Hikers find mysterious stash of gold hidden on a mountain trail
(CNN) — Ten gold bracelets, 17 cigar cases, a powder compact, a comb, and a whopping 598 gold coins: The items are all part of a valuable and somewhat mysterious stash, found by chance by two hikers in the northeastern Czech Republic.
The hikers, who wish to remain anonymous, were taking a shortcut through the forest in the Krkonoše Mountains — a popular hiking spot — when they saw an aluminum box sticking out of a stony wall.
After they opened it and discovered the loot, they immediately took it to the Museum of Eastern Bohemia, in the nearby town of Hradec Králové, according to Miroslav Novak, the head of the archaeological department at the museum.
'The finders came to our museum's numismatist (coin expert) without a prior appointment. Only after that did archaeologists begin to deal with the find and set out to explore the site,' Novak told CNN in an email.
Who may have hidden the treasure and why is still up for debate, but one thing is certain: The stash can't be more than about a century old, because one of the coins is dated 1921. As for the rest, there are only hypotheses, for now.
'It is most likely related to the turbulent period before the start of World War II, when the Czech and Jewish population was leaving the border area, or to 1945, when the Germans were leaving,' Novak said.
A complete historical appraisal of the stash is still ongoing, and two of the cigar cases are tightly shut and remain unopened, but the metal value of the gold coins alone — which weigh 3.7 kilograms, or 8.16 pounds — is 8 million Czech koruna, or about $360,000, according to the museum's coin expert, Vojtěch Brádle.
The finding has sparked interest in the surrounding community, and Novak says the museum is getting calls with 'various local rumors,' which he hopes could help solve the riddle of the gold's origin.
Speculation is fueled by the fact that, oddly, there are no local coins in the mix. 'Half are of Balkan origin and the other half of French origin,' Novak said. 'Central European coins, such as German ones, are completely missing. But the find is located on the former ethnic border between the Czech and German populations.'
Among the theories submitted by the public, Novak said, is one that traces the ownership of the coins back to wealthy families from the surrounding area, such as the the Swéerts-Špork family, the owners of the Kuks estate, a large baroque complex overlooking the Elbe River that includes a summer residence, a spa and a monastery. Another suggests the cache could be war spoils of Czechoslovak legionnaires.
Findings like this are not especially common for the area, Novak noted.
'About nine kilometers southeast, a hoard of 2,700 silver denarii (a type of European trade coin) from the 12th century was found ten years ago,' he said by email. 'Many residents left this area during the 20th century, which is why there are many abandoned farms here.'
Vojtěch Brádle agreed that the makeup of the stash is unusual.
'Usually, Czech finds from the 20th century mainly contain German and Czechoslovak coins. There is not a single one here,' he said. 'Most of the pieces from this treasure did not travel directly to Bohemia. They must have been somewhere in the Balkan Peninsula after the First World War. Some of the coins have countermarks from the former Yugoslavia. These were only minted on coins sometime in the 1920s or 1930s. At the moment, I do not know of any other Czech find that would contain coins with these countermarks.'
More research is required, he added, to understand the metal composition of the remaining items, and obtain a more accurate overall value.
It's significant that the most recent coin in the stash is from 1921, according to Mary Heimann, a professor of modern history and an expert of Czechoslovak history at the University of Cardiff in the United Kingdom. That was the year the Soviet-Polish War ended when the Treaty of Riga was signed, she said, but it was also a year of financial crisis in Czechoslovakia, the former state that separated peacefully into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993.
'It was an unstable period, there was a downturn in the economy and widespread unemployment. For that reason, it's not that surprising somebody would think of burying a stash of gold at that time,' she added.
Despite Novak's suggestions the stash was likely left around 1945, Heimann thinks that if that were the case, more recent coins would probably be in the mix. The absence of local currency, however, makes things murkier.
'(The person who hid the coins) could have been a collector, or someone who worked in museums. Or someone who stole a collection from somewhere. This is borderland territory, it separates what's today the Czech Republic — what was in the past Czechoslovakia — from Poland,' Heimann said. 'The first World War didn't end overnight, the ramifications were still being felt everywhere. There was still instability of borders, there was still economic crisis, there was quite a lot of crime. I suppose you might expect that in those border regions and in places of mixed ethnicity, there would be particularly high tension. So it might be that someone could be more frightened of the future if they lived in those areas than someone who lived elsewhere.'
Once the items have undergone further material analysis, they will be preserved and stored in the museum's coin collection. A short exhibition is planned for the fall.
And then, who will get to keep the loot? According to Czech law, Novak said, archaeological finds are the property of the local regional administration from the moment of discovery.
'In this case, the treasure was correctly handed over to the museum,' he said. 'The finder is entitled to a financial reward, which depends on the value of the metal or historical appraisal.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
7 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Warren Brodey, 101, dies; a visionary at the dawn of the Information Age
Although he formally trained as a physician, his thinking sprawled across topics as disparate as architecture, toy design, acoustics, and network computing. From his MIT base, he swapped ideas with other unconventional thinkers including Marshall McLuhan, Nicholas Negroponte, and Marvin Minsky, one of the intellectual forefathers of artificial intelligence. Advertisement Dr. Brodey had his greatest influence in the early 1970s, a time of economic and political malaise but also of radical optimism about a postindustrial, technology-driven future -- a moment when hard science and New Age sensibilities intersected. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up He explored the sort of wild-eyed questions that could be asked with a straight face only during those tumultuous times -- questions like 'We can explore technology, but can technology explore us?' and 'Can a room be designed to make you more creative?' His thinking was grounded in the field of cybernetics, a cross-disciplinary approach to the complexity of such dynamic systems as cities, organisms, families, and computer networks. Though it had been around since the end of World War II, cybernetics really took hold among academics in the late 1960s, as a response to the perceived rigidity of industrial society. Advertisement During his early career as a psychiatrist in Washington, D.C., Dr. Brodey first applied cybernetics to the family, which he saw as a system that had its own internal forces but was also influenced by external systems: A parent might have problems at work, which then cause disruption at home. But he left his lucrative practice in 1965 to take an unpaid job at MIT, which at the time was a leading center for work on cybernetics and artificial intelligence. He later got funding through a grant from NASA. Like others around him in Cambridge, Dr. Brodey believed that rapid developments in computing technology presented a choice: Such advances could be used to augment society as it was, or they could enhance human potential in revolutionary ways. He spent the rest of his long life advocating for the second option, all the while pushing aside fears that capitalism would force humans to pick the first. He took issue, for example, with an approach to artificial intelligence advocated by Minsky and others that was based on processing a massive set of data; at the time, this seemed to exclude an alternative AI that would be able to learn and grow -- and to help humans do the same. 'To date, we have not endowed our environment with this creative flexibility,' Dr. Brodey wrote in Landscape, a journal about design theory, in 1967. 'The intelligence we have commonly achieved is uncreative, stupid and in large measure hostile to human well-being. We have allowed hard shell machines to multiply and control us.' Advertisement But he was not all doom and gloom. That same year he spoke at a conference on digital technology and creativity held at the downtown Manhattan studio of the artist Robert Rauschenberg. New technologies, Dr. Brodey told the audience, offered 'a new potential for living in a personalized environment if we merely can think our way out of the old mass-production mentality.' Dr. Brodey was considered a key influence on several Boston area visionaries, including Nicholas Negroponte, the founder of the MIT Media Lab. Warren Brodey via Evgeny Morozov Warren Mortimer Brodey was born on Jan. 25, 1924, in Toronto. His father, Abraham Brodey, a doctor, and his mother, Blanche (Levy) Brodey, helped arrange passage and obtain visas for scores of Jewish refugees fleeing Europe in the years before World War II. He received his medical degree from the University of Toronto in 1947. After his psychiatric residency in New York and Boston, he was the assistant director of the Child Guidance Center in Worcester and a researcher at the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Md. He became a clinical professor at Georgetown University in 1959. Along with studying for certification in psychoanalysis, he consulted on CIA-funded studies with blind people who had developed advanced senses of hearing. Such work exposed him to the idea that our environments, both natural and human-made, shape our thoughts. Context, he said, was everything, a conviction that he brought with him to MIT. In 1967, with a grant from a wealthy friend, he and another researcher, Avery Johnson, founded the Environmental Ecology Lab, which they operated from a building on Lewis Wharf in the North End. There, they developed what Dr. Brodey called 'soft architecture' and 'soft materials' that responded to interaction with people: freon-filled rubber surfaces that changed shape depending on body temperature, for example, and a 'dancing suit' that changed music based on a user's movements. The idea was to fashion environments that evolved with human users, in a way that would push those same users to evolve as well. Advertisement 'At a basic level, Brodey and Johnson were hoping that such materials would help avoid the traps of mass-produced homogenous goods and interfaces, nudging users to learn, to think, to react to reality as reality reacts to them,' the writer Evgeny Morozov, who hosted a podcast series about Dr. Brodey, 'A Sense of Rebellion,' said in an email. The lab never produced a marketable product, but the two men's thinking took hold in corners of the Boston academic world where researchers were tackling similar foundational questions about the coming waves of technology. The industrial era saw humans bend themselves in the service of machines, Dr. Brodey and others believed; in the Information Era, they asked, could that relationship be reversed? When the money for the lab ran out, Dr. Brodey and Johnson relocated to a clothing-optional commune in Milford, N.H., where they restarted their work under the name Ecology Tool and Toy. Among their projects was a house built of balloons coated in spray foam and a patent for soft control materials, though again nothing ever went into production. Dr. Brodey and Dr. Johnson built a home made of balloons and foam in Milford, N.H. BRODEY FAMILY/NYT Dr. Brodey married Jane Tolson in 1957. They divorced in 1970. He married Karene Lyngholm in 2005. Along with his son Benjamin, from his first marriage, and his wife, he leaves two other sons, John and Ivan, and two daughters, Kim and Lisa Brodey, also from his first marriage; a stepson, Mathias Lyngholm-Dardeau; 14 grandchildren; and five great-grandchildren. By 1972 Dr. Brodey had become frustrated and disillusioned with the United States. It was clear, he said, that corporations would never support the transformational technology he envisioned; at the same time, with the hippie era waning and the Vietnam War ongoing, he lost faith that change would come anytime soon. Advertisement He moved to Norway, and, a few years later, renounced his citizenship and took up Maoism. For a time he worked as a laborer in an iron foundry. He lived in China in the early 1980s, teaching at Tianjin University, but he eventually found Chinese Communism likewise disillusioning and returned to Norway. There he founded Unite Against Racism, a group opposed to a rising wave of neo-Nazism in Norway. And he taught at the Technical University in Oslo, where he continued to advocate for technologies that would enhance human creativity. In recent years, his son Benjamin said, Dr. Brodey had grown cautiously optimistic about developments in artificial intelligence. Despite being built on the sort of large language models that Minsky would have supported, he believed it could yet be the sort of 'soft,' creativity-enhancing technology he had long dreamed about. This article originally appeared in
CNN
21 hours ago
- CNN
Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN. This move — which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast — fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place. Critics of the plan also say it's a short-sighted attempt to save money at the expense of understanding the oceans and atmosphere better. Two planned instruments, one that would measure air quality, including pollution and wildfire smoke, and another that would observe ocean conditions in unprecedented detail, are no longer part of the project, the sources said. 'This administration has taken a very narrow view of weather,' one NOAA official told CNN, noting the jettisoned satellite instruments could have led to better enforcement and regulations on air pollution by more precisely measuring it. The cost of the four satellites, known as the Geostationary Extended Observations, nicknamed GeoXO, would be lower than originally spelled out under the Biden administration, at a maximum of $500 million per year for a total of $12 billion, but some scientists say the cheaper up-front price would come at a cost to those who would have benefited from the air and oceans data. 'Our information will be less rich, and our understanding of the whole phenomenon of a hurricane event, or of a fire event or of a drought event will be lesser because we don't have these context information instruments adding real time, integrated understanding of the events,' the official stated. Both instruments were already contracted to BAE Systems, which could now charge cancelation fees. The changes are aimed at curtailing costs and are due in part to the perception that some of the instruments were going to be focused on gathering data to study climate change. According to a Trump administration budget document, weather forecasting should be the 'exclusive' focus of the satellites. In addition to the reduced number of instruments, NOAA is now only building four satellites as part of the constellation, rather than six, with the first set to launch in 2032. Having fewer satellites in the sky means less redundancy and raises the risk of critical data outages, the NOAA official stated. 'It's gambling with the continuity of an operational system that we've relied on since the early 70s,' they said. The satellite series is meant to be the successor to the GOES satellites, which provide a wealth of data for weather forecasting, with the first launch set for 2032 and service lasting through 2055. CNN has contacted NOAA for comment. The atmospheric composition instrument, for example, would have enabled scientists to more precisely measure air pollutants, which could help reduce health risks from wildfire smoke events. It would also enhance US capabilities to conduct air quality monitoring and forecasting, as well as keep tabs on emissions of greenhouse gases and the pollutants that form smog. The atmospheric composition instrument would have been beneficial for both NOAA's weather and climate missions, according to an assessment of the instrument's value that NOAA performed and was signed off on by the Commerce Department, which oversees NOAA. The instrument, the report said, 'is fundamental to understanding changes in air quality, the stratospheric ozone layer, and climate, as well as their corresponding impacts on human health and natural and engineered ecosystems.' The report warned that without the instrument on GeoXO, the US would risk falling behind other countries' air quality monitoring capabilities, jeopardizing America's longtime leadership in Earth observations. Also cut from the planned GeoXO series of satellites is an instrument that would measure ocean color, which could provide insights into fisheries populations, algal blooms, ocean productivity and water quality. While it is not unheard of for NOAA or Congress to alter major satellite series, given a history of cost and schedule overruns in NOAA satellite programs, cancelling already contracted instruments — and doing so in part due to the administration's determination to focus NOAA more narrowly on weather forecasting, and away from climate change observations and research — stands out. The Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request would close NOAA's extensive research facilities, shutting down its greenhouse gas monitoring network, among others. Congress is currently considering that proposal.
CNN
21 hours ago
- CNN
Trump admin strips ocean and air pollution monitoring from next-gen weather satellites
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is narrowing the capabilities and reducing the number of next-generation weather and climate satellites it plans to build and launch in the coming decades, two people familiar with the plans told CNN. This move — which comes as hurricane season ramps up with Erin lashing the East Coast — fits a pattern in which the Trump administration is seeking to not only slash climate pollution rules, but also reduce the information collected about the pollution in the first place. Critics of the plan also say it's a short-sighted attempt to save money at the expense of understanding the oceans and atmosphere better. Two planned instruments, one that would measure air quality, including pollution and wildfire smoke, and another that would observe ocean conditions in unprecedented detail, are no longer part of the project, the sources said. 'This administration has taken a very narrow view of weather,' one NOAA official told CNN, noting the jettisoned satellite instruments could have led to better enforcement and regulations on air pollution by more precisely measuring it. The cost of the four satellites, known as the Geostationary Extended Observations, nicknamed GeoXO, would be lower than originally spelled out under the Biden administration, at a maximum of $500 million per year for a total of $12 billion, but some scientists say the cheaper up-front price would come at a cost to those who would have benefited from the air and oceans data. 'Our information will be less rich, and our understanding of the whole phenomenon of a hurricane event, or of a fire event or of a drought event will be lesser because we don't have these context information instruments adding real time, integrated understanding of the events,' the official stated. Both instruments were already contracted to BAE Systems, which could now charge cancelation fees. The changes are aimed at curtailing costs and are due in part to the perception that some of the instruments were going to be focused on gathering data to study climate change. According to a Trump administration budget document, weather forecasting should be the 'exclusive' focus of the satellites. In addition to the reduced number of instruments, NOAA is now only building four satellites as part of the constellation, rather than six, with the first set to launch in 2032. Having fewer satellites in the sky means less redundancy and raises the risk of critical data outages, the NOAA official stated. 'It's gambling with the continuity of an operational system that we've relied on since the early 70s,' they said. The satellite series is meant to be the successor to the GOES satellites, which provide a wealth of data for weather forecasting, with the first launch set for 2032 and service lasting through 2055. CNN has contacted NOAA for comment. The atmospheric composition instrument, for example, would have enabled scientists to more precisely measure air pollutants, which could help reduce health risks from wildfire smoke events. It would also enhance US capabilities to conduct air quality monitoring and forecasting, as well as keep tabs on emissions of greenhouse gases and the pollutants that form smog. The atmospheric composition instrument would have been beneficial for both NOAA's weather and climate missions, according to an assessment of the instrument's value that NOAA performed and was signed off on by the Commerce Department, which oversees NOAA. The instrument, the report said, 'is fundamental to understanding changes in air quality, the stratospheric ozone layer, and climate, as well as their corresponding impacts on human health and natural and engineered ecosystems.' The report warned that without the instrument on GeoXO, the US would risk falling behind other countries' air quality monitoring capabilities, jeopardizing America's longtime leadership in Earth observations. Also cut from the planned GeoXO series of satellites is an instrument that would measure ocean color, which could provide insights into fisheries populations, algal blooms, ocean productivity and water quality. While it is not unheard of for NOAA or Congress to alter major satellite series, given a history of cost and schedule overruns in NOAA satellite programs, cancelling already contracted instruments — and doing so in part due to the administration's determination to focus NOAA more narrowly on weather forecasting, and away from climate change observations and research — stands out. The Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request would close NOAA's extensive research facilities, shutting down its greenhouse gas monitoring network, among others. Congress is currently considering that proposal.
