Long-serving ex-Tory MP Adam Holloway joins Reform
The 59-year-old former Army officer said: 'There comes a moment for many soldiers – and most politicians – when you realise the battle you think you're fighting isn't the one your leaders are waging.
'That moment came for me watching Kemi Badenoch tell Trevor Phillips there are real differences between Reform UK and the Conservatives. She was right.
'The difference is the Reform leadership and voters grasp the scale of our national peril and back a party serious about addressing it.'
Mr Holloway is at least the eighth former Tory MP to have joined Reform since the last election, following former party chairman Sir Jake Berry, former Wales secretary David Jones and Dame Andrea Jenkyns, who won the Greater Lincolnshire mayoralty for the party in May.
Having served in the Grenadier Guards for five years, including during the Gulf War, Mr Holloway worked as a journalist for ITV and ITN before his election to Parliament in 2005.
A strong supporter of Brexit, he was briefly a whip under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss and was one of six Tory MPs to vote against censuring Mr Johnson after he was found to have misled the Commons over the Partygate scandal.
He was himself reprimanded by Parliament's standards watchdog after improperly attempting to prevent the release of a character reference he had provided for former Tory colleague Charlie Elphicke, who was jailed for two years in 2020 for sexual assault.
He lost his seat in last year's general election, falling 2,712 votes behind Labour's Lauren Sullivan.
During the campaign, he told voters that backing Reform was 'effectively taking a vote from me' and 'helping Labour'.
Mr Farage said he was 'delighted' to welcome Mr Holloway to the party, saying his parliamentary and military experience would be 'vital' ahead of the next election.
He added: 'His bold move shows that we are the only serious option in Kent and is testament to the fantastic work our councillors are delivering across the region.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homelessness minister ‘hiked rent at London townhouse by £700 weeks after ending tenancy'
The government's homelessness minister reportedly raised the rent at her east London townhouse by £700 weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Rushanara Ali has been accused of raising the rent on the property, which has four bedrooms, from £3,300 to £4,000 after the previous tenants vacated the property. According to the i paper, the previous occupants were handed just four months' notice last November, informing them that their lease would not be renewed. And weeks after they had left, the house was reportedly once again up for rent – but for £700 more each month. It is understood that Ms Ali – who is the Labour MP for Bethnal Green and Stepney – told the occupants their tenancy would not be renewed as the house was being put up for sale and were offered a rolling contract while the house was on the market, but chose to leave. The property was then re-listed as a rental when a buyer could not be found, it is understood. Ms Ali has previously criticised 'private renters being exploited and discriminated against' when defending the government's Renters Reform Bill, which will eliminate "no-fault" evictions, where landlords can end tenancies without a specific reason using Section 21 notice. She said the legislation would 'empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases'. The bill will also stop landlords who have terminated a tenancy to sell the property from re-listing it with higher rent until six months or more after the occupants vacated the premises. Shadow housing secretary James Cleverly suggested she should resign, saying the allegations 'would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister'. The Renters' Rights Bill has received its third reading in the House of Lords having already been through the Commons. A spokesperson for Ms Ali told The Independent: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.'
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Gordon Brown warns child poverty in Scotland is getting 'worse everyday' as he calls for UK Government action
The former prime minister is demanding Rachel Reeves taxes gambling companies to pay for the scrapping of the two-child cap on benefits. Gordon Brown has warned child poverty in his former Fife constituency is getting "worse everyday" as he urged the UK Government to finally end the two-child cap on benefits. The former prime minister is calling on Rachel Reeves to slap targeted tax hikes on highly profitable parts of the gambling industry - such as online casinos and slot machines - in order to find the money required to scrap the hated two-child cap on benefits. The SNP Government has already announced it will mitigate the impact of the Tory-imposed policy in Scotland, with the first payments to affected families due to be made in March next year. Brown, who served as an MP in West Fife and Kirkcaldy for more than 30 years, said today he does not need to look far to see how the least well-off families are struggling. "I live in the constituency in which I grew up. I still live here. I see everyday this situation getting worse," he told BBC Radio 4. "I did not think I would see the kind of poverty I saw when I was growing up when we had slum housing... this is a return to the kind of poverty of 60 years ago and I think we've got to act now." Brown, who served as Chancellor for more than a decade, added: "We are dealing with a divided Britain. We are dealing with a social crisis. If I tell you that a million children will be trying to sleep tonight without a bed of their own, that two million children are in homes without a cooker or a fridge or a washing machine... something has got to be done. "This problem is getting worse. It's going to worsen over the next few years because there's a built-in escalator in the poverty figures because of the two-child rule. Unless we do something about it we're going to pile up costs for the future." Brown has said scrapping the cap could be paid for by targeted tax hikes on online casinos and slot machines. A Betting and Gaming Council spokesperson claimed such a move would hit ordinary punters and risk pushing people towards the black market. Keir Starmer told MPs in July that he wanted to get child poverty levels down by the end of this Parliament. But the UK Government is not expected to spell out how it plans to deliver on this pledge until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has backed calls to end the two-child cap. The SNP Government previously announced applications for payments to mitigate the impact of the policy will open on March 2 next year. First Minister John Swinney said earlier this year: "The eradication of child poverty is my government's number one priority, and I want it also to become our nation's number one goal. "The cornerstone of our approach is investment in more dignified and generous social security support. It includes the resources we need to build the systems that will allow us to effectively remove the two child cap for families in Scotland. "I can offer two guarantees today. Firstly, if we are able to safely get the systems up and running in this coming year, the first payments will be made in this coming year – helping to lift thousands more children out of poverty. "And secondly, if the UK government does the right thing and abolishes the two-child cap across the UK, the resources we have committed to this policy will continue to be used on measures to eradicate child poverty in Scotland."
The National
an hour ago
- The National
I'm not fan of Kate Forbes but this is a far wider problem
The party of government shouldn't be entertaining the notion that the hard-won rights of minority groups are debatable, and I won't be convinced that's a controversial stance to take. I think the presence of those views has unforgivably given rise to those narratives and allowed them to feel at home in a space they should not have been welcomed. An important preface. However, it's impossible to consider her decision in isolation. Whether her views are congruent with the foundations of the SNP or not, it raises serious questions for the party and Scottish politics more widely. Already, 23 SNP MSPs had announced their intention to stand down in 2026, with 14 of them women. A list inclusive of party giants like Nicola Sturgeon and Shona Robison as well as fresh faces like Natalie Don-Innes, representing more than 60% of those stepping down and almost a quarter of the SNP's current parliamentary group, and that's alongside resignations from other parties. It's not a case of a few gentle career transitions or a generational refresh, it's a systemic across-the-board retreat from political life. A gendered haemorrhaging of experience and talent. READ MORE: John Swinney to consider imposing state boycott on Israel Forbes is just the latest in what could be described as a mass exodus of women from Holyrood, and more specifically from the SNP benches. While I don't always agree with her politics, her decision is a really uncomfortable one. Politics has become a punishing and thankless environment for women in Scotland, especially those who dare to be ambitious. It's to the shame of everyone involved. Even more uncomfortable when you consider that it wasn't so long ago Scotland was internationally recognised for its gender balanced representation in political life, a sore contrast to the reality heading into 2026. Even just looking to the last Holyrood election in 2021, which saw a record number of women elected to our national parliament. Or even more nostalgically to the heydays of the mid-2010s, when three of Scotland's major parties were headed by women. Sturgeon for the SNP, Ruth Davidson for the Tories and Kezia Dugdale for Labour. I remember watching First Minister's Questions at the time and feeling like I was witnessing something big and out of the ordinary. Like progress was not only in front of us in the short term, but had taken root. It was what we understood to be normal in Scotland, even if it wasn't the case more broadly around the world. We're now watching that progress, which was so intentional and meaningful, be unravelled and in large part due to the neglect of those with the power to change it. Forbes has decided to step down because the job demands too much of a mother to a young child. Was it naive of me to hope that gone were the days women would have to sacrifice the careers they worked tirelessly to build because those careers aren't accommodating of family life? It would seem so. (Image: Colin Mearns) If elected politics can't be a place of work flexible enough to accommodate family priorities, it's not working for the benefit of us all. That's just one issue cited as a reason. Others speak of burnout from an unsustainable workload, relentless abuse and a lack of support to handle it, misogyny both from external sources and internal mechanisms that are setting women up to fail. Our female political leaders are communicating en masse that they are no longer willing to tolerate what politics demands of them. The cost is too high, and the return is too low and it's no longer enough for these announcements to be met with lacklustre statement after lacklustre statement loosely expressing disappointment but understanding. We are sleepwalking into a regression that will be as hard to undo as it was the last time. Michelle Thomson MSP, one of those stepping down, described politics as being 'generally very misogynist'. She went on to say: 'I don't think the SNP can be complacent about their own internal mechanisms.' She's absolutely right. Long gone are the days of the gender balance mechanisms championed by Sturgeon, which we are told did their job in 2021 and therefore cannot be repeated. It's almost as if when women aren't represented in the highest offices, gender equality begins to slip back down the priority list. Just two years after the departure of Sturgeon and four since a record number of women were elected to Holyrood, candidate selections for 2026 are already demonstrating a backwards trend, with women making up just 42% of confirmed SNP candidates. A number that isn't final by any means and still has the potential to decline before the election rolls around. The party still completely lacks any kind of system for dealing with harassment or providing meaningful support to those facing the relentless abuse that has become synonymous with politics in Scotland. I say that from experience as a woman in the party, who has faced that abuse for years now. Support is impossible to come by, even when you ask for it. I don't believe there is a single party in our political atmosphere that is tackling this effectively, but as the party of government, it's not amiss to expect the SNP to lead by example. It's this environment, and the lack of support that allows it to freely continue, that is driving women away from our public life. It's not just women who lose out and it's not just part and parcel of being in politics like we are led to believe, it's the strangling of our democracy. When Parliament becomes a place where only certain types of people can survive and be heard, decisions naturally stop being about the many and start being about the same few. That's how representation works, and it's where we're heading if the passive acceptance of this trend continues. So yes, Kate Forbes might never have been the future of feminist politics in Scotland. But her decision to go is emblematic of a much bigger problem. A system that failed her as it has her colleagues and as it will the women coming up behind them if nothing changes. Our leaders of today would do well to look to the example of leaders gone by – who were living proof that progress is possible and sustainable – before it's too late. The time for listening is now, to the women choosing to stay and to those choosing to leave, or we are going to find our politics drowned once again under the weight of a political culture built primarily for and upheld by men. If we don't, 2026 will mark a huge step back for gender equality in Scotland. A reality that was supposed to be behind us.
