Venezuelans in Doral Fear Deportation After TPS Ruling
'I have to go out and work. I can't stay shut in at home. Obviously I am afraid but there is nothing I can do,' Caldeira, who has been in the US for four years, said in the Miami suburb of Doral, where 40 percent of the population is from Venezuela.
Caldeira, a 47-year-old employee of an export company, had temporary protected status (TPS), which can be granted to foreign citizens who cannot safely return home because of war, natural disasters or other 'extraordinary' conditions.
Joe Biden extended TPS for Venezuelans for 18 months just days before Trump returned to the White House in January, citing economic and other crises in the South American country under authoritarian socialist ruler Nicolas Maduro.
Maduro is accused of stealing Venezuela's last election to start a third six-year term in power. He has presided over the collapse of the oil-rich country's economy, which is saddled with shortages of food, medicine and other basics. Millions have fled in recent years.
But Trump -- whom many Americans of Venezuelan heritage voted for in the 2024 election -- revoked the TPS extension while an appeal proceeds in a lower court.
A judge in California put a stay on the administration's plans in March. But on Monday the Supreme Court voted to let Trump proceed and eliminate TPS protection for Venezuelans.
'Since his term started there has been a kind of persecution of Venezuelans in particular,' Caldeira told AFP as he sat in El Arepazo, a popular Venezuelan restaurant in Doral.
The city, where Trump operates a golf course, is known locally as Doralzuela because it is home to so many Venezuelans.
Sitting around Caldeira, many people said they do not understand how Trump included them in his aggressive campaign to rid America of undocumented migrants.
'Most Venezuelan-Americans voted for him thinking he was going to be much tougher against the Maduro regime, that he was going to remove him from power -- not that he would end up removing Venezuelans from the United States,' said Jose Antonio Colina, president of an organization of Venezuelan exiles.
'There is a huge contradiction because if the US intelligence services assessed that Venezuela is a country where human rights are not respected, how can he send back there thousands of people who left precisely due to political persecution,' Colina mused.
Maduro himself criticized the Trump administration's insistence on removing TPS for Venezuelans.
'Migrating is not a crime. Removing TPS is a crime,' Maduro said.
Future up in the air
Keyla Mendez is not among the Venezuelans whose TPS status expired in April. Hers lasts until August but after the Supreme Court decision she is worried about the future.
'We have formed a family here. We have made progress. We have created a bond,' said Mendez, 55, who works for a law firm.
'My children are studying. They want their future to be here. They are afraid of going back. We left a situation that was very bad in our country,' she added.
Most Venezuelans interviewed by AFP said it is hard to think about having to leave a country where they not only found refuge, but also worked hard to get ahead.
'We had hoped that this whole process of cleansing would be against the people who deserved it, not against us,' said Oli Garcia, 42, who runs a printing company in Doral.
'We have contributed a lot. I want more businesses and I want to grow more,' said Garcia.
'But now I don't know what to do. I don't know what is going to happen. I don't know if I will actually end up growing here or in the end I will have to leave.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
US military deploys forces to Caribbean to combat drug cartels
WASHINGTON: The United States has ordered the deployment of air and naval forces to the southern Caribbean Sea to address threats from Latin American drug cartels, three sources briefed on the decision told Reuters on Thursday. President Donald Trump has wanted to use the military to go after Latin American drug gangs that have been designated as global terrorist organizations. The Pentagon had been directed to prepare options. One U.S. official, who was speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the additional commitment of military assets would include several P-8 spy planes, at least one warship and at least one attack submarine. The official said the process would be ongoing for several months and the plan was for them to operate in international airspace and international waters. The naval assets can be used to not just carry out intelligence and surveillance operations, but also as a launching pad for targeted strikes if a decision is made, the official added. Trump has made cracking down on drug cartels a central goal of his administration, part of a wider effort to limit migration and secure the U.S. southern border. The Trump administration in recent months has already deployed at least two warships to help in border security efforts and drug trafficking. 'This deployment is aimed at addressing threats to U.S. national security from specially designated narco-terrorist organizations in the region,' one of the sources said. The Trump administration designated Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel and other drug gangs as well as Venezuelan criminal group Tren de Aragua as global terrorist organizations in February, as Trump stepped up immigration enforcement against alleged gang members. The U.S. military has already been increasing its airborne surveillance of Mexican drug cartels to collect intelligence to determine how to best counter their activities. The Trump administration in recent months has already deployed at least two warships to help in border security efforts and to counter drug trafficking. Trump has previously offered to send U.S. troops to Mexico to help combat drug trafficking, an offer Mexico says it has refused. - Reuters
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump proposes Putin-Zelenskiy Alaska meeting amid US-Russia talks
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he would like to see a second meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Alaska. Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'I would say that tomorrow, all I want to do is set the table for the next meeting, which should happen shortly. ... I'd like to see it actually happen, maybe in Alaska,' Trump said. - Reuters
The Sun
8 minutes ago
- The Sun
US Supreme Court declines to block Mississippi social media age-check law
WASHINGTON: The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Thursday to put on hold a Mississippi law requiring that users of social media platforms verify their age and that minors have parental consent in a challenge by a trade group whose members include Meta's Facebook, Alphabet's YouTube and Snapchat. The justices denied a request by NetChoice to block the law while the Washington-based tech industry trade association's legal challenge to the law, which it argues violates the U.S. Constitution's protections against government abridgement of free speech, plays out in lower courts. Justice Brett Kavanaugh in a statement about the court's order said the Mississippi law was likely unconstitutional, but that NetChoice had not met the high bar to block the measure at this early stage of the case. In a statement, Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said Kavanaugh's view 'makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed' in its challenge. Taske called the Supreme Court's order 'an unfortunate procedural delay.' The Mississippi attorney general's office in a statement welcomed the Supreme Court's order to leave the state law in place 'while the case proceeds in a way that permits thoughtful consideration of these important issues.' NetChoice turned to the Supreme Court after the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals let the law take effect even though a judge found it likely runs afoul of the First Amendment. NetChoice sued in federal court in 2024 in a bid to invalidate the law, which was passed unanimously in the state legislature amid concern by lawmakers about the potential negative effects of social media use on the mental health of children. Its emergency request to the justices marked the first time the Supreme Court was asked to consider a social media age-verification law. The state law requires that a social media platform obtain 'express consent' from a parent or guardian of a minor before a child can open an account. It also states that regulated social media platforms must make 'commercially reasonable' efforts to verify the age of users. Under the law, the state can pursue civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation as well as criminal penalties under Mississippi's deceptive trade practices law. U.S. District Judge Halil Suleyman Ozerden in Gulfport, Mississippi, last year blocked Mississippi from enforcing the restrictions on some NetChoice members. Ozerden issued a second order in June pausing the rules against those members, including Meta and its Instagram and Facebook platforms, Snapchat and YouTube. The 5th Circuit on July 17 issued a one-sentence ruling that paused the judge's order, without explaining its reasoning. Courts in seven states have preliminarily or permanently blocked similar measures, according to NetChoice. Some technology companies are separately battling lawsuits brought by U.S. states, school districts and individual users alleging that social platforms have fueled mental health problems. The companies have denied wrongdoing. NetChoice said the social media platforms of its members already have adopted extensive policies to moderate content for minors and provide parental controls. In its request to the Supreme Court, the state told the justices that age-verification and parental consent requirements 'are common ways for states to protect minors.' - Reuters
