logo
‘Empathy is a kind of strength': Jacinda Ardern on kind leadership, public rage and life in Trump's America

‘Empathy is a kind of strength': Jacinda Ardern on kind leadership, public rage and life in Trump's America

The Guardian2 days ago

In 2022, a few months before she quit as prime minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern was standing at the sink in the toilets in Auckland airport, washing her hands, when a woman came up to her and leaned in. She was so close that Ardern could feel the heat from her skin. 'I just wanted to say thank you,' the woman said. 'Thanks for ruining the country.' She turned and left, leaving Ardern 'standing there as if I were a high-schooler who'd just been razed'.
The incident was deeply shocking. Ardern had been re-elected in a historic landslide two years before. She enjoyed conversation and debate; she liked being the kind of leader who wasn't sealed off from the rest of the population. But this, says Ardern, 'felt like something new. It was the tenor of the woman's voice, the way she'd stood so close, the way her seething, nonspecific rage felt not only unpredictable but incongruous to the situation … What was happening?'
The incident came at a pivotal moment: Ardern sensed that the tide was turning against her and she was grappling with whether to go. 'Something had been loosened worldwide,' she says, with rage everywhere, public servants being followed and attacked, as if they were 'somehow distinct from being human'. We all recognise this rage, but Ardern was at the centre of it, representing progressive politics, tough Covid measures, empathy, emotion, anti-racism, femaleness; a symbol of a different time, more rational, kinder, when rules still meant something. When there were many female leaders – Angela Merkel, Theresa May, Sanna Marin, Mia Mottley, Mette Frederiksen, Tsai Ing-wen.
For all these reasons, Ardern is now missed by progressives, at home and abroad. At her height she had blazed a global trail, modelling a different way of doing politics – wearing a headscarf and embracing weeping bereaved families after the Christchurch mosque massacre, then reforming gun laws in 10 days; taking decisive action on Covid that meant New Zealanders were able to party again while the rest of the world could barely go out; leaving celebrities from Elton John to Stephen Colbert starry-eyed with her poise and wit and humanity. It was Jacinda-mania, and everybody wanted a prime minister like her: young (elected at just 37) and a woman, she offered a different vision of national identity for New Zealand – straightforward, compassionate, diverse, globally desirable – and a different way to lead a country – youthful, human, decent. She had a hunky feminist boyfriend and was pregnant when she became PM; and she was going 'to bring kindness back'.
And then, out of the blue, after six years in office, in January 2023, she dramatically announced her resignation. How could she have done this to us, her fans wailed, at a time when the world is falling apart before our eyes?
We meet to discuss her memoir, A Different Kind of Power, for the first major interview she has given since she resigned. Ardern chooses the cafe, a cavernous bare-boards-and-metal type of place, in a small mall in Cambridge, Massachusetts – she is leading a course in empathetic leadership at Harvard. I arrive very early, to get my equipment ready, but Ardern is already there, drinking a huge black tea and primed with her own recording device. 'Girly swot,' I joke, using a line she has used about herself. 'Ah well,' she laughs, 'why hide who you are?'
She has a lovely open face and that famous toothy smile, both emphasised by red lipstick, ballerina-style scraped-back hair and big gold hoops. She is wearing a padded khaki jacket and black clumpy boots.
Ardern and Trump always felt like yin and yang; both took power in 2017, and gave their first speeches at the UN eight days apart, but they take directly opposite political and cultural positions on just about everything. So how does it feel to be the anti-Trump living in Trump's America?
'I consider myself an observer, observing someone else's politics,' she says. She's enjoying the anonymity of being in the US (quite a contrast to New Zealand). 'But increasingly what happens in one place affects other places. And it's not just political culture, it's also our economies, our security arrangements.'
She chooses her words carefully: once a politician, always a politician. 'Political leaders in those moments of deep economic insecurity have two options. One is to acknowledge the environment that they're in. We're in a globalised world. We're in an interconnected world. And we're in a world of technological disruption. We need a policy prescription that acknowledges all of that. And those are often hard solutions. Hard, difficult to communicate, difficult to implement. But that's what you've got to do. Or …'
She pauses. 'You choose blame. Blame the other, blame the migrant, blame other countries, blame multilateral institutions, blame. But it does not fundamentally solve it. In fact, all that happens at the end is you have an othered group, and people who feel dissatisfied and angry and more entrenched.'
Would she call Trump's America fascism yet?
There is a very long pause – when I listen back to the tape I time it to 11 seconds. 'I'm just trying to think about where that takes us,' says Ardern, eventually. 'I think probably in my mind, certainly what we're seeing isn't anything I've ever experienced in my lifetime.'
She is gently funny about Trump the man, without ever going too far, saying he is 'taller than I expected, his tan more pronounced'. Vladimir Putin is 'quiet, often alone and almost expressionless'. She talks about former Australian prime minister Scott Morrison's 'self-satisfied indifference' and simply rolls her eyes when I mention Boris Johnson. The only really mean comment I can find in the book is about the very rightwing New Zealand politician David Seymour, and it's laugh-out-loud funny: she was overheard on camera calling him 'an arrogant prick', and is relieved when her aide tells her about it. She thought she'd called him a 'fucking prick'.
Dame Jacinda Kate Laurell Ardern was born in 1980 in the North Island of New Zealand, and she describes herself as 'a very ordinary person who found themselves in a set of extraordinary circumstances'. Ardern and her sister were the first in her family to go to university, and lived at home while studying, to save on costs. Her dad was a police officer; her mother a school dinner lady. She was brought up a Mormon – long skirts, no caffeine and 'door-knocking on behalf of God'. A tomboy with a 'relentless sense of responsibility', Ardern famously worked in a fish and chip shop called the Golden Kiwi – already an over-preparer, she got ready for her first shift by endlessly wrapping a cabbage in newspaper.
Throughout her memoir, Ardern reminds us that she was always extremely sensitive and emotional, as well as a 'chronic overthinker'. The book is dedicated to 'the criers, worriers and huggers'; her thesis is that these people can make great leaders, too. Her father said she was 'far too thin-skinned' to be an MP. 'Sensitivity was my weakness, my tragic flaw, the thing that might just stop me sticking with the work that I loved,' she writes.
Still, in retrospect, some kind of political career looked inevitable. She witnessed unfairness as a child and couldn't bear it, particularly when it concerned her town's Māori community. She was a champion debater at school, studied politics and communications at university, was a researcher for leaders of the NZ Labour party, and even worked in London as a policy adviser at a unit called the Better Regulation Executive ('a job title that would end conversation with most polite company'). She became an MP at 28.
She always had progressive politics but believes being surrounded by people with different points of view helped her. 'I have a very diverse family, lots of diverse views, and we haven't lost any relationships, we've always talked,' she says. There's a bit in the book when a woman in her home town says: 'Jacinda, I wanted to tell you that there are a lot of people in Morrinsville who are praying for you … They're not voting for you, but they are praying for you.' Even her loving grandma admitted that she probably wouldn't vote for her.
By the time she entered politics, she had stopped being a Mormon; she says the gulf between her religion and her values (especially around LGBTQ+ rights) became too wide. But she won't speak badly of the church, and believes it taught her a lot about 'service and charity'. And, of course, having a door slammed in your face is excellent preparation for politics.
Perhaps it was this upbringing that drove Ardern's self-effacement – I tell her this is the most modest political memoir I've read, and her response is: 'Have you read any other New Zealand political memoirs? Because I would not say that's a trait particular to me.' I say I think she is pretty cool for a politician (interesting ear piercings, likes drum'n'bass, has been seen in Portishead T-shirts). 'I would not describe myself as cool,' she says, shaking her head.
For about a decade, Ardern worked diligently as an MP, learning the ropes in politics. In the book she tells an anecdote about the time she asked a fellow MP, known as a bruiser, how to toughen up. He begs her not to. 'You feel things because you have empathy, because you care,' he told her. 'The moment you change is the moment you'll stop being good at your job.'
In 2017, she was elected deputy Labour leader. A general election was called and the party was tanking; the poll numbers were so bad that the party leader resigned, and Ardern was unexpectedly tasked with running for prime minister, even though all the billboard posters still had her as the deputy. Leadership was thrust on her. She had 72 hours to formulate a new campaign plan – at the time, she reckoned ''winning wasn't possible, not when we were seven weeks out from the election and polling at 23%'. But she thought she could at least 'save the furniture'. In the end there was no clear majority and, after weeks of coalition negotiations, the centre right New Zealand First party chose to go with Labour. She was to become the country's third female leader.
There was just one thing: in the middle of all this, and days before she became PM, she had found out she was pregnant.
Ardern and her partner, Clarke Gayford, had been struggling to conceive and had consulted a fertility specialist; next thing she knew, she was 'pregnant, unwed and new to the job'. Gayford presents a popular travel and fishing TV show called Fish of the Day, which has been running for more than a decade, and they met in 2012 at an awards ceremony. A year later he emailed to ask if he could help with her campaign (that old trick). Ardern says Gayford didn't even own a suit when they met, although he 'relished' being part of the group of international leaders' spouses. He famously held their three-month-old daughter, Neve, in between feeds when Ardern made her debut speech at the UN. When she decided to quit politics, Clarke tried to get her to stay, suggesting she delegate more. 'I just don't want them to feel like they've won,' he said. (Gayford makes me think of Margaret Atwood's husband; he was such a supportive spouse that people used to go round in T-shirts saying 'Every woman writer should be married to Graeme Gibson'. Every woman politician should be married to Clarke Gayford.) As Ardern puts it with a smile: 'Model of a modern man. Yeah, feminist hero, exactly.'
Ardern was only the second female leader to give birth in office, after Pakistan's Benazir Bhutto. The birth was difficult – she couldn't stand upright properly for weeks afterwards. She constantly felt she should be somewhere else. 'It felt like living with chronic discomfort – half guilt, half disappointment – all the time.' She was doing an important job. Even as PM, there's still guilt about whatever you're not doing? 'If any role was going to give you a bit of a pass on guilt, it might have been leading a country,' she laughs. But she still felt bad. 'So I just think that it's part of the package. And you can't get rid of it. You can instead just try and make the best decision you can in that moment and try and suppress the guilt. That's all you can do.'
Why did she leave? 'I never wanted to use the line, 'I'm leaving to spend time with my family',' she says. 'I was very careful not to express anything like that, because I never wanted to convey that you couldn't have a family or that being in politics meant that you were making a decision to place them on a lower bar, or vice versa.'
Many assume it was because of burnout – on the day Ardern quit, she said she didn't have 'enough gas in the tank' to carry on. But burnout is not to blame, she says today. 'Burnout is very different from making a judgment in yourself as to whether or not you're operating at the level you need to be.' Things were starting to get to her more than usual; and, 'of course I was tired, but wasn't everyone in their 40s?'.
No wonder she was tired: Ardern's time in power may have been short, but it was particularly tumultuous, punctuated by earthquakes, a terror attack and, of course, a global pandemic. Neve was born in June 2018. Nine months later, a far-right Australian man killed 51 worshippers at a mosque in Christchurch, livestreaming the attack on Facebook. Ardern's response was instinctive and moving, most notably in the simple statement about the Muslim victims: 'They are us.' In a speech that reverberated around the world, she said: 'Many of those who will have been directly affected by this shooting may be migrants to New Zealand, they may even be refugees here. They have chosen to make New Zealand their home, and it is their home.' She held the families of the dead and cried with them.
In the book, she describes how Trump called her after the massacre, and it's subtly revealing about both of them. 'We discussed what might happen to the terrorist,' she writes. 'I used that word, 'terrorist', specifically and President Trump asked if we were calling the gunman that.' She said to him: 'Yes, this was a white man from Australia who deliberately targeted our Muslim community. We are calling him that.'
Trump did not respond, but asked if there was anything America could do. 'You can show sympathy and love for all Muslim communities,' she told him. It was the reverse of the politics of division: she says that the terrorist 'chose us because he knew that New Zealand openly welcomed people of all faiths. He wanted to destroy that.'
What was behind her response, and why does she think so many found it so affecting? She says: 'You're actually leading a collective. They [the public] were deciding how they were responding and I just happened to be in the front of that with them. That's how it felt to me.' So she believes she was channelling New Zealanders in those moments? 'I think it was a reflection of how New Zealanders felt. These things are part of our identity. Perhaps it's our size, but you can almost feel it. You can feel a response that literally feels like a whole country.'
When she says she can feel it, what's it like? 'It sounds unusual, but I've always felt like I had a general sense of where New Zealand is at on something. I relied on it a lot while I was in office. You feel an energy.' It sounds almost physical. 'It's a mood thing. A vibe. Sounds a bit woo-woo. I guess politicians use polls a lot to try and understand that. I wouldn't let staff give me polls.'
She moved quickly after the attack, announcing the banning of military-style weapons within days; two months later she co-chaired a summit with Emmanuel Macron for world leaders and tech CEOs to commit to 'eliminating terrorist and violent extremist content online'. There are now more than 130 governments and tech firms signed up to the 'Christchurch Call to Action'.
Christchurch was a massive test. As 2020 came around, she was hoping for a bit of calm. It was not to be.
Ardern's response to the pandemic stood out worldwide. She was careful, rational, guided by data modelling, scientific experts and public health advisers – the opposite, you could say, of the approach taken by Johnson and Trump. This was a tiny, remote island nation with few intensive-care beds. She closed the border on 19 March 2020 to all non-citizens; there was strict lockdown and contact tracing; and, for a long time, she was personally informed of every single Covid death in the country. And, for a long time, there were very few. While people across the world were banned from seeing their loved ones, many New Zealanders were living a life close to normal. At the end of 2020, while English schools were still closed and hundreds of thousands had died in the US alone, Ardern and Gayford were at a festival watching a band called Shapeshifter (for which, as it happens, they had discussed a shared affinity on their first date).
But then came the Delta variant, which was much more infectious. Ardern believed that even with strict rules around mask wearing and proof of vaccination, it would be impossible to contain an outbreak. As the lockdown went into its seventh week, she began to see that 'New Zealand's sense of togetherness was starting to fracture'.
Worse was to come. In February 2022, 3,000 anti-vaccine protesters pitched tents and occupied the grounds of Parliament House in Wellington. As she writes of the encampment: 'I saw my own image, with a Hitler moustache, monocle and 'Dictator of the Year' emblazoned above my face. I saw the gallows, complete with a noose, which people said had been erected for me. I saw the American flags, the Trump flags, the swastikas.' She could hear the protesters shouting, 'You stand on the bones of death' through the government doors. And, 'We're coming for you next.'
Did these people hound her out? 'Absolutely not,' she says. 'I left a year after some of those most difficult patches.' But it must have been horrific. She writes that she had always tried to be 'human first, and a leader second. I understood that, to the crowd occupying parliament, I was neither.'
Does she now think she went too hard with restrictions and vaccination mandates? She says that New Zealand 'came out of Covid with one of the highest vaccination rates in the world and fewer days in lockdown than nations like the UK, and during this time our country's life expectancy actually increased'.
She gets little credit for this. I guess it's hard to get credit for things that didn't happen; you can't really prove a negative, prove how many people didn't die. Oh you can, she says, firmly. 'Twenty thousand. Four times my old town. It's a lot of people.' There's a long pause. 'How do you feel remorse about that?'
It sounds as if she feels she has been unfairly attacked over her approach to Covid. At this suggestion, Ardern goes very still and quiet, and I suddenly realise she has tears in her eyes. 'I find Covid really hard,' she says, swallowing her words. 'I had a conversation up north, after I'd left office. I was wandering around some markets and I could feel this young woman looking at me, so when she caught my eye I said hello, and we struck up a conversation, and it turned out that she was a teacher who'd had an adverse reaction to the vaccine. And because she didn't get the second dose, she had stopped working in teaching.'
The New Zealand vaccine mandate meant that people in some professions were required to have it.
'We talked about the fact that we, of course, had an exemption regime, but for some reason it hadn't worked out for her. It was the kind of conversation that I just wish I could have with everyone: when everything isn't distilled down into black and white. But the world leaves so little space for that now. And I feel very sad about that.'
She's fighting back tears again. Her tone is so sad. Why does she think it's still so hard? 'People only see the decisions you made, not the choices you had. The first part of Covid, people saw all the choices and decisions. And the second half, it just got hard. It got hard. Vaccines bring an extra layer that's really difficult.'
I apologise for taking her back to a dark time. 'One of the things that still stands out in my mind – I can't remember if it was a meme or a genuine cartoon – but it was an image of Winnie-the-Pooh and Christopher Robin,' she says. 'It was at the tail end of Covid, and Christopher says, 'How will we know if we succeeded?' And Winnie says, 'Because they'll say we did too much.' And it captured this idea that there probably isn't a sweet spot. Maybe there were only two options in the end. Maybe it was: you'll be attacked for doing too little or you'll be attacked for doing too much. And I know what I would choose.'
She faced extreme reactions from fellow New Zealanders. 'There'd be some people who would spontaneously cry because they absolutely believe that you saved their lives,' says Ardern. 'And then there's someone else on the other end of the spectrum who mirrors that level of emotion, who felt that somehow you ended theirs.'
Hardly anyone talks about Covid any more, but it changed our economies, children's relationships with school, adults' relationships with work, citizens' relationship with the state.
Ardern nods. 'It disrupted our own sense of security around what we could fundamentally expect. Covid disrupted the baseline.'
And maybe she was a fall guy for that. 'It's distressing when you're misunderstood, or feel misunderstood,' she says. 'Sometimes I'd read a comment and I'd think, holy heck, if half of that was true, I'd dislike me, too.'
Another former PM of New Zealand, Helen Clark, said Ardern had faced 'a level of hatred and venom that I believe is unprecedented in this country'.
She was trivialised, called vapid, vacant, even 'pretty bloody stupid'. She writes about how women are held to 'some unspoken, impossible standard'; how she is careful not to be seen as 'humourless and too sensitive' in her response to a cartoon portraying her as a boxing-ring girl in a bikini with black stiletto boots.
Does she think women face particular vitriol? 'There's a magnified impact on women in public life,' she agrees. 'And also on those of different ethnic backgrounds and also our LGBTQ+ communities. And I say public life, because I don't think it's just politicians; it's journalists, academics.'
As she left parliament, Ardern said that she hoped her leaving would 'take the heat out of politics'; that it 'might make our politics feel calmer, less polarised'. That didn't work, did it?
'I didn't take the heat out,' she admits; she knows it's obvious. 'What felt more important to me were the things that we'd done, rather than me staying on to do more of them.' When I ask for examples, she says she succeeded in 'removing the politics from climate change' with the Zero Carbon Act, and points to 'child poverty measures, that we've also got consensus on. Both of those have lasted. Abortion law reform has lasted.'
But there's a wistfulness when she talks about these achievements, and many New Zealand progressives were frustrated with the amount of change she managed to implement, especially considering the landslide she won in 2020.
Their disappointment is particularly acute in light of the current government, which is the most rightwing ever elected in New Zealand and is trying to undo years of progress on Māori rights, for example. Ardern refuses to talk about New Zealand politics now, but what's happening must appal her.
The 'politics of empathy' might not be in vogue, but Ardern remains committed to it. Is it a strong enough weapon against authoritarianism? Elon Musk recently said that 'the fundamental weakness of western civilisation is empathy'. She snorts. 'What does that even mean?'
Attacking empathy is all the rage with the right, I point out, especially in the US. There are popular books called Against Empathy and The Sin of Empathy. 'Well, in that environment, saying loudly and proudly that you believe in empathy and that you'll govern in that way is an act of strength.'
But public life today is so horrible, so brutal. Why would anyone go into politics? 'I think the rehumanisation of people in public life is really important,' she says.
After our interview, both Anthony Albanese in Australia and Mark Carney in Canada are elected in defiance of Trump's authoritarian politics; Albanese even mentioned 'kindness' in his victory speech. With these victories looking likely, I had asked her what she thought they would show about Trump's kind of power.
'I think people swinging in the other direction [from America] is almost making the point. I don't think that form of leadership is what people seek.'
So she still believes in politics? 'I love politics,' she laughs, 'but that's because I love people.'
She loves democracy and people more than power, she says. 'In fact, I was probably in power in spite of the power bit. I would have been very happy to be a minister, a wider member of a team.' It's a profound comment in a world of strongmen and autocrats.
Ardern wanted to be a different kind of leader, and for six years she was. She feels an almost mystical connection to her country. Covid made it stronger. Then Covid destroyed it. And she still can't believe it. She plans to move back home soon.
We have talked for a while, well over our allotted time; the teas are cold and she wants to get back to her daughter. She walks me to the appropriate junction and tells me the most scenic route to take, then strides out anonymously in the Massachusetts streets, clumpy boots grounding her. Decent, resolutely human, and only 44, Jacinda Ardern still believes modesty, kindness and compassion will win the day.
A Different Kind of Power by Jacinda Ardern is published globally on 3 June by Crown (US), Penguin Random House NZ and Penguin Random House Australia. To support the Guardian, order a copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sonny Bill Williams apologises for posting video about a new viral collision sport - following a 19-year-old's tragic death
Sonny Bill Williams apologises for posting video about a new viral collision sport - following a 19-year-old's tragic death

Daily Mail​

time17 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Sonny Bill Williams apologises for posting video about a new viral collision sport - following a 19-year-old's tragic death

Former All Blacks player Sonny Bill Williams has apologised after he published a video on Instagram appearing to show support for a new viral collision sport. 'Run it straight' is a game that challenges two participants to run straight into each other and compete in full-contact collisions. Players win by either tackling an opponent to the floor or by successfully breaking through the tackle as a ball carrier. Last week, a 19-year-old man tragically died after participating in a private game of 'run it straight' with friends in Palmerston North, New Zealand. Ryan Satterthwaite is understood to have suffered a 'serious head injury' and later died in hospital. His uncle also told Stuff that Satterthwaite and his friends were inspired to try the sport after seeing it on social media. Run it straight events have become popular in recent years for their big collisions (pictured) but health experts and government officials have issued concerns over the sport's safety Multiple health professionals have also raised concerns over the dangers of the sport while some 'run it straight' events in New Zealand have been cancelled. Last week, Williams, who played both rugby union and league during his career, shared a clip from his playing days with Canterbury in 2004 on social media. In the video, the former footy player was seen colliding with Penrith's Joel Clinton during a match. He captioned the video 'old school what a hit'. He added: 'Playing run it straight before it was called run it straight.' Williams has since taken to social media to apologise for his comments upon learning of Satterthwaite's passing. 'I put a video up last night, and I just want to ask for forgiveness of the young fulla that passed away,' Williams said on his social media account. 'Please excuse me for my insensitivity. I did not know that had happened. 'I want to talk about it for a second right now. 'I've been asked to collab with the Run it Straight people, or a couple of people and I haven't. 'Simply because I wouldn't put my kids in it. 'I have safety concerns and that's just my thoughts on it.' Williams believes the sport will continue to be played and added the changes he'd like to see implemented to ensure the safety of participants. 'I'd like weight classes and rules around head contact, but also age and experience classes as well,' he said. 'It's gonna carry on, because people love it. It's entertainment. But I'd like to see some heavily controlled safety restrictions come in. 'Once again to the family, my love and regards go out to you guys.' Some run it straight events that were due to take place in New Zealand have been cancelled in recent weeks Another former All Blacks star Ardie Savea has also spoken out on the new sport, encouraging people to be safe, but like Williams, believes run it straight events will continue. 'First and foremost, condolences to the young brother that passed away and his family,' the former World Rugby Player of the Year said. 'I obviously don't want anyone getting hurt and losing lives. 'It's really hard to say, but I'd just encourage people to be safe.' Organisers of the RUNIT Championship, one of the sport's most high-profile competitions, have also spoken out following Satterthwaite's passing. 'We do not encourage any copying of the sport as it should only be performed under strict conditions,' a spokesperson from the RUNIT Championship told Code Sports. Both New Zealand Rugby League and New Zealand Rugby have been forced to distance themselves from the trend and events 'RUNIT is planning future events over the coming months and will continue to educate our followers on the risks associated.' A safety spokesperson for the RUNIT Championship, Billy Coffey, has previously told RNZ that the competition has several safety precautions in place, to reduce the risks associated with the sport. Competitors are required to wear gumshields and head gear is also optional. 'We've got an ambulance on site… We've got liability. Everything's covered,' RUNIT safety spokesperson Billy Coffey told RNZ. 'There's waivers, medicals beforehand, medicals after. There's an ambulance on site.' Earlier in May, an event, which was being organised by RunItStraight24 at Auckland's Williams Park Mangere was postponed. It comes as the New Zealand government have raised concerns over the safety risks the sport presents and are seeking advice on the matter. Sport NZ CEO Raelene Castle told The New Zealand Herald: 'Both Sport NZ and High-Performance Sport NZ (HPSNZ) are committed to fostering safe and inclusive activities and events for all New Zealanders. 'We are working to facilitate a cross-agency discussion with those who have an interest in this area on what a Government approach to the operation of combat sport, including the emergence of activities and events like run it straight, in New Zealand could look like.' Sport and Recreation Minister Mark Mitchell said: 'I have made my concerns clear and have asked officials for advice in terms of what powers and actions can be taken by the Government to respond to unregulated activities and events that pose a significant level of risk.' New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has also urged young adults to take heed of the safety advice being issued by medical professionals. 'When it's happening at a 21st birthday party unofficially, that is not something the Government can solve through legislation or through regulation,' Luxon said. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has expressed his concerns over the sport, which has grown in popularity following its explosion on social media 'All I can say to young adults who are participating is you've got some personal responsibility in this. You're hearing the advice from the police, from the medical fraternity, from the Government, from principals saying don't do it. 'To the adults that are involved in more formal organisation of it and are influencing it and leading this out on social media; I think you need to stop and I can't be any clearer. 'The evidence is that it's a dumb thing to do and you should stop.' Dr Rowena Mobbs, a neurologist and the founder and director of the Australian CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopathy) Biobank, told Daily Mail Australia that the sport poses 'higher risk scenarios' compared to other contact sports. 'It is a form of harm and it should be avoided,' she said. 'What we have is data worldwide in terms of concussion and CTE with tackling environments. 'We know that a single traumatic brain injury can be devastating for an individual, leading to lifelong disability or death in some instances. This is likely to involve brain swelling or bleeding.' 'In my opinion, this is a higher risk scenario than contact sports like the football codes,' she said. 'That's because participants are running at full speed towards each other with a much greater force of impact than on the footy field. 'Parents who have children engaging in this form of harm need to be acutely aware that there could be serious consequences, even death.' New Zealand Rugby League have since echoed the warnings before distancing themselves from the sport.

What Britain can learn from New Zealand, a pioneer in ‘post-woke' economics
What Britain can learn from New Zealand, a pioneer in ‘post-woke' economics

Telegraph

time17 hours ago

  • Telegraph

What Britain can learn from New Zealand, a pioneer in ‘post-woke' economics

It has just reversed its ban on oil and gas exploration. It has liberalised its mining laws, sparking a boom in mineral production. And it has even scrapped a planned ban on smoking to help generate tax revenues for tax cuts elsewhere. Ever since Christopher Luxon replaced the liberal-Left hero Jacinda Ardern as prime minister of New Zealand, the country has been setting an example for what a 'post-woke' economy looks like. It has started unwinding many of the key policies championed by the Left – and if it works it will set a powerful template for the UK and many other countries to follow. New Zealand's economic policies have started to shift dramatically since Ardern left office. In its latest budget this month, the government confirmed plans to invest in new offshore gas fields, with subsidies on offer to attract global companies into the sector. It reversed the ban on new developments imposed by Ardern's government, despite the discovery of huge new fields in the country's territorial waters, and maintained in the face of soaring power prices and potential blackouts as the country ran short of electricity. 'The government is not prepared to sit on the sidelines and watch our industrial and manufacturing [base] dwindle because of energy security concerns,' argued Shane Jones, New Zealand's resources minister, in a defence of the change in policy. It does not stop there. New Zealand has announced plans to double mineral exports to NZ$3bn (£1.3bn) over the next decade, adding both gold and coal to the critical minerals list for the national economy and brushing aside many of the environmental concerns that have restricted development of natural resources over the past decade. Likewise, Luxon's centre-Right government has scrapped the generational smoking ban, a policy copied by Rishi Sunak, which would have steadily abolished tobacco by age group. The reason? The government agrees, as we all do, that smoking is very bad for people, but it wants to maintain all the revenue tobacco generates to allow taxes to be cut elsewhere. Indeed, there have already been extra tax breaks for businesses in the 2025 budget and the planned digital services tax has been scrapped. Add it all up and one point is clear: New Zealand is providing a template for what might be termed the post-woke economy. It is not doing anything that is especially Right-wing, or libertarian, by any reasonable historical standards. Its policies would have been standard centrism during the 1990s. Tony Blair or Gordon Brown would have been quite happy with any of them. But it is ditching a lot of the liberal baggage that prioritised virtue-signalling over economic growth. It is allowing domestic fossil fuel production to be expanded until renewables come on stream. This is unlike the UK, which is running down its North Sea oil and gas industry even as we have to import more and more energy from abroad, and the soaring price of industrial electricity lays waste to what remains of our industrial base. New Zealand is allowing mining to be expanded, recognising that, so long as China needs lots of raw materials, it might as well supply them rather than leaving the market to its rivals. And it is rolling back the nanny state, while steadily cutting taxes for both businesses and individuals, while at the same time not running up huge deficits or testing the patience of the bond markets. Will it work? Under Ardern, New Zealand's output stagnated as public spending exploded, rising by almost 50pc under her premiership, while debt as a percentage of GDP rose from 28pc in 2018 to 46pc by 2024 (admittedly still a miraculously low figure by European or American standards). It is still early days, and the reforms will take time to work, but the early signs are encouraging. The economy is expected to expand by 1.4pc in 2025, a lot better than anything the UK is likely to manage. As extra oil and gas comes on stream and the mining industry expands, we can expect that to accelerate. The country has been here before. In the 1980s New Zealand pushed through a series of free market reforms that became known as Rogernomics after Roger Douglas, the radical, liberal finance minister. They included floating the NZ dollar, abolishing exchange controls, privatising industries such as airlines and the post office and abolishing farming subsidies, a far bigger deal than in most other countries given the size and importance of its agricultural sector. That powered a decade or more of strong growth. Perhaps just as importantly, it set a template for the Thatcher and Reagan reforms on a bigger stage later in the decade. New Zealand was a laboratory for fresh ideas and when they worked other countries started to copy them. The UK, and indeed the rest of Europe, should take a look at what is happening on the other side of the world all over again. It doesn't make any sense to run down fossil fuels until renewables are as reliable and competitively priced. We will still need to mine for raw materials, and that can be done in a way that is compatible with preserving the environment. We can't keep banning everything we don't approve of without destroying the tax base and making the state too powerful. If New Zealand can get to the 2 or 3pc annual growth rates that now seem completely impossible in most of the developed world, policymakers as well as voters will have to take notice. In the 2020s perhaps New Zealand can show us all what the post-woke economy will look like. After all, the world certainly needs a very different model than the doom loop of stagnant growth and permanently rising taxes it is trapped in right now.

Ban smartphones in schools, Starmer told – by the country that's done it
Ban smartphones in schools, Starmer told – by the country that's done it

The Independent

time18 hours ago

  • The Independent

Ban smartphones in schools, Starmer told – by the country that's done it

Sir Keir Starmer is under pressure to consider the 'overwhelming evidence' from New Zealand to consider banning smart phones from schools. In an exclusive interview with The Independent, New Zealand's education minister Erica Stanford said she has heard 'overwhelmingly positive feedback' about the world-leading phone ban in her country, with more engagement and less cyberbullying in schools. The New Zealand National Party government now hopes to take it further and introduce a ban on social media for under-16s. It comes as Sir Keir's government is under increasing pressure to introduce similar measures in English schools, with the Tories and campaign groups pressing for a ban. New Zealand's government introduced a ban on mobile phones in schools last year. Ms Stanford told The Independent: 'I've been told students are much more focused on their learning in class, they are engaging with their peers, reading more books, spending more time playing outside and there are fewer reports of cyber-bullying. 'I am committed to ensuring children are not only safe but remain focused in the classroom. Taking away the distraction of cell phones ensures better engagement in class and improves student achievement and wellbeing.' In the UK, a recent push by the Tories to add an amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which would require schools to prohibit phone use during the school day, was shut down by the government. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has urged ministers to reconsider after Sir Keir Starmer labelled the amendment as 'completely unnecessary', claiming 'almost every school' already bans phones. Ms Badenoch claimed: 'The prime minister is wrong: not all schools do this. Only one in 10 schools is smartphone-free.' Despite the government's stance, education secretary Bridget Phillipson has commissioned a review into 'whether schools in England are banning children's phones and whether bans are effective'. In New Zealand, the National Party's election promise was greeted with scepticism, criticism, and an assumption that students would become sneakier. Now, it's being praised by students and educators. Anna Wilson, acting principle of Wellington East Girls' College in the nation's capital, said the state-funded school has seen only positive results from the ban. She said: 'We see a lot more social interaction at break times, such as playing cards, volleyball on the courts, joining in on lunchtime activities and clubs that are student-led.' The nationwide ban came into effect in April last year, but Ms Wilson's school introduced the policy slightly ahead of the nationwide rollout, embedding it firmly into school life from the start of the year, 'and the momentum continued across the year.' Although they took charge with the ban, she said, 'the government policy across all schools was helpful as collectively each school was doing it at their campuses at the same time'. Fred Oppenhuis, head prefect of Wellington College, an all-boys secondary school, told The Independent the ban had a positive impact on students. He said: 'I think that the phone ban has significantly increased engagement and efficiency in class because students know that if they check their phone or bring it out without teacher permission, there are well-known consequences.' Oppenhuis said the initial reaction came with concerns as the thought of not having a phone at school was 'daunting'. But, he said it didn't take long for students to adjust, and most students said it wasn't as bad as they had anticipated. One of the loudest advocates for phone-free schools has been Jonathan Haidt, a prominent US social psychologist and author of the bestselling book The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. She said that two years after schools go completely phone-free, they always seem to report big drops in disciplinary problems and increases in student engagement in class. 'My favourite outcome: teachers and administrators say 'we hear laughter in the hallway again'.' The New Zealand ban applies to all state schools and expects cell phones to be off and away during day, however, schools are allowed to decide how to enforce it. Mobile phones can only be used for educational purposes, however, there is an exemption for students who need their phones for learning challenges or health reasons. Parents and guardians must contact their child by going to the school office. However, some doubts have been raised by the Labour Party in New Zealand. Willow-Jean Prime, the New Zealand Labour opposition's spokeswoman for education, told The Independent: 'It is important young people are able to focus at school, and phones can be a distraction; but on the flip side, many students need cell phones, for example for accessibility reasons. 'In New Zealand, it is individual school boards of trustees that set the rules for the operation of schools. Schools have always been able to ban cell phones at school if they believe this is appropriate, and many already did."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store