Greek artist warns of fanaticism after art vandalised
"This violence is increasingly present in Europe and the United States, where ideas of purity, race or faith fuel nationalism," artist Christophoros Katsadiotis told AFP in an interview on May 29.
On March 10, four of Katsadiotis's artworks at Greece's National Gallery were thrown to the ground by two members of extreme-right Orthodox Christian party Niki -- one of them a party lawmaker -- who viewed them as "blasphemous".
Two months later, about 30 masked individuals attempted to assault him before an event in Thessaloniki, resulting in the 53-year-old engraver being put under police protection during public appearances.
Katsadiotis said the vandalisation incident at the National Gallery was "an attack on democracy... (and) our civilisation".
"If I need police protection, then freedom of expression no longer exists. It's a form of censorship," he told AFP on the sidelines of his new exhibition in Athens.
The art in question -- four engravings depicting Saint Christopher with a dog's head -- was part of a collective exhibition titled "The Allure of the Bizarre".
The two perpetrators, who smashed the glass protecting the engravings, were detained by police but later released.
Niki later expelled the lawmaker involved, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, from the party and the National Gallery has sued him.
- Outcry -
Katsadiotis is also planning to take legal action.
"I was surprised and upset. It was the first time this had happened to me," he said.
The incident at the National Gallery sparked an outcry and was condemned by the culture ministry.
But the Orthodox Church, which holds broad influence over politics and society in Greece, has publicly criticised parts of the exhibition involving Katsadiotis, who spends his time between Athens and Paris.
The Greek Church's governing body, the Holy Synod, voiced "regret" over "the content of certain works in this exhibition" and said it would "take action with the Greek government", without providing further details.
Katsadiotis is currently presenting a solo exhibition, including engravings and collages, at the Benaki Museum in Athens.
Security was reinforced around the building during the opening last week and police stationed three vehicles outside the entrance, he said.
Papadopoulos has continued to publicly condemn the artist's works as "a brutal insult" to sacred Orthodox icons.
At the National Gallery, Katsadiotis's engravings are now protected by a transparent panel and an alarm is triggered if visitors get too close.
- 'Dangerous for the public' -
The museum, which houses masterpieces of modern Greek and European art, has also increased protection overall due to "ongoing threats against the exhibited works and its staff".
"Initially, the idea was to leave the damaged works on the ground to illustrate... the violence," Katsadiotis said.
"(But) far-right sympathisers came to trample on them, which was dangerous for the public."
Niki, known for its nationalistic and homophobic rhetoric, has 10 MPs in the 300-seat Greek parliament.
This is not the first time it has sought to influence art policy.
In late 2023, the conservative government took down the work "Flag" by US-Greek artist Georgia Lale from the Greek consulate in New York following a complaint from the ultra-conservative party.
The artist had depicted a Greek flag with pink and red stripes instead of its official blue and white colours, to denounce feminicides in Greece.
"This decision left the field open for Niki to continue its attacks," said Katsadiotis.
He said there was a rise in militant vandalism and warned that "fanaticism" could spiral out of control, offering the example of the fatal attacks in Paris in 2015 after satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo republished caricatures of the prophet Mohammed from the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten.
hec/yap/jph/rmb
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
an hour ago
- News24
Trump blocks Ukraine from joining NATO, orders Crimea to Russia ahead of talks with Zelensky
US President Donald Trump wants Ukraine to cede Crimea to Russia. President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in the US for talks on ending the war. Trump met Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. US President Donald Trump said reclaiming Crimea or entering NATO were off the table for Ukraine, as President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Washington for Monday talks aimed at ending the war with Russia. Zelensky, who has repeatedly rejected territorial concessions, will meet Trump in Washington on Monday, accompanied by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and other leaders. The meeting comes on the heels of a summit between Trump and Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, which failed to yield a ceasefire breakthrough but produced promises from both leaders to provide 'robust security guarantees' to Ukraine. Zelensky was not invited to the Alaska meeting, after which Trump pivoted to the long-held Russian position that a ceasefire was not needed before a final peace deal. 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump posted on his social media platform. 'Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet one-on-one before being joined by a cohort of European leaders on Monday, according to the White House schedule. Along with von der Leyen, NATO chief Mark Rutte and the leaders of Britain, Finland, France, Germany and Italy will be present. It will be the first time Zelensky visits Washington since a bust-up with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February when the two men berated the Ukrainian leader for being 'ungrateful'. On Sunday night, after arriving in Washington, Zelensky said: 'We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably.' Since the Oval Office row in February, Trump has grown more critical of Putin and shown some signs of frustration as Russia repeatedly stalled on peace talks. But Washington has not placed extra sanctions on Moscow and the lavish welcome offered to Putin in Alaska on his first visit to the West since he invaded Ukraine in 2022 was seen as a diplomatic coup for Russia. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP Speaking in Brussels on the eve of his visit to the US, Zelensky said he was keen to hear more about what Putin and Trump discussed in Alaska. He also hailed Washington's offer of security guarantees to Ukraine as 'historic'. Trump said he spoke to Putin about the possibility of a NATO-style collective defence guarantee for Ukraine. The promise would be outside of the framework of the Western military alliance that Ukraine wants to join and which is seen as an existential threat by Russia. French President Emmanuel Macron said European leaders would ask Trump 'to what extent' Washington is ready to contribute to security guarantees for Ukraine. Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff said Moscow had made 'some concessions' regarding five Ukrainian regions that Russia fully or partially controls, and said that 'there is an important discussion with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.' Fermin Torrano/Anadolu via Getty Images That discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday,' he said, without giving details. Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 following a sham referendum and did the same in 2022 for four Ukrainian regions - Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia - even though its forces have not fully captured them. A source briefed on a phone call between Trump and European leaders on Saturday told AFP that the US leader was 'inclined to support' a Russian demand to be given territory it has not yet captured in the Donbas, an area that includes the Donetsk and Lugansk regions and which has seen the deadliest battles of the war. In exchange, the source cited Trump as saying, Moscow would agree to 'freeze' the front line in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian forces hold swathes of territory but not the regional capitals. Diego Herrera Carcedo/Anadolu via Getty Images Russia has until now insisted that Ukraine pull its forces out of all four regions as a precondition to any deal. There is concern in Europe that Washington could pressure Ukraine to accept Russia's terms. 'For peace to prevail, pressure must be applied to the aggressor, not the victim of aggression,' Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said on Sunday. Macron said: 'There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' Zelensky has repeatedly pushed back against ceding territory, but said he is ready to discuss the issue in the context of a trilateral summit with Trump and Putin. Trump has raised the possibility of such a meeting, but Russia has played down the prospect. Moscow's forces have been advancing gradually but steadily in Ukraine, particularly in the Donetsk region. Russian attacks on Kharkiv killed three people and wounded dozens more, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday, while a separate overnight attack on the Sumy region near the border wounded two others.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump cranks up pressure on Zelensky ahead of his high-stakes White House return
President Donald Trump is ratcheting up pressure on Ukraine to agree to terms to end the war with Russia, echoing some of Moscow's talking points two days after meeting President Vladimir Putin. Trump will host a summit Monday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a bodyguard of European leaders in the most important moment yet in a quickening push to end the brutal conflict that followed Russia's 2022 invasion. The White House meeting is also one of the most critical days for European security and the Western alliance since the end of the Cold War, and it will test Trump's sincerity and his capacity to lead Ukraine and Russia toward an exit ramp likely to satisfy neither side. It follows Trump's summit with Putin on Friday in Alaska, widely viewed outside the administration and MAGA world with dismay as the US president welcomed his guest, who is accused of war crimes, with applause. Trump offered several major symbolic and process concessions to Putin for few public undertakings in return. But Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff insisted Sunday on CNN that Russia had softened its opposition to post-war Western security arrangements for Ukraine and was ready to make significant land swaps in any deal to end the fighting. 'We agreed to robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing,' Witkoff told Jake Tapper on 'State of the Union.' Differing perceptions of the Trump summit will influence Monday's White House talks. European officials told CNN privately that Putin called for Ukraine to hand over swaths of the critical strategic and economic powerhouse region of Donbas, which his troops have failed to seize in three and a half years of fighting. This would be all but impossible for Zelensky to accept — politically, constitutionally, economically and strategically. His forces have suffered severe losses defending farmland and cities seen as a bulwark against future Russian aggression. No one outside the US and Russian delegations knows for sure what happened in Alaska. And the president's invite to European leaders and his energetic push for peace should not be prejudged before vital meetings take place. Trump insisted on social media Sunday that 'great progress' was being made. But hanging over Monday's White House meetings is his warning to Ukraine after the summit with Putin. 'Make a deal,' Trump said on Fox News. 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not.' The president exerted more pressure on the Ukrainian leader on Sunday night in a post on Truth Social that also echoed Russia's stance that Zelensky's country can never join NATO. 'President Zelensky of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' Trump wrote. This prompted concern in Kyiv and other European capitals that Trump will try to impose Putin's ideal vision of a settlement on Zelensky and that if the Ukrainian leader refuses this impossible choice, Trump will blame Kyiv and walk away from the conflict entirely. This points to a vital dynamic in Monday's White House meeting, which could turn into an extraordinary, televised spectacle if the president opens large portions of it to the cameras — a possibility for which his visitors must prepare. Is Trump prepared to act as a broker who will bring Ukraine and its European supporters and Russia to a point where they can accept painful concessions despite their bitter antipathy? Or does Trump's acceptance of Putin's opposition to an immediate ceasefire and postponement of tough new US sanctions on Moscow mean the US will now side with Russia against Ukraine and Europe? 'Trump has done something useful in his drive to end the war: Negotiations have shown the world that Putin — not the Ukrainians or Europeans — is the one who's unwilling to stop fighting without conditions like handing over more land than he has already illegally conquered,' said Josh Rudolph, managing director and senior fellow of strategic democracy initiatives at the German Marshall Fund. 'The question is now which side America is on.' Trump is a vital player despite mistrust of his motives Despite criticism of the Alaska summit and Trump's empathy toward Putin, the US president remains the potential catalyst to any peace deal. While there's little sign the Russian leader wants peace, US pressure, properly applied, might be the one thing that could stop him fighting. And while Europe will play a major role in Ukraine's security after any deal, it lacks influence with Putin and can't fulfill a promised peace enforcement mission without Trump's support. In this context, speculation in the Washington bubble over whether Trump is trying to rush the Ukraine war to a conclusion to secure a Nobel Peace Prize is pointless. If he could somehow end the conflict fairly, who cares about his motives? Bad Oval Office memories If Europe is secured, Trump might even fulfill his craving for the prize that his first presidential predecessor, Barack Obama, won. However, US support for Israel as it comes closer to fully occupying Gaza amid starvation conditions might still disqualify him from the Nobel Committee's consideration. Zelensky's arrival will stir memories of his disastrous last Oval Office visit in February. Shocking live footage of Trump and Vice President JD Vance berating the Ukrainian leader means his escort this time from the leaders of France, Germany, Britain, Italy, Finland, NATO and the European Commission is seen as a protection squad. But Europe has far more at stake than Zelensky's reputation. The possibility that Russia could triumph in Ukraine and win vindication for its illegal invasion is the biggest geopolitical threat to Europe since the fall of the Soviet Union. 'This is existential also for European security. So, minimizing the role of Europe here, be it the United Kingdom, be it Poland, be it Finland, be it France, be it Germany, is not the way to go,' Fiona Hill, who served as a Russia expert in Trump's first term, said Sunday on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'Europe has to have an equal say in all of this,' Hill said. 'This is about Europe's future and the future of European security, not just about Ukraine's.' But it will be hard to create momentum for genuine peacemaking even as the administration pushes for a three-way summit among Trump, Putin and Zelensky, possibly as soon as the end of this week. 'The challenge is to try to achieve alignment between what look like very disparate things — what Trump wants, what the Europeans want, what Putin wants,' said Nicholas Dungan, a senior member of the European Leadership Network. 'The Europeans want a sovereign Ukraine. Trump wants a peace deal. These are not the same thing,' said Dungan, who is also CEO of CogitoPraxis, a strategic advisory firm. What Putin wants may be impossible for Ukraine and its European allies to accept. The Russian leader dictated terms alongside Trump in Alaska, demanding attention to the 'root causes' of the war. This is his shorthand for various factors including the ousting of Zelensky, huge cuts to Ukrainian armed forces that would compromise Kyiv's capacity to repel any future invasion, and a redeployment of NATO forces from Moscow's former Soviet-era orbit in Eastern Europe. The disconnect helps explain why Marco Rubio, the secretary of state and Trump's national security adviser, is more downbeat than the US president or Witkoff. 'We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remains some big areas of disagreement,' Rubio said on ABC. 'We're still a long ways off. I mean, we're not at the precipice of a peace agreement; we're not at the edge of one.' Trump's mood will be critical European leaders traveling to the White House include French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and European Council President Ursula von der Leyen. Trump has good personal relationships with several of them, especially Meloni; Stubb, a golf partner; and Starmer. Rutte is seen as something of a Trump whisperer. But the president's mood will be crucial, especially after critical media coverage of his lavish welcome for Putin. Europe's influence is also in question. Trump had adopted the European position that a ceasefire was a vital first step in peacemaking and said he'd be disappointed if he didn't secure one in Alaska. But after meeting with Putin, he backed Russia's stance that a push for a full peace deal is best. This was a win for Russia, since a full settlement could take months to negotiate and give more time for its forces to seize more land while continuing attacks against civilians. Europe is far more skeptical than the White House about the sincerity of any undertakings Putin offered to Trump on Friday. Macron wrote on X on Saturday that it will be 'essential to draw all the lessons from the past 30 years, in particular from Russia's well-established tendency not to honor its own commitments.' But Witkoff said Trump's acceptance of Putin's ceasefire sequencing was a good sign. 'We made so much progress at this meeting with regard to all the other ingredients necessary for a peace deal that we, that President Trump, pivoted to that place,' Witkoff told CNN's Tapper. The Russian president tried to split the allies while in Alaska. 'We expect that Kyiv and European capitals will perceive (the talks) constructively and that they won't throw a wrench in the works; they will not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress,' Putin said. Witkoff pushed back at criticism of Trump by insisting that Putin had accepted a security guarantee among Ukraine, European powers and the US similar to NATO's Article 5 clause that an attack on one is an attack on all. This undertaking would not, however, be linked to NATO in any way. He also told CNN that Putin had offered 'concessions on several of the regions,' but refused to say what they were. And there has been no confirmation from the Kremlin. But in return for an Anchorage welcome that purged his international pariah status, Putin offered political gifts to Trump. These included an echo of the president's false claims that mail-in voting is undemocratic and backing for Trump's claim the Russians would not have invaded Ukraine had he been in office. US bullishness about an Article 5-style guarantee is also a little strange, since Putin would demand extraordinary steps in return. And there are already concerns that Trump wouldn't honor NATO's mutual defense clause if Russia attacked one of the alliance members close to its borders, perhaps in the Baltic states. The idea he'd would risk war with Russia to save Ukraine seems absurd. This might also put Trump at odds with his political base, which shares his doubts about America's protection of European allies and his desire to avoid more foreign wars. Conservative media has been running interference for Trump all weekend, with several key MAGA-friendly sites already portraying Zelensky as an obstacle to peace and the impediment to yet another Trump 'win.' But the imagery of Trump as a peacemaker is a powerful one among his most loyal supporters.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Putin Takes Victory Lap Following Trump's Ceasefire Summit Flop
Russian state media and Kremlin officials are gloating about the warm reception Vladimir Putin received after landing on U.S. soil for the first time in a decade to meet with President Donald Trump on Friday. Trump's red-carpet rollout, excited clapping, friendly handshakes, and joint ride in 'The Beast' limousine are being cited as proof by Putin allies that the Russian president is no longer the pariah the West has been painting him to be since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 'Western media are in a state of derangement verging on complete insanity: For three years they told about Russia's isolation, and today they saw a red carpet rolled out for the Russian President in the U.S.,' Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova wrote on Telegram in response to Putin's Alaska summit with Trump. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Putin who now serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, suggested that the meeting was a tacit acceptance of one of Putin's key demands: the continuation of Russian attacks on Ukraine while diplomatic talks occur. Trump has long maintained that a ceasefire is a precondition for diplomacy, yet he has reportedly backed away from that demand following Friday's summit. 'Important: the meeting proved that negotiations are possible without preconditions and simultaneously with the continuation of the Special Military Operation,' Medvedev wrote on Telegram. According to Medvedev, both Putin and Trump now appear to agree that Ukraine and Europe, not Russia, bear responsibility for ending the war—another key Russian diktat. 'The main point: Both sides directly placed responsibility for achieving future results in negotiations on ending hostilities on Kyiv and Europe,' Medvedev wrote. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity following the meeting on Friday, Trump did shift responsibility for peace to Ukraine, saying that 'now it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done.' 'I would also say the European nations… have to get involved a little bit. But it's up to President Zelensky,' Trump continued. While the meeting was originally expected to last approximately seven hours, it was cut to just under three, with no official explanation given by the White House. A planned three-course lunch was also nixed at the last minute. Upon his return to Russia, Putin briefed his executive officials on the outcome of the talks, which he described as 'timely and quite useful.' 'We discussed our interactions in virtually all their aspects with a focus, of course, on achieving a fair resolution of the Ukraine crisis,' Putin said in a statement released by the Kremlin. 'We certainly had an opportunity to discuss the origins and causes of this crisis, which we did. It is the removal of these root causes that must underlie the settlement. 'We did not have direct talks at this level for a long time,' Putin continued. 'Let me reiterate: We had a chance to convey our position in a calm and detailed manner. We definitely respect the U.S. administration's position, which wants the hostilities to stop as soon as possible. So do we, and we would like to move forward with settling all issues by peaceful means.' The Daily Beast reached out to the White House for comment on Putin's statements about the summit. Putin's mention of 'root causes' is typically viewed as shorthand for the Russian leader's hardline demands, which have repeatedly been rejected: that Ukraine be disarmed, hand over a large chunk of its land to Russia, and abandon the idea of joining NATO. In his Hannity interview, Trump appeared to back down on his previously made threat of severe economic consequences if no peace deal was agreed to on Friday. 'Because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that,' Trump said. 'Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something. But we don't have to think about that today.' Yuri Podolyaka, an extremely influential Ukrainian-born, pro-Russian military blogger, told his 3 million followers on Telegram that the meeting was a 'master class in how to wrest a total victory from a difficult starting position.' 'We will now watch the results that should follow. They will come, but not the ones expected in Kyiv, London, or Brussels. They certainly won't like the outcome,' Podolyaka wrote. Podolyaka further celebrated the notion that sanctions appear to be completely off the table as Russian influence over the outcome of the war grows. Ivor Bennett, Sky News' Moscow correspondent, echoed Podolyaka's sentiment by reporting that the reaction in Russia to Putin's meeting with Trump is 'nothing short of triumphant.' CNN senior international correspondent Frederik Pleitgen further noted that 'the Russians are pretty happy with the way that the Trump-Putin summit went down.' In the U.S., Trump administration officials have largely echoed the president's sentiment that the meeting was 'very productive' and 'great progress.' That said, it has been alleged that behind the scenes, the reaction from Trump's inner circle has not been as enthusiastic. The president's former National Security Adviser John Bolton told CNN that Putin 'clearly won' after leaving the meeting with everything he hoped to achieve. Trump, for his part, released a groveling video praising the Russian leader in the wake of their talks, thanking him multiple times for his attendance. 'There were many, many points that we agreed on, most of them, I would say,' Trump noted in the video. Trump is scheduled to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday. If those talks go well, he hopes to schedule a three-way meeting with Zelensky and Putin by next Friday.