
Nebraska Republican Denies Doing a 'Nazi Salute' in Photo With Her Dog
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Nebraska Republican Party Communications Director Haile McAnally rejected accusations on social media that she made a Nazi salute in a recent photo with her dog.
"My arm was just up," she said in a post on X. "There was zero meaning behind it."
Newsweek reached out to McAnally via direct message on X and Nebraska's Republican Party via email for comment.
Why It Matters
The social media accusations against McAnally emerged at a time of heightened sensitivity to Nazi references within American political and social discourse.
High-profile public figures, such as tech billionaire Elon Musk and New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, have been accused of making similar gestures.
What To Know
On Sunday, McAnally posted a mirror selfie of her sitting with her dog on a bed with her arm raised above her head and the caption: "Dog mom-ing it today."
Several X users accused McAnally of performing a Nazi salute, including the progressive account Definitely Not Al Gore (@AlDefinitely), which said in a separate post: "The communications director for the Nebraska Republican Party is an open Nazi."
Nebraska State Senator Megan Hunt, an independent in Omaha's District 8, posted on X: "Did you get the views Haile? Did you get the clicks? Did you get the engagement? Here's the Nebraska GOP comms director & Omaha Young Republican chair 'throwing a Roman' as the young Nazis say."
McAnally later shared a post that defended her on X and wrote, "My arm was just up. There was zero meaning behind it. I think it's weird that those salutes are a 'trend.' And it is not one I wish to be a part of. That is all."
The controversy follows similar accusations against public figures.
In January, Musk was accused of making a Nazi-style salute at President Donald Trump's inauguration, sparking widespread criticism and debate. Musk denied the allegations on X, stating he was being attacked by "radical leftists."
Trump loyalist Steve Bannon was also accused of performing the salute at the Conservative Political Action Conference in February.
Bannon insisted his gesture was a "wave" and said it was the "exact same wave" he had performed previously while addressing a National Rally conference.
In May, Booker, a Democrat from New Jersey, faced allegations from some Trump supporters that he made a Nazi salute during a public event.
Booker's spokesperson told Newsweek, "Cory Booker was obviously just waving to the crowd. Anyone who claims his wave is the same as Elon Musk's gesture is operating in bad faith. The differences between the two are obvious to anyone without an agenda."
What People Are Saying
Conservative social media figure Benjamin Uber defended McAnally on X: "Haile is NOT Doing a Nazi salute. Y'all are seeing Nazis where there are not Nazis.If you continue to normalize calling people who are not Nazis, Nazis, people will then embrace it whether they are or not."
Elon Musk said after he was accused of using a Nazi salute: "The radical leftists are really upset that they had to take time out of their busy day praising Hamas to call me a Nazi."
The Anti-Defamation League said of Musk's gesture at the time: "It seems that Elon Musk made an awkward gesture in a moment of enthusiasm, not a Nazi salute, but again, we appreciate that people are on edge."
What Happens Next
It remains uncertain whether McAnally or the Nebraska Republican Party will make further statements addressing the controversy. The trend of scrutinizing gesture and symbolism in political and public life is expected to continue, as social media amplifies both genuine concerns and misinterpretations.
Broader debates about the normalization of extremist language and iconography are likely to persist and intensify as the U.S. enters another election cycle.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator Changed Child Rape Law After Relative Accused of Sex With Minor
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An 18-year-old in Utah who was accused of having sex with a 13-year-old avoided jail after the laws governing sexual offenses were changed while his relative was president of the state Senate. Senate President J. Stuart Adams confided to legislators that the law relating to his relative's case should be reviewed in a large bill that was passed in 2024, according to a report from The Salt Lake Tribune. Adams told The Salt Lake Tribune: "Some have suggested this change was made to benefit the case I was made aware of involving the high school senior. That is simply not true. "While the sponsor of [the bill] was aware of the case, I did not request the legislation and did not intervene or give input on the drafting of the bill." Newsweek reached out to Adams via email for further comment. Why It Matters The fact that the 18-year-old was related to someone with significant political power in Utah has raised questions over whether or not the legislation was adopted in order to make the sentencing less strict. While the law did not apply retroactively and the 18-year-old was not charged with the new lower-level crime created by the bill, they nonetheless avoided further jail time and were not required to register as a sex offender after the bill was passed. What To Know SB213, a 49-page bill sponsored by Republican Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, passed into law in March 2024, changing sentencing rules over sex between teenagers. Prior to the bill passing, the 18-year-old could have faced a charge of child rape, a first-degree felony that would have required them to register as a sex offender, along with a prison sentence ranging anywhere from six years to life in jail. However, the bill allowed a clause that lets 17-year-olds receive a less serious third-degree charge of unlawful sexual activity to be extended to 18-year-olds, provided they were still in high school. The new bill did not apply to cases brought before it became law, but the 18-year-old was not given any jail time beyond the initial week they had spent, after they pleaded guilty to reduced charges. Prosecutor and defense attorney for the case, Cara Tangaro, said in court hearings that the legislation had been crucial to the improved plea deal, telling Judge Rita Cornish at sentencing, "You saw the legislative change. We all agree that's not retroactive, but the government did change their offer based on that." The bill's sponsor, Cullimore, told the Tribune that Adams had requested that the charges against the relative be looked into for the legislation. Adams denied using his political power to benefit a relative. The Utah State Capitol in Salt Lake City. The Utah State Capitol in Salt Lake City. Getty Images What People Are Saying The mother of the 13-year-old told The Salt Lake Tribune: "I feel like a law is the law, regardless of who you are, but that wasn't what was going on here. I feel like [the 18-year-old] just got special nobody was going to say anything about it." What Happens Next Utah will continue to use the new law for sex offenses going forward for all cases.


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Toppled Confederate statue returning to DC
A toppled statue dedicated to the memory of Confederate officer Albert Pike will soon be reinstalled in Washington, D.C., according to the Department of Interior. The statue will be back in Judiciary Square by October, according to The Washington Post, who first reported the move. It comes a year ahead of the nation's 250th founding anniversary, a milestone President Trump has pledged to mark with tributes to American history in Washington through his ' Making the District of Columbia Beautiful ' executive order. In the order, Trump says 'monuments, museums, and buildings should reflect and inspire awe and appreciation for our Nation's strength, greatness, and heritage.' Pike's contributions to the country's history fit the mold. 'This project reflects our commitment to the responsible stewardship of public lands and the preservation of our nation's cultural resources,' a spokesperson for the Department said in a Tuesday statement to The Hill. But in 2020, demonstrators removed the sculpture by hand in following the death of George Floyd at the hands of police officers. Pike's 27-foot-tall bronze and marble statue was erected more than a century ago, in 1901. The measure was aimed at paying homage to his history as a brigadier general in the Confederate army and prominent figure in Scottish Rite Freemasonry. He was also a member of the Know Nothing Party, known for its strong anti-immigration stance. As the Trump administration lauds the statue's reinstallment, local leaders remain in favor of keeping Pike out of street view. 'I've long believed Confederate statues should be placed in museums as historical artifacts, not remain in locations that imply honor. A statue honoring a racist and a traitor has no place on the streets of D.C.,' Congresswoman Eleanor Norton Holmes (D-D.C.) said in a statement to The Post. The D.C. Scottish Rite also said in 2017 the statue had become 'the subject of contention and escalating controversy' and that the group would agree to its removal, per the outlet.


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
House Republican: Johnson needs to ‘show some leadership,' end redistricting ‘chaos'
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) called out Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) over their responses to redistricting efforts across the country, saying the chaos needs to end. 'Ultimately I think that the Speaker needs to step up and show some leadership here because even our own members in states that might in some theoretical way, mathematical way stand to benefit from new maps, they don't like what's going on either,' Kiley told MSNBC's Chris Jansing on Tuesday. 'They don't like the prospect of having their district broken up or having communities they've represented, been voted in by, taken out of their district.' Kiley, who represents a competitive House district, said on Monday he will introduce legislation on Monday that would block states from redrawing their congressional districts prior to the 2030 census. 'It's not a good thing for either Democrats or Republicans. It's certainly not a good thing for the country,' he continued. 'So I think that the Speaker and Leader Jeffries need to show some leadership here to bring this chaos to an end, and I think that the bill that I have offered gives them the opportunity to do just that.' In the same interview, Kiley also criticized California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) efforts to redraw maps in California as a means of fighting back against Republican redistricting efforts in red states. Newsom has said he wants to abolish the state's Independent Redistricting Commission. 'The old saying is that voters should choose their representatives; representatives shouldn't choose their voters,' Kiley said. 'And I think that what's happening right now across the country, and especially in California, is a very unhealthy thing for democracy.' The redistricting fight jumped into overdrive in Texas this week after state Democratic lawmakers fled the Lone Star State for blue states including Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York.