logo
Riddle me... Jacinda Ardern's fall from grace

Riddle me... Jacinda Ardern's fall from grace

Observer05-07-2025
How does one fall from the giddy heights of national treasure and international acclaim to the depths of national chagrin and scorn? The praise of the world's media for then New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, in the wake of the tragic shootings at the Al Noor Mosque, and Linwood Islamic Centre, in Christchurch (NZ) during March 2019, made her celebrity overnight.
Ardern, head covered in the Islamic fashion, offering support to the victims and their families, calmly met the intensity of that global media furore in a 'textbook' media response. Encouraging 'sympathy and love for all Muslim communities,' and saying she would 'never use the gunman's name,' taking away the infamy that he craved for his supremacist beliefs, she struck a chord, as her '100 per cent Pure,' New Zealand had been violated and Ardern represented the nation's rage impeccably.
First elected as an MP at the age of 28, Ardern became the party's Deputy Leader at 37, acceding to the leadership just six months later. Her youth, wisdom beyond her years and a canny coalition with New Zealand First, saw her sweep to power on October 26, 2017. So why is Ardern now, so loved and lauded then, absolutely reviled in her homeland today? Well, her critics, seemingly today, most of the five million population, point to her 'wry opportunism,' as, in the months following the tragedy, alarm bells rang as she appeared more focused on the 'me' of the shootings and the aftermath, rather than the 'we' and that's quite simply, 'not the Kiwi way.' Ardern, who had touted herself as a 'reluctant PM,' was by then revelling in the job, travelling widely, being feted and photographed, a 'cause celebre,' for news, current affairs and the talk show circuit and 'loving it'. The pandemic of 2020, never helped her popularity at home either, as it was felt the measures she implemented went too far and whilst everyone was subject to the same, almost draconian restrictions, though Ardern countered that criticism, pointing to international acclaim for her 'masterclass in crisis communication (Washington Post) and the 'saving of 80,000 lives through her government's actions'. The electorate 'took its medicine' and Ardern was subsequently re-elected later the same year with 70 per cent of the vote.
Within months though, her popularity had waned, or more correctly plummeted, to 30 per cent, as the even more punitive restrictions of the second wave of Covid-19 hit hard. Ardern's determination that 'it is what it is,' in a condescending dismissal of electorate concerns were remarkably offensive from a 'caring' leader and the beginning of the end.
Fast forward to January 2023, at just 43 years of age, citing 'general dissatisfaction with the political realities of coalition politics' and that 'I no longer had enough in the tank,' Ardern stepped away. Now a resident in Boston, the US, she is a regular on the chat show' circuit and has written a book, 'A Different Kind of Power,' which, of course portray her as humble and between the lines, almost saintly. On the other hand, Christchurch journalist Chris Lynch writes of her emasculation of public concerns, while walking straight into UN employment immediately, and leaving New Zealand with indecent haste, echo of 'rats and sinking ships,' while he suggests she writes another book: 'The Authoritarian: How I Left New Zealand Divided and in a Mess'.
With hindsight, the reality is that Ardern's politics were always about Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern and not her nation. Ardern worked as a political researcher for, among others, then PM Helen Clark, subsequently prominent in the UN and WHO; and it's clear Ardern has positioned herself to follow the same path. Questions remain over substantial expenses claims and media speculation around the activities of her husband, TV personality Clark Gaylord, which if not tarnishing her legacy enough, have certainly eroded the trust of a nation.
Watching Ardern in the media today inspires only cynicism, exuding about as much sincerity as disenfranchised royals Meghan and Harry, in a truly astonishing fall from grace.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU chief von der Leyen comfortably survives confidence vote
EU chief von der Leyen comfortably survives confidence vote

Observer

time2 days ago

  • Observer

EU chief von der Leyen comfortably survives confidence vote

STRASBOURG: EU chief Ursula von der Leyen on Thursday comfortably saw off a no-confidence vote in the European Parliament — but the rare challenge has exposed frictions between her backers and complaints about her leadership style. Lawmakers in Strasbourg rejected the censure motion — launched by the far-right over the European Commission president's handling of Covid vaccine contracts — by 360 to 175 in a widely expected result. "In a moment of global volatility and unpredictability, the EU needs strength, vision, and the capacity to act," von der Leyen, who wasn't at the parliament for the vote, wrote on X afterwards. "As external forces seek to destabilize and divide us, it is our duty to respond in line with our values. Thank you, and long live Europe." Addressing parliament earlier this week, von der Leyen had dismissed the initiative as a conspiracy theory-laden attempt to divide Europe, slamming its supporters as "anti-vaxxers" and "apologists" for Russian President Vladimir Putin. She had urged lawmakers to renew confidence in her commission arguing it was critical for Europe to show unity in the face of an array of challenges, from US trade talks to Russia's war in Ukraine. The no-confidence motion was initiated by Romanian far-right lawmaker Gheorghe Piperea. He accused von der Leyen of a lack of transparency over text messages she sent to the head of the Pfizer pharmaceutical giant when negotiating Covid vaccines. The commission's failure to release the messages — the focus of multiple court cases — has given weight to critics who accuse its boss of centralised and opaque decision-making. That has also been a growing refrain from the commission chief's traditional allies on the left and centre, who largely backed von der Leyen, but used the vote to air their grievances. One major complaint from her critics is that von der Leyen's centre-right camp has increasingly teamed up with the far-right to further its agenda — most notably to roll back environmental rules. Iratxe Garcia Perez, the head of the centre-left Socialists and Democrats, said the group's support did not "mean that we are not critical of the European Commission". Its shift towards the far-right was "a major cause for alarm", she added. "The motion of censure against the European Commission has been overwhelmingly rejected," centrist leader Valerie Hayer wrote on X. "But our support for von der Leyen is not unconditional." "Pfizergate" aside, Romania's Piperea accused the commission of interfering in his country's recent presidential election, in which pro-European Nicusor Dan narrowly beat EU critic and nationalist George Simion. That vote came after Romania's constitutional court scrapped an initial ballot over allegations of Russian interference and massive social media promotion of the far-right frontrunner, who was barred from standing again. Piperea's challenge was supported by some groups on the left and part of the far right — including the party of Hungary's nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban. But Piperea's own group, the ECR, was split on the question. Its largest faction, the party of Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni that did not back the motion. — AFP

ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders
ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders

Muscat Daily

time3 days ago

  • Muscat Daily

ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders

The Hague, Netherlands – The International Criminal Court (ICC) on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for the Taliban's supreme leader and chief justice, accusing them of persecuting girls and women in Afghanistan. The ICC said there were grounds to believe that supreme spiritual leader Haibatullah Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, chief justice of the Taliban, had committed the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds against girls, women and 'other persons non-conforming' with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression, a statement from the UN court said. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the statement continued. The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' Taliban's response The Hague-based court alleged the crimes took place from August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and endured until at least January 20, 2025. The Taliban dismissed the warrants as 'nonsense' and that the ICC move 'won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)', spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement. The purpose of the ICC The ICC was created to pass judgement on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The court has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. In practice, this has not always been the case. Since returning to power four years ago, the Taliban have imposed measures that include the banning of women from public places and prohibiting girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade. Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognise the Taliban regime. In recent years the ICC also has sought the arrest of Russian President Vladimir Putin and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. DW

ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women

Observer

time4 days ago

  • Observer

ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over persecution of women

The Hague: The International Criminal Court on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders, accusing them of crimes against humanity for persecuting women and girls. Judges said there were "reasonable grounds" to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. "While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms," the court said in a statement. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities rejected the International Criminal Court's arrest warrants and called the move "nonsense". "Such nonsense announcements won't affect the strong commitment and dedication to sharia (Islamic law)" of Taliban authorities, spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement, adding that the Taliban government does not recognise the court. The Taliban had "severely deprived" girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. Taliban authorities did not immediately reply to a request for comment. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants — with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. After sweeping back to power in August 2021, the Taliban authorities pledged a softer rule than their first stint from 1996 to 2001. But they quickly imposed restrictions on women and girls that the United Nations has labelled "gender apartheid". Edicts in line with their interpretation of Islamic law handed down by Akhundzada, who rules by decree from the movement's birthplace in southern Kandahar, have squeezed women and girls from public life. The Taliban government barred girls from secondary school and women from university in the first 18 months after they ousted the US-backed government, making Afghanistan the only country in the world to impose such bans. Authorities imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs -- or being paid to stay home. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks, gyms and baths as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A "vice and virtue" law announced last year ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be "concealed" outside the home. — AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store