
Expert Insights: Q&A with FCAI chief executive Tony Weber
Australia's first federally mandated automotive emissions legislation, known as the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES), is now upon us.
The NVES officially began on January 1 and there's now less than a month to go before auto brands start accruing financial penalties for exceeding increasingly stringent CO2 limits determined by vehicle type from July 1.
Intended to reduce the CO2 emissions of Australia's new-vehicle market overall by incentivising the uptake of more efficient vehicles, the scheme will also award credits to automakers that sell zero- and low-emissions vehicles, creating somewhat of a carbon trading system for the local auto industry.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Needless to say this has caused significant friction in the industry, between brands that sell only electric vehicles (EVs) such as Tesla and Polestar, which are members of the Electric Vehicle Council (EVC), and brands that do not.
In this exclusive interview with the chief executive of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI), Tony Weber, the head of the organisation that represents most auto brands in Australia, outlines several problems with the NVES.
These include the potential for higher prices for some new vehicles, which the FCAI says could throttle sales, force owners to keep their existing vehicles for longer and slow the total emissions reduction of the 'carpark' of vehicles currently on our roads.
The NVES is a policy that aims to reduce emissions from Australia's light vehicle fleet by setting emissions targets for new vehicle sales.
Manufacturers that exceed the targets must pay penalties or adjust their model mix to meet future targets.
The FCAI has long advocated for an emissions reduction scheme that is ambitious in scope. The scheme must recognise current and projected consumer demand, as well as the unpredictable nature of future technological breakthroughs. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
The NVES provides the impetus to supply low-emission vehicles to the Australian market. The great unknown is consumer demand for these products.
But the NVES, an extremely ambitious scheme, could result in a lower-than-anticipated uptake of low-emission technologies, which could encourage consumers to hold onto older vehicles for longer.
This could have the opposite effect of increasing emissions rather than achieving the policy objective of reducing emissions, while making new cars more expensive.
The NVES has already led to the withdrawal of certain internal combustion engine (ICE) models. At the same time, several new market entrants have entered the market in 2024 and 2025, lifting the number of EV models to more than 90. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
We expect brands to continue reviewing their product lineups in light of NVES targets and consumer demand.
Brands will consider the most efficient mix of low-emissions technologies, including hybrid, plug-in hybrid (PHEV), and battery electric vehicle (EV) offerings.
Most important is the Australian consumer's ability to continue accessing the vehicle models and powertrains they want at prices they can afford.
It will be up to individual OEMs [automakers] to make decisions on how they manage the cost of compliance across their fleets. This includes adjusting their model mix, purchasing credits, or factoring in the risk of penalties.
Many consumers rely on vehicle segments that lack practical EV options and will hold onto their existing vehicles for longer. The large commercial vehicle, large SUV and small vehicle segments are examples where the range of pure battery-electric or plug-in hybrid versions is still limited.
The model was produced as an indication of the potential impact of the proposed NVES at that time in 2024. It assumed that if 2023 sales were replicated in 2025 and the out years under the proposed government scenario, there was the potential for significant penalties to apply. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Since that model was produced, legislation was changed and passed in May 2024. OEMs are responding to the NVES by increasing the number of zero- and low-emission vehicles in the market.
Given the current level of consumer demand for EVs and their limited availability in a number of vehicle segments, we are concerned about upward price pressures on vehicles as fines accrue under the NVES.
Price is just one element buyers consider when purchasing a vehicle. Buyers correctly examine the total cost of ownership (TCO) when buying a car. The TCO includes purchase price, fuel costs, insurance, maintenance and resale residuals.
As the scheme commences on July 1, 2025, the need for modelling will be offset by sales data, which will provide real-time information about the scheme, including the accrual of credits and fines.
EV ownership costs are predicated on several factors, including fuel costs, purchase price, residual value, insurance costs, and maintenance. Focusing solely on potential savings from fuel costs is misleading.
It's too early to predict how credit trading will impact the market, as the decisions of individual OEMs will ultimately drive it. However, given the current demand for EVs among consumers, it's unlikely that sufficient credits will be generated to offset the accumulated debits over the years of the scheme from 2025 to 2029.
While there's an increasing number of EV models available in Australia, several segments including large SUVs, LCVs and some small vehicles still have limited EV options. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Without suitable models, consumers may hold onto older vehicles longer, delaying overall emissions reductions.
A more balanced transition is necessary to allow technology to catch up, ideally incorporating all forms of zero and low-emission vehicle options.
Recent sales data indicate that consumers are increasingly turning to hybrid and plug-in hybrid vehicles as a transitional step toward full battery electric vehicles.
Still, these vehicles are unlikely to meet NVES targets after the initial stages of the scheme.
In general, the FCAI advocates a technology-neutral approach to transport sector decarbonisation, allowing the market to determine the most efficient and effective method of achieving the government's ambitious carbon dioxide reduction goals.
Emissions reduction targets should be approached by engaging all forms of emissions reduction technology. Based on prior analysis by our independent global expert, we expected EVs to account for around 11 per cent of new vehicle sales in 2024.
However, the actual result was around 7.0 per cent. Despite the increased availability of EVs, this level of EV penetration is not likely to meet the NVES targets.
Many Australians remain unconvinced about the suitability of EVs due to range limitations, charging concerns, and concerns about the total cost of ownership. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Australia's public charging network is underdeveloped, particularly in regional areas, creating range anxiety.
In general, EVs remain more expensive than ICE vehicles.
There are few options in key segments like utes, 4WDs and small vehicles.
There is pressure on residual values, which can be a significant concern for private and fleet buyers. This might be a positive for potential buyers of second-hand EVs but an issue for buyers of new cars, which in turn reduces the number of vehicles entering the Australian market.
Increased EV adoption will require significant [electricity grid] upgrades to ensure sustainability.
High interest rates and cost-of-living pressures limit consumer purchasing power.
Inconsistent federal and state policies create uncertainty for manufacturers.
MORE: Australian Government set to make crucial change to emissions regulationsMORE: EV brand urges Australian Government to 'stay the course' on new emissions rules MORE: Customers to wear the cost of new emissions laws
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
25 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Trump and Musk's bromance had to ‘blow up' at some point
Sky News host Rowan Dean says the relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk had to 'blow up' at some point. United States President Donald Trump has taken another swipe at his once-ally Elon Musk and is reportedly considering selling his Tesla after the billionaire's public spat. Musk, who finished his tenure with the administration overseeing the Department of Government Efficiency, lashed the President's signature "big, beautiful bill", which would unleash trillions in tax cuts and slash spending, but also add to the USD$36 trillion debt.


The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
'No justification': minister seeks tariff breakthrough
Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent. Australia will keep pressuring the US to remove tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, the trade minister says, ahead of a likely meeting between Anthony Albanese and the president. The two leaders could meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week, with the economic measures imposed by Mr Trump around the world set to dominate discussions. As Australia looks to negotiate for an exemption on tariffs, Trade Minister Don Farrrell was optimistic a deal could be reached. "I certainly haven't given up on the prospect of getting these tariffs removed, and every opportunity I get, I'll continue to pursue that argument with the United States," he told Sky News on Sunday. "There is no justification for the United States to impose tariffs on Australia ... we want all of the tariffs removed, not just some of them." Mr Trump recently signed off on doubling tariffs on exports on steel and aluminium from 25 to 50 per cent. All other Australian exports to the US have been slapped with a 10 per cent tariff. But opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said any meeting between the prime minister and US president should have happened sooner. He said an exemption on steel and aluminium secured by the UK showed it was possible Australia could receive a similar outcome. "Australia is at least as good an ally of the United States as the United Kingdom is and so there's no reason why the prime minister shouldn't at least be able to secure that exemption," Senator Paterson told ABC's Insiders program. Senator Farrell met with US trade representative Jamieson Greer last week and said he pushed the case for all of the economic measures to be removed. The minister was hopeful a similar approach that removed $20 billion worth of tariffs on Australian goods entering China could be used with America. "We didn't retaliate on that occasion, and bit by bit, we managed to get all of those tariffs that had been applied on Australia by China removed. I'd like to do the same with the United States," he said. "It's only by open discussion, honest discussion with out allies in the United States that I think we can do that." Senator Paterson said the coalition would be open to the idea of a critical minerals stockpile that could be used as a bargaining chip in any tariff negotiations. "It is something that Australia could do which would represent an economic opportunity and a strategic contribution," he said. As the US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth urged Australia to increase its defence spending by billions of dollars to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Senator Farrell said the federal government had already proved its commitment through the AUKUS submarine deal. Australia is looking to up its total spent on defence to 2.3 per cent. "We are committed to the defence of this country, we are committed to a significant uplift in the amount of spending," Senator Farrell said. "(AUKUS) is going to be a project that's worth more than $360 billion, so I think we've talked the talk." Senator Paterson said the opposition was still committed to its election platform of increasing defence spending to three per cent.

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trade Minister Don Farrell confident in negotiations to finalise European Union free trade deal
Trade Minister Don Farrell has confirmed momentum is building for a free trade agreement with the European Union, more than 18 months after negotiations collapsed, with sticking points like beef exports and luxury car taxes still on the table. The Albanese government has expressed confidence it will strike a long-awaited free trade agreement with the European Union. Trade Minister Don Farrell told Sky News Sunday Agenda there was 'a lot of goodwill in the air' following revived negotiations with the EU. Mr Farrell met with European counterparts on Wednesday, the first face-to-face talks since free trade negotiations collapsed in October 2023. He acknowledged several sticking points remain unresolved, including Australia's luxury car tax and EU demands for exclusive naming rights for prosciutto and parmesan 'We haven't yet got an agreement, but there was a lot of goodwill in the air in Paris last week,' Mr Farrell said. 'I'm confident that if that goodwill continues, that we can secure a new free trade agreement with the European Union.' The comments follow Mr Farrell's meeting with European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic on the sidelines of an OECD summit in Paris. A visit by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to Australia is also expected in July or August. Mr Farrell said both sides now recognise the urgency of finalising an agreement in a 'rapidly changing global environment', amid US President Donald Trump's tariffs. 'Those countries that believe in free and fair trade have to work together,' Mr Farrell said. 'I'm very confident that with a little bit of time, a little bit of hard work on our part… we can get there and we can strike an agreement.' — Anthony Albanese (@AlboMP) May 18, 2025 Australian officials have said that agriculture remains the biggest sticking point, which was a major cause of the failed negotiations in 2023. The government has signalled a willingness to consider abolishing the luxury car tax—an irritant to EU exporters—in exchange for greater access to lamb and beef markets. The issue of geographical indications—terms like feta, prosecco, parmesan, and prosciutto—also continues to be a flashpoint. Some European nations want to reserve these product names for EU-based producers only, a move resisted by Australian farmers and manufacturers. The EU is Australia's third-largest trading partner, representing a market of 450 million people and a GDP of about AUD$20 trillion. Mr Farrell said a trade agreement would unlock benefits across investment, education, supply chains and export growth. 'We've got lots of things that we can sell to the Europeans. I believe now that there's an appetite to reach an agreement on both sides,' he said. The renewed push comes amid heightened global uncertainty, with US President Donald Trump announcing plans to double steel tariffs to 50 per cent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Trump will likely meet for the first time in Kananaskis, Canada, between June 15 and 17.