Car overturns after crashing into power pole
A car overturned after crashing into a power pole Sunday morning, according to a social media post from the Miami Valley Fire District.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
The crash occurred at the intersection of Byers Road and Maue Road in Miami Township around 6:30 a.m.
TRENDING STORIES:
Hundreds protest Elon Musk, Department of Government Efficiency at local Tesla Service Center
4-year-old Ohio girl in coma after serious flu complications
'He saved us;' Student thankful for bus driver after fire
The fire department said the crash caused power outages for people in the area, but AES Ohio crews are working to make repairs.
The AES Ohio outage map indicates that about 50 customers do not have power.
It is unclear if anyone was injured in this crash.
News Center 7 is working to learn more.
[SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Think Lucid Group Stock Is Expensive? This 1 Chart Might Change Your Mind.
Lucid Group stock looks expensive. Tesla's history shows Lucid's true potential. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Everyone wants to invest in the next Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA), and an examination of analyst predictions suggests Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) has the potential to be it. Sales are expected to grow by 73% this year, with another 96% growth expected in 2026. There's just one problem with buying the stock at the moment: Lucid shares trade at 6.7 times sales, a pricey valuation for a business that might be unprofitable for at least the next several years. If you dig deeper, however, Lucid shares might be wildly undervalued despite the high price-to-sales ratio (P/S). Despite generating less than 1% of Tesla's revenue, Lucid Group still trades at roughly half the valuation of Tesla on a price-to-sales basis. That could all change when the company releases its "mass market" vehicles. Management has previously teased three new vehicle models that will all sell for less than $50,000 a piece. While these vehicles are still a year or two away from production, they should eventually put Lucid's growth in overdrive. Tesla released its Model 3 in 2017, with the Model Y following in 2020. These two affordable vehicles now account for more than 90% of Tesla's sales -- the primary reason that Tesla's sales have gone from a few billion dollars to more than $95 billion today. Lucid has a very long way to go before matching Tesla's revenue numbers. But releasing more affordable models is the key to closing the gap. If management is to be believed, the first of several mass market models will arrive sometime in 2026, with more on the way in 2027 and beyond. It should be stressed that Lucid's financial position isn't incredibly strong right now. It has less than $1.9 billion in cash on the balance sheet, yet it lost nearly $2.4 billion over the last 12 months. More cash will need to be raised to get these new models to market. However, Tesla's success shows Lucid's true potential. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Think Lucid Group Stock Is Expensive? This 1 Chart Might Change Your Mind. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Column: Will Tesla suffer if Musk alienates both political wings?
Donald Trump and Elon Musk — two epic disrupters of U.S. politics and the automotive industry, respectively and vice versa. Over the past year, they united over the election and efforts to cut government spending. They parted ways amicably … and then started trashing each other. It escalated quickly with Musk suggesting that the president be impeached and that he is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein child-prostitution scandal. Musk later reportedly called the president before posting that he regretted some of his words: 'They went too far.' It was a remarkable breakup — incredible drama between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man, who had been the closest of allies for hundreds of days of campaigning and governing. To the extent that it was a reality TV train wreck, I'd just as soon leave it be. But since the primary business in Musk's remarkable portfolio is nominally an automaker, it actually matters in this industry we cover. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. Love it or hate it, this disruptive era in which we live is providing us all with some real-life experiments in economics — the likes of which we probably thought we would never see. For decades, basically everyone who went to college was taught in an economics or history class that widespread tariffs would do more harm than good. Trump argues for a different approach, and he's pursuing it. Or he's pursuing it to negotiate for something else. In either case, we're now seeing how that works: So far, there's been a lot of paralysis, especially among suppliers and foreign automakers, but also a big investment announced recently by General Motors. His political strategy has been unorthodox, yet he's won two electoral colleges and one popular vote. He's only the 21st president to win two elections. So he's had success, whether some people like it or not. Same for Musk, of course: He approached the auto industry unlike anyone else — with an expensive electric car — had a couple of near-total collapses, and came out as the world's richest man and CEO of the world's most valuable automaker. That success helped propel his rocket business SpaceX and other ventures such as Starlink satellites and Twitter, which he bought and renamed X. But the disruptive move I'm watching was his decision to be an automaker CEO who got personally and financially involved in partisan politics. While new-vehicle sales skew to the affluent, when you sell something in the millions or tens of millions, a brand or model has to connect with a broad swath of people. And while there can be success with, say, a polarizing design, mass-market brands generally try to avoid alienating large chunks of their potential customer base. I've cited here before the story about Michael Jordan saying he didn't speak out on politics because 'Republicans buy sneakers, too.' In retrospect, he said it was just a funny line among friends. But the thing is that he wasn't wrong, and every business school graduate knows it. Musk, however, is not your typical MBA type. So out of his frustration with former President Joe Biden — who habitually sided with the UAW and its automakers against the U.S.-based global leader in EVs, even as he advocated for a carbon-neutral future — Musk threw an estimated quarter of a billion dollars behind the Trump campaign. That's an unbelievable sum of money to many of us, but when Trump won, it looked like the greatest bet ever. From late October to late December, Tesla stock more than doubled and its market cap approached $1.5 trillion. While Musk's political activism may have upset many of his loyal, environmentally motivated customers, there were a lot of reasons to be bullish on Tesla under Trump. It seemed likely that NHTSA and the SEC would take a more sympathetic view of the company's issues. Beyond that, Musk has refocused the company's future on artificial intelligence, humanoid robots and robotaxis. (Tesla said it plans to launch its service in Austin, Texas, on June 22.) A new administration with a deregulatory inclination toward self-driving cars was a significant tailwind. Now, those advantages for Tesla are gone or at least seemingly diminished. Structures that have legacy automakers paying to buy Tesla's credits for selling emission-free, fuel-efficient vehicles could be eliminated. (And let's not forget that Trump hinted at ending federal contracts with other Musk-affiliated companies.) Turning back to the auto business: The conventional wisdom is that Musk has now alienated all but the most apolitical consumers. Environmentally minded liberals might like EVs, but Musk's support of Trump (and the far-right Alternative for Deutschland party in Germany) has them seeking out other brands' offerings. There might have been an opportunity to become the preferred electric brand of the president's Make America Great Again movement — especially the tech-forward, high-income types and those motivated by the president's endorsement of the brand on the White House grounds. But after this month's blowup — with longtime Trump adviser Steve Bannon arguing to deport Musk — that notion seemed ever more remote. No fans on the left, no fans on the right. Is Elon out in deep water in an electric boat surrounded by sharks with no friends to bail him out? Maybe not. There is significant animus against Musk on the EV-inclined left, especially in the wake of his DOGE team's deep and sometimes chaotic cuts to government entities and programs. Certainly, protests at auto retail outlets are rare. The damage to stores is not acceptable, but it shows the intensity of the situation. But I still have to wonder how far consumers will follow those kinds of feelings. Michiganders, for instance, often assume that Americans prefer to buy American cars made by American (union) workers. But I've been to America, and most of them don't care. They want the best car for their money, whether it's American, German, Japanese or Korean. Some are clamoring for cheap Chinese cars: If Xi Jinping wants to pay for half of their EV, they ask, why not let him? So maybe they won't care about Elon's politics. Tesla sales are down a little this year, but some of that might be attributable to production hiccups. If the Model Y — the bestselling model in the world last year — provides a great value, they'll probably buy it regardless of what they think of the CEO. And now we get to find out. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla rival gets good news as robotaxi launch looms
Tesla rival gets good news as robotaxi launch looms originally appeared on TheStreet. The world of self-driving cars is quickly evolving, as a leading automaker prepares for a historic event. After months of teasing it, Tesla () is preparing to officially roll out its fleet of autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas, and its loyal fans are watching closely. CEO Elon Musk has hinged a lot on this self-driving technology, as the company works to usher in a turnaround after months of volatility. 💵💰💰💵 Despite all the recent focus on the Tesla robotaxi debut, Musk's company isn't the only automaker that's been working hard to pull ahead in the driverless race. Waymo, a subsidiary of Google parent Alphabet, has successfully put self-driving cars on the road in multiple major cities. Now, a new report has highlighted some of the economics of the self-driving car market, providing key insights into a key area that sparked concern among some financial experts. As areas such as artificial intelligence (AI) have advanced in recent years, the rise of self-driving vehicles has seemed inevitable. Elon Musk, known for his focus on futuristic technology, has helped champion it, even though Tesla is currently still behind Waymo in the driverless that may change as Tesla's robotaxi offically enter the market. They won't be operating fully autonomously, however, as the cars will come with a teleoperator standing by to assist if necessary. As experts have told TheStreet, this means they can't be considered fully self-driving. The industry recently received some good news that suggests Waymo is in an excellent position to continue expanding. Market research Obi has published a report on the state of the industry, providing a detailed analysis of its economic elements, with a focus on Waymo, Uber () , and Lyft. The report's authors highlight Waymo's undeniable growing presence in San Francisco, a city synonymous with technology and innovation. They also reveal a shocking statistic that bodes extremely well for self-driving technology adoption, but specifically for Waymo: consumers are very willing to pay for a driverless experience. 'Waymo rides cost 41% more than Lyft and 31% more than Uber on average when comparing pricing at the same time and across the same routes,' the report states. 'Waymo also shows the highest price variability with a standard deviation of $3.65, suggesting that its pricing algorithm is more influenced by factors like ETA, consumer demand, time of day, etc.' More Self-Driving Car News:The authors add that overall, Lyft remains the least expensive rideshare option, offering a $14.44 mean average fare, while Uber's average price is $15.88 and Waymo's is $20.43. But even with that price increase, Obi's data makes it clear that an increasing number of consumers are willing to pay for a ride in a Waymo vehicle. Given the nationwide excitement surrounding the rise of self-driving cars, it likely won't surprise most people that Waymo is enjoying this type of success. But the report shows that customers aren't just willing to pay more for a car with no driver. Surprisingly, they are willing to wait longer for discussing the factor of estimated time of arrival (ETA), Obi highlighted this area, often one that plays into a consumer's decision to take a rideshare or traditional taxi cab, stating: 'ETA is the second most important factor in rideshare selection for consumers after price. Waymo, due to fewer cars, can have significantly longer ETAs, as well as higher prices in peak hours, showing that consumers who do choose to use a Waymo at these times are driven by a strong preference for autonomous vehicles.' Many people are quick to complain about the high prices of ride-share vehicles and long wait times. But if the vehicle comes without a driver, it is clear that consumers are willing to overlook these elements. The fact that Waymo's cars are rising in popularity so quickly may be reassuring for some Tesla investors, as it indicates that demand for self-driving cars isn't slowing down. But it also shows that the company's primary competitor is surging in popularity and gaining market share. Until the Tesla robotaxis start establishing a presence in multiple cities, it will be hard to assess the impact on Waymo. Other reports have shown that public trust in Tesla's self-driving technology is low, which could further compromise the company's chances of overtaking its early rival gets good news as robotaxi launch looms first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 13, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio
