logo
DeSantis signs execution order for man convicted of 1992 triple murder

DeSantis signs execution order for man convicted of 1992 triple murder

CBS News6 days ago
Continuing to quickly order executions, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday signed a death warrant for a man convicted of killing three people in 1992 in Orange County.
Curtis Windom, 59, is scheduled to be executed Aug. 28 at Florida State Prison, according to the death warrant posted on the Florida Supreme Court website.
Windom could be the 11th inmate executed this year in the state — a record-breaking pace.
The state is scheduled Thursday to execute Edward Zakrzewski for the 1994 murders of his wife and two children in Okaloosa County, and DeSantis has signed a death warrant to execute Kayle Barrington Bates on Aug. 19 for the 1982 murder of a woman in Bay County.
Zakrzewski's attorneys have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court to try to halt his execution. But if he is put to death by lethal injection, the state would break a modern-era record of eight executions in a year. That record was set in 1984 and 2014 and represents the period after the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 after a U.S. Supreme Court decision halted executions four years earlier.
As with the earlier executions, the Windom death warrant and supporting documents were posted Tuesday on the Florida Supreme Court website without additional explanation from DeSantis.
But one of the documents, a letter from Attorney General James Uthmeier to DeSantis, outlined the Windom shootings on Feb. 7, 1992.
The document said Windom claimed that victim Johnnie Lee owed him $2,000. After finding out that Lee had won $114 at a greyhound track, Windom bought a .38-caliber revolver and ammunition.
"Minutes later, Windom drove his car next to where Lee was standing and shot Lee twice in the back," the document said. "He then got out of the car and shot Lee two more times at close range as Lee lay on the ground."
It said Windom then ran toward the apartment of what the document described as his "on-again-off-again girlfriend," Valerie Davis, and fatally shot her. After Davis' mother, Mary Lubin, learned that her daughter had been shot, she left work and was driving down the street.
"When she stopped at a stop sign, Windom approached her car, said something to her, and then shot her twice, killing her," the Uthmeier document said. Another man, Kenneth Williams, was wounded in the shooting spree but survived.
The state this year has executed Michael Bell on July 15; Thomas Gudinas on June 24; Anthony Wainwright on June 10; Glen Rogers on May 15; Jeffrey Hutchinson on May 1; Michael Tanzi on April 8; Edward James on March 20; and James Ford on Feb. 13.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom threatens ‘fire with fire' if Republicans push ahead with redistricting plans in Texas
Newsom threatens ‘fire with fire' if Republicans push ahead with redistricting plans in Texas

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newsom threatens ‘fire with fire' if Republicans push ahead with redistricting plans in Texas

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to 'fight fire with fire' in response to moves in Texas to redraw the electoral map to favor Republicans. Newsom was speaking as Greg Abbott, his Lone Star State counterpart, ordered the arrest of the 51 state Democratic lawmakers who have left Texas to prevent its House of Representatives voting through the redistricting proposals advantageous to the GOP by denying it a quorum. Speaking of the possibility of the Sunshine State engaging in its own retaliatory redistricting push to weaken Republican-leaning districts, Newsom said: 'The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established. 'Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire.' He acknowledged, however, that going ahead with such a step would have to be done within the law, commenting: 'That process has to have the concurrence, the support of two-thirds of the legislature. 'The maps, we believe, should be transparent. They should be provided in a transparent way to the public, and as a consequence, those maps are being processed and will be brought to light.' He also said that California citizens should be given a chance to have their say: 'We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward. 'I'll reinforce that we believe it should be a national model, independent national redistricting, and it would revert back to its original form, but it's done in response to the existential realities that we're now facing. 'Things have changed, facts have changed, so we must change.' Newsom continued: 'They've triggered this response and we're not going to roll over and we're going to fight fire with fire, but we're going to do so not just punching with the weight of the fourth largest economy, the most populous state in our union, the size of 21 state populations combined. 'We also will punch above our weight in terms of the impact of what we're doing, and I think that should be absorbed by those in the Texas delegation. Whatever they are doing will be neutered here in the state of California, and they will pay that price.' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul have likewise indicated they could be prepared to act in kind if Texas proceeds with its gerrymandering manoeuvre. The desperate measures taken by the Texas Democrats to block the redistricting – which saw them jet out for New York, New Jersey and Illinois on Sunday to stop a vote going ahead – came after the Texas House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting advanced the GOP's proposals on Saturday. Republicans hold a majority in the Texas House of Representatives, as they do in its Senate, meaning the bid to revise the state's 38 congressional districts would likely pass both chambers and be signed off by Gov. Abbott. Doing so would create five extra right-leaning seats in the U.S. House of Representatives in Washington, D.C., potentially expanding the congressional GOP's majority and easing the passage of President Donald Trump's future legislative agenda. Faced with that likelihood, the Democrats left town, preventing the 150-seat House being able to hold the vote, which requires at least two-thirds of representatives to be present before it can grind into action. Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu led the exodus and has the support of the Democratic National Committee but he and his colleagues look set to be fined $500 for every day they are absent from the legislature and now face arrest under Abbott's orders after failing to return to Austin in time for a 3pm deadline set by Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Trump's 'good economic news' is awfully murky
Trump's 'good economic news' is awfully murky

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's 'good economic news' is awfully murky

Bonanza what? Re "Trump delivers bonanza of good economic news for U.S.," Aug. 1: I'm not sure what 'bonanza of good economic news' the president is said to have delivered, as Nicole Russell claims in her opinion piece. But here is a quote from a Wall Street Journal article by Paul Kiernan, published the same day: '… official data this week showed a marked slowdown in economic output and consumer spending, followed by a jarringly weak jobs report. Where things go from here is murky.' Russell, please note: that's Paul Kiernan, not Paul Krugman. Yet Kiernan's reporting and the data seem to support Krugman's concerns about the state of the economy. Nicole Russell: "Trump delivers bonanza of good economic news for U.S. If this is bonanza, one shudders to think what the bad news feels like. Manoj Choudhary, Reynoldsburg Honoring a man who always prioritized people I am writing to express profound appreciation for the well-deserved recognition of the late former Ohio Director of Agriculture Steve Mauer on Aug. 1, inducted posthumously into the Ohio Agricultural Hall of Fame. As a longtime admirer of Steve's contributions to our community and the broader agricultural landscape, I was deeply moved by the tribute paid to him at the Ohio Ag Council Hall of Fame Breakfast. Steve, also twice appointed Ohio State executive director for the United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency by Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, embodied the spirit of Ohio agriculture — a visionary leader whose dedication to all things Ohio , advocacy for rural communities and mentorship of future generations left a lasting mark. He championed diversifying Ohio crop production, helped establish Ohio's organic certification program and opened up new international markets for Ohio agricultural products. Above it all, he genuinely cared about and always prioritized people. He not only advanced our industry but also inspired countless individuals, myself included. The hall of fame's decision to honor Steve celebrates more than his legacy; it reaffirms the values of perseverance, integrity and stewardship that define Ohio's agricultural heritage. Seeing his wife Amy and their family accept this accolade was a poignant reminder of the lives he touched and the enduring impact of his work. Thank you to the Ohio Agricultural Hall of Fame for ensuring that Steve Mauer's contributions will never be forgotten. This recognition not only honors his memory but also inspires all of us to carry forward his passion for progress and community. Tim Sword, Agricultural Export Administrator, Ohio Department of Agriculture LifeWise and Tressel Re letter to the editor "Full background checks shouldn't be optional," Aug. 1: Coincidence that the letter to the editor from Dave Schwendenman about LifeWise Academy's failure to put basic safeguards in place for the children they remove from class during school hours was immediately followed by the "Tressel for Ohio governor" letter from Keith Luck? It should be lost on no one that Tressel's name will be on the LifeWise training room when their new national headquarters opens in Hilliard this year. Sue Miller, Columbus This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Good news for the economy? Data begs to differ | Letters Solve the daily Crossword

Could the city of Erie explore other forms of government besides a home rule charter?
Could the city of Erie explore other forms of government besides a home rule charter?

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Could the city of Erie explore other forms of government besides a home rule charter?

The city of Erie is still poised to let voters weigh in on whether the city should study a new form of government. However, Erie City Council is considering expanding the scope of that study and pushing any ballot referendum into 2026. City Council, at its Aug. 6 meeting, is expected to consider a first-reading ordinance related to what's known as a home rule form of government. Council gave final approval to a different home rule charter ordinance on April 16. But if this new ordinance receives majority approval from City Council, that April ordinance would be repealed. More: Erie City Council approves home rule charter ordinance. What's next? Here are more details about the new legislation City Council is considering. What would this latest ordinance do? The ordinance City Council approved in April did not put home rule in place. Instead, it authorized the creation of a ballot question that would ask city voters if they want to launch a nine-member commission to study the possibility of moving to a home rule charter. This new ordinance would also do that. However, 'the City desires to expand the scope of this governmental study to analyze both a home rule charter and all other optional forms of government that may benefit the City of Erie,' the new ordinance states. That means a study commission could consider forms of government other than home rule — which is a process that would essentially empower city government to create its own constitution with greater flexibility and independence regarding issues such as city operations, taxation and executive/legislative structure. Erie currently adheres to the state's Third Class City Code, with an optional charter, in terms of how its government operates. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development, the basic authority to act in municipal affairs under home rule 'is transferred from state law, as set forth by the General Assembly, to a local charter, adopted and amended by the voters." Home rule municipalities also have significant latitude to craft their own governmental rules in various areas, according to DCED, except where specifically limited by state law. Government study in Millcreek, too: Millcreek Government Study Commission findings and recommendations to be shared soon City Councilman Chuck Nelson is among those who have advocated hardest for a home rule study, saying the move would give citizens more say on how the city is governed and give city officials more ability to craft laws and make decisions based on needs specific to Erie. Council members Tyler Titus, Ed Brzezinski, Jasmine Flores, Maurice Troop and Kathy Schaaf voted for the ordinance on April 16. Nelson and Council President Mel Witherspoon were absent. Voters in Lancaster recently approved a home rule study. Two other third-class cities in Pennsylvania, Reading and Allentown, adopted home rule decades ago. If city voters approve a government study, the commission would compile a public report on what a new form of government might look like in Erie and make a recommendation on whether or not to move forward. Then Erie voters would either approve or reject any proposed new form of government through a second ballot question. The entire process could take years. When might a referendum take place? The ordinance approved by City Council in April could have placed the study commission ballot question on the ballot as soon as the Nov. 4 municipal election. But the ordinance that will be considered by City Council on Aug. 6 specifies that 'the City desires to create a referendum question asking voters at the May 19, 2026 Primary Election if they want to form a commission of citizens to study all possible forms of government that may help the City of Erie.' Citizens interested in serving on the home rule commission would have to be elected to those posts in relation to the ballot question. Those candidates will be required to collect 200 non-partisan signatures on nominating petitions, similar to what other candidates for elected office are required to do. If city voters approve a home rule study, the commission would compile a public report on what a new form of government might look like in Erie and make a recommendation on whether or not to move forward. Then Erie voters would either approve or reject any proposed new form of government through a second ballot question. The entire process could take years. The new study commission ordinance would need to pass two readings of City Council to take effect. That means if council gives preliminary approval to the ordinance on Aug. 6, council could take a final vote as soon as its next regular meeting, scheduled for Aug. 20. City Council's Aug. 6 meeting begins at 9 a.m. in the Bagnoni Council Chambers at City Hall, 626 State St. The meeting can be viewed on Facebook and YouTube. Contact Kevin Flowers at kflowers@ Follow him on X at@ETNflowers This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Why Erie City Council could expand scope of home rule study Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store