logo
Health Minister Ong Ye Kung 'dismayed' at company's S$52,000 monthly rental bid for Tampines clinic

Health Minister Ong Ye Kung 'dismayed' at company's S$52,000 monthly rental bid for Tampines clinic

CNA2 days ago

SINGAPORE: Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said he was "dismayed" at a healthcare company's S$52,188 monthly rental bid for a clinic in a Housing and Development Board (HDB) estate in Tampines.
In a Facebook post on Wednesday night (Jun 4), Mr Ong said: "This must translate to higher cost of healthcare one way or another, and negate the effort of Ministry of Health, Singapore (MOH) to try to keep the cost of primary healthcare affordable.
"More importantly, higher rental bids do not necessarily translate to the best healthcare that the community needs."
The successful bid for the ground floor unit at Block 954C Tampines Street 96 by I-Health Medical Holdings in January has led to discussions online about rental fees and healthcare costs.
The rental works out to over S$1,000 per sq m.
NEW TENDER APPROACH
He noted that MOH and HDB last month launched a new tender approach for general practitioner (GP) clinics at Bartley Beacon.
In the new approach, quality of care will account for 70 per cent of the tender evaluation, and rental will make up 30 per cent.
The unit is about 100 sq m – twice the size of normal clinics – and suited for clinics which intend to provide multi-disciplinary care and "try out new care models", he added.
'Through this Price-Quality evaluation Model (PQM), we can shift the competitive focus away from rental rates, to better care models, including preventive care, chronic disease management and mental health,' Mr Ong said.
The tender for the unit at Bartley Beacon was closed on May 29.
'I understand from my MOH officers that we have received interesting proposals, with rental bid prices significantly below the Tampines site in per sqm terms. We are currently assessing the proposals,' he said.
Mr Ong noted the Tampines clinic was tendered in December 2024 and awarded in March this year, before the PQM model started.
'Going forward, and given the encouraging response to the Bartley Beacon site, we will make the new PQM approach the norm, when tendering our GP clinics in our HDB heartlands,' Mr Ong said.
'It will be a meaningful shift, both in improving primary care, and ensuring greater affordability.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tan Tock Seng Hospital explores AI for faster, more accurate screening of breast cancer
Tan Tock Seng Hospital explores AI for faster, more accurate screening of breast cancer

CNA

time2 hours ago

  • CNA

Tan Tock Seng Hospital explores AI for faster, more accurate screening of breast cancer

Artificial intelligence will be used for breast cancer screening in at least one hospital in Singapore so patients can get faster and more accurate detection. This is as women who have gone for breast cancer screening in Singapore remains much lower than other developed nations. This is despite the disease being the most common cancer among women here. Dr Priyanka Rajendram, Clinical Head of Cancer Prevention & Control at the Singapore Cancer Society, discusses the low breast cancer screening numbers. She talks about reasons why women are not going for them and what can be done to encourage more to get screened.

Kneading through the pain: Why this baker refuses to give up his craft despite severe arthritis
Kneading through the pain: Why this baker refuses to give up his craft despite severe arthritis

CNA

time4 hours ago

  • CNA

Kneading through the pain: Why this baker refuses to give up his craft despite severe arthritis

"It's okay if I lose mobility in two fingers, I can still use the other three," said 55-year-old baker Dennis Lim, who suffers from severe arthritis with visible deformities to both his hands. Despite the chronic pain, Mr Lim still pushes through 16-hour working days, kneading and shaping each loaf bread with dedication and perseverance. "A good loaf of bread is one that's made with heart," said Mr Lim, who has been baking for 27 years.

'Culturally sensitive' mediation: Can a new China-led international outfit earn global trust?
'Culturally sensitive' mediation: Can a new China-led international outfit earn global trust?

CNA

time6 hours ago

  • CNA

'Culturally sensitive' mediation: Can a new China-led international outfit earn global trust?

SINGAPORE: A new international mediation group spearheaded by China - with most of its founding members from Asia, Africa and the Caribbean - could serve as a 'softer' alternative to existing dispute resolution bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that are perceived to be Western-led, analysts say. Signed into law on May 30 at a ceremony in Hong Kong presided over by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, the International Organisation for Mediation (IOMed) aims to 'resolve world issues through dialogue and understanding'. 'The establishment of the IOMed helps to move beyond the zero-sum mindset of 'you lose and I win',' said Wang, who also hailed it as an 'innovative step in international rule of law'. 'It will fill an institutional gap in international mediation and serve as an important public good in the field of the rule of law for better global governance,' he added. Analysts observe that the IOMed is being positioned as a model that is more acutely attuned to cultural sensitivities. 'What sets IOMed apart from institutions like the ICJ or PCA is its philosophical orientation,' said Kun Fan, an arbitrator and associate professor at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). 'While those global bodies centre on binding adjudication, IOMed will adopt a softer, consensus-based model grounded in mediation, compromise and cultural sensitivity,' she added. Enthusiasm and support from developing countries have also signalled Beijing's efforts to court the Global South, experts noted. Global bodies like the ICJ, PCA and International Criminal Court (ICC), 'lack objectivity and neutrality and cannot be trusted to deliver justice in global governance', said Joyce Chimbi, a journalist from Kenya, one of 33 countries which joined the IOMed. 'Africa has long been dissatisfied with the existing world order, especially with international dispute settlement instruments bred in the West, which are often blind to the cultural sensitivities of African states and their societies,' Chimbi told the Chinese state tabloid Global Times after Friday's signing ceremony. She also noted the significant role China played in brokering a reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran back in 2023 - a deal hailed as a major step towards peace and stability in the Middle East. 'When China brokered a reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023, it proved that mediation comes with many advantages, including cultural sensitivities and inclusion. It is also cost-effective, flexible, convenient, fast and easy to implement,' Chimbi said. Yet not everyone is convinced by China's growing role as a global mediator. In an era of tariffs, trade wars and heightened geopolitical tensions, analysts said the Chinese-led mediation body will need to earn global credibility and demonstrate impartiality in resolving conflicts. 'What would happen if its rulings differ from the ICJ and other global courts?' said political scientist Chong Ja Ian from the National University of Singapore (NUS). WHO'S IN? Thirty-three countries so far have signed up. Among them, long-term Beijing allies like Cambodia, Pakistan and Belarus - and Pacific nations like Vanuatu, where competition between the US and China has been escalating. Also joining them are multiple African countries including Algeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, Benin, Cameroon, Uganda, Sudan and Zimbabwe. 'The signatories definitely lean towards (being) more China-friendly, but they are also generally countries China wants to court,' noted China analyst Robert Rust from the US science advocacy nonprofit the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). 'Most are also countries in the Global South where China wants to position itself as a global leader.' Also on the list are Venezuela, Iran and Cuba, which Rust described as countries 'targeted or excluded by the US and its connected international bodies to varying degrees'. And for now, the usual China-friendly countries like Russia, as well as Central Asian states, have not signed up as members. 22:28 Min Fan from UNSW also noted that several countries are Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) member-states. 'These early signatories signal that the IOMed is an institution clearly positioned within the BRI ecosystem,' she said. "The aim is not simply to serve disputes but to offer more inclusive and culturally resonant institutional architecture that reflect BRI values and interests." 'NO LOSERS' IN MEDIATION The ICJ, which has its seat in The Hague, is the world's highest court - established after World War Two as a judicial organ of the UN to adjudicate disputes between countries and provide advisory opinions on issues arising under international law. The Chinese-led IOMed will also function on the basis of international law, according to officials, but with a focus on resolving global disputes through mediation. Its scope covers disputes between states, disputes between states and foreign nationals, as well as commercial disputes between private parties. 'Unlike the ICJ or the PCA, which adopt largely adversarial processes based on legal rights, the IOMed will use mediation,' said Lawrence Boo, a Singaporean professor and arbitrator, noting that there are 'no losers' in mediated settlements. While both arbitration and mediation involve neutral third parties, they differ in a crucial way. An arbitrator hears evidence and makes a binding decision. A mediator, by contrast, does not decide the outcome - instead they facilitate difficult conversations to help disputing parties find a mutually acceptable solution. 'Mediation creates space for win-win solutions that foster long-term relationships and preserve sovereignty - priorities that resonate not only with China's vision, but with many countries in the Global South that are seeking more balanced, inclusive dispute resolution mechanisms,' said Fan. 'In that sense, China's leadership in establishing IOMed is both a strategic effort to shape international legal norms and a response to broader demands for more cooperative and culturally sensitive governance frameworks.' IMPACT ON REGIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRES The new mediation body, headquartered in Hong Kong, aims to cement the city's presence as a top centre to resolve disputes between countries, Chief Executive John Lee said. Work could begin as early as the end of this year, Hong Kong government officials said, revealing that the IOMed would later establish a secretariat and governing council. Signatory countries will be eligible to nominate their own nationals as mediators, said Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice Paul Lam. 'The acceptance and influence of the IOMed will depend much on how it will administer the organisation and more importantly, how professional are their mediators - they must get those in the field and not just political figures,' Boo said, adding that he was 'hopeful initial reservations and anti-China bias would give way to pragmatic acceptance'. Hong Kong is already an arbitration hub, tying with Singapore for second place, behind London, as the top choice for a seat of arbitration this year, according to the 2025 International Arbitration Survey conducted by Queen Mary University of London. While some view the China-led IOMed as a potential competitor to existing dispute resolution centres in the region, analysts say the initiative is more likely to complement rather than displace established players in the region. These include the Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), both of which have earned reputations as leading institutions in Asia. 'We're witnessing the emergence of a more multipolar dispute resolution ecosystem,' said Fan, describing it as multiple tracks 'reflecting different legal traditions and institutional logics, which can be tailored to different users' needs'. Boo views IOMed's arrival as a positive step - particularly in raising global awareness of mediation as a viable and often underused method of resolving international disputes. 'There is now an international organisation willing to champion mediation as the more appropriate form of dispute resolution,' he said. Institutions like Singapore's SIMC and SIAC will 'continue to be relevant', Boo said, suggesting that IOMed might need the 'support of existing institutions to promote its cause'. In his view, increased global awareness of mediation could in fact raise caseloads for SIMC, rather than divert them. He added that arbitration and mediation are not mutually exclusive but 'different nodes of resolving disputes' which could 'grow in tandem without affecting the other'. But IOMed's primary focus would still be on state-to-state disputes as well as Investor-State Dispute Settlements (ISDS) - mechanisms in trade and investment agreements allowing for foreign investors to resolve disputes with foreign governments of countries they are investing in. This is distinctive from commercial caseloads that dominate Singapore's arbitration and mediation landscape, Boo said. 'IMPORTANT QUESTIONS' REMAIN While China has said that the IOMed would adhere to international law and the United Nations Charter, experts have raised questions about its impartiality and credibility. 'Like many major global powers, China often tries to ignore or go around international legal proceedings and rulings which are not in their favour,' said Chong from NUS, noting that Beijing's record of solving disputes tended to be 'primarily political rather than legal'. He recalled Beijing's dismissal of a 2016 landmark PCA decision in the Hague, which ruled in favour of the Philippines - concluding that China had no legal basis to claim historic rights to the bulk of the disputed South China Sea. 'China's new mediation body will ultimately serve as an alternative to the ICJ (by providing) a more suitable legal system which Beijing is comfortable with,' he said. However, major questions remain, Chong said. For instance, he questioned whether the IOMed would be able to rule against Beijing given that courts in both Hong Kong and mainland China have refused to do so in the past, and whether it could also re-litigate decisions made previously at the ICJ. 'Would this encourage other major powers to further ignore international law - if global rulings (elsewhere weren't in their favour)? Could these major powers start setting up their own courts that conform more with their own legal systems and comfort levels?' he asked. 'These are important questions that remain unresolved and ultimately, more questions remain than answers.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store