North End Women's Centre included in 12 Winnipeg projects receiving housing funding
The transitional housing component of a women's centre is one of 12 downtown housing initiatives to receive funding from the City of Winnipeg's $25 million housing grant program.
The city announced the recipients of its second round of grants Monday, using money from the federal Housing Accelerator Fund. This round of funding will eventually create 1,418 housing units, including 633 affordable units downtown.
The projects include the North End Women's Centre, a resource centre in the inner city since 1984. The centre has also run a transitional housing program for nearly 20 years, starting with two units above the centre's thrift shop, Upp Shop, in 2006.
"We are so excited for this announcement, which will double our transitional housing capacity," said executive director Cynthia Drebot. She says it will create "opportunities for accessing healing groups, ceremony, in a space that is double this size of what we're in right now."
In 2023 Manitoba's previous government announced the centre would receive $400,000 in funding to help maintain its existing eight-bed program and support women in long-term recovery from substance use and trauma.
The new city-funded facility will be built in the parking lot area of the existing women's centre at 390 and 394 Selkirk Ave., and will have wraparound supports in place to support residents in a multitude of ways including counselling, parenting programs and life skill development, and will house eight rent-geared-to-income units.
Gender-based housing is important for women and gender diverse people who experience homelessness differently than men, and are often precariously housed.
"They're living in very unsafe situations and spaces. They often do not feel safe going to shelters, and they tell us that they are often assaulted when they're in those spaces," Drebot said
Included in the other 11 projects receiving funding through the city's housing program is a 144-unit apartment building that prioritizes Brokenhead Ojibway First Nation members and other First Nations community members at 269 River Ave., managed by Brokenhead Ojibway Nation Development Corp.
Projects are required to obtain building permits within 12 months of receiving funding, said Mayor Scott Gillingham in a Monday press conference.
The city announced the first round recipients of the program in September 2024. Eleven projects received $25 million dollars, creating 1,135 housing units, including 597 affordable units.
In addition, 16 housing development projects will receive $33.5 million in tax increment financing through the City's Affordable Housing Now Program, according to a Monday news release.
Total construction costs for all projects are expected to exceed $1.6 billion. All projects awarded funding through round two of the Housing Accelerator Fund Capital Grand Program applied during the programs initial intake period with a total of 66 total grant applications.
"What we're really proud of is the partnership that we've been able to establish with the federal government to get housing built," Gillingham said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
7 hours ago
- CBC
Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: First Nations chief
The regional chief of the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations said Wednesday that governments should not speed up major projects at the expense of First Nations rights — and warned that projects will be slowed down by court challenges if First Nations are not consulted from the start. "We're asking the government to follow your own laws," Terry Teegee said, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the federal government adopted. The government of Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced major economic legislation last week. The bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the "national interest." Those criteria include the project's likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. WATCH | Teegee pulls out of trade mission over similar B.C. legislation: Why this First Nation chief pulled out of a B.C. trade mission 9 days ago Duration 12:10 Over the weekend, B.C. Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee announced he would not be attending a 10-day trade mission to East Asia with Premier David Eby. Teegee says his withdrawal was due to recent legislation from the province, meant to speed up infrastructure projects, which the chief says is not in compliance with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. But First Nations leaders say their interests weren't considered when the legislation was being drafted and they were given just one week to review and bring comments forward on a briefing document on the bill. "It's probably going to take a lot longer to get approval for some of these projects because we're going to end up in court," Teegee said. "This is where we end up." The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations agreed. "It's not about the bill itself. It's about the process. And I think that ramming something through when you should be hearing from Canadians, from industry, from First Nations … is the wrong way to go," Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said. "You don't want to end back up in court. You don't want to have civil unrest. Why not just invite us to the table?" WATCH | Carney's bill faces blowback: First Nations leaders have warned that widespread protests and blockades are possible if governments don't obtain affected Indigenous communities' free, prior and informed consent, as required by the UN declaration. The federal government has said that declaration doesn't amount to a veto — a statement Justice Minister Sean Fraser walked back last week following criticism from Woodhouse Nepinak. Teegee said "no government has a veto, meaning that when we come to a decision, all governments come into the room to make a decision together." "First Nations, certainly as a part of this, need to be part of the decision-making process," he added. Supporters also raise concerns Even groups that generally support development are raising concerns about the federal government's plan. Mark Podlasly, CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, said he was "surprised" First Nations were only given seven days to review parts of the legislation before it was introduced. "The answer will not automatically be 'no' from First Nations when a project comes along. It's just that Indigenous rights and involvement has to not only be included, but respected. That hasn't happened a lot in the Canadian past," he said. "There's also a question on the environment, and there's a question about who bears the impact of these projects if they're rushed through. It's going to be Indigenous Peoples, especially in parts of the country where there's mining or energy sources [on lands] that are integral to our lifestyle, our cultural practices." Podlasly said that while the federal legislation "seems to have Indigenous participation at its core," it's not clear what that participation will look like, especially under the tight two-year approval timeline the government seeks. He said First Nations can support projects and many do — but they don't want to be "caught at the back end" of decisions made without their knowledge or consent. "We're all operating with seven days' notice. That's what we're operating with. And time will tell," he said. The Assembly of First Nations is holding an emergency chiefs meeting on Monday to discuss what to do next. Woodhouse Nepinak vowed to follow their direction and said a legal review of the legislation is ongoing.
Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers
OTTAWA — Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon rejected the Bloc Québécois' proposal to split Bill C-5 in two parts, so that the sections on lifting internal trade barriers and the fast-tracking of major projects can be studied separately. Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin said earlier this week it made little sense that the bill, in its current form, would be sent to the House of Commons committee on transport as it falls under the mandate of Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland. Normandin instead suggested dividing the bill to study the portions on free trade and labour mobility in one committee and the fast-tracking of major projects in the national interest in another. She said the free trade portion is 'rather consensual' and could go 'a bit faster,' whereas the major projects portion would warrant more scrutiny. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. On Wednesday, MacKinnon offered a resounding 'no' to the Bloc's proposition. 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' he said. 'These projects have a certain urgency, as do interprovincial trade barriers that must fall,' he added. 'This is a very comprehensive bill. We understand that it's going to be debated, but it's something that we solicited and secured a mandate for.' Prime Minister Mark Carney said his intention is to see the bill passed before June 20 , when the House of Commons rises and MPs return to their ridings for the summer. 'It is a top priority for this government, and we will do everything to get it passed before the summer,' he said after C-5 was tabled on Friday. 'And if Parliament needs to sit longer, it should sit longer in order to get it passed. That's what Canadians expect.' MacKinnon said to date there is no consensus from other parties to sit into the summer. The part of the bill on lifting internal trade barriers would allow a good or service that meets provincial or territorial rules to have met federal requirements but also make it easier for workers to get a federal licence by recognizing provincial or territorial work authorizations. The second part, which is a bit more contentious, seeks to get projects deemed in the national interest — such as highways, pipelines, mines and nuclear facilities — built faster by having only one environmental assessment done and respecting federal conditions. On Wednesday, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) once more expressed concern the Liberals were 'ramming' through this bill without giving First Nations time to properly study the text. 'I keep hearing that they want to push through this legislation right to the end of this month, and I think that that's the wrong way to go,' said AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak during a press conference on Parliament Hill. Woodhouse Nepinak is expected to meet with Carney in July, presumably after the bill may have passed. She urged the government to slow down the process to allow meaningful consultation and study to occur with all the parties involved, including First Nations. 'Look, take the summer, take the time to listen to First Nations, take the time to listen to Canadians. And I think that'll make a more united country,' she said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, on the other hand, is favourable to the fast-tracking of major projects like pipelines and dismissed the need for a consensus to move ahead. 'If you wait till everybody agrees on everything, nothing will happen. You're never going to get everybody to agree on every single project,' he told reporters on Monday. 'If the prime minister says he's going to wait until everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' he added. Woodhouse Nepinak said national chiefs before her were ignored in discussions on major projects, which caused civil unrest and lawsuits that slowed down the projects. 'Isn't it better to talk through things rather than always being in litigation?' she asked. 'It seems like First Nations always need to litigate, and then we get… results later.' 'Does Canada want to change that or not?' National Post calevesque@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .
CTV News
7 hours ago
- CTV News
Calls for tax breaks for seniors looking to downsize their home
For some seniors across Canada, downsizing doesn't make a lot of financial sense. Adrian Ghobrial on the seniors choosing to stay in their homes. For some seniors across Canada, downsizing doesn't make a lot of financial sense. Adrian Ghobrial on the seniors choosing to stay in their homes. CTV National News: Why so many seniors are staying in their homes Governments must give seniors a tax break to make it more financially viable for them to downsize from their family homes, according to a report by the Missing Middle Initiative released this month. The Ottawa-based organization suggests doing so would also open more housing supply for young families and first-time home buyers. 'If a senior wants to downsize and move into a new condo, in Ontario for example, they're assessed GST and they're assessed PST,' says economist and Missing Middle Initiative Director, Mike Moffatt. In Toronto, some pay both a provincial and municipal land transfer tax. In March, the Carney Government announced the elimination of the GST for first-time homebuyers on properties under $1 million. Moffatt and others are calling on the federal government to extend the GST rebate to all who are purchasing 'owner-occupied homes' and for provincial governments to match that rebate with incentives of their own. 'If that happened, it would shave up to 13 per cent off the cost of new homes' shares Moffatt. In an email, CTV News asked the federal government if they would consider the extension. 'This GST rebate is intended to help first-time home buyers enter the housing market, rather than people who already own a home,' an official for the Department of Finance replied. Effie Panagiotopoulos' parents, who are in their mid 80's, live in a two-storey, four-bedroom home in Toronto's east end, which they built in 1988. Panagiotopoulos, a real estate agent who specializes in helping seniors downsize, says it would be a financially questionable decision should her parents move into a bungalow that would be better suited to their needs. 'It doesn't add up -- pay all those expenses to move from a two story to a bungalow. I mean, the (price difference) is not that big. So where do they go? Do they leave the city? Leave family and friends?' Panagiotopoulos tells CTV News. Like many aging Canadian couples, Panagiotopoulos' parents have also had to navigate unexpected expenses due to her mother's deteriorating health. Anna Panagiotopoulos, 85, was diagnosed with dementia five years ago. The couple have had to retrofit their family home with a lift for the staircase, among other items they've had to purchase to help caregivers move her mother around her home. Her daughter admits that for her parents to make the move and downsize, it must be their own choice. Though whether it's a real estate client, or her parents, the younger Panagiotopoulos shares that she sees it everyday. 'They (seniors) want to make a move, many times they need to make a move, but they're looking at all the costs involved, and it simply isn't worth it for them. They've paid taxes their whole life, they need a break so they can downsize and still live comfortably,' she said. The Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis estimates that there are 4.4 million empty rooms in Ontario alone, in part because of seniors and empty nestors who won't, or in some cases, can't afford to downsize. Moffatt believes that 'one way to help first time home buyers, is to help seniors downsize with incentives, because the senior who downsizes from their suburban home, frees up that home for the next generation of families,' while creating more supply for the housing market as a whole.
