Will Elon Musk's Loop drive down Dubai traffic?
There is no denying that Elon Musk – the billionaire tech mogul, space flight pioneer and confidante to US President Donald Trump – has a special way of presenting new projects. Speaking via video call to an audience attending the last day of the World Governments Summit in Dubai yesterday, Mr Musk said a proposed underground road network for the city is 'going to be like a wormhole. You just wormhole from one part of the city to another'. Tesla is set to work with the emirate's authorities to build the Dubai Loop – an ambitious urban transport project that will resemble the Las Vegas Loop, a $47-million system built by Mr Musk's Boring Company. That project opened in 2021 and carries convention centre visitors in high-speed tunnels to avoid surface traffic. The American project took two years to build the tunnels and five stations for 70 driverless vehicles to travel through, and there are plans to further develop it into a sprawling system of 100 stations that will connect the Nevada city's airport to hotels and casinos. As enterprising as this sounds, Mr Musk's joint project with Dubai is in keeping with the emirate's future-focused ideas about making the city greener, more liveable and easier to get around. Like Dubai, Las Vegas is one of the world's hottest urban areas and below-ground transport is regarded as ideal for reducing emissions and ensuring smoother journeys. The Dubai Loop is just one of several current projects that aim to cut congestion and better connect one of the world's fastest growing cities. Technical studies of Dubai's solar-powered Railbus network are ongoing and the city has plans to more the double its number of Metro stations by 2040. In addition, Dubai is planning other ways to reduce the number of vehicles on its roads, such as the Super Block project – unveiled earlier this month, this aims to transform key areas into pedestrian zones with more greenery, shared public spaces and greater opportunities for social interaction. The drive to create new and innovative modes of transport – thereby improving the quality of life in urban areas – is something that the UAE as a whole is embracing. The Etihad Rail project, which has been advancing since work began on it in 2009, took a significant step forward in January when plans for a 30-minute high-speed train service connecting Abu Dhabi to Dubai were unveiled. The UAE capital also looks set to embrace flying taxis, with one company, Archer Aviation, saying earlier this month that it hopes to get Abu Dhabi's first flying taxis in the air this year, adding that its long-term goal is to replace 60 to 90-minute trips by car with 10 to 20-minute electric air journeys. For now, the focus is on this high-profile plan to dig underground roads in the desert. It is certainly a bold move, and Dubai will be watching the progress and expansion of Mr Musk's Las Vegas Loop closely. It may be the case that, in a few short years, Dubai travellers will indeed be 'wormholing' their way from one part of the city to another.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
12 hours ago
- Gulf Today
No winner to declare in Trump-Musk feud
The bitter feud that broke out this past week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump is more than bravado gone bad. It highlighted the ugly, juvenile tendencies of both as they aired a personal grudge on a global scale. As bizarre and, admittedly, entertaining in a sort of WWE way, it proved, there were no winners to declare. Not Musk, not Trump, not their supporters, investors nor perhaps even bystanders. Ego can bring down the powerful — as Shakespeare observed long ago with Macbeth, King Lear and Othello. Achieving common goals and maintaining stability requires unity and collaboration. But that was quickly lost as they traded punches on social media. For Musk, it only further erodes his current and future customer base for everything from Tesla cars to The Boring Company tunnel contracts to SpaceX rockets and satellites. It also suggests that maybe he isn't cut out for leadership no matter how many billions of dollars he still has. Lost trust is difficult to recapture. For Trump, the world sees again that if you upset him enough, you can get under his skin. Get close to him, play to his ego and you can win him over without any authenticity. Neither quality is ideal for a global leader at a time when America needs to reassert itself. Oh, it was quite the bromance for a time. Remember when in the aftermath of the assassination attempt on then-presidential candidate Trump, Musk tweeted unequivocally, 'I fully endorse Trump.' What followed was a prolonged political alliance that saw Musk sporting MAGA hats of nearly every variety, standing beside Trump at rallies across the country, addressing tens of thousands of Republicans at each stop, helping to raise millions for Trump and the GOP, and frequently, if awkwardly, appearing in the background of Oval Office meetings. Now, we suspect, Musk (and his son) won't be invited back to the Oval Office for some time. Some of the more prescient among us saw this coming. Cracks were already apparent as Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' was vetted. Claims that it would both jumpstart the economy and reduce the deficit proved too difficult a pill for Musk to swallow. 'Shame on those who voted for (the bill),' Musk now famously observed. Trump and many of his supporters alleged Musk only took issue with the bill because of the loss of electric vehicle subsidies. Musk, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get Trump reelected, then reminded the president of his game-changing political contributions. Oh, and he used the word 'ingratitude.' rump then threatened to cut all of Musk's government contracts, to which Musk quickly replied that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon Spacecraft (a spacecraft that the government heavily relies on for deliveries and trips to the International Space Station). Musk also dropped his 'big bomb,' accusing Trump of being in the government's unreleased Epstein files meaning he was associated with the late Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier convicted of sex offenses. In a Shakespeare play, this would now be the third act and one or more of the antagonists would express some remorse. They might even recognize their faults. Whatever offers of rapprochement we hear from the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man, we see little chance of such self-awareness. Musk crossed the Rubicon given how Trump values loyalty above all else. Perhaps a marriage of convenience is still possible but trust? Never again. The takeaway for the rest of us? How embarrassing and truly awful that the president of the United States would engage in this juvenile, public dispute with his most valued supporter simply because they have differing views on deficit spending. And perhaps there's also a lesson in not airing your dirty laundry in front of tens of millions on a social media account. In a better functioning democracy, disputes among political allies are resolved through negotiation and compromise, not through public accusations and threats. We are better than that.
Zawya
12 hours ago
- Zawya
US small business sentiment improves in May, but uncertainty rising
U.S. small-business confidence improved in May, likely because of a de-escalation in trade tensions between Washington and China, though uncertainty over the outlook mounted amid worries over the fate of President Donald Trump's tax-cut agenda. The National Federation of Independent Business said on Tuesday its Small Business Optimism Index increased three points to 98.8 last month, rising for the first time since December. The trade truce resulted in the Trump administration slashing tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% from 145% through early August. That probably led small business owners to anticipate higher sales, accounting for most of the increase in the index. But the survey's uncertainty index rose two points to 94. "Congress hasn't passed the big beautiful bill yet, and Trump is still messing with tariffs, the uncertainty level is rising," said NFIB Chief Economist Bill Dunkelberg. "While tariffs might be a bumpy road while countries negotiate trade deals, Congress can do their part by passing the BBB sooner rather than later to take that piece of uncertainty off the table." Trump's so-called big beautiful bill squeaked through the U.S. House of Representatives last month, but is facing stiff opposition from conservative Republicans in the Senate amid concerns that it would significantly add to the nation's already large debt. It is at the center of a feud between Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk. The share of small businesses expecting higher inflation-adjusted sales volumes jumped 11 points to 10%, accounting for most of the improvement in the Optimism Index. There was also a big rise in the proportion expecting better business conditions, though the share reporting taxes as their single most important problem increased. The share viewing current inventory as "too low" was the highest since August 2022. That, together with lengthening delivery times of inputs to factories, suggests shortages of some goods and price hikes could be looming. The survey also confirmed the labor market was slowing. The share of owners reporting labor quality was the single most important problem for their business dropped close to levels last seen in the spring of 2020. The share raising compensation was the lowest since early 2021. "Overall, the economy will continue to stumble along until the major sources of uncertainty are resolved," said Dunkelberg. "It's hard to steer a ship in the fog." (Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Andrea Ricci)
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Trump-Musk dispute exposes US space programme's reliance on SpaceX
A dispute between US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk that had escalated last week demonstrated a vulnerability of America's space programme and the consequences of its reliance on one private company. While the tension between President and billionaire has eased, the clash has exposed the risks of Nasa and the Department of Defence relying so much on SpaceX, Mr Musk's aerospace company, to carry out critical missions from taking astronauts into orbit to developing battlefield communications. The dispute unfolded on June 3, when Mr Musk criticised Mr Trump's proposed economic policy on X, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' Mr Trump responded on Truth Social, threatening to withdraw 'billions and billions of dollars' in government contracts awarded to his companies. 'The clash between President Trump and Elon Musk exposes both the vulnerability of SpaceX and the reliance of the US government on SpaceX's capabilities,' said Laura Forczyk, founder of space consulting firm Astralytical. 'A healthy ecosystem needs multiple competitors to provide a variety of options for the space industry to choose from.' A public fallout Mr Musk escalated the situation by tweeting that SpaceX would begin 'decommissioning Dragon,' referring to the spacecraft that carries Nasa astronauts to the International Space Station. 'Cancelling government contracts over social media spats could be a real-world consequence to escalating rhetoric in cyberspace,' said Evan Nierman, chief executive of crisis communications company Red Banyan. 'But there is no reason for that to happen, especially since all sides will lose.' The Dragon capsule remains the only operational American spacecraft capable of transporting crew to and from the ISS, and its only rival, Boeing's Starliner, has only just completed its first crewed test flight after extensive delays. Before SpaceX, Nasa relied on Russian rockets and spacecraft for more than 10 years to ferry their astronauts to the station. Strategic reliance SpaceX launches most of the Pentagon's military satellites, delivers cargo and astronauts to the ISS, and is developing the Starship vehicle that will serve as Nasa's lunar lander for the Artemis programme. Its Starlink satellite internet system is also being used by the US military and allied forces for secure communications, including in war zones and disaster areas. 'Nasa has already invested $4 billion in SpaceX to develop the Human Landing System, and at present, there are no near-term alternatives, so SpaceX is secure for now,' said Dimitra Atri, a planetary scientist at NYU Abu Dhabi. Dr Atri said that the public dispute between Mr Trump and Mr Musk could prove useful in the long run. 'The feud essentially serves as a catalyst for diversification efforts that were likely needed regardless of political dynamics, given the strategic risks of single-source dependency,' he said. During a press briefing on June 9, Mr Trump acknowledged the importance of Starlink despite his criticisms of Mr Musk, saying: 'I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service.' Legal and political limits While Mr Trump has hinted at punishing SpaceX, any serious attempt to cancel or redirect federal contracts are likely to lead to legal challenges. Ms Forczyk said such actions would break procurement laws. 'Contracts by Nasa and the US Department of Defence are won by competition. In many cases, SpaceX is the best competitor,' she said. 'In a few cases, SpaceX is the only company capable of doing what the US government needs, such as launching astronauts to the International Space Station. 'Companies that feel they are treated unfairly can legally protest contract awards, as SpaceX did in 2014 and 2019. 'Political biases should not play a part in contracting decisions, and contracts under suspicion of political bias could be challenged in court. It would be illegal for President Trump to cancel a federal contract with SpaceX and give that same contract to a competitor company.' Tough times at Nasa The Trump–Musk dispute comes at a time when Nasa is under heavy funding pressure. A proposed budget cut of nearly 25 per cent for the 2026 fiscal year could jeopardise dozens of scientific missions. 'I don't think it's too far off to say that Nasa is facing its worst-ever crisis,' said Gordon Osinski, a planetary scientist at Western University in Canada. 'The Artemis programme to return humans to the Moon seemed to be safe but given the crucial role of SpaceX in this endeavour, even that could now be in jeopardy.' The face of SpaceX While SpaceX has consistently delivered on launch services and human space flight, its image is closely tied to Mr Musk's unpredictable behaviour and political views. 'The SpaceX brand is so deeply tied to Elon Musk that it is seen as an extension of him,' said Mr Nierman. 'That makes the political risk of the Trump–Musk feud harder to contain. The company's best move right now is to maintain institutional calm, keep its head down publicly, and double down on performance behind the scenes.' He said that the firm's long-term reputation would benefit from separating its operational excellence from Mr Musk's personal identity. A push for competition The argument may serve as a catalyst for Nasa and the Department of Defence to broaden their portfolio of providers, by increasing investment in Blue Origin, Northrop Grumman and emerging launch firms. Dr Atri said that while SpaceX currently leads in terms of capability and cost-efficiency, building a diversified and resilient space economy is in the national interest. Blue Origin was awarded a second Human Landing System contract by Nasa, but its lander is not expected to be ready until after the 2030s. 'That company is rapidly building the capabilities needed to challenge SpaceX in rocket launches,' said Dr Atri.
