Riddle me... Jacinda Ardern's fall from grace
Ardern, head covered in the Islamic fashion, offering support to the victims and their families, calmly met the intensity of that global media furore in a 'textbook' media response. Encouraging 'sympathy and love for all Muslim communities,' and saying she would 'never use the gunman's name,' taking away the infamy that he craved for his supremacist beliefs, she struck a chord, as her '100 per cent Pure,' New Zealand had been violated and Ardern represented the nation's rage impeccably.
First elected as an MP at the age of 28, Ardern became the party's Deputy Leader at 37, acceding to the leadership just six months later. Her youth, wisdom beyond her years and a canny coalition with New Zealand First, saw her sweep to power on October 26, 2017. So why is Ardern now, so loved and lauded then, absolutely reviled in her homeland today? Well, her critics, seemingly today, most of the five million population, point to her 'wry opportunism,' as, in the months following the tragedy, alarm bells rang as she appeared more focused on the 'me' of the shootings and the aftermath, rather than the 'we' and that's quite simply, 'not the Kiwi way.' Ardern, who had touted herself as a 'reluctant PM,' was by then revelling in the job, travelling widely, being feted and photographed, a 'cause celebre,' for news, current affairs and the talk show circuit and 'loving it'. The pandemic of 2020, never helped her popularity at home either, as it was felt the measures she implemented went too far and whilst everyone was subject to the same, almost draconian restrictions, though Ardern countered that criticism, pointing to international acclaim for her 'masterclass in crisis communication (Washington Post) and the 'saving of 80,000 lives through her government's actions'. The electorate 'took its medicine' and Ardern was subsequently re-elected later the same year with 70 per cent of the vote.
Within months though, her popularity had waned, or more correctly plummeted, to 30 per cent, as the even more punitive restrictions of the second wave of Covid-19 hit hard. Ardern's determination that 'it is what it is,' in a condescending dismissal of electorate concerns were remarkably offensive from a 'caring' leader and the beginning of the end.
Fast forward to January 2023, at just 43 years of age, citing 'general dissatisfaction with the political realities of coalition politics' and that 'I no longer had enough in the tank,' Ardern stepped away. Now a resident in Boston, the US, she is a regular on the chat show' circuit and has written a book, 'A Different Kind of Power,' which, of course portray her as humble and between the lines, almost saintly. On the other hand, Christchurch journalist Chris Lynch writes of her emasculation of public concerns, while walking straight into UN employment immediately, and leaving New Zealand with indecent haste, echo of 'rats and sinking ships,' while he suggests she writes another book: 'The Authoritarian: How I Left New Zealand Divided and in a Mess'.
With hindsight, the reality is that Ardern's politics were always about Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern and not her nation. Ardern worked as a political researcher for, among others, then PM Helen Clark, subsequently prominent in the UN and WHO; and it's clear Ardern has positioned herself to follow the same path. Questions remain over substantial expenses claims and media speculation around the activities of her husband, TV personality Clark Gaylord, which if not tarnishing her legacy enough, have certainly eroded the trust of a nation.
Watching Ardern in the media today inspires only cynicism, exuding about as much sincerity as disenfranchised royals Meghan and Harry, in a truly astonishing fall from grace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
5 hours ago
- Observer
Opportunity Oman: Unlocking trade and investment with Indonesia
The contours of global commerce are being redefined by collaborations among nations in the Global South, forging innovative pathways for mutual growth and development. Within this transformative environment, the Sultanate of Oman and the Republic of Indonesia are strategically positioned as key players in their respective regions, demonstrating a growing convergence of interests that points towards a robust bilateral partnership. While historical interactions have fostered a foundation of cultural understanding, the current momentum indicates a deepening engagement across political and economic spheres, suggesting the emergence of a potentially transformative economic corridor linking Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1977, both nations have steadily cultivated meaningful connections, marked by the opening of embassies in each other's capitals – Indonesia in Muscat (2011) and Oman in Jakarta (2013). This deepening of diplomatic ties has facilitated enhanced communication and cooperation. The shared Islamic heritage provides a natural cultural affinity, while concurrent membership in organisations such as the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) offers platforms for aligned action on global issues. A key driver of this evolving relationship is the notable expansion of economic ties. As per Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) bilateral trade volume has witnessed substantial growth, reaching $2.22 billion in 2023, a significant increase from $464 million in 2012. This upward trajectory reflects complementary economic strengths that position both nations for mutual benefit. An analysis of trade dynamics reveals both opportunities and areas for potential enhancement. While Indonesia historically maintained a trade surplus, the year 2023 saw a shift, with Oman's exports to Indonesia reaching $1.86 billion, contrasting with Indonesia's exports to Oman of $364 million. This imbalance is largely attributed to Oman's significant exports of semi-finished iron ($1.04 billion), refined petroleum ($539 million), and acyclic alcohol derivatives ($124 million). Indonesia's export portfolio to Oman includes key commodities such as palm oil ($150 million), cars ($79.3 million), and refined petroleum products, showcasing Indonesia's diverse manufacturing capabilities. This complementarity in economic outputs provides a solid foundation for expanded trade activities. Indonesian companies, such as PT Medco Energy International, have established a presence in Oman's energy sector. Furthermore, Oman's Vision 2040 programme actively encourages further Indonesian investment, particularly in sectors like real estate and tourism, with a focus on Integrated Tourism Complexes. The people-to-people dimension of this relationship is also significant. Approximately 80,000 Indonesian workers contribute to Oman's economy, fostering grassroots connections between the two societies. Tourism flows are also on the rise, facilitated by the introduction of a visa-free agreement in 2019. These interpersonal connections contribute to a favorable environment for strengthening business relationships. Looking ahead, digital cooperation presents an exciting avenue for growth. Recent high-level discussions have centered on collaboration in areas such as digital infrastructure, cybersecurity, and innovation. Indonesia's thriving digital economy offers attractive opportunities for Omani investors, while Omani expertise in specific technological fields could contribute to Indonesia's development. Oman's strategic geographic location provides Indonesian businesses with a valuable gateway to the broader MENA region. Conversely, Indonesia's membership in ASEAN and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) offers Omani businesses potential access to the dynamic Southeast Asian market, encompassing over 650 million consumers. Untapped trade potential exists within specific sectors. Estimates suggest that Indonesia has the capacity to increase its exports of refined petroleum to Oman by an additional $31.5 million, while Oman could potentially increase its exports of iron ore to Indonesia by $10.7 million. These figures illustrate immediate opportunities for trade expansion. For Omani businesses seeking to enter the Indonesian market, focusing on Indonesia's large consumer base, exceeding 250 million people, is advisable. Beyond current exports, significant potential exists for expansion in sectors such as chemicals, metals, methanol, raw aluminum, gypsum, and polypropylene. Indonesian businesses targeting Oman should leverage existing strengths in sectors including wood products, electrical appliances, textiles, furniture, and foodstuffs. As Oman continues its infrastructure development, opportunities in the construction materials sector are also expected to grow. To advance the evolving partnership between Oman and Indonesia, both governments must prioritise reducing trade barriers, streamlining investment procedures, and fostering direct business-to-business engagement. Recent high-level business delegation visits highlight strong private sector interest in expanding bilateral cooperation. Despite the promising potential of the Oman-Indonesia economic corridor, it remains largely underutilised. With their complementary economic capabilities, shared cultural affinities, and strategic geographic positions, the two nations are well-positioned to cultivate a deeper and mutually advantageous relationship. Leveraging their respective strengths and regional influence, Oman and Indonesia could shape a transformative alliance that contributes not only to their national development goals but also to a more interconnected, balanced global economy. Realising this potential requires proactive efforts to enhance physical and diplomatic connectivity. Increasing direct flight connections between Oman and Indonesia is vital, particularly given Indonesia's demographic scale and its importance as a Global South economy with high tourism and trade potential. Improved air connectivity will also strengthen cultural and societal ties. On the trade front, the establishment of direct shipping routes between key ports would significantly facilitate bilateral commerce. Additionally, launching structured diplomatic platforms—such as a joint investment forum—would institutionalise dialogue and deepen economic cooperation. Embassies in both countries must play a catalytic role by accelerating business facilitation measures, promoting investment opportunities, and creating an enabling environment for sustained engagement. Dr Yousuf Hamed al Balushi The writer is founder and CEO - Smart Investment Gateway, economists, board adviser & business transformation mentor.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Why celebrity opinions don't matter
We live in strange times. People are so desperate for famous people to agree with them that they're now using AI to fake what TV presenters say. This needs to stop. I've just received a WhatsApp with Piers Morgan telling me how much he likes Islam. It's clearly an AI fake but I'm not interested in Piers Morgan's views either way. Does it really matter if Piers Morgan likes or hates Islam? Does it matter if he supports Israel or Palestine? Or whether he prefers fish and chips to chicken curry? The answer should be obvious: no, it doesn't matter at all. The same goes for any famous person on TV. Oprah Winfrey's views on world politics are no more important than anyone else's. She's good at making TV shows, but that doesn't make her an expert on anything else. Recently, social media has been flooded with fake audio clips. These use AI to make it sound like Morgan is praising Islam or supporting causes he's never actually backed. This is dishonest and completely pointless. As a practising Muslim, I don't understand why some Muslims need approval from a BBC presenter. Islam has existed for over 1,400 years without needing British TV personalities to validate it. We don't need Morgan's opinion on our faith. When people use AI to fake medical advice or promote dodgy investments, we rightly call it dangerous. So why is it acceptable to fake religious or political endorsements? This double standard makes no sense. Here's something most people already know but don't like to admit: Western media lies. These outlets have their own agendas and will twist facts or leave out important information when it suits them. Most British people understand that politicians lie to us every day. We expect it. Piers Morgan is good at his job. He knows how to create controversy and keep people watching. Political debates on TV are just entertainment now. We don't take what they say seriously. So why do we care what these same media figures think about important issues? Why seek approval from a system we know can't be trusted? It's completely illogical. Morgan is good at his job. He knows how to create controversy and keep people watching. These are useful skills for a TV presenter. But being entertaining doesn't make him an expert on religion, politics, or social issues. Just because someone appears on TV regularly doesn't mean they know what they're talking about. Their main skill is attracting viewers and selling advertising space. It's time to stop caring what TV personalities think about serious matters. Important issues need proper consideration based on facts and real expertise, not casual comments from entertainers trying to fill airtime. Next time you find yourself caring about what Morgan or Oprah thinks about something important, ask yourself why. Instead of using AI to fake celebrity endorsements, why not spend that energy learning about issues properly? Talk to real experts. Read primary sources. Build arguments based on evidence, not manufactured celebrity approval. Western media will keep prioritising entertainment over truth. With AI getting better, the lies will become more convincing. This makes it even more important that we learn to judge information by its content, not by who appears to be saying it. Next time you find yourself caring about what Morgan or Oprah thinks about something important, ask yourself why. Their opinions are no more valuable than those of anyone else you might meet, and much less valuable than those of people who actually know what they're talking about. We need to stop treating entertainers as authorities and TV appearances as qualifications for serious discussion. Media personalities are there to entertain us, not to guide our thinking on complex issues. The sooner we realise this, the sooner we can focus on what actually matters: forming our own opinions based on reliable information and genuine expertise, not celebrity approval.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Riddle me... Jacinda Ardern's fall from grace
How does one fall from the giddy heights of national treasure and international acclaim to the depths of national chagrin and scorn? The praise of the world's media for then New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, in the wake of the tragic shootings at the Al Noor Mosque, and Linwood Islamic Centre, in Christchurch (NZ) during March 2019, made her celebrity overnight. Ardern, head covered in the Islamic fashion, offering support to the victims and their families, calmly met the intensity of that global media furore in a 'textbook' media response. Encouraging 'sympathy and love for all Muslim communities,' and saying she would 'never use the gunman's name,' taking away the infamy that he craved for his supremacist beliefs, she struck a chord, as her '100 per cent Pure,' New Zealand had been violated and Ardern represented the nation's rage impeccably. First elected as an MP at the age of 28, Ardern became the party's Deputy Leader at 37, acceding to the leadership just six months later. Her youth, wisdom beyond her years and a canny coalition with New Zealand First, saw her sweep to power on October 26, 2017. So why is Ardern now, so loved and lauded then, absolutely reviled in her homeland today? Well, her critics, seemingly today, most of the five million population, point to her 'wry opportunism,' as, in the months following the tragedy, alarm bells rang as she appeared more focused on the 'me' of the shootings and the aftermath, rather than the 'we' and that's quite simply, 'not the Kiwi way.' Ardern, who had touted herself as a 'reluctant PM,' was by then revelling in the job, travelling widely, being feted and photographed, a 'cause celebre,' for news, current affairs and the talk show circuit and 'loving it'. The pandemic of 2020, never helped her popularity at home either, as it was felt the measures she implemented went too far and whilst everyone was subject to the same, almost draconian restrictions, though Ardern countered that criticism, pointing to international acclaim for her 'masterclass in crisis communication (Washington Post) and the 'saving of 80,000 lives through her government's actions'. The electorate 'took its medicine' and Ardern was subsequently re-elected later the same year with 70 per cent of the vote. Within months though, her popularity had waned, or more correctly plummeted, to 30 per cent, as the even more punitive restrictions of the second wave of Covid-19 hit hard. Ardern's determination that 'it is what it is,' in a condescending dismissal of electorate concerns were remarkably offensive from a 'caring' leader and the beginning of the end. Fast forward to January 2023, at just 43 years of age, citing 'general dissatisfaction with the political realities of coalition politics' and that 'I no longer had enough in the tank,' Ardern stepped away. Now a resident in Boston, the US, she is a regular on the chat show' circuit and has written a book, 'A Different Kind of Power,' which, of course portray her as humble and between the lines, almost saintly. On the other hand, Christchurch journalist Chris Lynch writes of her emasculation of public concerns, while walking straight into UN employment immediately, and leaving New Zealand with indecent haste, echo of 'rats and sinking ships,' while he suggests she writes another book: 'The Authoritarian: How I Left New Zealand Divided and in a Mess'. With hindsight, the reality is that Ardern's politics were always about Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern and not her nation. Ardern worked as a political researcher for, among others, then PM Helen Clark, subsequently prominent in the UN and WHO; and it's clear Ardern has positioned herself to follow the same path. Questions remain over substantial expenses claims and media speculation around the activities of her husband, TV personality Clark Gaylord, which if not tarnishing her legacy enough, have certainly eroded the trust of a nation. Watching Ardern in the media today inspires only cynicism, exuding about as much sincerity as disenfranchised royals Meghan and Harry, in a truly astonishing fall from grace.
