logo
AI is fuelling an alarming surge of deepfake child sexual abuse material in Canada: What parents need to know

AI is fuelling an alarming surge of deepfake child sexual abuse material in Canada: What parents need to know

Canada could be facing a disturbing new frontier in digital child sexual abuse.
New data from the
Canadian Centre for Child Protection's Cybertip.ca
shows a chilling surge in AI-generated child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) in Canada. The number of sexually explicit deepfakes of children that the tip line has processed more than doubled in the past year,
Cybertip.ca
director David Rabsch said in an interview with Metroland Media.
Deepfakes
are hyper-realistic, AI-generated synthetic media that use existing photos, images or audio. It is produced by feeding an AI software with images or audio of real people to create fake materials.
According to Rabsch, who leads the team of analysts at Cybertip — Canada's national tip line for reporting online sexual exploitation of children — the number of these types of materials processed has shot up from 4,000 in 2023 to 9,000 in 2024.
And the figures in early 2025 paint an even grimmer picture, with 4,000 of sexually explicit deepfakes processed just in the first quarter of 2025 alone.
'We have seen cases where offenders have taken images of known children and used AI to create intimate images,' Det. Staff Sgt. Mike Krisko of the Waterloo Region Police's cybercrime unit said in a phone interview.
Offenders will sometimes find photos of people that are publicly available on social media and run it through an AI tool, he explained, adding that the cybercrime unit started seeing cases of this in Waterloo Region late last year.
In cases involving
sextortion
, extortionists will send the image to the victim and threaten to distribute the deepfakes to friends and family unless the victim pays or gives in to more demands, Krisko said.
With AI, predators can now skip the initial process of luring the child into sending the explicit photos.
That 'fast tracks' their process by picking up typically harmless images on a child's Snapchat, TikTok or Instagram, then using a generative AI tool to create sexually explicit deepfakes of children that they can use for sextortion, to add to their own collections or to sell and trade in underground pedophile forums.
'These are minors, and adult content is being made of them nonconsensually, then also being posted on social media,' says Bellingcat senior researcher Kolina Koltai. ttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-nudify-impacts-law-change-fight-60-minutes/
pic.twitter.com/6kqd2hJ5SD
While many of these are accumulated by child predators and added to massive personal collections that are saved in their computers, others trade and share and many more make profits out of it on the dark web.
Rabsch said some criminals share the materials and ask for 'donations' in cryptocurrency. Transactions are done in crypto, the currency of the dark web, since it's an anonymous way of trading value, he explained.
In other cases, these child predators will go on dark web forums looking for like-minded individuals. These are places on the dark web where people discuss child abuse and advertise their massive collections.
Advertisements luring other predators to get access are posted on the dark web, but the content itself may be kept in a compressed archive on the clear web or surface web, the publicly accessible layer of the internet.
These archives have thousands of child sexual abuse photos and videos and are hosted on the clear web by file hosting services that do not have any form of proactive scanning for harmful materials, Rabsch explained.
They then set up premium file hosting services that charge pedophiles a subscription or one-time fee to download the content.
'Now you've got a profit model where you can have a ring of sites on the dark web that are all funneling this traffic and potentially money into these premium file hosters,' he said.
A
Pulitzer investigation
published early this month has found that sites like Instagram are also being used to advertise child sexual exploitation materials and direct child predators willing to pay content subscription platforms Patreon and Fanvue. The two are file hosting sites that are sometimes used by digital child exploitation rings to keep large collections of AI-generated child sexual exploitation materials.
According to the investigation, the Patreon and Fanvue accounts offered 'exclusive subscription content' and production of 'special media.'
Patreon is a content hosting and sharing site where fans can support content creators by paying for monthly subscription to access videos, images and blogs.
A
BBC investigation
has found that some Patreon accounts used to host 'AI-generated, photorealistic obscene images of children,' including materials depicting sexual abuse of babies and toddlers, are selling them with varying pricing levels depending on the type of material predators want to access.
Detective Krisko advises parents to make sure profiles are 'locked down with the tightest security settings on them.' Parents should also keep in mind that any photo they post publicly can be taken by online predators and altered.
'You only want to share images with people that you really know,' he added. This means parents should make sure all those in their contact list and who may have access to their children's photos are people they know and trust. 'You shouldn't have strangers or people you've never met on your contact list.'
How does exploitation happen? 🫢
It starts small. Something as simple as setting your family's accounts to private can make a major difference in protecting your kids online.
We're proud to partner with
@Know2Protect
, a DHS campaign to support you.
pic.twitter.com/4Jf1CZ2JU7
For those with children who go online, Rabsch says the best that they can do is to talk to their children. Explain the dangers lurking online and 'teach them how to spot and avoid these kinds of scenarios,' he said.
'We have content on
cybertip.ca
and
needhelpnow.ca
to help parents at least understand what the scope of the problem is,' he shared.
Parents who discover sexually explicit materials of their children being shared online can reach out to
cybertip.ca
or report it to
needhelpnow.ca
.
NeedHelpNow can guide parents through the process of reporting and removing the harmful images or videos of their children online.
Parents of victims can also reach out to the
Canadian Centre for Child Protection
who can help determine and navigate the next steps, assist victims of online sexual abuse with impact statements for criminal proceedings, connect victims and their families to support services and assist in disrupting the availability of the harmful material online.
While Rabsch acknowledges the role parents must play to protect their children, he thinks emphasis should instead be on pressuring governments, regulators and the industry to create more comprehensive standards for the development, deployment and use of AI technologies.
The bigger problem, he said, is how this new technology has recently been brought out into the public to freely use without systems of controls in place.
'It's being developed at a ridiculously rapid pace. There's no oversight, there's no regulation … And here we see the fruits of that reckless behaviour,' he said.
Rabsch says it doesn't matter how the imagery is created.
'Whether it was created the way it's always been created or whether it's produced through deepfake technology, the harm or trauma inflicted on the victim is the same,' he said.
'We have this real issue now where child sexual abuse material can be freely created by basically anyone and there's nothing that the industry, government and regulators are really doing,' Rabsch said, adding that governments should start pressuring and applying regulations so the AI industry will have to conform.
'Until that is really addressed, this problem is just going to continue as it is right now.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Todd Chrisley shares first social media message since Trump pardon
Todd Chrisley shares first social media message since Trump pardon

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Todd Chrisley shares first social media message since Trump pardon

(NewsNation) — Todd Chrisley has shared his first post on social media since the release of him and his wife, Julie Chrisley. Chrisley posted Tuesday on Instagram about his son, Grayson Chrisley, making the Dean's list at the University of Alabama for the spring semester. 'God is good all the time. I love you to the moon and back and we couldn't be more proud,' Chrisley wrote about his 19-year-old son. 'You have shown great character and fortitude and stood with your lord and savior amidst the fire and came out the other side never smelling of smoke, you are proof of Gods word.' Todd Chrisley and Julie Chrisley were pardoned by President Trump just a few weeks ago. Their daughter, Savannah Chrisley, has been fighting for her parents' release since they were convicted of conspiring to defraud banks in the Atlanta area out of over $30 million in loans. Chrisley was initially sentenced to 12 years in prison but later had his sentence reduced to 10 years. His wife was originally sentenced to seven years in a Kentucky prison before her sentence was shortened by 14 months before the pardons. It was recently reported that an untitled Chrisley project is in the works at Lifetime. The new show is supposedly going to focus on the family's challenge of carrying on the Chrisley legacy and name without their parents. 'The multigenerational family will also be exposing the raw truth of their lives — past and present — and the reality is far different from what audiences have seen before,' the network reportedly said. Trump told Savannah Chrisley in a phone call that he was granting full pardons to her parents. Chrisley has been a vocal Trump supporter, endorsing him in a speech at the Republican National Convention in 2024. The Chrisley family originally skyrocketed to fame in 2013 with their hit series, 'Chrisley Knows Best,' on the USA Network. The new series is scheduled for release later this year. Before the couple was pardoned, NewsNation's Brian Entin had talked exclusively to Todd Chrisley twice. In December, he expressed his concerns about the conditions at the facility where he was residing. He said he and other inmates had to deal with filthy conditions. The reality star had also claimed that prosecutors and the prison staff had it out for him. 'The prosecutor said that we were the southern version of the Trumps,' he told Entin at the time.

Meta AI searches made public - but do all its users realise?
Meta AI searches made public - but do all its users realise?

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Meta AI searches made public - but do all its users realise?

How would you feel if your internet search history was put online for others to see? That may be happening to some users of Meta AI without them realising, as people's prompts to the artificial intelligence tool - and the results - are posted on a public feed. One internet safety expert said it was "a huge user experience and security problem" as some posts are easily traceable, through usernames and profile pictures, to social media accounts. This means some people may be unwittingly telling the world about things they may not want others to know they have searched for - such as asking the AI to generate scantily-clad characters or help them cheat on tests. Meta has been contacted for comment. It is not clear if the users know that their searches are being posted into a public feed on the Meta AI app and website, though the process is not automatic. If people choose to share a post, a message pops up which says: "Prompts you post are public and visible to everyone... Avoid sharing personal or sensitive information." The BBC found several examples of people uploading photos of school or university test questions, and asking Meta AI for answers. One of the chats is titled "Generative AI tackles math problems with ease". There were also searches for women and anthropomorphic animal characters wearing very little clothing. One search, which could be traced back to a person's Instagram account because of their username and profile picture, asked Meta AI to generate an image of an animated character lying outside wearing only underwear. Meanwhile, tech news outlet TechCrunch has reported examples of people posting intimate medical questions - such as how to deal with an inner thigh rash. Meta AI, launched earlier this year, can be accessed through its social media platforms Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp. It is also available as a standalone product which has a public "Discover" feed. Users can opt to make their searches private in their account settings. Meta AI is currently available in the UK through a browser, while in the US it can be used through an app. In a press release from April which announced Meta AI, the company said there would be "a Discover feed, a place to share and explore how others are using AI". "You're in control: nothing is shared to your feed unless you choose to post it," it said. But Rachel Tobac, chief executive of US cyber security company Social Proof Security, posted on X saying: "If a user's expectations about how a tool functions don't match reality, you've got yourself a huge user experience and security problem." She added that people do not expect their AI chatbot interactions to be made public on a feed normally associated with social media. "Because of this, users are inadvertently posting sensitive info to a public feed with their identity linked," she said. Meta urged to go further in crackdown on 'nudify' apps WhatsApp defends 'optional' AI tool that cannot be turned off Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.

Netflix's updated homepage is getting pushback from some users — here's why it's exactly what the service needs
Netflix's updated homepage is getting pushback from some users — here's why it's exactly what the service needs

Tom's Guide

time3 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Netflix's updated homepage is getting pushback from some users — here's why it's exactly what the service needs

Netflix recently rolled out its first big homepage redesign in over a decade, and it's definitely a noticeable change. The new look is cleaner and more modern, with a navigation bar at the top and recommendations that feel more tailored to what you like. The service has streamlined how shows and movies are displayed, aiming to make it easier to find something to watch without all the clutter. Plus, Netflix is catering to the TikTok generation by testing a vertical video feed on its mobile app, packed with short clips from shows and movies. Unfortunately though, not everyone's thrilled. Since the update started rolling out globally, plenty of users have taken to social media to complain. Spending any time on the Netflix subreddit quickly uncovers plenty of users sharing their frustrations and personal complaints about the service. This includes missing (and removed) features along with fewer titles being shown at once. Some have even gone so far as to start a petition to "bring back the old user-friendly interface." It's the first major redesign Netflix has done in years, so it's understandable that change feels jarring for some. Despite the grumbles, I actually like the new layout. It feels less overwhelming, which helps me focus on what I want instead of falling into the endless scroll vortex that usually ends with me annoyed and turning the TV off. Sometimes change is exactly what a streaming service needs, and here's why. As mentioned before, the Netflix subreddit is where most opinions are being voiced. The common complaint by far is how few titles are now visible on screen at once. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Previously, a single row could show around seven options, but that number has dropped due to the new design's auto-expanding tiles and autoplay previews. Some users have even noted (somewhat ironically) that they can now see more shows on their phone screen than they can on their much larger TV. I also noticed that a couple of well-liked features have quietly disappeared. The 'new & popular' tab (which used to give a quick overview of trending titles and upcoming releases) is no longer part of the new layout. The update also did away with the 'categories' section, though fewer users seem to be upset about that change. Netflix highlighted the differences between the new "My Netflix" tab and the main homepage, but in practice, they look pretty similar as both show many of the same rows and recommended content. This is a criticism I can't really argue with. Of course, it wouldn't be a real controversy without some backlash on X too. One user commented on how they can't set reminders on movies and TV shows, because they can't even see them. Meanwhile, another user called it 'headache-inducing' due to the titles being too big. However, it's tough to tell just how much the online controversy reflects the opinions of Netflix's entire user base. Plus, it's unclear exactly how many people have even seen the new interface yet. The rollout started in May, but which countries or what portion of users have access remains unknown. It's also important to note that Netflix's own testing indicates that most users (even if they're not vocal about it) actually prefer the new layout (h/t The Hollywood Reporter). While it might seem like everyone's unhappy, you're only hearing one side. Don't get me wrong, I totally get why people are disappointed. Change is frustrating, especially when it comes to the platforms we use daily. But as someone who's incredibly picky about what to watch, I've actually found the new Netflix homepage to be a refreshing update. The fewer titles shown on screen at once make the experience feel less cluttered and more focused on your viewing habits. Instead of getting overwhelmed by endless rows, I can actually take in what's there, and honestly, the larger thumbnails and auto-playing previews make everything look way more appealing (we love a good aesthetic). Despite the redesign, all the essentials are still right where you need them. You've still got the top 10 list, the 'continue watching' row, and the ever-helpful 'new on' section. So while it might look different, nothing else has really been taken away. The same goes for the 'My Netflix' tab. Your personal list is still there, plus a solid lineup of recommendations based on what you've been watching. That said, I do understand why some people are frustrated. A few features do feel a bit more tucked away, and certain titles might not jump out like they used to. But with any big change, there's a bit of a learning curve. Hanging on to the same design forever can get stale pretty fast. People's habits change, tech moves forward, and what felt great ten years ago might now seem a bit clunky or outdated. Updating the interface keeps things feeling fresh, shows Netflix is actually listening and evolving, and helps the service keep up with what we want and need. Plus, with better screens, faster internet, and all kinds of new devices focused on AI, there are better ways to make browsing and watching easier and more fun. Changing things up lets Netflix use those improvements so the whole experience just feels smoother and more enjoyable. So yes, I'll keep defending Netflix's redesign, and I don't think it's quite cause for anyone to rush into canceling their subscriptions over it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store