers and professionals. Ka Puta Ka Ora Emerge Aotearoa's evidence-based approach to tackling youth offending and truancy that will help at least 80 families each year to address youth offending and truancy; and The He Piringa Whare programme with Te Tihi o Ruahine, an alliance of nine hapū, iwi, Māori organisations and providers that will support 130 families at a time with a wraparound service that supports stable housing, education, training and employment, and other services.
