
How the far-left devours progressive businesses
They are living a fantasy. For the workers never do hijack companies. They just lose their jobs. The owners lose their businesses. The customers lose a service. Everyone loses.
The closures teach a lesson that being a nice, caring liberal whose sole wish is to plan a menu around vegan pasta sauces, is not the passport to a quiet life it once was.
I first heard about business hijacking when contacts in Glasgow called me in 2023 about the fate of the Saramago cafe bar at the city's Centre for Contemporary Arts. As the Tripadvisor reviews showed, people liked it. It was a cut above most of the venues on Sauchiehall Street. There were menus for vegetarians and vegans, and DJs as the night wore on.
One evening, a small group of staff members shut the cafe down. They said they wanted better staffing levels, but the owners said their demands had already been met, and fired them for their 'unannounced' strike in breach of their contract.
Their union, the Industrial Workers of the World, responded by demanding the reinstatement of the sacked workers – as unions have always done. There were pickets, and social media demands to boycott Saramago – nothing unusual there, either.
But then the normal restrictions on union action broke down. The campaign became so intense the Centre for Contemporary Arts closed the café because the dispute was putting the 'arts programme and the wellbeing of our staff' in danger.
The small group staff who had precipitated the action submitted a bid to reopen the café as a workers' cooperative. But you need capital, licences and contracts with suppliers to run a catering operation and nothing came of it. Commercial operators weren't interested either. Despite inducements from the centre's management, they backed away for fear that they would receive the same treatment as Saramago.
The people who contacted me from the Centre for Contemporary Arts were appalled. The café owners were not exploitative bosses, they said, but nice people who paid decent wages and had been around the Glasgow music scene for years. They could not understand where all the aggro had come from.
I do, or at least I have a working theory.
Journalists at the Guardian and Observer still remember the story told by Phillip Hope-Wallace, the Guardian's great post-war critic. He recalled the despairing cry from his father when he told him he had found a job with the Guardian, 'my dear boy, never work for a liberal newspaper they will sack you on Christmas Eve.'
The argument goes that because liberal companies, charities and campaign groups think themselves virtuous, they treat their workers abysmally and expect them to put up with it in the name of the greater good.
I have seen that happen. But in truth businesses that profess to be left wing are more likely to be vulnerable to assault from the left than standard capitalist enterprises. They can be more easily shamed on social media as hypocrites who refuse to live up to their values. Activists can target their leftish customers, as happened to Saramago, and persuade them to go elsewhere
In other words, it's easier to destroy a community, vegan-friendly café than McDonald's.
In 2023, I did not know what to do with the story. I had never heard of union activists destroying a business before. Negotiators are normally very careful not to risk putting their members out of work. This is just a freak occurrence, I thought. How wrong I was.
To stay in Glasgow, the Centre for Contemporary Arts is now closed. It's not just the café that is gone, everything is closed. A group calling itself Art Workers for Palestine Scotland demanded last month that the centre boycott Israel. The board said it wasn't sure it could because of its duty to be politically impartial. A protest was planned. The management locked the doors, and for the time being Glasgow has not just lost a café but an arts centre, too, not because of funding cuts demanded by evil politicians, but because of the demands of activists.
How much longer arts bureaucrats can ask taxpayers to fund this shambolic centre is now a live question.
The city also had a music venue called 13th Note, which promoted new acts. Unite organised a strike in 2023 over working conditions and pay. Once again, the venue closed. Once again, there was an attempt to reopen it as a workers' cooperative and once again that failed too. I am not saying the workers didn't have a case. But by the end of the dispute, they didn't have a job.
Meanwhile the current issue of the Londoner carries the grimly comic story of Scarlett Letters, named after its owner Marin Scarlett. Until a few weeks ago, it was a radical, queer independent bookshop in Bethnal Green, east London.
As the authors Andrew Kersley and Jack Walton tell it, trouble began with the shop's disabled toilet, which, inexplicably, was installed in an inaccessible basement. Marin Scarlett told staff: 'We have had an issue over the last few weeks of people just letting themselves downstairs to use the toilet.'
In future, staff were to personally escort anyone who asked to use the loo to ensure they didn't steal stock. The problem as she saw it was that her staff were simply too kind, too feminine, too British to refuse to allow access to random strangers wandering in off the street.
'You are all extremely nice, assigned female at birth, in customer service, mostly British etc., and all of this sometimes doesn't lend itself to 'no'.'
As if to prove her wrong, the staff condemned her message as 'bizarre and sexist'. They unionised and demanded secure contracts and cooperative control of the store.
'The workers are queer, trans, racialised, disabled, sex workers and students,' they said in a statement. 'Their identities have been used to advertise and fundraise for the bookshop as a radical space whilst their voices are not listened to.'
Marin Scarlett improved sick pay, but pointed out that her shop did not make a profit and relied on the generosity of an anonymous backer. It couldn't carry on with this level of disruption and had to close.
Scarlett was clearly mortified at being treated as an oppressive boss rather than an ally: 'The management targeted by this dispute is not a faceless collective of executives in boardrooms. It is one person, who is multiply marginalised, a known member of the community and for the past year has been working for six or seven days a week for the fraction of the salary offered to the booksellers.'
Her sacked employees weren't finished, however. They occupied the building and demanded that she give them the stock so they could start a new bookshop on their own. Scarlett had to round up friends and organise a nighttime raid to pack up the books and take back control of her property. As her team tooled up, and a locksmith stood ready to change the locks, I wonder if she ever imagined that running a queer bookshop would end like this.
The left is always torn by arguments between reformists and revolutionaries, and nowhere more so than now. The threat that Trump, Farage and their kind pose to liberal democracy can make people argue that you must move to the centre and do everything you can to woo waverers.
It's not a shabby argument. To my mind it is obvious that the US Democrats need to junk woke ideology if they are ever to save the American republic.
But doubling down is an equally human reaction to hard times. You can see it in the enthusiasm in the US for the left-wing mayoral candidate in New York Zohran Mamdani.Or in the UK you can look at resident doctors who still went on strike despite their pay increasing by 28.9 per cent across the last three years.
And you can see it too in the ferocity with which workers in progressive businesses turn on their employers, and in how little they care that they may end up destroying themselves as they attempt to destroy their bosses.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
11 hours ago
- Spectator
There's nothing worse than male trouser trouble
First, there was the bizarre tale of the poor unfortunate man who, after dropping his trousers on the District line near Upton Park, was set upon by an outraged gang, beaten and then forcibly expelled from the Tube. And then, just a day or so before, the perpetually beleaguered Gregg Wallace caused a similar degree of opprobrium when he put out a video in which he addressed allegations of bad behaviour involving a lack of trousers. What on earth is going on? On Instagram, Wallace announced, with a touch of the Beowulf poet: 'Would you like the truth about the stories regarding me taking my trousers down, listen! There are no findings in the investigation that I took my trousers down in front of anybody.' He ended his video by repeating, sternly: 'Any claim that the report says differently is not true.' So there we have it. Gregg Wallace may be many things, but he is not a trouser-dropper – unlike the anonymous semi-flasher on the Underground, who definitely was, has now been detained for his own good under the Mental Health Act. A warning, perhaps, to those of us who, now that the weather is becoming disconcertingly warm once again, might fancy a little impromptu chino removal on public transport for our comfort. Yet in truth, the idea of taking down one's trousers is an innate source of English fascination that has been a staple of comedy since Chaucer and Shakespeare, and is likely to remain so until the day we are all wafting round in unisex kimonos. The reason why trousers – more than any other form of attire – are imbued with such comic potential is that the average English gentleman associates them with his dignity. Lose them, and his sang-froid tumbles to the floor along with the fabric. It was no wonder that the Aldwych farces and Carry On films all made considerable weather of their stiff, not-so-buttoned-up characters being compelled to cover their reduced dignity in increasingly absurd circumstances as their breeches sally off into the sunset. I would like to say that the loss of trousers is something that only occurs on stage and in film, but alas, I can testify that it is all too real. In my home city of Oxford, I have seen many cruelly abandoned pairs of formal trews in the street, presumably after a heavily misspent night involving fine wine. Nor is this limited to the young. A friend tells how, after a wild evening on Clapham Common with some newfound friends resulted in his being debagged, he cycled past the scene of the crime the next day to see his once-beloved slacks fluttering mournfully in the wind – the mute observer to whatever unspeakable things had happened in that particular spot. As for the shame's memorialisation in memoir, another friend – a leading light in the entertainment industry – has confessed that, should he ever put finger to keyboard and write his autobiography, it could only be called A Life Without Trousers, so torrid have his exploits in this field been. I would dearly love at this point to confess that I know nothing of such things, but unfortunately I recently had my own narrow brush with infamy. A few months ago, I was strolling along Hampstead Heath with my family when, to our horror, a tree fell just behind us, nearly causing grave hurt, or worse. We scrambled to safety just in time, with no worse injury than a few cuts and bruises – but as I realised that we were largely unharmed, I also realised that the sudden impact on the ground had sent my kecks cascading round my knees. To be found dead and trouserless on Hampstead Heath: now that, I fear, is the end that many of my enemies would wish on me. But I intend to give them the dissatisfaction of continuing to live – with the bottom of my trousers rolled – for many a well-furnished year to come, God willing.


The Guardian
21 hours ago
- The Guardian
Microsoft launches inquiry into claims Israel used its tech for mass surveillance of Palestinians
Microsoft has launched an 'urgent' external inquiry into allegations Israel's military surveillance agency has used the company's technology to facilitate the mass surveillance of Palestinians. The company said on Friday the formal review was in response to a Guardian investigation that revealed how the Unit 8200 spy agency has relied on Microsoft's Azure cloud platform to store a vast collection of everyday Palestinian mobile phone calls. The joint investigation with the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call found Unit 8200 made use of a customised and segregated area within Azure to store recordings of millions of calls made daily in Gaza and the West Bank. In a statement, Microsoft said 'using Azure for the storage of data files of phone calls obtained through broad or mass surveillance of civilians in Gaza and the West Bank' would be prohibited by its terms of service. The inquiry, to be overseen by lawyers at the US firm Covington & Burling, is the second external review commissioned by Microsoft into the use of its technology by the Israeli military. The first was launched this year amid dissent within the company and reports by the Guardian and others about Israel's reliance on the company's technology during its offensive in Gaza. Announcing the review's findings in May, Microsoft said it had 'found no evidence to date' the Israeli military had failed to comply with its terms of service or used Azure 'to target or harm people' in Gaza. However, the recent Guardian investigation prompted concerns among senior Microsoft executives about whether some of its Israel-based employees may have concealed information about how Unit 8200 uses Azure when questioned as part of the review. Microsoft said on Friday the new inquiry would expand on the earlier one, adding: 'Microsoft appreciates that the Guardian's recent report raises additional and precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review.' The company is also facing pressure from a worker-led campaign group, No Azure for Apartheid, which has accused it of 'complicity in genocide and apartheid' and demanded it cut off 'all ties to the Israeli military' and make them publicly known. Since the Guardian and its partners, +972 and Local Call, revealed Unit 8200's sweeping surveillance project last week, Microsoft has been scrambling to assess what data the unit holds in Azure. Several Microsoft sources familiar with internal deliberations said the company's leadership was concerned by information from Unit 8200 sources interviewed for the article, including claims that intelligence drawn from repositories of phone calls held in Azure had been used to research and identify bombing targets in Gaza. Israel's 22-month bombardment of the territory, launched after the Hamas-led attack on 7 October 2023, has killed more than 60,000 people, the majority of them civilians, according to the health authority in the territory, though the actual death toll is likely to be significantly higher. Senior Microsoft executives had in recent days considered an awkward scenario in which Unit 8200, an important and sensitive customer, could be in breach of the company's terms of service and human rights commitments, sources said. If you have something to share about this story, you can contact Harry Davies and Yuval Abraham using one of the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. To send a message to Harry and Yuval please choose the 'UK Investigations' team. Signal Messenger You can message Harry using the Signal Messenger app. Use the 'find by username' option and type hfd.32 Email (not secure) If you don't need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email SecureDrop and other secure methods If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. According to leaked files reviewed by the Guardian, the company was aware as early as late 2021 that Unit 8200 planned to move large volumes of sensitive and classified intelligence data into Azure. At Microsoft's headquarters in November that year, senior executives – including its chief executive, Satya Nadella – attended a meeting during which Unit 8200's commander discussed a plan to move as much as 70% of its data into the cloud platform. The company has said its executives, including Nadella, were not aware Unit 8200 planned to use or ultimately used Azure to store the content of intercepted Palestinian calls. 'We have no information related to the data stored in the customer's cloud environment,' a spokesperson said last week. An Israeli military spokesperson has previously said its work with companies such as Microsoft is 'conducted based on regulated and legally supervised agreements' and the military 'operates in accordance with international law'. The new inquiry will examine the military's commercial agreements with Microsoft. Once completed, the company will 'share with the public the factual findings that result from this review', its statement said.


The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Microsoft launches inquiry into claims Israel used its tech for mass surveillance of Palestinians
Microsoft has launched an 'urgent' external inquiry into allegations Israel's military surveillance agency has used the company's technology to facilitate the mass surveillance of Palestinians. The company said on Friday the formal review was in response to a Guardian investigation that revealed how the Unit 8200 spy agency has relied on its Azure cloud platform to store a vast collection of everyday Palestinian mobile phone calls. The joint investigation with the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call found Unit 8200 made use of a customised and segregated area within Azure to store recordings of millions of calls made daily in Gaza and the West Bank. In a statement, Microsoft said 'using Azure for the storage of data files of phone calls obtained through broad or mass surveillance of civilians in Gaza and the West Bank' would be prohibited by its terms of service. The inquiry, to be overseen by lawyers at the US firm Covington & Burling, is the second external review commissioned by Microsoft into the use of its technology by the Israeli military. The first was launched earlier this year amid dissent within the company and reports by the Guardian and others about Israel's reliance on the company's technology during its offensive in Gaza. Announcing the review's findings in May, Microsoft said it had 'found no evidence to date' the Israeli military had failed to comply with its terms of service or used Azure 'to target or harm people' in Gaza. However, the recent Guardian investigation prompted concerns among senior Microsoft executives about whether some of its Israel-based employees may have concealed information about how Unit 8200 uses Azure when questioned as part of the review. Microsoft said on Friday the new inquiry would 'expand on' the earlier one, adding: 'Microsoft appreciates that the Guardian's recent report raises additional and precise allegations that merit a full and urgent review.' The announcement comes as the company faces pressure from a worker-led campaign group, No Azure for Apartheid, which has accused it of 'complicity in genocide and apartheid' and demanded it cut off 'all ties to the Israeli military' and make them publicly known. Since the Guardian and its partners, +972 and Local Call, revealed Unit 8200's sweeping surveillance project last week, Microsoft has been scrambling to assess what data the unit holds in Azure. Several Microsoft sources familiar with internal deliberations said the company's leadership was concerned by information from Unit 8200 sources interviewed for the article, including claims that intelligence drawn from repositories of phone calls held in Azure had been used to research and identify bombing targets in Gaza. Israel's 22-month bombardment of the territory, launched after the Hamas-led attack on 7 October 2023, has killed more than 60,000 people, the majority of them civilians, according to the health authority in the territory, though the actual death toll is likely to be significantly higher. Senior Microsoft executives had in recent days considered an awkward scenario in which Unit 8200, an important and sensitive customer, could be in breach of the company's terms of service and human rights commitments, sources said. If you have something to share about this story, you can contact Harry Davies and Yuval Abraham using one of the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. To send a message to Harry and Yuval please choose the 'UK Investigations' team. Signal Messenger You can message Harry using the Signal Messenger app. Use the 'find by username' option and type hfd.32 Email (not secure) If you don't need a high level of security or confidentiality you can email SecureDrop and other secure methods If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform. Finally, our guide at lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. According to leaked files reviewed by the Guardian, the company was aware as early as late 2021 that Unit 8200 planned to move large volumes of sensitive and classified intelligence data into Azure. At Microsoft's headquarters in November that year, senior executives – including its chief executive, Satya Nadella – attended a meeting during which Unit 8200's commander discussed a plan to move as much as 70% of its data into the cloud platform. The company has said its executives, including Nadella, were not aware Unit 8200 planned to use or ultimately used Azure to store the content of intercepted Palestinian calls. 'We have no information related to the data stored in the customer's cloud environment,' a spokesperson said last week. An Israeli military spokesperson has previously said its work with companies such as Microsoft is 'conducted based on regulated and legally supervised agreements' and the military 'operates in accordance with international law'. The new inquiry will examine its commercial agreements with Microsoft. Once completed, the company will 'share with the public the factual findings that result from this review', its statement said.